Chinese fighter jet in near miss with Japanese military plane as Pacific tensions rise
Japan has voiced 'serious concern' over a near miss involving one of its military planes and a Chinese fighter jet in the Pacific, where recent manoeuvres by Chinese aircraft carrier groups have raised tensions across the region.
The Chinese aircraft took off from a moving aircraft carrier, the Shandong, and reportedly flew within 45 metres of a Japanese Self-Defence Force (SDF) patrol plane shortly afterwards. On Thursday, Japan's chief cabinet secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi, urged Beijing to prevent a repeat of the incident, which took place at the weekend.
Hayashi said the near miss, which occurred in international waters, could have caused an accidental collision.
Japan's defence ministry said a J-15 fighter jet from the Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong had engaged in other 'dangerous' activity, including passing in front of an SDF aircraft flying at the same altitude about 900 metres away.
Although there was no damage to the Japanese plane or injuries among its crew, Japan had 'expressed serious concerns' over the 'abnormal approaches', the ministry said.
The incidents have added to concern across the Asia-Pacific about China's increasingly bold naval and air activity.
China sees its carrier groups as essential to its goal of projecting power in the region's oceans. It routinely sends coast guard vessels, warships and warplanes to areas around disputed islands in the east China Sea, but it appears to be extending its reach.
China's military and government have not responded publicly to Japan's complaint about the near miss. Earlier this week, however, the foreign ministry defended the dual aircraft carrier drills in the Pacific, urging Japan to 'view those activities objectively and rationally'.
'China's military vessels' activities in relevant waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices,' spokesman Lin Jian said. 'China pursues a national defence policy that is defensive in nature.'
The dual carrier drills, which officials said were designed to test 'troops' capabilities in far-sea defence and joint operations', are a sign of China's intention to expand its presence beyond the first and second island chains that border its eastern coastline.
The first chain refers to the Pacific archipelago off the Asian mainland that includes Japan, Taiwan and part of the Philippines; the second is a strategic line that extends to Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. Last weekend was the first time a Chinese carrier had sailed east of the second chain.
Japan's defence minister, Gen Nakatani, said: 'China apparently aims to elevate its capability of the two aircraft carriers, and to advance its operational capability of the distant sea and airspace.'
Chinese fighter pilots have been accused of dangerous manoeuvres in the past, including by Australia, the Philippines, the US and Canada, as recently as February.
In February the People's Liberation Army (PLA) also held live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand.
State officials and media insist the naval activity is not aimed at a specific country or entity, but the PLA is openly working towards being able to launch a land invasion of Taiwan.
On Wednesday, Chinese state media accused Japan of potentially breaching its postwar constitution, which limits its armed forced to a strictly defensive role, with plans to deploy new missile systems to the southern main island of Kyushu.
The reports said the deployment, along with other weapons procurement, was 'confrontational' and would 'ultimately affect the peaceful development prospects of the entire region'.
The Shandong and a second Chinese aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, entered an area of Japan's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) – an area within 200 nautical miles (370km) of its coastline – in the Pacific for the first time last weekend.
The Shandong sailed through waters 550km south-east of Japan's Miyako Island in the southern prefecture of Okinawa on Saturday, the ministry said, adding that it had conducted takeoff and landing drills involving fighter jets and helicopters north of Okinotori, Japan's southernmost island, and inside its EEZ.
The Liaoning was spotted the same day 300km south-west of the easternmost island of Minamitori, before leaving Japan's EEZ to conduct similar exercises on Sunday, the Kyodo news agency said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Fighter jet headfake: U.S. sent B-2 bomber flights West as DECOY ahead of bombing Iran
Top U.S. military officials revealed the historic strikes on Iran 's nuclear facilities utilized a massive deception effort, including the use of 'decoy' planes that allowed the actual bombers to go 'completely undetected.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine spoke to reporters in a rare early morning press briefing Sunday at the Pentagon. 'Our B-2s went in and out and back without the world knowing at all,' Hegseth said. It was the most robust B-2 bomber strike carried out in history. 'A large B-2 strike package comprised of bombers launched from the continental United States as part of a plan to maintain tactical surprise part of the package proceeded to the west and into the Pacific as a decoy, a deception effort known only to an extremely small number of climbers and key leaders here in Washington,' Hegseth said. The chairman of the joint chiefs claimed no Iranian planes were deployed to intercept the bombers, and the planes used in the strike were not hit with any fire. Caine said the mission was named 'Operation Midnight Hammer' and was meant to degrade the country's nuclear programs. 'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated,' Hegseth added, noting the operation was an 'incredible and overwhelming success.' It did not target Iranian troops or Iranian people, the defense secretary stressed. President Donald Trump announced Saturday in an evening address at the White House that U.S. strikes within Iran 'were a spectacular military address.' Nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan were all hit, the president said. The surprise attack on Saturday utilized six B-2 stealth bombers that dropped a dozen 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's primary nuclear facility. The target was a secret uranium enrichment facility located deep underground in Fordow, approximately 80 miles south of Tehran. U.S. submarines also fired 30 Tomahawk missiles and wiped out two other Iranian nuclear sites at Natanz and Isfahan. Hours after the strikes, Iranian forces began lobbing missiles at Israel in a counterattack. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi called the U.S. offensive 'extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior.' 'Humanity has come too far as a species to allow a lawless bully to take us back to the law of the jungle,' Aragchi said. The Middle Eastern country has vowed revenge for the airstrikes. Iran's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, threatened 'severe punishment.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, celebrated Trump for attacking 'the world's most dangerous regime' And Hegseth noted that while many presidents have dreamed of delivering the 'final blow' to Iran's nuclear programs, 'none could until President Trump.' But experts note it will take some time to verify if the bombing campaign eradicated all of Iran's nuclear capability.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump's shock Iran strikes take us to brink of global conflict and will strengthen Axis of Evil alliance, experts warn
TRUMP'S historic strikes against Iran could push the world to the brink of global conflict, experts have warned. Wounded Iran has vowed to fight on, and at this very moment will be calling upon its allies to gather against the West. 7 7 While Israel has stamped out much of Iran's power in the Middle East, it still has formidable allies with similarly anti-west interests. Experts believe Trump's strikes could force the axis of evil closer together and set in motion a chain of events that embroils more countries in the conflict. Philip Ingram, a global defence expert, told The Sun: 'Iranian ballistic missiles will not reach the United States and therefore to try and respond to the United States attack Iran's going to have to do something different. "It'll bring its axis of evil. That means Iran, Russia, North Korea and China. "We are a couple of feet further up the escalation ladder towards a global conflict." North Korea showed its willingness to get involved with other wars when Kim sent 12,000 troops over to fight on Russia's front line with Ukraine. With Iran increasingly desperate, North Korea could step in and provide military aid such as "missile technology", Ingram said. Russia has been one of Iran's most vocal allies, and has warned all along that regime change would be "unacceptable". The Kremlin said the assassination of Iran's supreme leader would "open the Pandora's box". Ingram said that 'Iran and Russia will join forces to try and cause as much disruption in different countries as possible." Watch Trump hail 'very successful' bombing on Iran's nuke bases Russia is well-versed in the dark arts, and has propagated a campaign of sabotage against the West, so would have plenty to teach Iran. Forcing Iran and Russia closer together is not the only way US strikes could impact on Putin. Ingram said: 'The escalating conflict helps Russia by moving Russia-Ukraine further down the agenda so that people aren't focusing on it. 'It also ties up international geopolitical organisations and politicians in a complex Middle East situation - so again they don't have the capacity to focus on what Russia's doing in Ukraine." Chip Chapman said that the most immediate threat to western allies would be if Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz - which could even see the UK dragged into the conflict. He said: "20 percent of the world's oil runs through the strait. Closing it could have huge implications for the oil price. 'And that's where the Brits may get involved. If the Iranians were to try and close the Strait of Hormuz, there would be a definite ask from the Americans to the Brits." 7 7 Russia would likely back Iran's decision to close the strait, because an increase in oil prices would help fund its activities, Ingram explained. For many years Iran enjoyed considerable power in the Middle East through its proxies across the region. Two of the key players were Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon - but over the past 20 months Israel has seriously crippled them. However, Ingram says the Houthis in Yemen still pose a threat to the world other. He said: "I think we will see a massive uptake in Houthi activity in disrupting international shipping in the Red Sea." Experts have also warned that the strikes could prove a "slippery slope" and commit the US to pursuing more extreme military goals in Iran - such as overthrowing the regime. 7 7 Laura Blumenfeld, a Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School, said: "Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratization campaigns. "You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands." US-driven regime change would likely drive a wedge further between the West and the Islamic world - as was the case with Iraq - the experts suggest. Ingram said: "If there Ayatollah was killed it could change the whole way the government is set up in Iran, like we had with the fall of the Shah. "Then you whatever comes in next could be worse than what's in now and more polarised." 7 The US strikes could also prove a spark to other flash points around the world - such as the China-Taiwan tensions. Ingram said 'China will likely sit back and wait to see what's happening, to begin with. "Xi Jinping might think the international community is so tied up in the Middle East, that he has a window of opportunity, and he might try and take Taiwan. 'The world is not just a more febrile place, but the potentials for a series of events to happen to take us into a global conflict have just become even more complex to try and analyse. 'We haven't moved away from conflict. We have moved away from a despot regime getting towns on nuclear weapons, but it's not made the world immediately safer. 'What happens over the coming days and weeks will let us understand as to whether we have moved back from the brink of a global conflict or move further forward.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Taiwan is 'of course' a country, president says in rebuke to China
TAIPEI, June 22 (Reuters) - Taiwan is "of course" a country and China lacks both the historical evidence and legal proof to back up its sovereignty claims, President Lai Ching-te said on Sunday in a strong rebuke to Beijing and its stepped up political and military pressure. China says democratically-governed Taiwan is "sacred" Chinese territory that has belonged to the country since ancient times, and that the island is one of its provinces with no right to be called a state. Lai and his government strongly reject that view, and have offered talks with China multiple times but have been rejected. China calls Lai a "separatist". Giving the first of 10 speeches in a series called "uniting the country", Lai drew on Taiwan's history, including the millennia-long connection of its indigenous people to other Austronesians, like native Hawaiians, to show what he said was Taiwan's separate and distinct development from China. Taiwan's people have a record of opposing invasion, like uprisings against Japan's 1895-1945 colonial rule, and under the last imperial Chinese dynasty, the Qing, Taiwan was only considered a Chinese province for eight years, he added. "Of course Taiwan is a country," he said at a speech to a Taiwan branch of Rotary International, pointing also to its presidential elections. "But China says no, that Taiwan is not a sovereign country." China's Taiwan's Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment outside of office hours. China says the 1971 United Nations resolution, which took away Taipei's seat in the body and gave it to Beijing, is one of the legal bases of its claims. Lai, who in March called China a "hostile foreign force", said it was "totally wrong" for Beijing to say that U.N. resolution had anything to do with Taiwan's sovereignty as it was only about which government was represented at the body. China's threat to Taiwan is real, added Lai, pointing to its daily military activities around the island. "Taiwan's future can only be decided by its 23 million people - does everyone approve of this?" he said, to a round of applause. The defeated Republic of China government fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, and that remains the island's formal name.
