
Descendants of Battle of Bunker Hill fighters tell about unsung family heroes
CHARLESTOWN, MA – One of the turning points during the Revolutionary War was the Battle of Bunker Hill 250 years ago.
While it was a British victory, the confidence and morale of the colonial militia were greatly boosted.
The militia were not trained soldiers, but rather ordinary men who were doctors, tradesmen, even farmers. (See the video at the top of this article.)
Timothy Riordan, Ph.D., historian and vice president of the Charlestown Historical Society in Massachusetts, said the average age of the men fighting the British Army was 27 years old.
With Riordan's research, he founded the "Brothers of the Battle" program.
It helps to locate and find descendants of militiamen who fought for America's independence, he said.
"Bunker Hill was thought of as the most important battle because it's where we proved we could fight the British," Riordan told Fox News.
Dozens of descendants gathered for events around the 250th anniversary. One of them was a New Hampshire representative of Rockingham 13 in Derry, New Hampshire.
State Rep. Steve Pearson (R) is a descendant of Lt. John Wheeler, who fought under Doolittle's regiment at the Battle of Bunker Hill.
Pearson said the Battle of Bunker Hill "really set the tone in the colonies, set the tone in media propaganda … [It] made people realize, 'There's no going back now.'"
Another descendant eager to tell the story of a long-admired family member is Matt Woodfin.
He said he's proud to be the descendant of two men who fought at the Battle of Bunker Hill.
Just before the Battle of Bunker Hill, 20,000 men from the area decided this was the time to stand up to the British.
One is Michael Dalton, expected to have been a fife during the battle.
"He was one that was blowing the flute-type whistle to kind of direct troops, left, right, when to eat, when to march," Woodfin told Fox News.
Just before the Battle of Bunker Hill, 20,000 men from the area decided this was the time to stand up to the British.
One of those men was Woodfin's eighth great-uncle, Henry Dearborn.
"He heard about Concord and Lexington and just put down whatever he was doing and just started walking south."
Dearborn was a doctor who became a captain, said Woodfin.
"Before a formal army, before anything like that, you basically earned your rank by the number of folks you were able to recruit. He came down with 40, 50, 60 men and showed up here as a captain," said Woodfin.
Dearborn later served under President Thomas Jefferson as secretary of war in 1801.
Woodfin said Jefferson presented an ornate sword to Dearborn during a ceremony. It has been taken care of by the Woodfin family for generations.
Many more trekked to Charlestown, Massachusetts, including Josiah Puffer.
Sheila Puffer, a descendant of his, said "he lost a thumb [due to] the explosion of a gun in his hands and was disqualified from military service."
She found a book written by a family member over 100 years ago, telling many stories of Josiah Puffer over the years. He fought in the French and Indian War, then at Bunker Hill.
"When he enlisted, it is said that he passed the examination by wearing gloves of which the thumb of one was filled with wood," she said.
For more Lifestyle articles, visit foxnews.com/lifestyle
While the British won the battle at Bunker Hill — the colonial militia got the confidence boost.
"They only lost because they ran out of ammunition," said Riordan.
The British Army lost twice as many casualties than the American patriots.
But Riordan said that proves an undisciplined and untrained militia could stand against the British.
"It's not that they stood there and fought — it's because they stood there and fought for what they believed in," said Riordan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
Judge blocks Trump administration from tying transportation funds to states' cooperation with immigration efforts
A federal judge in Rhode Island blocked the Trump administration from using states' cooperation with immigration efforts as a condition for receiving transportation funds. US District Judge John McConnell granted a preliminary injunction to 20 mostly Democratic-led states that filed a lawsuit last month to prevent the Department of Transportation from cutting off billions of dollars in funding if the states refused to comply with federal immigration enforcement. In his Thursday ruling, McConnell, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, said, 'Congress did not authorize or grant authority to the Secretary of Transportation to impose immigration enforcement conditions on federal dollars specifically appropriated for transportation purposes.' The ruling is the latest legal setback for President Donald Trump's administration. Many state attorneys general have sued over issues ranging from the president's bid to end birthright citizenship to his tariff policies. The president has used federal funding as leverage amid policy disagreements with different states and organizations. He threatened to withhold funds from California over a transgender athlete's participation in a sporting event and to cut off $3 billion in federal grant funding for Harvard University over its handling of anti-Israel protests. In his ruling, McConnell wrote that the immigration-enforcement condition on the funding 'is arbitrary and capricious in its scope and lacks specificity in how the States are to cooperate on immigration enforcement in exchange for Congressionally appropriated transportation dollars–grant money that the States rely on to keep their residents safely and efficiently on the road, in the sky, and on the rails.' CNN has reached out to the Department of Transportation for comment. Earlier this week, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wrote in a social media post that the department 'will NOT fund rogue state actors who refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.' The lawsuit was brought by California, Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Maryland, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. California's Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the court's decision and criticized Trump for using funds 'as a bargaining chip.' 'It's immoral – and more importantly, illegal. I'm glad to see the District Court agrees, blocking the President's latest attempt to circumvent the Constitution and coerce state and local governments into doing his bidding while we continue to make our case in court,' Bonta said in a statement on Thursday.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Rise on Waller's Remarks and Mideast Hopes: Markets Wrap
A post-holiday Wall Street session saw stocks rising and short-dated Treasuries outperforming after Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said rates could drop as soon as July, while concerns about a direct US involvement in the Middle East conflict eased as Donald Trump held off on a decision on whether to strike Iran. The S&P 500 bounced after two sessions of losses. Investors also braced for a $6.5 trillion US options expiring on Friday, in a move that could free equities to swing more wildly than the subdued changes seen in recent weeks. Two-year yields almost wiped out their advance, trading around 3.94%. Oil fell after a news report that Tehran is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Drops as Trump Signals Iran Strike Decision Within Two Weeks
Oil slumped after President Donald Trump signaled a decision on whether to strike Iran will be made within two weeks, easing fears about an imminent attack from the US. Brent tumbled as much as 4.2% to trade below $76 a barrel, the loss deepening after Reuters reported Tehran is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is scheduled to meet counterparts from the UK, France and Germany later Friday in Geneva. Those talks will be 'limited to nuclear and regional issues,' he said in an interview with state television.