As US eyes its airspace, Pakistan confirms: Trump, Munir had discussion on Iran
As anticipated by Delhi, US President Donald Trump and Pakistan Army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir had a 'detailed exchange of views' on the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict when they met over lunch at the White House.
In a statement Thursday, the Pakistan Army said, 'A detailed exchange of views also took place on the prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasising the importance of resolution of the conflict.'
Asked if Iran was discussed with Munir, Trump said: 'Well, they know Iran very well, better than most, and they are not happy about anything.'
'It's not that they are bad with Israel. They know them both, actually, but they probably, maybe they know Iran better, but they see what's going on, and he agreed with me,' he said.
In Islamabad, the Pakistan Army said the US President showed 'keen interest' in developing a mutually beneficial trade relationship with Pakistan on the basis of long-term strategic interests.
According to Delhi's assessment, the US is enlisting Rawalpindi's support since it would want to use Pakistan's airspace, air bases and other infrastructure for launching any military offensive on Iran.
This was the key focus of Trump's lunch with Munir which, according to sources, lasted for about two hours, and not one hour as scheduled.
According to news agency Reuters, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said Trump was hosting Munir after he called for the US President to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for preventing a nuclear war between India and Pakistan.
But sources indicated that the meeting was not arranged through routine diplomatic channels, and was the outcome of 'unorthodox efforts' by a group of advisers, businessmen and other influential figures.
Sources said stronger counter-terrorism cooperation, engagement with crypto-linked influence networks, and targeted lobbying via Republican-aligned firms in Washington helped Pakistan secure the meeting.
A source, who has been tracking the US-Pakistan relationship over decades, said, 'It is not rare but absolutely unprecedented for a military chief to be invited by a POTUS (President of the United States) for a meeting, let alone a meeting over a meal. All Pakistan military chiefs who visited the US and other capitals did so as Presidents.'
In the past, US President George W Bush met Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf in 2004. Munir's US visit began last Sunday and was his second since he took over as military chief in 2022.
Trump was effusive about both Munir and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He said he was 'honoured' to meet Munir and that they discussed the situation arising out of the Iran-Israel conflict.
'The reason I had him here, I want to thank him for not going into the war, ending the war (with India). And I want to thank, as you know, Prime Minister Modi,' he said.
'We are working on a trade deal with India. We are working on a trade deal with Pakistan.'
Trump also recalled his meeting with Modi at the White House in February.
He said he was 'happy' that 'two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war'. 'That could have been a nuclear war. Those are two nuclear powers, big ones, big, big nuclear powers, and they decided (to end the conflict),' he said.
The US President was accompanied at the meeting by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Special Representative for the Middle East Steve Witkoff. Munir was joined by Pakistan National Security Advisor Lt Gen Asim Malik, who is also head of the spy agency ISI.
Earlier, in his phone conversation with Trump, Modi had told the President that India and Pakistan halted their military actions following direct talks between the two militaries without any mediation by the US.
The Pakistan Army, in its statement on the Trump-Munir meeting, said, the 'Chief of Army Staff conveyed the deep appreciation of the government and people of Pakistan for President Trump's constructive and result-oriented role in facilitating a ceasefire between Pakistan and India in the recent regional crisis. The COAS acknowledged President Trump's statesmanship and his ability to comprehend and address the multifaceted challenges faced by the global community.'
'President Trump, in turn, lauded Pakistan's ongoing efforts for regional peace and stability, and appreciated the robust counter-terrorism cooperation between the two states. Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to continued collaboration in the field of counter-terrorism,' it said.
'Discussions also encompassed avenues for expanding bilateral cooperation in multiple domains including trade, economic development, mines and minerals, artificial intelligence, energy, cryptocurrency, and emerging technologies. President Trump expressed keen interest in forging a mutually beneficial trade partnership with Pakistan based on long-term strategic convergence and shared interests,' it said.
'In a gesture reflecting the warmth of bilateral ties, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir extended an invitation to President Trump, on behalf of the Government of Pakistan, to undertake an official visit to Pakistan at a mutually convenient date'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Up 29% in 5 months! Should you invest or avoid gold mutual funds?
Gold based funds and ETFs together have offered an average return of 29.11% in the current calendar year so far. There were around 32 funds including both gold funds and gold ETFs in the said time period. LIC MF Gold ETF FoF offered the highest return of around 30.14% in the current calendar year so far, followed by UTI Gold ETF which gave 29.75% return in the same Gold ETF gave 29.37% return in the same period. Zerodha Gold ETF delivered a return of 29.28% in the said time period. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Best MF to invest Looking for the best mutual funds to invest? Here are our recommendations. View Details » by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Most Cat Parents Miss This About Their Aging Cats Dr. Marty Click Here Undo Also Read | ITC and Cochin Shipyard among stocks that Quant Mid Cap Fund bought and sold in May Invesco India Gold ETF FoF and Groww Gold ETF FOF gave 28.34% and 28.14% returns respectively in the current calendar year so far. Experts attribute this surge to a combination of global economic and geopolitical factors such as geopolitical uncertainty and central bank buying. Live Events 'Gold prices have rallied in recent times due to a combination of global economic and geopolitical factors such as rising tensions globally, such as conflicts in the Middle East, and Trump tariffs, have increased demand for gold as a safe-haven asset and several countries, including China and India, have been aggressively adding gold to their reserves to diversify away from the US dollar and enhance financial security,' Shweta Rajani, Head - Mutual Funds , Anand Rathi Wealth Limited shared with ETMutualFunds. The expert further shared country wise gold purchases over the years and mentioned that with India seeing a huge jump to 72.6 tonnes of gold in 2024, the highest annual purchase in this three-year period and a 347% increase from 2023 and this sharp rise indicates a strategic focus on gold as a reserve asset, aligning with global trends of de-dollarization and building resilience due to the geopolitical and economic uncertainties. Echoing a similar opinion, another expert mentions that fresh investments should be made cautiously. 'Gold has rallied due to rising global geopolitical tensions and increased central bank buying early in the year. While it has given strong YTD returns, fresh investments should be made cautiously, as much of the rally may already be priced in,' Shruti Jain, Chief Strategy Officer, Arihant Capital Markets told ETMutuaFunds. Quant Mutual Fund, in a recent note, highlighted that gold may be due for a short-term correction of 12-15% in dollar terms over the next two months. The fund house cautioned investors that the metal may have "peaked out" in the short term, noting that while gold prices have surged recently, the momentum could slow down, and a retracement in prices could be on the horizon. While commenting on whether one should increase their gold investment or wait for further correction, Jain advises that after this steep run-up, it's better to wait for a dip before adding more and gold should ideally make up 3–5% of the total portfolio as a diversification and risk-hedging tool. On the other hand, Shweta Rajani suggests investors to maintain a balanced portfolio, with an asset allocation of 80:20 in equity to debt but if one wants exposure to gold, it should not exceed 5-10% of their portfolio. Also Read | Eternal and Vedanta among stocks which Edelweiss Mutual Fund bought and sold in May 'Gold should be treated as a defence asset, with maximum exposure at 20%. Combined allocation to gold and debt should not exceed 20% of the overall portfolio to maintain growth potential,' she added. Amid safe-haven buying triggered by Israel-Iran tensions and weakness in the dollar index, gold August futures contracts on the MCX opened sharply higher by Rs 2,011 or 2.04%, crossing the Rs 1 lakh mark to trade at Rs 1,00,403 per 10 grams on last Friday, according to a report by ETMarkets By attributing the recent gold rally to mainly driven by demand and supply, not underlying fundamental metrics, the expert from Anand Rathi Wealth mentions that investing in Gold through SIP is not the best option for investors. They would generate a better return investing in equity mutual funds. She further shared that if an investor does an SIP in Gold ETFs and another investor does an SIP in 5 diversified equity mutual funds, the XIRR return for gold is 12.53%, whereas for an equity mutual fund portfolio, it is almost 15%. Sharing a different opinion, Jain mentions that the rally is largely driven by geopolitical tensions and global factors, including safe-haven demand and foreign central bank purchases and having gold in your portfolio is always a good idea because it adds diversification and additionally it's also a good idea to invest via SIP to spread out your entry and manage risk. In the last one year, gold based funds have offered up to 38.16% returns with an average return of around 37.16%. Tata Gold ETF offered the highest return of around 38.16% in the last one year, followed by UTI Gold ETF which gave 38.09% return in the same period. Zerodha Gold ETF offered a 37.69% return in the last one year. Invesco India Gold ETF FoF gave the lowest return of around 35.61% in the last one year period. Post looking at the last one year performance and current rally, Jain shared that Gold may face some pressure if geopolitical tensions subside and also there is news on selling by China. 'Expect it to trade in a range, and avoid aggressive buying at current highs,' she adds. 'Gold ETF holdings have declined in May 2025 to 930 tonnes compared to April 2025. However, the expectation is that the investors will continue to invest in yellow metal for portfolio diversification,' according to commodity communique by Tata Mutual Fund. Also Read | Deepak Shenoy's Capitalmind Mutual Fund files its first draft document with Sebi for a flexi cap fund After analysing the different probabilities of CAGR of Nifty vs. Gold over different time frames, Shweta Rajani firmly says that Gold's ability to deliver high long-term returns significantly declines over time and the chance of earning over 12% CAGR from gold is just 0.58% over 10 years and drops to 0% over 15 years and despite similar volatility to equity, its long-term upside is limited, making it less rewarding on a risk-adjusted basis. 'When considering long-term wealth creation, Nifty maintains a much stronger probability of beating inflation and compounding wealth versus Gold, which have a higher standard deviation and lower risk adjusted return potential. As mentioned, gold is a defence asset like debt. Hence, the total allocation to gold and debt in your portfolio should not exceed 20%,' Shweta Rajani said. Gold is considered a hedge against inflation and with global economic conditions remaining uncertain, gold is expected to retain its appeal as a hedge against market instability. Gold ETFs are exchange-traded funds that track the price of physical gold. Each unit of a Gold ETF is backed by a specific quantity of gold, usually equivalent to one gram. They are listed on stock exchanges, and you need a demat and trading account to buy and sell them. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times) If you have any mutual fund queries, message on ET Mutual Funds on Facebook/Twitter. We will get it answered by our panel of experts. Do share your questions on ETMFqueries@ alongwith your age, risk profile, and Twitter handle.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
An EV revolution is happening in the heart of OPEC
Think of the most important markets for electric vehicles, and you'll have a list of the usual suspects: Norway, China, Germany, the UK. But Dubai? It seems improbable, but OPEC 's second-biggest exporter deserves a place alongside those other markets. Fully-electric vehicles comprised 10% of the value of cars imported into the United Arab Emirates last year, according to trade data. Throw in hybrids and plug-in hybrids, and more than a quarter of the market is switching to batteries. That's a troubling sign for the UAE and its oil-exporting neighbors in the Persian Gulf. If nations that owe their very existence to the transformative power of crude are switching to lithium-ion, then the prospects for their key export are looking distinctly shaky. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Invest today with in Shriram's ULIP Shriram Life Insurance Undo The UAE is, to be sure, an outlier. But it's not completely alone. In Qatar, one in eight vehicles imported last year was battery-powered or hybrid, with similar proportions in Iraq and Iran. The share was 10% in Bahrain, and 7% in Kuwait. In Singapore — no oil producer, but a crucial node for the global trade in petroleum — one in three imported cars were battery-powered, rising to 56% including all types of hybrid. EVs are springing up everywhere across the region. About 35,000 were registered in the UAE as of last October, according to government data. Tesla Inc. has stores in four of the UAE's emirates as well as Qatar, and in April announced a division in Saudi Arabia. It's playing catch-up with China's BYD Co., already in all of those markets plus the other three Gulf monarchies. Bloomberg Saudi Arabia's relative paucity of imports belies its ambitions as a manufacturer. The Kingdom's Public Investment Fund, or PIF, has poured more than $8 billion into its majority-owned Lucid Group Inc., a US-headquartered EV-maker. Lucid has built an electric vehicle plant in King Abdullah Economic City on the shores of the Red Sea that aims to churn out 150,000 cars a year, though sales so far haven't come close to such ambitious projections. Live Events Nearby, a joint venture between the PIF and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., or Foxconn, is building another $1.3 billion EV plant, while a third JV between the PIF and Hyundai Motor Co. broke ground last month with plans to manufacture both EVs and conventional cars. This budding love affair with EVs might not be quite as surprising as it first seems. Two of the biggest barriers toward switching to electric are range anxiety and up-front costs, but neither applies much in the monarchies of the Gulf Cooperation Council. They're some of the most urbanized societies on the planet, so outside of Saudi Arabia few people are driving great distances. High disposable incomes make it easy to pay for a battery car, especially as cheaper Chinese models flood into the market. Bloomberg Lacking domestic auto industries to protect, they're less likely to raise tariffs like the US and Europe have done. Low-density suburbs give plenty of opportunities for owners to charge cheaply at home. The heavily subsidized gasoline that the world's petrostates give to their citizens isn't nearly the deterrent you might expect, either. Most of the Gulf countries have made attempts to link their fuel prices to market rates over the past decade, discouraging the extreme wastefulness of domestic consumption and freeing up more crude for export. While gasoline is still absurdly cheap by global standards, electricity now receives far more generous subsidies as governments attempt to stimulate industrial activities that can carry their economies through the looming downturn in oil demand. That translates into rock-bottom charging costs for owners. 'Electricity is so cheap here that you won't even notice the difference on your bill,' one Dubai-based owner of an Xpeng Inc. car wrote in a social-media post last month. An owner of a BYD Qin estimated savings of 36,000 dirhams ($9,800) over five years due to paying 'basically nothing' for electricity. It might be tempting to think of the burgeoning Gulf EV market as an idiosyncratic case. That would be a mistake. The popularity of battery propulsion in a region built on the thirst of internal combustion engines is a warning that a fundamentally better technology is now displacing gasoline for good. With oil prices gyrating after last week's Israeli attack on Iran, who wants the cost of filling up their gas tank to become collateral damage in the Middle East's wars? The world's refiners are already gearing up for an imminent future where chemicals consume more petroleum than gasoline-powered vehicles. In decades to come, oil monarchies won't pay their bills by providing the fuel for your car, but feedstock for the plastics in its dashboard and seat foam. Road fuel still consumes more than half of the world's oil. Judging by the electrification of crude's heartlands, decline is now imminent.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Newsom: federal court rules US President has control over California National Guard in LA protest response
A federal appeals court has granted President Donald Trump continued authority over the California National Guard , allowing thousands of troops to remain under federal command in response to protests against immigration enforcement actions in Los Angeles. The unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court ruling that had sided with California Governor Gavin Newsom. The court's action comes as part of an ongoing legal battle over who controls the state's military forces during periods of civil unrest. Trump invoked federal law in early June 2025 to federalize nearly 4,100 California National Guard members and deployed an additional 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators had gathered outside federal buildings in protest of immigration raids. This marks the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state's National Guard without the governor's consent. Governor Newsom, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's authority, arguing that the move was illegal and exceeded presidential powers. On June 12, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer agreed with Newsom, ordering Trump to return control of the troops to the state. However, the appeals court quickly issued a stay, and Thursday's ruling extended that suspension while the legal dispute continues. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo In their decision, the appeals court judges wrote, 'Given that deference to the President, we find it likely that he exercised his statutory powers lawfully.' The panel emphasized that judicial review of presidential decisions to federalize the National Guard should be 'highly deferential,' citing longstanding legal precedent. The judges also noted that the temporary restraining order issued by the lower court could have adversely affected the public interest amid widespread protests. The court's decision was issued by a panel that included two Trump appointees and one appointed by former President Joe Biden . Legal experts say the ruling reflects a broader judicial trend of granting the president significant discretion in matters of national security and military deployment. Live Events Governor Newsom has condemned the decision, calling the deployment an 'unnecessary provocation' and warning that it sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach in state affairs. He has vowed to continue his legal challenge, and legal analysts suggest California may seek emergency intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Trump and his administration have defended the deployment as necessary to restore order and protect federal property and agents. 'The president has broad—though not 'unreviewable'—authority to deploy the military in American cities,' wrote Judge Mark J. Bennett, one of the panel's members, in the court's opinion. As of Thursday, approximately 4,800 federal military personnel remain deployed in Los Angeles, including about 4,100 National Guard members and 700 Marines. While the intensity of protests has subsided somewhat in recent days, the legal and political standoff over the use of military forces in domestic law enforcement continues to unfold.
