Trump migrant detentions at Guantanamo Bay cost $100,000 per person daily, senator says
President Donald Trump's use of the Guantanamo Bay naval base to house migrants appears to cost $100,000 per day for each detainee, U.S. Senator Gary Peters said during a hearing on Tuesday, decrying what he described as a prime example of wasteful government spending.
Peters, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, questioned Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about the high cost, far more than the $165 per day in U.S. immigration detention facilities. Peters also asked why detainees have been sent to the American naval base in Cuba but then shuttled back to the United States at taxpayer expense.
'We're spending $100,000 a day to keep someone at Guantanamo,' Peters said. 'We keep them there awhile, then we fly them back to the United States, or we could keep them here for $165 a day. I think that's kind of outrageous.'
The White House has requested a huge increase in funding for immigration enforcement as it tries to achieve Trump's goal of mass deportations. The administration asked Congress this month for an additional $44-billion for the Department of Homeland Security in fiscal year 2026, which begins on Oct. 1.
Noem, appearing before the committee to defend the budget request, said she did not know the daily cost to house migrants at Guantanamo Bay. Her department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there were roughly 70 migrants currently detained there.
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in March to prevent 10 migrants from being transferred to the base. In the suit, ACLU alleged that migrants at Guantanamo had been held in windowless rooms for at least 23 hours per day, subjected to invasive strip searches, and unable to contact family members. Some had attempted suicide, the ACLU said.
Senator Rand Paul, the Republican chairman of the committee, also raised concerns with spending for additional barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border since the number of migrants caught crossing illegally has plummeted since Trump took office. A sweeping U.S. House of Representatives budget plan would devote $46.5-billion to the border wall alone.
'I'm not saying no new money is needed,' Paul said. 'I think you need more Border Patrol, and you're going to need more money for that, but I think it should be within reason.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
More Canadians want to join the military, but enlisted members keep leaving
Interest has spiked in the Canadian military, with recruitment levels hitting their highest point in a decade. But as more people walk in the door, thousands of enlisted members are deciding to walk out. Numbers obtained by Global News show the retention crisis worsened year over year, as Prime Minister Mark Carney who is attending the NATO summit in Brussels, vows to rebuild the Armed Forces and reduce Canada's dependence on the U.S. 'The reason why retention has not been improving is because the military has been putting all of his eggs in the recruitment basket,' said Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a defence analyst with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. 0:45 'A real end': Trump says he wants Iran to 'give up entirely' on nuclear weapons According to figures from the Department of National Defence, attrition rates in the regular forces increased, with 5,026 leaving the military between 2024 and 2025, compared with 4,256 during the same period the previous year. Story continues below advertisement Retention among reservists improved slightly during the past two years. Overall, the situation has remained largely stagnant, the DND numbers show. 'This is knowledge and readiness that we're losing that new recruits cannot replace immediately … and skills that are necessary to defend Canada,' Duval-Lantoine said. 6:20 PM Carney pledges to meet NATO's 2% defence spending target this year Recruitment in the regular forces hit a record high this fiscal year, but not all 6,706 enrolled will pass basic training. The gains are offset by the loss of 5,026 members. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy More people are considering careers in the Canadian Armed Forces, as Canada's relationship with the U.S. undergoes a major shift, and Ottawa vows to prioritize defence and increase pay for military personnel. U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened Canadian sovereignty and has not backed away from punishing tariffs. The CAF cautions it's too early to link the jump in interest to Trump's rhetoric and policies. Story continues below advertisement The military has widened eligibility recently to include permanent residents and applicants with certain medical conditions, while modernizing recruitment with a new online portal. 5:59 Breaking Down Canada's Defence Spending Plan Unless the military can hold onto more currently serving members, Duval-Lantoine doubts it will fill a shortage of roughly 13,000 personnel or meet its targets of 71,500 regular force members and 30,000 reservists by 2030. 'It's too slow of a growth. There really needs to be more aggressive measures,' she said. 'The lack of urgency is quite scary from my point of view.' 4:51 Canada-U.S. trade talks accelerate as Carney hosts G7 leaders in Alberta Story continues below advertisement DND says the 'fluctuation' in the attrition rate is 'within the normal range' and consistent with Canada's allies. 'There are a wide variety of reasons members choose to stay in or leave the CAF, so it is difficult to attribute it to one or a few specific factors,' department spokesperson Derek Abma said in a statement to Global News. But defence experts point to issues around training and career management, a lack of affordable housing, and pay. Earlier this month, Defence Minister David McGuinty said CAF personnel will be getting a salary bump, but did not specify when. 'That's where a lot of the initial investment will be, of course, including a 20 per cent pay increase,' he told reporters June 10. A day earlier, Carney announced an additional $9.3 billion in military funding to meet the NATO target of spending two per cent of GDP on defence. Of that, $2.6 billion will go towards recruitment, salary hikes and hiring an additional 1,400 new staff, said government officials, speaking on background, at a technical briefing on June 9. 9:55 Former Chief of the Defence Staff reacts to spending plans More than 77,000 people hit 'Apply Now' on the Armed Forces' website, the highest number in five years, but less than 10 per cent — 6,706 – made it to the finish line and enrolled Story continues below advertisement The military says a large number of people never finish their applications. It's not clear how many are completed, but Duval-Lantoine insists there isn't enough staff to handle the intake. Canada's former chief of the defence staff, retired general Wayne Eyre, acknowledges there is no 'silver bullet' to solve the personnel crisis, but he would like to see the military be less risk-averse, something the CAF, like most government institutions, has struggled with. 'The secret to success is the willingness to experiment, to try new things. If it doesn't work well, fine. Learn from it. If it does, take it up to scale,' Eyre said. 'We've got to keep our foot on the gas…. We've got to get as many qualified members of Canadian society in the door as quickly as possible.'
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Wartime NATO summits have focused on Ukraine. With Trump, this one will be different
BRUSSELS (AP) — At its first summits after Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, NATO gave President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pride of place at its table. It won't be the same this time. Europe's biggest land conflict since World War II is now in its fourth year and still poses an existential threat to the continent. Ukraine continues to fight a war so that Europeans don't have to. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the invasion on Kyiv. But things have changed. The Trump administration insists that it must preserve maneuvering space to entice Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table, so Ukraine must not be allowed steal the limelight. In Washington last year, the military alliance's weighty summit communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership. The year before, a statement more than twice as long was published in the Lithuanian capital Vilnius. A new NATO-Ukraine Council was set up, and Kyiv's membership path fast-tracked. Zelenskyy received a hero's welcome at a concert downtown. It will be very different at a two-day summit in the Netherlands that starts Tuesday. NATO's most powerful member, the United States, is vetoing Ukraine's membership. It's unclear how long for. Zelenskyy is invited again, but will not be seated at NATO's table. The summit statement is likely to run to around five paragraphs, on a single page, NATO diplomats and experts say. Ukraine will only get a passing mention. If the G7 summit is anything to go by … Recent developments do not augur well for Ukraine. Earlier this month, frustrated by the lack of a ceasefire agreement, U.S. President Donald Trump said it might be best to let Ukraine and Russia 'fight for a while' before pulling them apart and pursuing peace. Last weekend, he and Putin spoke by phone, mostly about Israel and Iran, but a little about Ukraine, too, Trump said. America has warned its allies that it has other security priorities, including in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. Then at the Group of Seven summit in Canada, Trump called for Russia to be allowed back into the group; a move that would rehabilitate Putin on the global stage. The next day, Russia launched its mass drone attack on Kyiv. Putin 'is doing this simply because he can afford to continue the war. He wants the war to go on. It is troubling when the powerful of this world turn a blind eye to it,' Zelenskyy said. Trump left the G7 gathering early to focus on the conflict between Israel and Iran. Zelenskyy had traveled to Canada to meet with him. No meeting happened, and no statement on Russia or the war was agreed. Lacking unanimity, other leaders met with Zelenskyy to reassure him of their support. Questions about US support for Ukraine Trump wants to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. He said he could do it within 100 days, but that target has come and gone. Things are not going well, as a very public bust up with Zelenskyy at the White House demonstrated. Trump froze military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine's armed forces for a week. The U.S. has stepped back from the Ukraine Defense Contact Group that was set up under the Biden administration and helped to drum up weapons and ammunition. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth skipped its last meeting; the first time a Pentagon chief has been absent since Russian forces invaded in February 2022. Addressing Congress on June 10, Hegseth also acknowledged that funding for Ukraine military assistance, which has been robust for the past two years, will be reduced in the upcoming defense budget. It means Kyiv will receive fewer of the weapons systems that have been key to countering Russia's attack. Indeed, no new aid packages have been approved for Ukraine since Trump took office again in January. 'The message from the administration is clear: Far from guaranteed, future U.S. support for Ukraine may be in jeopardy,' said Riley McCabe, Associate Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a U.S.-based policy research organization. Cutting aid, McCabe warned, could make the Kremlin believe 'that U.S. resolve is fleeting, and that time is on Russia's side.' 'Putin has less incentive to negotiate if he believes that U.S. disengagement is inevitable and that Russia will soon gain an advantage on the battlefield,' he said. What the summit might mean for Kyiv Trump wants the summit to focus on defense spending. The 32 allies are expected to agree on an investment pledge that should meet his demands. Still, the Europeans and Canada are determined to keep a spotlight on the war, wary that Russia could set its sights on one of them next. They back Trump's ceasefire efforts with Putin but also worry that the two men are cozying up. Also, some governments may struggle to convince their citizens of the need to boost defense spending at the expense of other budget demands without a strong show of support for Ukraine — and acknowledgement that Russia remains NATO's biggest security threat. The summit is highly symbolic for Ukraine in other ways. Zelenskyy wants to prevent his country from being sidelined from international diplomacy, but both he and his allies rely on Trump for U.S. military backup against Russia. Concretely, Trump and his counterparts will dine with the Dutch King on Tuesday evening. Zelenskyy could take part. Elsewhere, foreign ministers will hold a NATO-Ukraine Council, the forum where Kyiv sits among the 32 allies as an equal to discuss its security concerns and needs. What is clear is that the summit will be short. One working session on Wednesday. It was set up that way to prevent the meeting from derailing. If the G7 is anything to go by, Trump's focus on his new security priorities — right now, the conflict between Israel and Iran — might make it even shorter.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
As corporate sponsors walk away from Pride, some call for a return to its activist roots
Despite major sponsors pulling their support from this year's Toronto Pride festivities, one advocate says that it might actually be a chance to put a new focus on Pride's raison d'etre. "The focus of Pride as an overall event must be ... the people," Nicki Ward, an advocate who's worked on 2SLGBTQ+ housing and disability issues in Canada for over 25 years, told CBC Radio's Day 6. "Maybe it's time for a little more authenticity. And if company XYZ doesn't want to get involved, well then, too bad." Earlier this month, Pride Toronto said it's facing a $900,000 funding gap due to sponsors — including Google, Nissan, Home Depot and Clorox — pulling support, and the rising costs of running the festival. Executive director Kojo Modeste linked the corporate withdrawals to backlash against diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States under President Donald Trump's administration. Toronto isn't the only city with Pride festivals facing similar challenges. Organizations across Canada are grappling with a chilled enthusiasm among sponsors and donors this year, even as a new poll suggests Canadian support for 2SLGBTQ+ rights hasn't waned. Now, organizers are forced to search for the delicate balance between growing Pride's audience and staying true to its activist roots fighting for 2SLGBTQ+ rights Zac Rempel, managing director of the Vancouver Pride Society, says their sponsorships this year are down about 50 per cent compared to last year. Their programming has been cut from a 10-day festival last year to a three-day weekend because of the lack of funds. "We are running on a skeleton crew right now," said Rempel. In a statement posted online, Halifax Pride says it chose to part ways with some longtime sponsors and parade participants, while others stepped back "for reasons we weren't told, but we can read the room." In the U.S., major corporations like MasterCard, Pepsi and Deloitte pulled out of Pride events in New York, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. According to research cited by Axios, a majority of the corporations surveyed about their reasons for pulling out cited the Trump administration, and conservative activists and policymakers. Corporate pinkwashing According to Ward, the transformation of many Pride festivals from a protest march to a major parade with corporate sponsors, including some flying their company logos at a parade, didn't happen overnight. Some of the earliest companies to sponsor Pride events were local breweries or other alcohol businesses, simply because the marches and parades were also big parties. "Later on, some of the banks got involved, which I actually think they came with good hearts, to try to make sure that their employees felt that they could bring their whole selves to work," she said. Later, however, corporate motives became more capitalistic as Pride's audience and the amount of money involved increased. "People would pay, basically, to pinkwash their companies and be gay for a day. [As if to say], 'Yeah, sure, we tolerate them,'" she said. Pinkwashing is a term used to describe corporations appealing to 2SLGBTQ+ communities, despite engaging in activities or practices that might harm those communities. That's led to tensions between multiple camps who disagree about what Pride should look like. In Montreal, for example, several 2SLGBTQ+ groups cut ties with Fierté Montréal, accusing it of prioritizing image over activism. Tom Hooper, an assistant professor in the department of human rights and equity studies at York University, said he thinks major corporations sponsoring or marching in Pride events gave many people in the 2SLGBTQ+ community a sense of acceptance and even safety, especially for people who worked at those corporations. But when they pull out en masse, it puts doubt on why they joined in the first place. "Did they just see us as this market to feed their bottom line? Was this just an opportunity to advertise?" he said. 'Pride is not just a party' Fiona Kerr, executive director of Halifax Pride, thinks so — especially when it comes to the bigger, multinational corporations who aren't as vulnerable to financial constraints as smaller sponsors with ties to their local communities. "I think a lot of larger sponsors are reckoning with the fact that Pride is not just a party and are choosing to walk away because of it. It's not the happy, fun dance party they originally signed up for," Kerr said in an email. "A lot of Pride organizations are taking stronger political stances and active steps to protect our community, and those are things these companies don't want to truly align themselves with." WATCH: Is Trump's anti-DEI agenda hurting Pride funding in Canada? Pride Toronto links funding woes to Trump's anti-DEI agenda 10 days ago Duration 2:01 Pride Toronto says the festival faces a major financial shortfall after multiple corporate sponsors pulled their support, which the festival's executive director links to American companies moving away from DEI efforts under the Trump administration. Hooper said that while the Trump factor looms large on the situation, it shouldn't be seen as the only factor. "We have our own Canadian versions of attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion," he said, noting that some political candidates in the spring's election took aim at so-called "woke" policies. "Canada's not immune from a lot of these policies that are aimed at gender-affirming care, that are aimed at school curriculum. We're having these same debates," he said. Meanwhile, an Ipsos poll released Friday suggests that a majority of Canadians support 2SLGBT+ visibility, rights and protections, at rates "far higher" than the average of 26 countries covered in the poll. Seventy-eight per cent of Canadians surveyed said that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry legally, and 79 per cent supported protections for 2SLGBT+ against discrimination in employment, housing and access to businesses. The poll, conducted online with about 1,000 participants in each country from April 25 to May 9, did find support for specific transgender protections, such as for health insurance coverage of gender transition, was divided. It also found that women were largely more supportive of 2SLGBT+ rights than men, and that difference was greatest among respondents under 35 years old. A parade? A march? Both? Ward and others told CBC that while the latest challenges have forced a rethink about what partnerships Pride festivals take on in the future, they're not ruling them out entirely. Kerr says Halifax Pride held community consultations on how to fill funding gaps that, while they "wouldn't totally fill the gap" left by sponsors who have withdrawn their support or might do so in the future, will help them be less dependent on corporate sponsors. "Money and spirituality can mix, but boy, it's awfully tricky," said Ward. She believes "a less commercial, more people-based Pride" could work, and even attract audiences who yearn for "a more authentic, less gaudy but more fabulous" festival compared to recent years. She said Toronto's Trans March has managed to keep its "spiritual centre" because it's still a walking march and not a parade with floats or other accoutrements. But that doesn't mean wiping away the parades, parties and fun of Pride entirely — in fact, it's a deeply important part of its DNA. "They want that celebration. They want that joy, which is completely valid," said Rempel. "Joy is radical in and of itself."
