7 Apple TV 4K settings to change now for the best results
The Apple TV 4K is one of the best streaming devices, and it just got a big update at WWDC that will take tvOS to new heights.
As much as we like it, however, it's still not a perfect system right out of the box. There are a few settings you might want to consider changing for optimal performance.
Luckily, Apple has made it pretty easy to sift through the settings on this device, with many of the options we need right in the Video and Audio section. Here's which ones you need to change, and which ones you can leave alone.
Let's start with the most obvious setting: Video Format. This might surprise you, but I usually recommend setting this to 4K SDR.
Once this is set properly, you don't have to see that annoying black flash when content switches from SDR to HDR formats. It's pretty prevalent on YouTube and other platforms, and it might make you think there's a problem with the device.
Thus, it's best to keep the main video format to 4K SDR (or 1080p SDR if you aren't using a 4K TV). This won't diminish quality by any means. In fact, it could make menus and other content that's being force-converted into HDR look a little better.
Chroma subsampling refers to the way color is transmitted via compressed video data, and in the case of the Apple TV 4K, you have a couple options to choose from depending on the TV that you're using.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Chroma 4:4:4 is the way to go if your TV supports it and if you're using an applicable HDMI cable. Switching to 4:4:4 essentially gives you access to the full color array and will make menus a bit more vibrant. You'd be hard-pressed to see any noticeable changes in general content, though.
You also might have to change your HDR settings first before you can get the full benefits of any chroma tweaks (and this setting will revert back to 4:2:0 if you adjust video output at all).
Unfortunately, my TV only supports Chroma 4:2:2, but it's better than 4:2:0 — even if the latter is largely favored for its increased reliability. If you do run into any signal failures, like flickering or black screens, you can always switch back to 4:2:0, which I'd recommend if you're using an overly long HDMI cable or one of the best projectors.
The HDMI setting on the Apple TV 4K controls the color space in digital video content, which goes hand-in-hand with chroma and brightness. There's really no need to change this setting unless it's not already set to YCbCr.
You will have three total options to choose from, including RGB High, RGB Low, and the aforementioned YCbCr. The latter is your best bet to obtain the best possible performance on the Apple TV 4K, whereas RGB might be better if you were running a different type of device.
You could also consider RGB High or Low if you were using one of the best monitors with your Apple TV 4K, but I'm not sure there's a huge audience for that.
There are also some TVs that might look slightly better with RGB enabled, but for our purposes we're going to stick with YCbCr.
Right below the chroma setting you'll find the "Match Content" setting, which will allow the Apple TV 4K to automatically switch from SDR to HDR and from 24Hz to 30Hz depending on what's playing on the screen. Thus, you'll want to enable both Range and Frame Rate.
Once enabled, you don't have to worry if your device is setup correctly for when a Dolby Vision movie is playing at 24Hz. The Apple TV 4K will simply set itself to the right settings to get that crisp cinematic feel without any extra fiddling on your part.
"Range" in this case not only refers to HDR, but also other factors like motion clarity. It largely depends on the content you're watching, but it's highly recommended to change this right out of the box.
At the bottom of the Video and Audio section, you'll find all the audio settings we need to change. From here, you can set it so that your audio output will play from other connected speakers if you'd like, or just rely on the TV speakers if you'd prefer that.
You can also check to see if your TV has any surround sound functionality built into it under the Audio Format section. Given that the Samsung S90D OLED TV I'm using has Dolby Atmos support, it's listed among available formats, but most users should just leave it set to Auto.
There are also a few other notable settings here that you could tweak, like Enhance Dialogue and Reduce Loud Sounds. As their names suggest, they amplify and diminish certain audio cues to make audio sound slightly better. I'd recommend Enhance Dialogue above all else, but this comes down to user preference.
Lastly, I recommend turning off Navigation Clicks. It doesn't offer too much aside from noisy feedback when you move about the menus.
One extra setting I would change is the clickpad functionality. This is another preference thing, so don't feel it's an obligation. Still, this can get pretty annoying — most especially if you have Navigation Clicks enabled in the Audio tab. Better to just keep it to Clicks Only as it just makes navigation so much more fluid.
While you're here, you can also change the TV Button to the Home Screen if you'd prefer that over jumping into Apple TV Plus. It would be cool if Apple let you set this to any application, but makes sense it's just Home or Apple TV Plus in this case.
Also scroll to the bottom and turn on the CEC functionality, which is titled as just "Control TVs and Receivers." This allows you to use a single remote instead of two so you're not stuck rummaging for multiple remotes when it's time for a movie or show.
Last but not least, there are a few settings in the General section that you may want to consider changing. A big one is the appearance. I immediately changed this to Dark Mode, which I find to be easier on my eyes, but you might prefer it in the Light setting.
You can also adjust how long it takes before the Apple TV goes into sleep mode. It's set to 15 minutes on default, but this can be as short as 5 minutes or as long as 4 hours. You could set it to "Never" so the Apple TV never goes to sleep, but your energy bill might not be too happy.
In General, you'll also find some notable Privacy settings: Although the Apple TV 4K is still the best streaming box when it comes to privacy, a couple settings are important here, like Share Apple TV analytics, Improve Siri & Dictation, and Location services. You could turn these off you'd prefer, but they do help Apple improve its products.
Make sure you enable "Allow Apple to Ask to Track" in the "Track" setting. This ensures apps must ask you to track data after they're installed, making it harder for certain brands to use your data against you.
You can go down the list and see which apps are using data from various features, like Bluetooth, Photos, Microphone, and Camera. It's a good habit to keep an eye on this, especially if you have kids who might not be so inclined to read want they're opting into at any given moment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
Top 10 Sites to Buy YouTube Views in 2025
Growing a YouTube channel today isn't as easy as it used to be. With millions of videos uploaded daily, standing out can feel impossible. That's where buying YouTube views comes into play. It's a fast way to boost your video's exposure, build trust, and help the algorithm notice your content. If you're planning to buy YouTube views, you need to be smart and choose the right service. In 2025, there are more providers than ever—but not all of them are trustworthy. We've done the research and created a list of the top 10 sites to buy YouTube views in 2025. Whether you're a new creator or a brand looking for a push, these platforms offer safe and reliable options. leads the pack in 2025. This site is known for delivering real views from genuine users. It's not just about numbers; they focus on high-retention views, meaning people watch your videos longer. Their customer support is quick, prices are fair, and delivery is smooth. Whether you're a beginner or an influencer, this site is the safest and most effective choice. ✅ Real, high-retention views✅ 24/7 customer service✅ Safe and private ✅ Fast delivery StormViews is trusted by many YouTubers for its clean, simple layout and affordable packages. It provides instant delivery and offers views from active accounts. It's a solid pick if you want quick results without risking your channel. ✅ Instant delivery✅ Clean user dashboard ✅ 100% money-back guarantee Media Mister has been around for years and offers more than just YouTube views. You can also buy likes, comments, and subscribers. Their wide range of options makes them perfect for anyone who wants a complete YouTube growth plan. ✅ One-stop shop for social media✅ Custom packages available ✅ Safe and gradual delivery SidesMedia is great for creators who want organic-looking results. Their service provides views that seem natural and gradual, which helps you stay under YouTube's radar. They also offer plans tailored for long-term growth. ✅ Realistic delivery speeds✅ Good for long-term growth ✅ Supports other platforms too If you're looking for cheap but reliable views, SocialPackages might be your go-to. They cater to creators on a budget but still deliver decent results. You won't get advanced options here, but the basic service is solid. ✅ Budget-friendly✅ Simple process ✅ Helpful support Famoid is known for speed. If you want views delivered within hours, this is the site to try. Their dashboard is easy to use, and they accept multiple payment methods, including PayPal and crypto. ✅ Ultra-fast delivery✅ User-friendly site ✅ Safe payment options YTMonster is a bit different. It runs on a credit-based system, where users earn points by watching other videos. You can also buy credits if you don't want to wait. It's more of a YouTube exchange system, so it's great if you want to stay fully organic. ✅ Community-based system✅ Organic growth ✅ Free and paid options Viewsta has gained attention in 2025 for its transparent reports and analytics. They show you exactly how your views are performing. If you love data, you'll enjoy this one. They also offer a dashboard to track engagement. ✅ Advanced analytics✅ Transparent delivery reports ✅ Great for agencies and brands QQTube is one of the oldest in the business. While their interface feels a bit outdated, their services still deliver. They've updated their technology in 2025 to ensure better retention and user quality. ✅ Long-time trusted provider✅ Updated features ✅ Good for bulk orders UseViral rounds out our list with a strong reputation for cross-platform promotion. Their YouTube view packages often include the option to promote on Twitter, TikTok, or Instagram too. It's great if you want to go viral beyond just one platform. ✅ Multi-platform promotion✅ Professional support ✅ Trusted by influencers Choosing the right site to buy YouTube views can make a big difference in how your channel grows in 2025. While there are risks to using low-quality services, the platforms listed above are known for delivering value, safety, and real results for your business growth. Always aim for providers that offer transparency, privacy, and strong customer support. If you're serious about growing your channel this year, take your time and pick a provider that fits your goals, not just your budget. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I ditched my AirTag for this smarter key tracker — and I love it
Everyone I know raves about how helpful it is for them to attach an AirTag on their keychain to keep track of their keys, but my issue is that AirTags are quite obvious — which gives potential thieves a quick opportunity of removing them. That's why I ditched mine in favor of this smart key tracker that doubles as a handy key organizer. The KeySmart iPro is a smart key organizer that neatly organizes my keys together, while also acting as a lifesaving tool in the event it goes missing thanks to its Find My support. Essentially, it's an AirTag disguised as a key organizer and I love it. For less than the cost of two AirTags, I think the KeySmart iPro still has value. I'd go far to say it's one of the best key finders around. Here's why. Keep your keys organized and in one place with the KeySmart iPro, which also supports Apple's Find My function to keep track of its location in the event it's lost or missing. There's also a built-in flashlight when you need check: $49 @ KeySmart I have so much stuff on my keychain that it's gotten so out of control in the last year, so I needed a change — but still want the peace of mind that an AirTag offers. I got all of that and more when I finally switched to the KeySmart iPro because of how it better organizes my keys. In fact, it can support up to 14 keys thanks in part to its design that lets me quickly expand it. While I don't have that many keys on me, I did manage to get the six main keys I need for my home. Much like a Swiss Army Knife, all the keys fold inside of it — but it typically accommodates standard keys that are uniformly flat. Meaning, I can't install my car key because of how the fob has a thicker base for its controls. Despite this, I managed to get all my other keys to fit inside of the KeySmart iPro after carefully figuring out how to best place them inside. What I really love most about it is how it supports Apple's Find My function, which practically gives it the same tracking abilities of the AirTag — but in a discreet design. Through the Find My app, I can see its location on a map and even play a sound to help me track it down easier around my home if I forgot where I put it last. On top of that, I really appreciate the notification I get every time it senses that I've left it behind. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unlike other smart key finders, like those from Tile or Nomad's Tracking Card, it doesn't rely on a battery I need to replace — nor does it require a proprietary charging cable. Instead, the KeySmart iPro features a USB-C port covered by a plastic flap that's much more convenient in my opinion. Not only is it rated for up to 30 days of battery life, but the simple fact it's a USB-C port makes it more ideal because I can charge it just about anywhere. There's also a built-in flashlight, which isn't as powerful as my phone's flashlight, but nonetheless helpful when I can't find anything else around. Now that I've been using this, I don't plan on going back to a regular keychain with an AirTag attached to it. For its $49 cost, I think it justifies its value over other smart key finders, especially when it actually organizes my keys. And yes, it comes with a bottle opener as well so now I don't have to ask a waiter for one at a BYOB restaurant.
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
I tested 10 flagship phones. This one has the best battery
When it comes to selecting the best phones, three key areas are most important. The display and the best smartphone camera are integral parts of the experience on most phones — especially with the display on the best folding phones — but battery life is important to every smartphone user. Between different types of battery technology and a lot of variety in capacity and charging speeds, there's a lot to take into consideration when evaluating the best smartphone battery life, especially as usage patterns vary so wildly as well. Recommended Videos Yet, the question remains unanswered: which phone has the best battery life and charging? Since the iPhone launch last year, I've been testing the best phones as they've come into my possession. I've tested over 50 phones — folding and non-folding — over the past year, and here's what I've found. Understanding battery technology Before we dig into the testing, a quick primer on battery technology. For almost three decades, the smartphone industry has been using lithium-ion batteries to power phones and other electronic devices that require a battery. The next generation of smartphone batteries uses Silicon Carbon technology, which offers higher energy density, faster charging capabilities, and potentially a longer lifespan. This means you can fit a bigger battery in the same-sized phone or a bigger battery in a thinner device, making it ideal for the best thin phones. The first smartphone with a Silicon Carbon battery was the Honor Magic V5 Pro, which was introduced two years ago. Since then, we've seen many other Asian phone makers launch phones that utilize this battery technology. Samsung, Apple, and Google have yet to follow suit, but OnePlus launched the OnePlus 13 in January, making it the first smartphone in the US to utilize this architecture. Curating the best phones for testing There are so many phones released each year, both inside and outside the US, that testing every single device wouldn't be feasible, at least not for this mid-year test. However, the data I collected over the past year, combined with my own subjective experiences with each device, means it's possible to calculate which phones to include in these tests. To simplify the testing and results, I've split the shortlist into two categories: candybar phones and the best folding phones: Here's a quick overview of the key battery specs for the shortlist: Battery Size (mAh) Battery Type Charging Speed (W) Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 45W Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh SIlicon Carbon 68W Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh Lithium-Ion 21W Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W How I tested these phones I have been reviewing phones for almost twenty years, and have been objectively testing phones since 2015. To reduce the number of variables, I ensured that these tests were run after a factory reset, with a specific test account installed on the phone. This helped limit any potential data corruption caused by a particular app or background data usage. Each phone underwent the same testing. Each test was conducted with the display set to 200 nits of brightness to minimize variations caused by auto-brightness or different display brightness controllers. For the folding phones, the tests were conducted on the cover display. To test the phones, I charged each to 100% and then ran various tests. The first involved browsing a looping set of websites and social feeds, while the second ran the same test, but with a looped video. The gaming test involved playing Genshin Impact for 60 minutes and extrapolating battery usage from there. The best battery life for web browsing and social media Let's first take a look at the results of the browsing and social media test for each of the five non-folding phones: Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 15:48 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 15:42 h 9 3rd OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 15:02 h 8 4th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 11:58 h 7 5th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 11:25 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 11:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 10:57 h 4 8th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 8:59 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 8:58 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 7:59 h 1 The biggest surprise through all of this testing is just how capable the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra battery proves to be. In this test, it outranks the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which lasted considerably longer than any other phone since the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Both of these devices outperform your expectations based on their capacity, whereas the opposite is true of the Galaxy S25 Ultra, which should be better. The best battery life for video playback Of course, web browsing and social media playback is only one test, albeit the most varied one I tried. A more strenuous test is video playback, especially as it engages the graphics card more strenuously than the simpler first test. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 23:21 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 23:04 h 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 19:22 h 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 18:42 h 7 5th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 16:58 h 6 6th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 15:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 14:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 14:31 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 14:21 h 2 10th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 14:02 h 1 The OnePlus 13 unsurprisingly outperforms the competition here, as the larger capacity and software optimizations work their magic. The iPhone 16 Pro Max meets expectations here as Apple's software and hardware integration proves to be magical for endurance. It'll be interesting to see how the new background tasks feature in iOS 26 affects this. I'm very impressed by the Galaxy S25 Edge here, as it has the smallest battery in this list — unsurprising as it's the thinnest non-folding phone — but it ranks 5th in one of the more strenuous tests. If you watch a lot of movies, this phone will likely handle what you throw at it. The best battery life for gaming The first two tests have become progressively more strenuous, but how does each phone endure when tested under heavy gaming conditions? Where applicable, I enabled game mode (or a similar feature) but left the settings at their default values. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 9:42 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 9:38 h 9 3rd Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 7:58 h 8 4th Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 7:42h 7 5th OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 7:13 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 7:03 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 6:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 6:40 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 6:03 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 6:02 h 1 I was taken aback by the Galaxy S25 Ultra's results here, but a retest revealed similar results, so this is a clear example of how a feature like Samsung's Game Booster can extend your battery life under heavy gaming conditions. This is made even more surprising, given that it shares the 8-core Snapdragon 8 Elite processor with the OnePlus 13, albeit Samsung has developed an optimized version of the processor for its flagship devices. The iPhone proves to be an endurance champion yet again, and the Find N5 and Razr 60 Ultra both continue to prove that folding phones can offer better battery life than non-folding phones. The rest of the results are as I expected: the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Z Fold 6, and Flip 6 all rank low in most of the tests. Before we head to the charging tests, here's a quick look at the overall top 3 in the battery tests: iPhone 16 Pro Max (27 points), Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (25 points), and OnePlus 13 (24 points). The phones that charge the fastest Of course, when your battery is running low, you need fast charging, so which of these phones charges the fastest? First, a quick note about mAh/min. It's a metric I have been using for years, and it's designed to standardize charging speeds while eliminating the variability of battery capacity and charging speed. It also applies to the 15-minute reading, where we record the battery percentage reported by the phone and multiply it by the capacity to estimate the mAh charged during those 15 minutes. Let's take a look, first, at the time taken for a full charge: Rank Phone Speed Full charge m/Ah min Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 35 mins 171.4 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 50 mins 112 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48 mins 93.8 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 64 mins 78.1 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 78 mins 64.9 6 6th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 67 mins 58.2 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 91 mins 48.4 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 105 mins 44.3 3 9th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 114 mins 41.1 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 102 mins 39.2 1 For more than a decade, one thing has been clear: companies like Huawei, Oppo, Honor, and OnePlus have all figured out how to recharge phones quickly and safely. This has been the case since long before the introduction of the new generation of Silicon Carbon batteries, and the technology is significantly faster than its competitors. The result is that it's no surprise that OnePlus and Oppo dominate the list. However, the biggest surprise comes from the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and its new 68W charging, which significantly increases charging speeds. I don't know about you, but I often forget to charge my phone, or the battery runs low when I only have a short moment to recharge. For those times, I also noted the percentage each phone added to the battery after a 15-minute charge. Rank Phone Speed % at 15 m ~mAh Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 55% 3,300 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 42% 2,352 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48% 2,160 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 40% 2,000 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 35% 1,771 6 6th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 27% 1,265 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 30% 1,170 4 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 26% 1,144 3 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 24% 1,116 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 23% 920 1 This overall charging test is when Apple's core weakness becomes apparent. The battery life of the iPhone 16 Pro Max is fantastic, but the charging speeds leave much to be desired. As you'll see below, however, this is not always the case, and the slower overall iPhone charging speeds are usually due to the device charging more slowly (to protect the battery) once it reaches 80%. The phone with the best battery is… There's a lot more testing to do on these phones and many of the best upcoming folding phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7, but where do Samsung's current folding phones stand? How about the new Galaxy S25 Edge? How does the thin body affect that battery compared to its beefier sibling? Let's look at the final results to find out! Rank Phone Total Points 1st OnePlus 13 44 2nd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 41 3rd Oppo Find N5 37 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 35 5th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 33 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 25 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 21 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 17 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 16 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 6 It's no surprise that the Galaxy Z Flip 6 comes last, especially given it's been there for most of these tests, but it does have me curious whether they'll be able to improve it in the upcoming Z Flip 7. The Galaxy S25 Edge performs admirably given the capacity constraints, especially as it has the smallest battery of all. In the top 5, Apple is the most interesting. Improving charging speeds would eliminate the gap to the top of the leaderboard, especially since it currently ranks first in the battery life tests. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a solid contender, but it shows that there's still room for Samsung to improve. The top 3 are very interesting. The Oppo Find N5 has the best book-style folding phone battery life that I've tested, and this rings true in the testing. The same applies to the Razr 60 Ultra, which proves that flip phones can be just as capable as non-flip ones. I'm very surprised by just how capable the Razr 60 Ultra battery life proves to be in this test. The best phone for overall battery life, however, is the OnePlus 13, which continues the OnePlus trend of offering outstanding battery life and super-fast charging. This is the biggest and best battery in a OnePlus phone to date, and shows that Silicon Carbon is the smartphone battery future we've been waiting for.
