Exclusive: Pakistan, India close to completing border troop reduction, senior Pakistani general says
SINGAPORE, May 30 (Reuters) - Pakistan and India are close to reducing the troop build up along their border to levels before conflict erupted between the nuclear-armed neighbours this month, a top Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday, although he warned the crisis had increased the risk of escalation in the future.
Both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery in four days of clashes, their worst fighting in decades, before a ceasefire was announced.
The spark for the latest fighting between the old enemies was an April 22 attack in Indian Kashmir that killed 26 people, most of them tourists. New Delhi blamed the incident on "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge denied by Islamabad.
On May 7, India launched missiles at what it said were "terrorist infrastructure" sites across the border and as Pakistan responded with its own attacks, both countries built up additional forces along the frontier.
General Sahir Shamshad Mirza, Pakistan's chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said the two militaries had started the process of drawing down troop levels.
"We have almost come back to the pre-22nd April situation... we are approaching that, or we must have approached that by now," said Mirza, the most senior Pakistani military official to speak publicly since the conflict.
India's ministry of defence and the office of the Indian chief of defence staff did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the remarks by Mirza.
Mirza, who is in Singapore to attend the Shangri-La Dialogue forum, said while there was no move towards nuclear weapons during this conflict, it was a dangerous situation.
"Nothing happened this time," he said. "But you can't rule out any strategic miscalculation at any time, because when the crisis is on, the responses are different."
He also said the risk of escalation in the future had increased since the fighting this time was not limited to the disputed territory of Kashmir, the scenic region in the Himalayas that both nations rule in part but claim in full. The two sides attacked military installations in their mainlands but neither has acknowledged any serious damage.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan this month that New Delhi would target "terrorist hideouts" across the border again if there were new attacks on India.
The two countries have fought three major wars, two of them over Kashmir, and numerous armed skirmishes since both were born out of British colonial India in 1947.
India blames Pakistan for an insurgency in its part of Kashmir that began in 1989 and has killed tens of thousands. Pakistan says it provides only moral, political and diplomatic support to Kashmiris seeking self-determination.
"This (conflict) lowers the threshold between two countries who are contiguous nuclear powers...in the future, it will not be restricted to the disputed territory. It would come down to (the) whole of India and (the) whole of Pakistan," Mirza said. "This is a very dangerous trend."
Reuters has reported that the rapid escalation of hostilities ended in part because of behind-the-scenes diplomacy involving the U.S., India and Pakistan, and the key role played by Washington in brokering peace. India has denied any third-party role in the ceasefire and said that any engagement between India and Pakistan has to be bilateral.
But Mirza warned that international mediation might be difficult in the future because of a lack of crisis management mechanisms between the countries.
"The time window for the international community to intervene would now be very less, and I would say that damage and destruction may take place even before that time window is exploited by the international community," he said.
Pakistan was open to dialogue, he added, but beyond a crisis hotline between the directors general of military operations and some hotlines at the tactical level on the border, there was no other communication between the two countries.
India's foreign ministry spokesperson said on Thursday "talks and terror don't go together" in response to a question on the possibility of dialogue with Pakistan.
Mirza said there were no backchannel discussions, or informal talks, to ease tensions. He also said he had no plans to meet General Anil Chauhan, India's chief of defence staff, who is also in Singapore for the Shangri-La forum.
"These issues can only be resolved by dialogue and consultations, on the table. They cannot be resolved on the battlefield," Mirza said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
20 minutes ago
- Times
Sleeper cells: threat of Iranian attacks in US ‘has never been higher'
The threat of attacks by Iranian sleeper cells inside the United States has 'never been higher', officials said, after Tehran warned it would activate agents if President Trump bombed its nuclear sites. The Iranians are believed to have sent a message to US diplomats during the G7 meeting in Canada last week, raising the threat of terrorist attacks on American soil in retaliation for any military intervention. Trump left the meeting a day early, returning to the White House to plan his response to the conflict in the Middle East. On Saturday night seven B-2 stealth bombers, using 30,000lb bunker-busting bombs, struck nuclear sites in Iran. Other warplanes and submarine-launched tomahawk cruise missiles were also used in the attack. • Operation Midnight Hammer: how the 'brilliant and bold' strikes unfolded The Department of Homeland Security warned in a statement after the raids that the 'Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States'. The department said there could be an increased possibility of terrorist attacks in the US, especially 'if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the homeland'. It also warned of less lethal measures the Iranians could use, such as cyberattacks on American networks and companies. In a post on social media after the US airstrikes, Trump said 'Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.' Amid growing concern, the Customs and Border Protection agency said at the weekend that Iranians were among those that have illegally entered the country in recent years. Rodney Scott, the CBP commissioner, said in a memo on Saturday that 'though we have not received any specific credible threats to share with you all currently, the threat of sleeper cells or sympathisers acting on their own or at the behest of Iran has never been higher'. The memo urged CBP personnel to remain vigilant. It said: 'Thousands of Iranian nationals have been documented entering the United States illegally and countless more were likely in the known and unknown got-a-ways.' Days after the presidential election in November, the US brought charges over an alleged plot by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to assassinate Trump. The charges detailed allegations that Farhad Shakeri, a 51-year-old Afghan national, had been ordered by Tehran on October 7 to devise a plan to kill the president. Tehran has been eager to avenge the killing, ordered by Trump in January 2020, of Qasem Soleimani, commander of the IRGC's Quds Force and the mastermind of Iran's regional expansion. Soleimani was killed near Baghdad airport in a US drone strike. The Iranians are known to have plotted attacks in the US against other targets. In recent years, prosecutors have charged suspects with plotting to kill John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, and the Iranian-American journalist Masih Alinejad. Both have been strong critics of the theocratic regime in Tehran. JD Vance, the vice-president, told US news networks on Sunday that the White House was monitoring the possibility of attacks inside America 'very closely'. He blamed the previous administration for allowing millions of migrants to enter the US. 'We know that some of those people were on terrorism watch lists,' he said.
ITV News
41 minutes ago
- ITV News
Newly-recruited Reform councillor under fire after voicemail message branded racist
Report by ITV Wales journalist Sofia Lewis A newly-recruited Reform councillor is under fire for comments made about the Pakistani community in a voicemail left to a Wednesday 18 June, Councillor Andrew Barry, who is a Reform councillor for Merthyr Tydfil Council, left a voicemail seemingly in error to an ITV Wales journalist. In it, he is having a conversation with an unknown second person about the benefits system and housing. He goes on to say: "They're putting the immigrants in the HMOs. They're everywhere. The problem we've got, no one's interested… (Inaudible)"Years ago, when there weren't that many Pakistanis…. They were just turned a blind eye to init… (Inaudible). "The problem we've got now is tens of thousands of them in cities. And their culture is different, like you and me, we're… (Inaudible).... got to protect them (Inaudible)."Those Pakistanis are tribal. They don't just dislike us, they dislike Sikhs…" Reform UK are standing by the councillor and deny the comments were offensive, saying a private conversation involving Councillor Andrew Barry has been "taken out of context". Merthyr Tydfil Council says a formal investigation process will now begin after it was made aware of the Ray Singh CBE, Chair of Race Council Cymru, has called the comments "offensive", while a statement from his organisation said: "Racially charged language has no place in modern public discourse". Meanwhile, Dawn Bowden, Member of the Senedd for Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney, has called the remarks "absolutely racist" and "shocking." Andrew Barry was an Independent councillor for Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council before defecting to Reform UK, announced in a speech by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage in Port Talbot earlier this month. A Reform UK spokesman said: 'The private conversation involving Councillor Andrew Barry has been taken out of context, with the recording only picking up snippets of the discussion."They were discussing the failure of multiculturalism and recent warnings about the India-Pakistan conflict spilling onto British streets. Past riots in cities like Leicester and Birmingham show these are serious and legitimate concerns. "Reform UK supports open and honest discussions about integration, community cohesion, and the impact of current policies. We reject hate or discrimination in any form but will not shy away from addressing difficult issues affecting communities across the UK.' A spokesperson for Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council said the local authority does not condone "any comments that could be deemed offensive to any group" and is "supportive of an inclusive and diverse culture."It continued: "Following election all Members receive mandatory training on the Councillor Code of Conduct which sets out the expectations of them and includes guidance on equality and respect." A statement from Race Council Cymru said that: "Offensive and racially charged language has no place in modern public discourse, especially when it comes from individuals seeking or holding political office. Such language doesn't exist in a vacuum; it reflects and reinforces deep-rooted prejudices that many communities have worked hard to overcome. At a time when we should be striving for greater inclusion and understanding, these comments are not only unacceptable but deeply damaging. The impact of this kind of rhetoric extends far beyond the individual who says it. It sends a harmful message to Black and ethnic minority communities, suggesting that they are still not fully accepted or respected in our society. It undermines trust in our political institutions and creates an environment where racism and discrimination are downplayed or dismissed.... "We urge all political parties to take clear, decisive action against hate speech and to hold their representatives to the highest standards. This is not about political correctness, it's about human dignity and social responsibility."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Security ramped up at US synagogues after strikes on Iran
Security has been stepped at synagogues across the US in the aftermath of America's strikes on Iran. The US president authorised strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure using 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, the largest and most powerful conventional bombs in the US arsenal, over the weekend. Mr Trump warned in the aftermath of the strikes on Fordow, the country's primary nuclear site, Natanz and Isfahan, that retaliating would be a mistake. On Sunday it was revealed the president had been warned at the G7 summit that Iran would activate terror 'sleeper cells' across the US in the event of a strike. Security precautions in the US have been ratcheted up in the wake of the strikes, with Rodney Scott, the customs and border protection commissioner, saying the terror threat had 'never been higher'. Extra police officers have been stationed outside synagogues and the Israeli consulate in New York City, which is home to around 1.9 million Jewish residents. 'The NYPD is tracking the situation in the Middle East. Out of an abundance of caution, we're deploying additional resources to Jewish, Israeli and other sites throughout NYC. We're coordinating with our federal partners, and we'll continue to monitor for any potential impact to NYC,' the New York Police Department said. Extra police are also patrolling Jewish and Muslim places of worship outside the city in Suffolk County on Long Island. 'There are no credible threats to New York at this time,' Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, said. 'As a precaution, we have increased security for sensitive locations and stepped up cybersecurity protections. My priority is keeping New Yorkers safe.' Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, which has a Jewish population of around 617,000, said she has increased the city's police patrols at 'places of worship, community gathering spaces and other sensitive sites.' Washington, DC, home to just under 60,000 Jews, has pledged to step up security around Jewish spaces, even though there are no known current threats. It comes following the murder of two Israeli Embassy staffers, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, in Washington, DC in May. In addition to the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC, the country has consulates in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco. In Canada, police in Montreal advised a Jewish school and synagogue to suspend prayers and lessons following a telephone shooting threat, according to reports. Police rushed to the scene on Ekers Avenue on Sunday after an anonymous caller said he would arrive within minutes to 'shoot up' the premises, the Jewish Community Council said. Research by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has revealed a surge in anti-Semitic and violent threats on social media. In the 12 days preceding Israel's pre-emptive air strikes, there were an average of 28.5 threats on the dozen sites monitored by the ADL. The number of threats surged to a record 398 on June 13, the day after Israel attacked Iran's nuclear installations, and then dropped back to just under 200 a day until June 17. Researchers also found a change in tone with threats going beyond harassment to calls for mass violence and genocide against Israelis and Jews.
