Sir Sadiq Khan to pedestrianise Oxford Street ‘as quickly as possible'

Two-thirds (66%) of respondents to a consultation support the pedestrianisation plan, Sir Sadiq's office said.
A separate YouGov survey conducted in September 2024 indicated 63% of Londoners are in favour of the project.
Oxford Street is one of the world's busiest shopping areas, with around half a million visitors each day.
Sir Sadiq Khan wants to ban vehicles from a 0.7-mile stretch between Oxford Circus and Marble Arch, with the potential for further changes towards Tottenham Court Road.
Detailed proposals for traffic will be consulted on later this year.
A previous attempt by Sir Sadiq to pedestrianise that part of Oxford Street was blocked by then-Conservative run Westminster City Council in 2018.
His latest proposals depend on him obtaining permission from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in her role as Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government to establish a new Mayoral Development Corporation, which would provide planning powers.
The aim is for this to be created by the start of next year.
Sir Sadiq said: 'Oxford Street has suffered over many years, so urgent action is needed to give our nation's high street a new lease of life.
'It's clear that the vast majority of Londoners and major businesses back our exciting plans, so I'm pleased to confirm that we will now be moving ahead as quickly as possible.
'We want to rejuvenate Oxford Street; establish it as a global leader for shopping, leisure and outdoor events with a world-class, accessible, pedestrianised avenue.
'This will help to attract more international visitors and act as a magnet for new investment and job creation, driving growth and economic prosperity for decades to come.'
Ms Rayner said: 'We want to see Oxford Street become the thriving place to be for tourists and Londoners alike, and that's why we welcome the Mayor of London's bold proposals to achieve that.
'We will support the mayor in delivering this ambitious vision, which will help to breathe new life into Oxford Street – driving investment, creating new jobs for local people and providing a boost to economic growth in the capital.'
Adam Hug, leader of Labour-controlled Westminster City Council, said: 'While the mayor's formal decision today was not the City Council's preferred outcome, it is far from unexpected, and it is now important for Oxford Street's future to move forward together.
'Since the mayor's new approach was made public last autumn, Westminster has worked pragmatically and productively with the Greater London Authority (GLA) to ensure that the plan for Oxford Street more closely meets the needs of businesses, visitors, and residents.
'Since 2022, Oxford Street has roared back to life after the pandemic. Such is the level of retail confidence that existing brands have spent £118 million refitting their stores in the last 12 months alone, according to Savills.
'Westminster City Council will work constructively with the mayor's team to ensure the nation's high street is re-imagined in a way that works for visitors, shoppers, and our residents.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

30 minutes ago

• The Sun

Reform on course to win next election with over a third of voters backing Nigel Farage, bombshell new poll reveals

REFORM are on track to win the next election, according to a new poll. More than a third of voters said they will support Nigel Farage's party, as reported by the Telegraph. Figures revealed 34 per cent of poll takers voted for Reform, ahead of 25 per cent who were in favour of Labour. It also emerged only 15 per cent of users elected the Conservatives. This marks the biggest breakthrough for Reform in a poll and in response Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'This poll shows Reform can and will win the next general election.' The news outlet estimated if the poll was taken in four years time, Farage would win more than 400 seats and a majority. It could see the party leader win his place as the UK's next Prime Minister. The research also suggested Labour would lose around 270 seats, while the Conservatives would have less than 10. Despite the stats, it is important to bare in mind opinion polls and seat numbers are very hard to correlate. A Reform UK source said: 'This is big Reform majority territory.' Meanwhile, Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'The last year has indeed been a long time in politics, with our first voting intention poll since the election showing just how much the political landscape has transformed since then. 'Reform UK has continued to build on its success, helped by high levels of enthusiasm among its own support and among working class voters in particular, and taking votes from both Labour and especially the Conservatives, who show little sign of recovery.' He added: 'The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. "We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services, and so far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024. "This is reflected in satisfaction ratings for the government and Prime Minister that - while not quite the worst Ipsos has ever seen - are well below the average we usually see coming up to a one year anniversary. "Indeed, they look remarkably similar to the poor ratings received by Gordon Brown in 2008 after the financial crash. Labour will be hoping that the Spending Review will start to switch the narrative to a more positive one of renewal, but the challenge they face is significant. "This research also marks a new methodological approach for Ipsos, using our online KnowledgePanel based on gold-standard random probability sampling, and other changes we have made since the general election. "As with any individual survey it is important to remember that margins of error apply, and results should be interpreted in the round along with other sources of data. "As always, Ipsos will continue to review this new approach, and may make further refinements in the future if necessary." 1 is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.

Wales Online

an hour ago

• Wales Online

'I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there'

'I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there' Welsh MP Alex Davies-Jones has spoken out about being harassed and threatened in a bid to help others Pontypridd MP Alex Davies-Jones was the victim of harassment (Image: Alex Davies-Jones ) Just over two weeks ago, Alex Davies-Jones stepped into a courtroom at Cardiff Magistrates' court. An MP, and government minister, she is used to speaking in formal settings, but this was different, because she was asked to place her hand on a bible, give an oath, and then give evidence to a courtroom as a victim of harassment. Switching the Commons for a witness box was something the UK Government's victim minister didn't want to do, but after a number of incidents she had endured, she felt it was important to do, for herself, for colleagues, for others who one day might enter politics. ‌ She was out campaigning in Treforest in Rhondda Cynon Taf, on June 26, just a few days before the general election when she saw two people waiting at the place she was due to meet campaigners. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here ‌ Before that day - as with many of her colleagues - her office had been targeted with protests held outside, posters stuck to the walls but she also knew leaflets were being posted around the constituency about her. "They were quite insulting and just not very nice, for want of a better description, accusing me of genocide and accusing me of things that weren't true and it was hard to see that," the Labour MP said. After the October 7 attacks on Israel, protests stepped up, and ahead of votes in the UK Parliament there was co-ordinated action by campaign groups but she says that became "sustained" once the general election was called. Article continues below Before this, there has been online or email abuse, but this was the first in-person incident she had experienced, which felt more acute as it was in her constituency. "The vast majority of abuse or threats you have to are not necessarily from real people or they don't seem to be real people because they're online," she said. "The day it happened we had scheduled our campaigning sessions in advance and this was the last one of the day, and it had been published on the Labour Party website where we were going to be for Labour members to join. "I was with a group of about five or six members and more were joining. We met up at the meeting point and they were there, both of them, at the meeting point. They had put up posters on the lampposts surrounding where we were meeting at Hoffi Coffi in Treforest and were handing out the leaflets that I had seen previously about myself so I knew what it was. ‌ "I thought there's two things I can do here, I can either try and engage and try and be the grown up and speak to them about potentially de-escalating it and get them to chat to me about this because they tend to be very passionate, or I can just walk away and ignore them. "I made the decision to to go up to them and try and speak to them." Asked if she regretted that now, she said no. "No, I don't, because I still think that trying to engage with people is always better, especially in person. ‌ "I immediately realised that one of them was filming the interaction so I was obviously very careful of my actions and what I was saying and was aware that it was being filmed. I tried to engage in a conversation, I tried to explain to them that they were wrong, that I hadn't abstained on the ceasefire vote because I wasn't even in the country at that time. "I tried to articulate all of the action I had taken to support conflict free resolutions in the Middle East, the work I'd done to support Palestinian women who had allegedly been raped by IDF soldiers, the work I've been doing support Jewish women who'd been raped on October 7. I pointed them to debates that I've spoken in Parliament, and I was like talking about what I had been doing in terms of diplomatic work. "It was clear that they didn't agree with me, and it was clear that it wasn't going to be resolved. So I said, look, 'we'll stop it there'. ‌ "We walked away from where we were due to be campaigning, and then they started following us down the street. "The interaction was getting more inflammatory, more aggressive, more frustrated, I suppose from their point of view, because they weren't getting what they wanted out of me necessarily. So they started following us down the street. It was awful, it was scary. They were shouting, 'Do you support genocide' and 'You're responsible for murder'. All of this was being screamed down the street as we were walking down the street. They were continuing to hand out leaflets to people as they were passing and screaming this to us. "We tried to get away from them, so we took a different route," she said. ‌ Ayeshah Behit leaving Cardiff Magistrates Court after being convicted of harassing Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones (Image: PA ) As they began knocking on doors in a different area, the pair - Ayeshah Behit and Hiba Ahmed - found them. "Every door we were knocking, they were then knocking and speaking to the people about why I was a genocidal baby killer. "It was just awful and I felt responsibility to my team, to my volunteers. I had quite a number of young volunteers never done this before that have been campaigning, and I didn't want them to be exposed to risk." She cancelled the session. ‌ "I think if that had been it, I would have said 'it was awful, but it's sadly part and parcel of being an elected representative or standing for an election. People have the right to speak to you and disagree with you'," she said. But that night, she said her office was defaced with stickers, which were highly adhesive and ripped the paintwork off. They were also put on local bus stops, local landmarks, monuments saying she supported genocide and was a "murderer". The Pontypridd MP continues: "Then they posted footage of the interaction that we had in person on social media but they did it in a way that was manipulated. They didn't put our full conversation on but amplified it, made it look like I was lying and that hurt me more than anything because people can say I'm many things, you can disagree with me, but I am not a liar. That really, really got to me because then that was when the huge amount of abuse started, because they incited a pile on for people to contact me, and it was relentless." ‌ As a candidate, she felt she couldn't withdraw from social media. "I didn't sleep. It was constant. I could turn the notifications off, but they were still there. I was doing a general election campaign and social media at that moment is key in terms of engaging with local voters and it was it was a bombardment which became terrifying because the escalation of abuse was awful." She has a young family, who has she spoken about publicly, but she said what didn't come out during the court case was that the pair broke bail conditions by emailing her. "One of the emails that was sent to me did make reference to the fact that I have a child and that really scared me because the words were used were 'I know you have a son ' and the way it was conveyed and it was really scary," she said. Hiba Ahmed, 26, (centre), leaving Cardiff Magistrates Court after being convicted of harassing Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones (Image: PA ) ‌ "It's really hard because I have chosen to be open and honest about my personal life because I think my personal experiences of being a mother going through IVF, having pre-cervical cancer, going through all the difficulties I have done, some of my colleagues have chosen not to open themselves up and not appear more human because of the risk that the more you open yourself up, the more then you become a target to potential attacks," she said. For the year before her case reached court, she said it was "hanging over me". "You know it's coming. and you psyche yourself up for it. You prepare yourself to go through that process. "I think about it all the time and now, I think about how will my interactions in public with constituents or whoever, what will that be like now? And I do feel like sadly, politics has become a lot more inflamed in recent years. ‌ "That's why it's also really important to humanise this, because people think we're just these people on screen or doing things rather than actually real human beings and that's why it's important to humanise this but then that does make me feel conscious of activity when out and about." All MPs have enhanced security offered to them after the killing of Sir David Amess. "I would say it is a different level of threat being a female MP because my male colleagues aren't necessarily subject to the misogynistic abuse that we are, which is more sustained. Research shows we are more prone to abuse compared to male colleagues and I would stress BME MPs are even more open to abuse." The risk factors into her day-to-day decisions. "Every time you plan to do something in person then you have to think about the safety implications. I'm not just responsible for myself. I'm responsible for my team. I'm responsible to whoever else may be coming to an event. I'm responsible for my family if they with me at an event, so you have to be aware and I think that's only responsible to do that of what security implications might mean about advertising your attendance something in advance, or opening something up to everyone to attend, or going to something that could be deemed to be controversial. ‌ "There's two sides of this. I've had a lot of praise and thanks from colleagues for pursuing the case because they have said thank you for being brave, because it's important that people realise that this is unacceptable and this did cross that threshold of holding your Member of Parliament to account and harassment and that's what the judge found in the case. "But then there's also the other side of this that I don't want what has happened to me and the normalisation of abusive of elected politicians to put anyone off from doing this job either. I have that responsibility to the next group of MPs coming forward, male or female, because this is still the best job in the world and I don't want that to influence anybody's decision into 'Gosh, this is awful. Why would anyone do that?' However, she does believe her experience of being a victim and having giving evidence in court will shape her experiences. "Now I've got that lived experience of having gone through it all, waiting for the trial to get to court, having been through the witness liaison officer scheme, speaking to police, the different agencies, being treated as a witness in court, giving evidence while your perpetrators in the dock and how that is all played out. ‌ "I have that experience now, which has helped me in terms of looking at, 'well, how can I make this experience better for victims and survivors?'. UK Government victims' minister Alex Davies-Jones has spoken about her own experiences of appearing in court (Image: Alex Davies-Jones ) "Ultimately, I don't want to diminish my case in any way, harassment happens to to individuals every day and it is awful and it is terrible, but also there are a number of victims and survivors all waiting years for their trial." ‌ She said she wants victims to be at the heart of the system. "One of the things I'm responsible for is the victims code, we are looking at how we give more power to the victims commissioner, so that they're able to hold agencies to account in our Bills coming forward and all of this is now feeding that work and giving me that perspective I didn't have before." Ms Davies-Jones said it has shaped her wanting to make sure victims can "take part in the justice system and do so safely and make them feel like they're able to represent the best version of themselves, so that we have an opportunity for justice to be heard in a courtroom" "Is there more we can do to make sure that victims actually stay engaged in the in the criminal justice system? Because we know court backlogs are so long, and we know that it can be quite difficult and traumatising to actually revisit that crime or your perpetrator in court," she said. ‌ There was a protest outside the court on that day, and protestors came to fill the public gallery. The courtroom had to be moved three times to accommodate all interested parties. "I just wanted to tell the truth, and I wanted to explain how all of this had happened. What's happening in Gaza is horrific. It's intolerable. It's awful and likewise, what happened on October 7 and the hostages still being held is awful and for people to think that I am in support of genocide or of murdering children is is it just terrible. I wanted to put that over that of course, that isn't the case. "We can have a difference of opinion about how you approach things and politics and policies but there is a line and when that line is crossed, then the action should be taken." Article continues below

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Immigration is the biggest burden on NHS, say Labour voters

Labour voters now believe immigration is the biggest burden on the NHS. Britons who backed Sir Keir Starmer's party at the general election last year think high levels of immigration are having more of an effect on the health service than the ageing population. A poll of 2,000 Labour supporters by Merlin Strategy also found that one in five Labour voters would now consider casting their ballots for Reform UK. It comes as Nigel Farage's party continues to enjoy a comfortable opinion poll lead after promising to effectively freeze non-essential migration and put an end to illegal Channel crossings. Research carried out on May 24 asked people who voted Labour in 2024 which of five factors they believed was 'the biggest burden' on the NHS. Some 24 per cent said high levels of immigration, with 22 per cent saying the mental health crisis. Thirteen per cent said a lack of social care provisions, while 12 per cent blamed junk food and obesity. A further 10 per cent said the biggest burden was people vaping. The remaining 19 per cent did not pick an option or said they did not know. Sir Keir said in a major speech last month that record levels of net migration to Britain in recent years had placed a heavy strain on the country's public services. Maxwell Marlow, the director of public affairs at the Adam Smith Institute, which commissioned the poll, said: 'It is clear that the British people have felt the impact of mass immigration on healthcare. 'Unless the government moves quickly, urging immigrants to purchase private health care as a requirement for any visa other than tourism, then they will continue to hold the Government accountable for the very rapid deterioration in their access to healthcare.' Sir Keir has been criticised for a lack of vision during his first year in office, with only 51 per cent of Labour voters saying the Government was prioritising issues that mattered to them. More than one in four (28 per cent) now regretted voting Labour and more than one in five (22 per cent) were now considering whether to vote for Reform at the next election. Two in five respondents (40 per cent) said they approved of Mr Farage, while 41 per cent disapproved. Scarlett Maguire, the director of Merlin Strategy, said: 'Labour voters are clear that they want to see action on cost of living, healthcare, and immigration. 'The Government needs to show that it is in tune with these priorities and that it understands what matters to their core voters.' Merlin Strategy also conducted a focus group in Runcorn and Helsby, one of the safest Labour seats at the 2024 election, before the party lost the seat to Reform by six votes at last month's by-election. Respondents said Sir Keir's Government was 'afraid of upsetting people', while another member of the group said: 'I don't think they give a toss about us.' The group were also unconvinced by the timing of Sir Keir's plans to clamp down on tobacco and vapes, which have banned disposable vapes and will raise the smoking age by one year, every year. 'How is that really relatable to the working person?' one member asked, adding that it was 'just something shiny to put in the media'.