The Guardian view on Israel's aid blockade of Gaza: hunger as a weapon of war
S hameful. That was the word that Gideon Sa'ar, Israel's foreign minister, used to describe proceedings at the international court of justice (ICJ) last Monday. The United Nations asked the court to determine whether Israel must allow aid to enter Gaza, two months after it cut it off again just before the ceasefire deal collapsed. Supplies are running out. Unicef says that thousands of children have already experienced acute malnutrition.
Mr Sa'ar's complaint is that Israel is unfairly targeted. The separate international criminal court case against Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, and Yoav Gallant, the former defence minister, also focuses on the alleged starvation of civilians. It is true that withholding food is a common weapon in war, yet has rarely been the focus of international legal cases, in part because intent is hard to prove. It is the rhetoric of Israeli officials, suggests Dr Boyd van Dijk, an expert on the Geneva conventions, which has changed that.
Last summer, Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right finance minister, remarked that it might be 'justified and moral' to starve people if it brought home Israeli hostages seized in the Hamas atrocities of 7 October 2023, but that 'no one in the world will allow us'. Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, said last month that its 'policy is clear: no humanitarian aid will enter Gaza'. The far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, insisted that 'there is no reason for a single gram of food or any aid to enter' until hostages were freed. An aid ship destined for Gaza was attacked by drones and disabled on Friday. More than 52,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Gaza since the war began, according to its health authorities. Unicef says they include 15,000 children, with hundreds of deaths since the new Israeli offensive began in March. But withholding food kills just as bombs do. Farmland is devastated. Flour is said to cost 30 times more than before the war. Aid warehouses are empty. UN World Food Programme bakeries closed a month ago when supplies ran out; essential community kitchens are now following.
Israeli officials have said they need to stop Hamas getting their hands on aid. It's obvious that men with guns will secure food long after others have starved. Donald Trump says that he has told Mr Netanyahu to allow aid in. Yet the US told the ICJ that Israel's security needs override its obligation to do so. The strong legal consensus is that occupying powers have an absolute duty under the Geneva conventions to permit food to be given to a population in need.
Israel is reportedly planning to resume aid delivery 'in the coming weeks', but via a radically new mechanism. It claims the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, essential to humanitarian efforts, has been mass-infiltrated by Hamas – an allegation strongly disputed by the UN and others. The proposed alternative, of international organisations and private security contractors handing out food to individual families, looks both unworkable and dangerous for civilians.
As Israel and the US attack international courts, other nations – including the UK – must do all they can to defend and bolster them. They must also press harder for the immediate resumption of aid. What is shameful about this ICJ case is the need to bring it. What is shameful is that almost half the children in Gaza questioned in a study said that they wished to die. What is shameful is that so many civilians have been killed, and so many more pushed to the brink of starvation. What is shameful is that this has, indeed, been allowed to happen.
Read More Credit hire boom powers firm's 62% profit surge
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
12 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Defence Stocks Surge: Avantel up 2.74%, Paras Defence up 2.64%, Premier Explosives jumps 2.35%
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 23, 2025, 09:30 IST Indian defence stocks rallied on June 23 morning after the United States formally entered the conflict against Iran by joining Israel in airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The move comes amid heightened fears of a broader Middle East conflict, with Iran vowing retaliation and threats of closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Shares of Avantel surged 2.74% to ₹159.17, Paras Defence & Space Technologies rose 2.64% to ₹1,697.90, while Premier Explosives climbed 2.35% to ₹606.75 on the NSE. Other gainers included Data Patterns (up 1.63%), Bharat Electronics (up 1.71%), and C2C Advanced Systems (up 2%). The uptick follows US President Donald Trump's confirmation that US forces, in coordination with Israeli operations, had 'completely and fully obliterated' key Iranian nuclear sites in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Trump warned Tehran of further consequences should Iran retaliate. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei's aide has urged a counter-attack on US forces and demanded closure of the Strait of Hormuz to Western powers. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran confirmed the strikes but stated their nuclear operations will continue. Market analysts believe the situation could lead to increased defence spending and demand for Indian defence exports amid global supply uncertainty. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
As allies call for diplomacy, Trump posts about regime change in Iran
Iran's appetite and capacity for a counterstrike are unknown. Especially now that its proxy forces, including Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah in Lebanon, have been hobbled, its leaders do not want to show weakness. Yet Israeli airstrikes in the past week have destroyed at least half of Iran's missile launchers and an unknown number of missiles. The lack of Iranian air defenses was evident Saturday night, as American bombers flew a 37-hour round-trip mission from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. The attack, which required a squadron of the world's most advanced bombers, multiple midair refueling missions and more than a dozen massive 'bunker-buster' bombs, met no resistance from Iranian fighter jets or surface-to-air missiles. Advertisement The damage did not prevent Iran from launching a barrage of missiles at Israel on Sunday. The missiles wrecked buildings but caused few fatalities, Israeli authorities said. Also on Sunday, Israeli air force jets carried out a 'wide' operation against sites related to Iran's ballistic missile apparatus, Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, the Israeli military's chief spokesperson, said in a televised statement. The attack included military facilities in Yazd, a central province in Iran, where seven members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and two conscript soldiers were killed, according to a statement published by the state-affiliated Tasnim News Agency. Advertisement Also unknown is the extent to which the Iranian nuclear operations were damaged by the American bombing. President Donald Trump immediately claimed success, adding that three nuclear facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Other leaders in the Trump administration, and in U.S. and Israeli military intelligence, described the destruction in more measured terms. In an interview on 'Meet the Press' on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance said: 'We destroyed the Iranian nuclear program.' Then he appeared to hedge, stating that the program had been 'substantially delayed.' An initial analysis by the Israeli military found the heavily fortified nuclear site at Fordo has sustained serious damage, but was not destroyed, according to two Israeli officials with knowledge of the matter. Even so, U.S. officials were counting on damage from the attack to compel Iran to agree to give up its nuclear enrichment program. Iran's leaders have claimed the program was meant only for civilian purposes, but U.S. intelligence agencies agreed the country had enough highly enriched uranium that it could soon make nuclear bombs. Iran has said it will never give up its right to enrichment. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking Sunday on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' said that 'it doesn't matter if the order was given' by Iran's leaders to develop a weapon, since the enrichment levels that Iran already had attained were far beyond anything needed for civilian use. Advertisement 'America has been truly unsurpassed,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said in a prerecorded statement. 'It has done what no other country on Earth could do.' His comments acknowledged that Israel does not possess a bomb capable of destroying deep underground military installations like Iran's enrichment site at Fordo, nor does it have aircraft capable of carrying such heavy bombs. Saturday's attack was momentous both militarily and politically. It was the first overt operation by the U.S. military on Iranian soil in decades, ordered by a president who campaigned on avoiding foreign entanglements. Trump has largely stood by that campaign promise, and when he did not, Iran retaliated with force. During his first term, Trump authorized a drone strike that killed a powerful Iranian general in Baghdad. Iran retaliated with a barrage of missiles fired at U.S. troops in Iraq, leaving some 110 troops with traumatic brain injuries and unintentionally hitting a Ukrainian passenger jet, killing all 176 people aboard. Political response to Saturday's attack fell largely along partisan lines. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said Trump's 'unilateral decision' to strike Iran without approval from Congress 'was not constitutional.' Trump also faced criticism from some Republicans, including Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who introduced a bipartisan resolution last week that would have required the Trump administration to seek congressional approval before attacking Iran. Iran posed 'no imminent threat to the United States,' Massie said on CBS' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday, and he warned that Republican voters were 'tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Advertisement Other Republicans defended the action. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, noted that the goal is limited to stopping Iran's nuclear program, which he said posed a threat to the United States and its allies. 'We're not going to invade Iran,' he said on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday. 'We're not going to try to topple their government or try to replace it with a new government.' Trump cast doubt on those reassurances later Sunday when he wrote in a post on Truth Social, 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' The United Nations Security Council met Sunday to discuss the widening conflict in the Middle East. Antonio Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, said he worried that 'we now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation.' Leaders from Russia and Iran, which are allies, described the U.S. bombardment as reckless. Vasily Alekseyevich Nebenzya, Russia's representative to the U.N., warned that the U.S. had opened 'Pandora's box,' and called the attack 'irresponsible, dangerous and provocative.' Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the Security Council that craters consistent with America's statements about the attack could be seen at Iran's Fordo nuclear site, but that the extent of underground damage at Fordo was unknown. Grossi said the agency had consistently warned that 'armed attacks on nuclear facilities should never take place,' since they could cause dangerous radioactive releases. The interim U.S. representative to the U.N., Dorothy Camille Shea, told the Security Council that 'the time finally came' for the U.S. to 'act decisively' after Iran stonewalled recent negotiations over its nuclear program. Advertisement The attacks left all sides wondering what happens next. On Saturday, before the attacks, the Houthi militia of Yemen had threatened to break the truce they had reached with Trump in May and attack U.S. targets if Washington attacked Iran. 'In the event that the Americans become involved in the attack and aggression against Iran alongside the Israeli enemy, the armed forces will target their ships and warships in the Red Sea,' the Houthis' military spokesperson, Yahya Saree, said Saturday. After the attacks, Trump posted a threatening all-caps message on Truth Social on Saturday night: 'ANY RETALIATION BY IRAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT.' The government of Bahrain, an island nation in the Persian Gulf and host to a U.S. naval base that could be the target of Iranian retaliation, warned residents to use main roads 'only when necessary' Sunday. Other countries in the Middle East responded with muted criticism of the attacks, stopping short of overtly condemning the United States. Qatar's Foreign Ministry said it regretted 'the deterioration of the situation with the strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities,' and expressed hope that all parties would 'exercise wisdom' and restraint, in a statement that did not mention the United States at all. Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates also expressed concern about the bombings, but avoided mentioning the United States. The bombing of the three nuclear sites deep inside Iran gave the world a stunning display of U.S. military might. B-2 stealth bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base just after midnight Saturday. One or more of the planes flew west over the Pacific, acting as a decoy to distract from the seven bombers flying east toward Iran. The heavy bombers refueled multiple times over the Atlantic Ocean, then linked up with American fighter planes as they entered Middle Eastern airspace at around 5 p.m. Eastern time. Advertisement At about the same time, a U.S. Navy submarine in the region launched more than a dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at a nuclear site in Isfahan. The B-2 bombers reached their targets, the nuclear sites at Fordo and Natanz, around 6:40 p.m. About 75 precision-guided munitions were used, including more than a dozen GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, which are designed to hit deeply buried targets. It was the first time such bombs had been used in combat. The bombers left Iranian airspace at 7:30 p.m. Twenty minutes later, Trump announced the attack on social media. Araghchi said Sunday that he would travel to Moscow and meet with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement Sunday condemning the U.S. military intervention, which it said undermined global efforts to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons. But there were indications that the Kremlin may tread lightly, analysts said. Russian officials had not confirmed by Sunday whether any meeting between Araghchi and the Russian president would actually take place. Putin may wish to avoid antagonizing Trump for fear of drawing the American president closer to the Ukrainian side at a time when Russia is pressing its military advantage in peace talks to end its war in Ukraine. This article originally appeared in
CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
Oil hits five-month high after U.S. attacks key Iranian nuclear sites
Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January as the United States' weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply worries. Brent crude futures was up $1.92 or 2.49% at $78.93 a barrel as of 0117 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.89 or 2.56% to $75.73. Both contracts jumped by more than 3% earlier in the session to $81.40 and $78.40, respectively, touching five-month highs before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament had approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move. "The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied," said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volume that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months. The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, adding global incentives to try to prevent a sustained and very large disruption. Brent has risen 13% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10%. The current geopolitical risk premium is unlikely to last without tangible supply disruption, analysts said. Meanwhile, the unwinding of some long positions accumulated following a recent price rally could cap an upside to oil prices, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, wrote in a market commentary on Sunday.
