Why Yunus's Each Day In Office Puts Bangladesh, India & Region At Risk
Last Updated:
Bangladesh's economic collapse can set the region in turmoil. To top it, Yunus and his student advisers have facilitated growing jihadism and Islamist takeover of institutions
In about 10 days, Muhammad Yunus's caretaker government will complete 10 disastrous months in power with nothing to show for it. Bangladesh's democracy has been suspended, the economy in collapse, and law and order on indefinite leave since mobs ousted Sheikh Hasina and celebrated it by waving their 76-year-old Prime Minister's bra.
Highlights of the Yunus government's tenure so far have been unleashing waves of genocidal terror against political opponents, setting free from prison several terrorists including Ansarullah Bangla Team chief Muhammad Jasimuddin Rahmani, giving Islamist groups like Jamaat, Hefazat, and Khelafat free play, allowing proscribed outfit Hizbut Tahrir's first public rally in Dhaka, making up ad hoc laws to stay in power, and bringing the economy to the point of breakdown.
At a press conference on Sunday, top industrialists said Bangladesh's economy was a ticking time bomb. The business leaders accused the interim government of sleeping through leaping production costs, fuel shortages, and a hostile business environment. They warned that the power and gas crisis is wrecking local industries and leading to factory shutdowns, mass layoffs, and financial defaults.
Bangladesh Textiles Mills Association President Showkat Aziz Russell said if during the 1971 Liberation War intellectuals were targeted, in 2025 it is the entrepreneurs.
'We are paying gas bills but getting no supply. Factories are idle, yet we are pressured to repay loans, deal with soaring interest rates, and face government threats," Dhaka Tribune quoted him as saying.
Bangladesh's economic collapse — given its massive low-income workforce — is enough to set the region in turmoil. To top it, Yunus and his immature and greedy student advisers have facilitated growing jihadism and the Islamist takeover of institution after institution.
If Yunus and his current team continue in power, Bangladesh could slide into civil war with the right (or rather, wrong) kind of push.
Their current dispensation is solely interested in hanging on unelected for as long as possible and making appalling amounts of money while Bangladesh goes to the dogs. Moazzem Hossain, the former assistant personal secretary (APS) of Asif Mahmud Shojib Bhuyain, is accused of amassing ill-gotten wealth of over 300 crore taka in such a short time. Many believe it is Asif's money, that too just a fraction of what the 'student adviser' has swiftly laundered.
This lot has resorted to emotionally blackmailing the nation that they were the harbingers of Liberation 2.0, so they should be allowed to rule without an electoral mandate.
Not just that, they want to carry out 'sanskar' or reforms of everything from the electoral process to education, a job which only an elected government must undertake.
BNP, the party projected to win handsomely if elections are held now, has taken to the streets demanding elections. Its exiled leader Tarique Rahman slammed the Yunus government from London for the state of the economy and law and order. If the BNP intensifies its agitation, the Yunus government will not be able to withstand it.
The Yunus government, run from the shadows by Jamaat and other Islamists, also want to permanently ban the Awami League from Bangladesh politics. It has already outlawed AL's activities. If the Awami League is barred from contesting, it will fulfil Pakistani ISI or the Muslim Brotherhood's dream of subverting for good Bangladesh's spirit of Bengali nationalism which AL captures at least on paper, and usurping it by an Islamic caliphate in the garb of exclusionary democracy.
But what stands between Bangladesh and the abyss is its army. Bangladesh army chief Waker-uz-Zaman wants Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus gone and elections held as soon as possible. The army, as well as the BNP, have cautioned Yunus not to get on to a misadventure like opening the Chittagong corridor for the UN and pushing his own nation and the region into chaos, only to do the US Deep State's bidding.
The Yunus regime tacitly tried to engineer a coup in the army to topple General Waker, but all the service chiefs and the forces stand firmly with him today. Waker is against Yunus's idea of waiting until June for elections, a ploy to buy time.
The interim government's legal basis is dubious. Article 123 of Bangladesh's Constitution mandates elections within 90 days of a government's dissolution, whatever the reason may be. Using it, the army may instruct President Mohammed Shahabuddin to declare a state of emergency.
During an emergency, the President could dissolve the interim government and declare immediate elections. Under Article 141A of the Bangladesh Constitution, the President can take on emergency powers if the constitutional machinery breaks down.
Given Yunus and his advisers' wilful dithering, that could be the only logical option left. Each day Yunus and his band of boys who suffer from premature articulation are in power, peace in the region will be taking a few big steps away.
Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 27, 2025, 11:32 IST
News opinion Opinion | Why Yunus's Each Day In Office Puts Bangladesh, India & Region At Risk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
‘Imported antisemitism': German chancellor sidesteps homegrown problems to blame migrants
In response to a report on the virulence of antisemitism in Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently cast the blame on attitudes held by immigrants. Merz stated in a Fox News interview that Germany has 'imported antisemitism with the big numbers of migrants we have within the last 10 years.' Merz is pointing to a real and pressing issue. Yet his emphasis on so-called 'imported antisemitism' serves as a convenient diversion from Germany's persistent failure to confront home-grown antisemitism. His remarks also risk emboldening those who weaponise antisemitism as a rhetorical tool to fuel anti-immigrant sentiments. Antisemitism in Germany Antisemitic incidents in Germany have been on the rise since the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas and the subsequent war in Gaza. According to a survey by the Research and Information Centre on Antisemitism (RIAS), antisemitic occurrences rose by more than 80% in 2023. That year, 4,782 occurrences were documented, the highest number since the organization began tracking such cases in 2017. However, RIAS's most recent report found that the primary motive behind antisemitic crimes remained right-wing extremist ideology (48% per). It also noted that, since 2023, there has been a marked increase in incidents attributed to 'foreign ideology.' These are understood as originating outside Germany and often linked to Islamist or anti-Israel sentiments, which accounted for 31% of cases in 2024. It should be noted that RIAS's approach to classifying antisemitism has been subject to controversy, especially with regard to its treatment of criticism of or protest against the Israeli government's actions. 'Imported antisemitism' narrative A recent survey of antisemitic attitudes among immigrants in Germany found that such attitudes are more prevalent among Muslim respondents compared to their Christian or religiously unaffiliated counterparts. The study revealed particularly high levels of antisemitism among individuals from the Middle East and North Africa. Approximately 35% of Muslim respondents – especially those with strong religious convictions and lower levels of formal education – 'strongly agreed with classical antisemitic statements'. These statements reflect classical antisemitic tropes, such as attributing too much influence over politics or finance to Jews, accusing Jews of driving the world into disaster or relativising the Holocaust. At the same time, there is evidence that immigrants successfully integrating into German society is associated with lower levels of antisemitism. Yet blaming a rise in antisemitism on 'imported' attitudes or 'foreign ideologies' signals a crude simplification. Antisemitism has remained prevalent in German society even after the Second World War, and political movements or leaders can easily mobilise it. Although Holocaust education is mandatory in German schools, knowledge about the Shoah and the legacy of antisemitism remains limited among younger generations. A recent study by the Jewish Claims Conference found that among Germans aged 18 to 29, around 40 per cent were not aware that approximately six million Jews were killed by the Nazis and their collaborators. According to a 2023 MEMO survey, more than 50% of 14- to 16-year-old students in Germany did not know what Auschwitz was. Blaming immigrants for challenges in Germany's memory culture oversimplifies a deeper issue: the growing difficulty of making the country's dominant remembrance — centred on the horrors of the Nazi dictatorship and the Holocaust — politically meaningful and emotionally resonant for younger generations. For many young Germans, the memory of the Holocaust feels increasingly remote, lacking the emotional immediacy that vanishing eyewitnesses once provided. This problem is further exacerbated by the absence of innovative, impactful teaching capable of conveying the continued relevance of Holocaust memory and its political message. In a 2023 article, American journalist Masha Gessen highlighted how Holocaust remembrance in Germany was becoming an elite-driven ritual, one that risks preventing a meaningful connection between its moral imperatives and today's political realities. Threat from Alternative for Germany At the same time, the rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party poses a direct threat to Germany's culture of remembrance. The AfD has made it a central objective to challenge the primacy of Holocaust memory, calling for a U-turn in Germany's remembrance culture. Leading party members have labelled Holocaust memorials ' monuments of shame ', reflecting the party's broader effort to promote nationalist reinterpretations of history. Furthermore, the AfD's staunchly anti-immigrant stance exposes a fundamental flaw in the imported antisemitism narrative. Across Europe, populist right-wing movements have increasingly mobilised anti-Muslim rhetoric under the banner of defending so-called ' Judeo-Christian values,' even as they simultaneously draw on classic antisemitic tropes targeting 'globalist elites' and conspiratorial power structures. This use of Jewish identity as a rhetorical weapon against Islam, while perpetuating antisemitism in other forms, reveals the deep contradictions and opportunism underlying imported antisemitism claims. Blaming Muslim immigrants for the rise of antisemitism offers German political leaders a convenient excuse for their own failure to confront entrenched antisemitic beliefs within German society. In addition, Holocaust remembrance can sometimes exclude immigrants. For example, Germany recently added questions about the Holocaust and Nazi crimes to its citizenship test, committing newcomers to its memory culture. Research shows this kind of policy can have unintended effects. It can make immigrants feel excluded if they are seen as not fully sharing in 'our' nation and 'our' history. Given the universalist values it is meant to embody, the commemoration of the Holocaust can also serve to alienate immigrants from full cultural citizenship. Framing antisemitism primarily as an imported problem risks strengthening those forces that actively seek to undermine and ignore Germany's confrontation with its Nazi past. Instead, what is needed is a more nuanced approach, one that bridges the divide between antiracist and anti-antisemitism efforts, and aligns more faithfully with the moral and political commitments that this collective memory is meant to uphold.
Deccan Herald
17 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Armed men on motorbikes kill 34 Niger soldiers; Islamic State claims responsibility
Niger, like other countries in West Africa's Sahel region, is battling Islamist militants linked to al Qaeda and Islamic State.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Bangladesh, Pakistan, China hold inaugural trilateral foreign office discussion
Bangladesh, Pakistan and China held an inaugural trilateral foreign office-level discussion this week in Kunming, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan has announced. The trilateral consultation was led by Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, Bangladesh's Acting Foreign Secretary Ruhul Alam Siddique and Additional Foreign Secretary of Pakistan Imran Ahmed Siddiqui. Foreign Secretary of Pakistan Amna Baloch, who participated in the first Foreign Office Consultation with Bangladesh in one and half decades on April 17, 2025, participated in Thursday's (June 19, 2025) trilateral discussion via video link, said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan. 'In her remarks the Foreign Secretary Ambassador Amna commended the Chinese side for convening the inaugural meeting of the trilateral mechanism. Noting the common aspirations of the three sides for people-centric development, the Foreign Secretary expressed Pakistan's desire for a deeper engagement between China and South Asian countries,' said a press note from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan announcing the Bangladesh, China, Pakistan Trilateral Mechanism. This is the first such meeting between the three neighbours of India – China, Pakistan and Bangladesh – since Chief Adviser of the interim government of Bangladesh Prof Mohammed Yunus visited China during March 26-29 and also since India carried out Operation Sindoor in May when India and Pakistan clashed. During his China visit, Prof Yunus had addressed the business community in China and presented Bangladesh as a partner of China politically and commercially. Prof Yunus presented Bangladesh's long coastline as an advantage to the country and said Bangladesh is the 'only guardian of the ocean' and that China should access the market of northeast India through Bangladesh. The comment was cited as an irritant in Delhi-Dhaka relations by official sources in India later when India stopped the flow of textile apparel from Bangladesh through the land ports of India. The May 17 order also stopped entry of certain specified products from Bangladesh to the northeastern States of India. The discussion in Kunming coincided with Bangladesh-United States dialogue that was held between the interim government's National Security Adviser Dr Khalilur Rahman and U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau at the State Department in Washington DC on June 19. 'They discussed the Rohingya issue, ongoing tariff negotiations between Bangladesh and the U.S-, developments in South Asia, and the democratic transition in Bangladesh,' said a press statement issued by the office of Prof. Mohammed Yunus, Chief Adviser of the interim government of Bangladesh. Mention of the Rohingya issue after the bilateral discussion has brought to focus the so-called humanitarian corridor from Bangladesh to Myanmar's Rakhine province that Dr. Rahman has been championing in recent weeks. Rakhine-Chin-Sagaing region of Myanmar is of common interest of India, China and Bangladesh and in recent weeks, the United States has also indicated more interest in the strategically important area with the US Air Force personnel conducting a humanitarian assistance and disaster relief programme in May in the Cox's Bazar area.
