Why Democratic Senator Alex Padilla was handcuffed, evicted from Kristi Noem's press event

US Senator Alex Padilla's dramatic removal and handcuffing at Kristi Noem's federal press conference in Los Angeles has ignited political outrage and alarm over federal overreach. With Democrats decrying the act as 'dictatorial', and Republicans split in their response, the incident has become a flashpoint in the US read more
US Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA) is held down on the floor before being handcuffed by security officers after he attempted to ask a question during US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference, in Los Angeles, California, US, June 12, 2025, in this still image obtained from a video. Office of the Senator Alex Padilla via Reuters
A political firestorm in the United States has erupted following the forcible removal and handcuffing of Democratic Senator Alex Padilla during a press conference led by US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles last Thursday (June 12, 2025).
The incident, captured on video and widely shared, has drawn fierce reactions from both parties and fuelled an already volatile national debate around immigration enforcement and democratic norms under Donald Trump's administration.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How the incident unfolded
According to Padilla, he had initially arrived at a federal building in Los Angeles for a scheduled briefing with representatives from US Northern Command. Upon learning that Noem was hosting a press conference nearby, he asked to listen in.
He was then escorted into the room by a member of the National Guard and an FBI agent, where he remained until he attempted to ask a question.
Video footage from the incident shows Padilla identifying himself as a US Senator before approaching the podium. 'I am Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' he can be heard saying.
Moments later, he was confronted by security officers, pushed to the ground, and handcuffed. As the officers moved in, Padilla said, 'Hands off.'
If that's what they do to a United States Senator with a question, imagine what they do to farm workers, day laborers, cooks, and the other nonviolent immigrants they are targeting in California and across the country. Or any American that dares to speak up.
I will not stop… pic.twitter.com/TUgT060yx2 — Alex Padilla (@AlexPadilla4CA) June 12, 2025
Padilla, who represents California and is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee's immigration panel, said on CNN's State of the Union that, 'They opened the door for me, and they stood next to me while I was listening for the entire time. And then, of course, once I was forcibly removed and handcuffed.'
How the DHS has responded to the incident
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) quickly issued a statement on X, describing Padilla's action as 'disrespectful political theater,' and claimed that the Secret Service had perceived him as a potential attacker.
'@SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately,' DHS stated, adding that Noem later met with Padilla.
Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem.
Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers'… https://t.co/5TGxrRZ2Ex — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) June 12, 2025
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino also defended the response by federal agents. 'The senator in question was not wearing a security pin and physically resisted law enforcement when confronted,' Bongino wrote.
'Our FBI personnel acted completely appropriately while assisting Secret Service.' However, Padilla strongly disputed this characterisation.
'If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmers, to cooks, to day-laborers throughout the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' he said in a separate statement.
In response to the DHS narrative, Padilla's fellow Californian Senator Adam Schiff said on NBC's Meet the Press, 'This is not some rabble-rouser. And to see him mistreated that way and tackled to the ground and shackled that way and in the midst of what we're seeing more broadly in Los Angeles is just atrocious.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
How lawmakers reacted across party lines
The incident has sharply divided lawmakers. Democrats were quick to condemn what they called an overreach of federal authority and a dangerous escalation of tactics against public officials.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the footage 'reeks of totalitarianism,' while Senator Patty Murray of Washington remarked, 'I cannot believe that we don't have senators on both sides of the aisle calling this out as outrageous.'
'This is the stuff of dictatorships. It is actually happening,' said Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii. Senator Cory Booker called it 'a pattern and a practice,' linking the event to earlier incidents involving other Democratic officials.
Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland declared, 'This is what a dictatorship looks like. We have to stand up.'
His colleague from New Jersey, Senator Andy Kim, pleaded with Republicans: 'This is not a time to put your finger up in the air and figure out which way the wind is blowing…'
Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Angela Alsobrooks called for an investigation into the handling of the event, with Alsobrooks saying she was 'so angry she was shaking.'
Senator Tim Kaine waved a pocket Constitution on the Senate floor, claiming the administration is attempting to instill fear in elected officials.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska also condemned the incident, describing it as 'shocking at every level.' She added, 'Senator Padilla is a big, tall guy, and to see how he was handled out of that room is wrong and sick.'
Senator Susan Collins of Maine said she saw the video and found it 'disturbing,' remarking that it was 'hard to imagine a justification for that.'
In contrast, several Republicans defended the administration's handling. Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming criticised Padilla for being absent from Senate votes. 'He has a responsibility to his constituents to show up at work, not to go try to make a spectacle of himself,' he said.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said, 'I think that that behaviour at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' while Senator Rand Paul opposed any such move. 'No, no, no. I'm not for censuring him. I think that's crazy. I'm not for that at all,' Paul said on Meet the Press.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Why this incident has become a flashpoint
The press conference itself was held against a tense backdrop. Los Angeles has witnessed days of mass protests against Trump's immigration crackdown, which included the deployment of National Guard troops and US Marines to enforce order and protect federal buildings.
During the press conference, Noem had stated that federal agents were in Los Angeles 'to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor have placed on this country,' referring to California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.
The forceful removal of Padilla has only amplified existing concerns among Democrats who view Trump's administration as increasingly authoritarian.
According to Axios, Senate Democrats led by Padilla have since demanded that all federal military forces be withdrawn from Los Angeles.
'This administration will stop at nothing to keep elected officials from doing our jobs and demanding accountability for our constituents,' said US Representative LaMonica McIver, who herself had previously been charged for resisting officers during a similar federal operation.
The Padilla incident is not isolated. It follows the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka at an immigration centre and the criminal charging of a Wisconsin judge who allegedly assisted a defendant in evading federal immigration officers.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Both cases have been cited by Democrats as part of a broader trend of suppressing political dissent.
Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware said she showed the video to several colleagues, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who reportedly appeared 'shocked.'
Thune later said he spoke with Padilla and the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and was working to gather more information.
'This is a test. This is a crossroads. This is a day in which the character of this body will be defined,' said Booker during a Senate floor speech. Murray added that it was the closest she had come to tearing up in her 32-year Senate career.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

16 minutes ago

• Time of India

Summons sent to lawyer for his role as co's ind dir: ED

Representative Image NEW DELHI: Faced with criticism, Enforcement Directorate Friday said it issued summons to senior advocate Pratap Venugopal as part of its ongoing investigation against Care Health Insurance Ltd (CHIL) in which Venugopal was an independent director. ED's Mumbai zonal office is conducting a money laundering investigation in which it has been alleged that shares of CHIL were issued at a much lower price in the form of ESOPs on May 1, 2022, in spite of the rejection of the same by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI). "As part of the investigation, summons was issued to Pratap Venugopal, an independent director of CHIL, to understand the circumstances under which the company has issued ESOPs despite its rejection by IRDAI and subsequent discussions in the board of CHIL in this regard," the agency said about the summons which it withdrew after protests by lawyers' bodies. In a statement, the agency emphasised that IRDAI on July 23, 2024, had directed CHIL to revoke or cancel any ESOPs that were yet to be allotted and had also imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore on CHIL for non-compliance with regulatory directions. "In view of the fact that Pratap Venugopal is a senior advocate in Supreme Court, the summons issued to him has been withdrawn and the same has been communicated to him," the agency said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In the said communication, it was also stated that if any documents were required from him in his capacity as an independent director of CHIL, the same would be requested to be submitted by email, the agency added. Further, ED has asked its units not to issue summons to lawyers, saying summoning them would be violative of Section 132 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. "If any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED," the agency said.

NDTV

21 minutes ago

• NDTV

US Court Orders Release Of Pro-Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil

New Jersey: A U.S. judge ordered on Friday that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil be released immediately from immigration custody, a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist. Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. Khalil became the first target of this policy. After hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Khalil and for the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, ordered DHS to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana by as soon as 6:30 pm (7:30 ET) on Friday. Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. "There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner (Khalil)," Farbiarz said as he ruled from the bench, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional. Khalil was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the U.S. starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge. They include Mohsen Mahdawi and Rumeysya Ozturk. Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the U.S., says he is being punished for his political speech in violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Khalil condemned antisemitism and racism in interviews with CNN and other news outlets last year. The Syrian-born activist plans to return to New York to be with his wife Dr. Noor Abdalla and their infant son who was born during Khalil's 104 days in detention. "This ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others," Abdalla said in a statement. "Today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom." The White House condemned the decision to release Khalil, saying he should be deported for "conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests" and fraudulently obtaining a student visa. "There is no basis for a local federal judge in New Jersey —who lacks jurisdiction — to order Khalil's release from a detention facility in Louisiana," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement. "We expect to be vindicated on appeal." Even though a federal judge ordered Khalil be freed, the immigration proceedings against him continue. The Louisiana immigration judge in his case on Friday denied his asylum request, ruled he could be deported based on the government's allegations of immigration fraud, and denied a bail hearing. Farbiarz's decision rendered the bail request moot. Like others facing deportation, Khalil has avenues to appeal within the immigration system. Farbiarz is also considering Khalil's challenge of his deportation on constitutional grounds, and has blocked officials from deporting Khalil while that challenge plays out. Earlier this month, Farbiarz ruled the government was violating Khalil's free speech rights by detaining him under a little-used law granting the U.S. secretary of state power to seek deportation of non-citizens whose presence in the country was deemed adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests. On June 13, the judge declined to order Khalil's release from a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, after Trump's administration said Khalil was being held on a separate charge that he withheld information from his application for lawful permanent residency. Khalil's lawyers deny that allegation and say people are rarely detained on such charges. On June 16, they urged Farbiarz to grant a separate request from their client to be released on bail or be transferred to immigration detention in New Jersey to be closer to his family in New York. At Friday's hearing, Farbiarz said it was "highly unusual" for the government to jail an immigrant accused of omissions in his application for U.S. permanent residency. Khalil, 30, became a U.S. permanent resident last year, and his wife and newborn son are U.S. citizens. Trump administration lawyers wrote in a June 17 filing that Khalil's request for release should be addressed to the judge overseeing his immigration case, an administrative process over whether he can be deported, rather than to Farbiarz, who is considering whether Khalil's March 8 arrest and subsequent detention were constitutional.

Time of India

27 minutes ago

• Time of India

Trump says Iran has 'maximum' two weeks to avoid US air strikes, dismisses Europe peace efforts

US President Donald Trump said Friday that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes, as Israel claimed it has already set back Iran's presumed nuclear programme by at least two years. Trump's latest comments indicated he could take a decision before the fortnight deadline he set a day earlier, as he dismissed European efforts to end the conflict and said it would be "very hard" to ask Israel to cease its attacks. A series of blasts were heard in Tehran on Friday as Israel kept up the massive wave of strikes it says is aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has denied. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ingin Tahu Tentang Diagnosis Limfoma? Dapatkan Info Selengkapnya Limfoma Baca Undo "According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb," Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published Saturday. Saar said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. "We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat," he told German newspaper Bild. Live Events As Trump mulls the prospect of joining the war on Israel's side, top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva and urged him to resume talks with the United States that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said "we invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for." But Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that "we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the United States) anymore, as long as the aggression continues." Trump was dismissive of European efforts, telling reporters, "Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this." Trump also said he's unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. "If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do," he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally busting markets largely abandoned on Friday. 450 missiles Since Israel launched its offensive on June 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages which Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 injured, including one person in serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. More than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones, according to Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate. Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not updated the toll since. A US-based NGO, the Human Rights Activists News Agency, provided a toll on Friday based on its sources and media reports, saying at least 657 people have been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Israel's military said it struck missile launchers in southwestern Iran after overnight air raids on dozens of targets including a nuclear research centre. In Israel, sirens sounded in the afternoon after missiles were launched from Iran for the second time on Friday. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had targeted military sites and air force bases. Meanwhile, a US Navy official said an aircraft carrier will be moved closer to the Middle East next week, making it the third in or near the region. "This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict," said Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who earlier stated "Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon." The International Atomic Energy Agency said that while Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60 percent, there was no evidence it had all the components to make a functioning nuclear warhead. "So saying how long it would take for them, it would be pure speculation because we do not know whether there was somebody... secretly pursuing these activities," agency chief Rafael Grossi told CNN. "We haven't seen that and we have to say it." Arab League foreign ministers gathered in Istanbul late Friday to discuss the war, Turkish state news agency Anadolu said, on the eve of a weekend gathering of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Switzerland announced it was temporarily closing its embassy in Tehran, adding that it would continue to fulfil its role representing US interests in Iran.