ArcelorMittal South Africa defers long steel plant closure with R1.7bn government support
An ArcelorMittal steel foundry. The company is receiving a R1.68 billion bailout from government to keep it operational, pending other industrial protection measures still to be implemented.
ArcelorMittal South Africa (Amsa) will defer the closure of its loss-making Long Steel plant to August 31 after getting a R1.68 billion injection from the state-owned Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), which will stave off the retrenchment of 3 500 workers and keep operations running for at least six months.
In a statement on Monday, the steelmaker said as part of the agreement, Amsa has committed to the continued operation of the Long Steel business and retention of jobs during the deferral period and had also received a Temporary Employee Relief Scheme (TERS) grant to assist in funding employee costs, which will reduce the drawdown required against the IDC facility.
"Based on engagements between the company and government, ArcelorMittal South Africa understands that a more market-related and less punitive Preferential Pricing System and export tax on scrap dispensation will be implemented soon, with safeguards imminent. These measures will help level the playing field in the steel industry to the benefit of the country," the company said.
The company had asked for lower electricity and freight rail tariffs, the imposition of import duties, and the removal of a scrap metal export tax it says gives its competitors - recycling mini-mills - an unfair advantage.
The closure of the long-steel operations, which produce fencing material, rail, rods, and bars used in the construction, mining, and manufacturing sectors, has been expected since November 2023.
Amsa CEO Kobus Venter said while this arrangement represents a positive development, he emphasised that sustainable profitability remains the ultimate objective.
"The next six months will be crucial in determining whether the Long Steel business can achieve the financial stability required for long-term viability. We are dedicated to this process and appreciate the support of all our partners in this endeavour," Venter said.
The National Employers Association of South Africa (Neasa) said it was opposed to the Amsa bailout by the IDC as the company was not sustainable, with old mills.
However, CEO Gerhard Papenfus said the continuing propping up of Amsa was at the expense of the downstream industry and taxpayers.
"Amsa has received several bailouts in recent months. None of this is good for the downstream industry; it will only drive prices higher. There will be a time when AMSA exists with government funding, but has no customers because the downstream industry is crumbling," he said.
Steel and Engineering Federation of Southern Africa (Seifsa) CEO, Lucio Trentini, said the move was welcome, though it was merely kicking the can down the road for a further six months.
"This is a bit of light at the end of the tunnel but there is still a long road ahead. We can only be optimistic that the temporary reprieve will lead to a lasting solution," Trentini said.
He said part of the gains were that some sectors, including auto manufacturing, had a six-month period to seek alternatives.
"We cannot afford to lose Amsa; it is important, but it has to be viable and competitive. We cannot have a primary steel producer disappear, but a more positive outcome will have to be found," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Post Office rescue plan slammed for lack of transparency and strategic detail
The Post Office turnaround strategy is being criticised for raising more questions than providing answers. The Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade expresses concern about the work of business rescue practitioners on the South African Post Office's (Sapo) turnaround strategy. This follows the practitioners' plan presentation in parliament on Wednesday, which outlined the progress being made. According to the practitioners, their long-term vision is to transform the Post Office into an e-commerce hub and multipurpose service centre. Concerns about further job losses and transparency Committee chairperson Sonja Boshoff said troubling realities remain. The biggest being the retrenchments of more than 4 000 employees, with no confirmation that there will not be any further job losses. 'Service delivery at the Post Office has significantly deteriorated, and the entity continues to survive on state bailouts. Public confidence has been completely eroded, and the long-term sustainability of Sapo remains in serious jeopardy,' Boshoff said in a statement on Thursday. She also raised concerns about the practitioners' request to present substantial portions of the turnaround strategy in a closed session. 'Sapo is a state-owned enterprise funded by public money. The use of in-camera briefings must remain the exception, not the rule. 'Such briefings should only be permitted in instances of legitimate commercial sensitivity – not as a tool to shield institutional failures from public scrutiny and parliamentary oversight,' Boshoff said. ALSO READ: Post Office rescue plan is working, but more money is needed Timelines and funding clarity The prevention strategy has been criticised for offering limited details regarding innovation and measurable outcomes. The committee notes that while the plan references digitisation, a revised branch footprint, and hybrid financing models, these aspects remain vague, lacking implementation timelines and funding clarity. It is troubling that no investor has yet shown serious interest in supporting the turnaround of the national postal service, Boshoff said. Unanswered questions She said the following key questions remained unanswered: How many of the retrenched employees have actually received support through the Temporary Employer-Employee Relief Scheme (Ters) fund? What efforts have been made to engage the private sector in restoring core service functions? On what basis is Sapo still classified as a 'strategic national asset' while continuing to rely on repeated state bailouts? How will the proposed hybrid funding model work in practice, and who will ultimately bear the financial risk? 'It is imperative that public institutions – particularly those under business rescue and funded by taxpayers – operate with transparency, accountability, and defined performance indicators, the committee chairperson said. ALSO READ: More millions to save jobs at SA Post Office 'A turnaround plan cannot rely on slogans or structural tinkering. It must restore credibility, modernise operations and rebuild trust with the South African public who depend on these services.' Clarity, accountability and transparency Boshoff also emphasised that as the committee continues its oversight work, it will insist on greater clarity, stronger accountability and full transparency from all parties involved in the business rescue process. 'The relevance of the Post Office in the broader communications and logistics sector is fast diminishing. 'This can only be reversed through genuine diversification of its service offering and complete modernisation of its operations,' she said. Retrenchments and saved jobs A total of 4 875 employees were retrenched in 2024 after Post Office entered business rescue, with a R8.7 billion debt. In May, it was announced that Sapo and the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) agreed on a deal to fund salaries of the remaining employees while the government works to restore the postal service's fortunes. The agreement saw the return of Ters, used during the 2020 global health pandemic. Ters will inject R381 million into the post office over six months to assist 5 956 employees. NOW READ: The plan to fix the SA Post Office
The South African
3 days ago
- The South African
Return of Formula One to South Africa moves a BIG step closer
The Kyalami Grand Prix Circuit has moved closer to rejoining the Formula One calendar after motorsport's global governing body, the FIA, approved final design proposals to upgrade the venue to Grade 1 status – a critical requirement for hosting Formula One events. At a media briefing on Wednesday, circuit owner Toby Venter and Apex Circuit Design founder Clive Bowen announced the milestone, marking the culmination of a five-year development process. When South Africans connect, we don't just network; we build a community. The Lekker Network is a professional network where every conversation starts with, 'How can I help you?' Come join us & be a part of a community of extraordinary Saffas. Apex, the UK-based firm behind the Miami Grand Prix layout, is overseeing the upgrade plans. 'This is a defining moment for South African motorsport,' said Venter. 'When we acquired Kyalami in 2014, we committed to restoring it as a world-class venue. The FIA's acceptance of our Grade 1 design is a major step forward.' Sports minister Gayton McKenzie was quick to highlight the news on X, posting: 'A massive step towards bringing @F1 to South Africa'. Kyalami last hosted a Formula One Grand Prix in 1993, won by Alain Prost in a Williams FW15C. If the planned upgrades are completed and a final inspection is passed, the circuit would become the only FIA Grade 1 venue on the African continent. The approved plans maintain Kyalami's current layout, but include crucial safety and infrastructure enhancements, such as expanded run-off areas, improved barrier systems, and upgraded kerbing and drainage. 'It's a light-touch upgrade in engineering terms,' Bowen explained, 'but one that aligns the circuit with modern F1 standards.' The FIA has granted Kyalami a three-year window to complete the work, which will be phased to avoid disrupting the circuit's existing schedule. Full implementation will depend on whether South Africa secures a place on the Formula One calendar and if Kyalami is selected as the host venue. 'Today, we turn the page to a bold new chapter for Kyalami,' said Venter. 'We are ready for the return of Formula One to African soil.' However, Kyalami still faces competition to be South Africa's preferred destination for a grand prix. The Cape Town Grand Prix SA (CTGPSA) recently announced plans to submit a bid to South Africa's Bid Steering Committee (BSC) to return Formula One to the country. Gayton McKenzie has repeatedly called for the return of F1 to the country and created the BSC to oversee the bid process. CTGPSA proposed a Formula One street race in the Cape Town Green Point Sport Tourism Precinct, with a 5.7km circuit around the Cape Town Stadium, built to host the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Cape Town hosted a Formula E, which exclusively features electric sports cars, in 2023, which was estimated to generate over R1 billion in economic impact, despite its relatively minor fanbase compared to Formula One. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
Standard Bank's ‘disproportionate' attempt to foreclose on Vavi's home fails
Bank was also claiming more than R160 000 in legal costs from Vavi and his wife – twice the value of their current repayment arrears. Saftu General Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi and his wife can stay put, for now. Picture: Neil McCartney / The Citizen Standard Bank has failed in its attempt to obtain authorisation for the foreclosure of a mortgage bond it granted over the Sandton primary residence of South African Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu) General Secretary Zwelinzima Vavi and his wife Noluthando. The judgment highlighted the high legal costs that result from mortgage bond arrears and foreclosure, with the bank claiming more than R160 000 in legal costs from the couple – twice the value of their current mortgage bond repayment arrears. Judge Stuart Wilson said Standard Bank had placed nothing before him explaining why execution against the Vavis' home is a proportionate means of recovering the arrears. He postponed the application brought by the bank indefinitely on Tuesday and ordered that each party should pay its own costs. Wilson said a court asked to authorise foreclosure against a debtor's primary residence must be satisfied that to do so would be proportionate. Read more The Art Lab: A space for collaboration, experimentation, and creativity at Nelson Mandela Square He added that foreclosure is generally proportionate when there is little meaningful prospect of the debt secured against the residence being recovered in some other way – and when the interest of the creditor in obtaining payment outweighs the interest of the debtor in retaining ownership of the home. Standard Bank was seeking a money judgment and leave to execute it against the primary residence of the couple, whose indebtedness arose from a mortgage bond passed over the property. ALSO READ: Court rules in favour of clients in Standard Bank home loan dispute Steps taken to reduce arrears – judge Wilson said the fact that the property is, on the face of it, an expensive dwelling in a well-heeled suburb makes no difference to the fundamental inquiry – but cases in which it would be disproportionate to authorise execution of a proven mortgage debt against such a property are likely to be rare. However, he said: 'This is such a case. The Vavis owe around R1.68 million on their bond, and are in arrears to the tune of just over R85 000 – or around four months' worth of instalments. 'The arrears were accumulated around three years ago, and since then the Vavis appear to have serviced their bond punctiliously while taking steps to reduce their arrears from just under R170 000 when the application was instituted to around R85 000 today. 'The latest home loan statement filed shows around 18 months of apparently perfect adherence to the Vavis' obligations to pay their monthly instalments.' ALSO READ: Class action suit shows banks sell repossessed houses for cents in the rand Legal costs and arrears 'separate issues' Wilson added that Standard Bank claims over R160 000 in legal costs against the Vavis – and it is apparent from the affidavits that the bank has tied the resolution of this dispute to the settlement of those costs. 'It is at least possible that the Vavis have balked at paying legal costs of twice the value of their current arrears. 'It seems to me that the Vavis would be entitled to rehabilitate the loan agreement by paying their arrears and then debating the reasonableness of those costs with Standard Bank as a separate issue, but I cannot say why the arrears have not been settled. 'Nevertheless, in the absence of more information, I cannot presently conclude that foreclosure against the Vavis' home is a proportionate means of liquidating their arrears.' Although the judge postponed the application sine die (indefinitely), Wilson said the bank may renew the application if and when it presents evidence that foreclosure would be proportionate. ALSO READ: What to do if you start falling behind on your home loan Financial woes The Vavis have been in the news for other alleged arrears related to their Sandton home. City Press reported in February 2024 that Vavi and his wife had been taken to court by the City of Johannesburg (CoJ) Metropolitan Municipality for allegedly failing to pay more than R400 000 in outstanding levies for their home. It said the CoJ was seeking an order from the High Court in Johannesburg that would compel the couple to pay an amount stipulated as R433 493 after they had applied to the municipality for provision. The article said it had previously reported on their financial woes, which it claimed began in 2022 when Standard Bank applied for a writ of execution on the same house after accusing them of non-payment. It subsequently reported that Noluthando Vavi said they only became aware of the court papers when inquiries were made by City Press about their home, which they bought for R2 million in 2008. It is unclear what happened to the CoJ's arrears high court application. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
