'Deep pockets' could help Abu Dhabi win regulatory approval for Santos bid, analysts say
SYDNEY, June 17 (Reuters) - Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, preparing an $18.7 billion bid for Santos (STO.AX), opens new tab, is likely to face close scrutiny from Australian regulators worried about local gas supply, but could win them over with pledges to speed up new projects, analysts say.
Santos shares closed at A$7.73 on Tuesday, well below the $5.76 (A$8.89) per share proposed takeover offer for Australia's second largest gas producer announced on Monday, which analysts said indicated investors believe the deal will face trouble with regulators.
"It's not going to be smooth sailing yet," said Jamie Hannah, Deputy Head of Investments and Capital Markets at VanEck Australia, which owns shares in Santos. However, he added that the offer price "is very attractive and it's straight cash".
The bid, which would be the largest ever all-cash takeover in Australia, according to FactSet data, has landed at a time when Australia's Labor government is debating how to deal with a looming gas shortage on the country's east coast from 2027.
"We would expect the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) to focus on Santos's key gas infrastructure as it relates to domestic gas supply," said Jarden analyst Nik Burns.
Santos' market share in eastern Australia is around 5%, with most of its gas output on that side of the country going to its Gladstone LNG export plant, analysts said. In Western Australia, where it runs two domestic gas plants and has a stake in a third one, it has a 24% market share.
The infrastructure assets were not major income-generating assets, so would be very hard to spin off to satisfy any regulatory concerns, said Hannah.
"This infrastructure is important for domestic gas supply in both markets. The government needs to decide if they are happy for this to sit in the hands of a foreign government," said MST Marquee analyst Saul Kavonic.
On the positive side, Santos holds undeveloped resources, including the Narrabri project and Beetaloo shale gas, that could help fill the expected gas supply gap on the east coast.
The bidding consortium, headed by ADNOC's investment arm XRG, could argue it would develop those projects faster than Santos could under its plans to boost capital returns to shareholders, and reduce the risk of an east coast gas shortage.
"XRG might point to regulators that its larger balance sheet and funding capacity provides an opportunity to accelerate Santos' undeveloped growth assets," UBS analyst Tom Allen said in a research note.
Romano Sala Tenna, portfolio manager at Katana Asset Management, which owns Santos shares, said the market was being too pessimistic about regulatory hurdles.
"A large sovereign wealth fund effectively coming in with deep pockets" could pour money into Santos' undeveloped assets, he said.
"So I think that is a card that will be appealing to the Australian government."
XRG said on Monday that if the deal goes ahead, the consortium aims to build on Santos' legacy as a reliable energy producer "unlocking additional gas supply" and intends to "work closely with the existing management team to accelerate growth".
Another factor that could work in favour of the ADNOC-led consortium, which includes the Abu Dhabi Development Holding Company (ADQ) and U.S.-based private equity firm Carlyle, is a trade deal Australia signed last year with the United Arab Emirates, analysts said.
Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has the final say on approving major foreign transactions, said he would listen to the advice of the Foreign Investment Review Board on the deal.
Santos Chief Executive Kevin Gallagher declined to comment on the deal and regulatory concerns on the sidelines of a gas conference in Malaysia on Tuesday, other than to say he would "let the process take its course".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
UK could boost growth by radically reshaping the Treasury: Peacock
LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - UK finance minister Rachel Reeves insists higher economic growth is her top priority, but the government's current plan to address the country's chronically low investment is unlikely to be ambitious enough. What may be needed is a structural rethink of the finance ministry itself. Reeves has adjusted her fiscal rules to allow for an extra 113 billion pounds of investment over five years, while remaining committed to ensuring debt falls as a proportion of national income within five years. In the UK government's latest spending plan unveiled last week, she started to allocate the extra capital to areas including defence, housing, transport infrastructure and a new nuclear power plant. Even so, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, an independent fiscal watchdog, UK capital spending will climb to a peak of 3.9% of GDP in 2027/2028 but then fall back in the following two years, continuing a limp public investment record stretching back to the global financial crisis. Reeves is searching for other growth levers, including deregulation and increased UK investment by British pension funds. Additionally, the government is seeking to streamline planning laws and taking steps – albeit small ones – to rebuild trade relations with the European Union. But the government is fundamentally hamstrung by its fiscal rules. Departments are currently required to go cap in hand to the finance ministry to learn what they can spend and then undergo frequent check-ins to see if the fiscal position has deteriorated, which could lead to spending cuts or tax rises. This is not a system that will produce a viable long-term growth strategy. The International Monetary Fund – not known for being a fan of unfettered state spending – said last month that the UK should consider taking a more pragmatic approach to avoid having to change policy too often. The IMF suggested minor breaches should not require instant corrective action and that assessment of the rules should be done no more than once a year. But something more radical is likely required for Britain to break out of the low growth, low productivity loop it has been trapped in for almost two decades. Over this period, debt as a proportion of GDP has almost tripled while the national tax take has held steady, suggesting that part of the problem might be with the way the finance ministry operates. The machinery of government needs recalibration to focus more systematically on productive investment that can ultimately help to drive debt down over time. Reeves is trying on this score. She has asked the OBR to assess the long-term impact of capital spending decisions to determine whether they could improve public finances. She is also changing the Treasury's "Green Book" rules that dictate approval of capital projects, shifting from a narrow cost-benefit analysis to an assessment of the impact on broader strategic goals such as lifting poorer regions of the UK. However, a fundamental issue remains. The Treasury still wields huge influence within the UK government, and when growth falls short, the impulse is typically to tighten the fiscal screws, thereby worsening growth prospects. The Institute for Government, a UK-based think tank, has argued that the economic heft of the prime minister's team needs strengthening as a counterbalance. EU nations – Germany, Spain and the Netherlands among others – have both a finance ministry and a separate, growth-focused economy ministry at the heart of government. Calls for a dramatic change in the Finance Ministry are growing. Maurice Glasman, who heads "Blue Labour", a campaign to reverse what it says is the Labour Party's abandonment of working-class communities, advocates abolishing the Treasury, scrapping fiscal rules and pursuing heavy infrastructure investment. While Glasman's prescription has little chance of being implemented in full, his ideas could gain influence within a government threatened by the rise of Nigel Farage's populist Reform UK party, which is targeting traditional Labour voters. Recent opinion polls have given Reform UK 27%-32% public support compared with 22%-24% for Labour. Ensuring public finances do not spiral out of control is, of course, critical for any government. And less oversight by the Treasury could result in wasted taxpayer money spent on unproductive investments that appeal to the political base. Moreover, the bond market has not reacted well to perceived UK fiscal imprudence in recent years, as demonstrated by the rapid demise of Liz Truss's premiership of 2022. But bond investors are apt to respond more positively to a long-term, investment-led approach to reducing public borrowing, even if it involves some upfront spending. It helps that the UK currently faces less political uncertainty than some of its peers and is in the middle of the pack in terms of developed market debt burdens. Reeves appears to understand that an investment-led structural reset is required to jump-start the UK growth engine. But to make that a reality, the first change may need to be rethinking the relationship between the Treasury and the prime minister's office. The opinions expressed here are those of Mike Peacock, the former head of communications at the Bank of England and a former senior editor at Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Iranian threat to oil supplies is overblown
Oil and gas still matter. For all the talk of net zero and the growing share of renewables in electricity generation, hydrocarbons remain crucial to the global economy. Back in 2005, oil accounted for 37pc of the world's primary energy consumption, with gas generating 23pc. The same numbers are now 31pc and 24pc respectively – still hugely significant, with the world's reliance on natural gas as an energy source actually up over the last 20 years. Oil remains vital across numerous sectors, not least transportation – think trucks, aviation and shipping – and the manufacturing of industrial chemicals, plastics and asphalt among vital materials. Gas still generates around a quarter of the world's electricity and is used to make fertiliser – sorely needed to grow enough to feed a fast-expanding global population. We're often told – usually with an eye on geopolitical realities, because hydrocarbons are predominantly found in 'awkward countries' – that the world is less dependent on oil than at the time of, say, the 1973 oil price shock. Back then, the crude price spiked four-fold in under a year after the Arab world embargoed energy exports from the Gulf during the Israel-Egypt Yom Kippur war. The world used 55m barrels a day in the early 1970s but over 100m now, with demand set to rise significantly into the 2030s and beyond. Oil – and gas – remain absolute necessities to any form of modern life, across a fast-industrialising world. Yes, the UK used 2.2m barrels daily half a century ago, and that's fallen to 1.4m now – in part due to efficiencies and renewable energy, but mainly because our manufacturing sector has shrunk from over a fifth to less than a tenth of our economy. Moreover, North Sea operations are now much diminished, not least because of punitive taxation and endless net zero regulation – so Britain is a net oil and gas importer. With both these vital hydrocarbons trading on global markets, we're particularly vulnerable to price spikes, losing out twice – paying more for our supplies without gaining the profits and extra taxation reaped by energy exporters when prices are high. I mention all this, of course, because the escalation of military hostilities between Israel and Iran, while causing yet more death, displacement and destruction across the Middle East, poses economic dangers too. Amidst the terrible human fallout, a spiking oil price threatens to reverse a fragile global recovery. From mid-January to early May, Brent crude fell from $81 (£60) a barrel to $61 – a 25pc drop – as a sluggish global economic outlook slowed projected energy demand. That combined with concerns that Donald Trump's tariff onslaught from early April would further stymie global trade. Over recent weeks, though, as this Israeli-Iranian conflict has intensified, Brent crude has spiked back up to $75, largely due to fears of turmoil engulfing the Middle East Tehran, specifically, has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, a critical route for 25pc of global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) flows daily. Were that to happen, oil would soar above $100 a barrel and way beyond – doing serious damage to oil importing nations, not least the UK. Even if that doesn't happen, the International Monetary Fund reckons a 10pc rise in oil prices raises inflation in advanced economies by about 0.4 percentage points – and we've seen a 20pc-plus rise over the last month. UK inflation, 3.4pc in May, could easily soar above 4pc and beyond – twice the Bank of England's target. Stand by for higher UK petrol and diesel prices, along with domestic gas price rises too, especially if the conflict disrupts LNG exports from Qatar and elsewhere in the Gulf. That will push up household and industrial bills, with knock-on effects on food prices too – with food price inflation already jumping from 3.4pc in April to 4.4pc in May. Such inflationary pressures would rule out any more cuts in the Bank of England's policy rates for the foreseeable future. Bond yields would also rise – not least on UK sovereign debt – compounding the difficulties of this big-spending Labour government to stabilise the public finances. Renewed cost of living crisis headlines would also increase risks of a damaging wage-price spiral, with the UK's public sector unions already squaring up for more conflict this autumn. And these trends would intensify, of course, if Hormuz closes – which Iran could do by using its submarine fleet to lay deep sea mines between its southern coast and Oman, a distance of 25 miles at the Strait's narrowest point. Other oil producers (not least US frackers) can offset the disruption of Iranian supplies – the country pumps 4pc of global production – but not supplies from the Gulf as a whole. The reality is, though, that Iran relies heavily on oil exports – and closing the Strait would starve an unpopular government of the revenues needed to keep a lid on domestic discontent. And with 85pc of the energy leaving Hormuz consumed on Asian markets, thwarting those flows would alienate neutral powers such as China and India. Iran would think hard before alienating these two in particular, which would rally international support against Tehran, strengthening regional rival Saudi Arabia. Attempting to close the Strait would also risk devastating military and potentially civilian losses for Iran, including its naval and coastal assets, if the US and powerful Gulf states engaged in sustained retaliation. But the main reason I don't think Iran will disrupt Hormuz is that Tehran gains more by threatening to close the Strait than by actually doing so. The mere threat of action can drive up oil prices, benefiting Iran's economy and strengthening Tehran's negotiating position, without risking the consequences of action.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Melbourne cottage dubbed the 'worst house on the best street' undergoes spectacular makeover - adding millions of dollars in value: 'It sold in just 11 days'
Melbourne 's inner-city suburb of Northcote has had its very own Cinderella story property glow-up, leaving both buyers and locals stunned. The unassuming weatherboard cottage, once dubbed 'the worst house on the best street', has just sold for $3.6million after an extraordinary architectural makeover. The original, humble two-bedroom home in Northcote was purchased over a decade ago for just $935,000, on a block of land that was far from charming. However, after an ambitious knockdown and rebuild, it's now one of the inner north's most enviable residences - and for good reason. The Melbourne couple who lived in the property from 2013 until 2023 decided to roll the dice and go big, demolishing the tired, outdated home and replacing it completely. 'I sold it to them in 2013 when it was just a little bungalow,' said Sam Rigopoulos, Director and Auctioneer at Jellis Craig Northcote in Victoria. 'That's until they knocked it over and built this new house a couple of years ago. 'It was their plan to do that,' he added. 'They really enjoyed the process and are keen to do it again.' Unsurprisingly, the home was snapped up in June - just 11 days after hitting the market. With an already impressive price guide of $3.3–$3.5million, the recent sale fetched $100,000 over that, thanks to fierce competition from eager buyers. 'They did well,' Rigopoulos said. 'The land on its own had its own growth journey, and then they improved the capital on the block as well.' 'The entry-level on the land would be about $1.8million now to buy that block again.' The couple engaged Hartman Construction to bring their vision to life, and the result is a designer dream home oozing style, craftsmanship and inner-city luxury. On a 400 sqm block, the two-storey property now boasts exposed brickwork, polished concrete floors, and a chef-worthy kitchen with premium NEFF appliances - including an integrated Liebherr fridge/freezer and Blanco double sink. It also features an entertainer's haven outside, complete with a built-in BBQ, wood-fired pizza oven and sparkling lap pool. Inside, the home includes a dedicated office, an upstairs retreat with private balcony, a kitchen and diner with large wine fridge, and even a two-level double garage with rear lane access and space for a home gym or workshop. Despite the hefty price tag, Rigopoulos said the new owners - a local family who had been house hunting for 18 months - were thrilled to finally secure their dream home after missing out on two other properties. 'It's a really good pocket, very well positioned… right in the thick of everything,' he added. While the exact renovation costs remain under wraps, the rise in land value alone proves that timing and great vision really are everything. The original home's modest exterior once blended in quietly with the rest of the street, but it's now a true architectural showpiece, drawing admiration from passersby and online viewers alike. 'This one really stands apart because of that nice brick foundation, and then the architecturally striking box on the top that has this really nice white timber screening,' Rigopoulos said. He also mentioned that the uniqueness of this design sets it apart from other 'all-white' builds that follow a rather mundane formula that 'everyone's getting a bit sick of'. 'They're all quite stark, and there's almost too many of them in the market now - they're getting a little bit long in the tooth.' In contrast, this home 'looks distinctly different' thanks to its beautiful landscaping, timber aspects and exposed warm bricks. Every bathroom and bedroom in the home embraces a timeless neutral aesthetic, creating a sense of calm, cohesion and understated luxury throughout - especially with the matching wood panelling Photos of the before and after are hard to believe, with the previous bungalow's outdated kitchen, design and furniture. From ugly duckling to a multi-million-dollar masterpiece, the transformation is certainly impressive. 'I really like the upstairs section as it kind of zig-zags when you're looking at the property from the outside,' Rigopoulos said. 'I think that part is quite striking - whether you're looking at it from the front of the house, the pool or the back - it makes it feel really well considered and quite different.' Every bathroom and bedroom in the home embraces a timeless neutral aesthetic, creating a sense of calm, cohesion and understated luxury throughout - especially with the matching wood panelling. Soft earthy tones, layered textures and elegant wooden finishes elevate each space, showcasing an interior style that's both contemporary and refined. The bathrooms are now fully tiled with sleek stone surfaces, floating vanities and brushed tapware that reflect the home's architectural finesse. Meanwhile, the bedrooms have been styled with a designer's eye: plush grey carpets, subtle lighting, integrated study nooks, built-in robes, and flat-screen televisions flush against the wall. The home that was once named 'the worst' is now a benchmark for luxury living in Northcote - and a dream come true for its proud new owners. In a market where cookie-cutter homes are losing their shine, this bespoke build has not only turned heads but set a new standard for what's possible when you think outside the box.
