Trump mobile phone: Specifications, plans, carrier, and all details — is it Made in China?

Is Donald Trump's smartphone really made in the USA?
Live Events
Can the U.S. actually manufacture a phone like this?
What happened during the phone's preorder launch?
What are the specifications of the Trump mobile?
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The "T1," Donald Trump 's much-anticipated mobile phone, is making headlines. Reports indicate that the advertised "Built in America" claim for Trump's new T1 smartphone appears to be false.Critics say that the rollout has problems and that the company made false claims about how it was made. There were also a lot of technical problems with Trump Media 's preorder system.According to reports, the new "All-American" smartphone that President Donald Trump's family is selling is made in China Apple Insider claims that although the base model of the device, which does not have the gilded trim or Trump branding, is only $169 on Amazon, the recently launched Trump Mobile is charging $499 for a gold iPhone lookalike, as quoted in a report by The Daily Beast.The president's sons unveiled the new phone, which they called the "T1," promising that it would be made in the US. Eric Trump, however, had to quickly quell hopes that the first Trump phones would be made in the US.The president's second-born son told right-wing podcaster Ben Shapiro that "all the phones can be built in the United States of America eventually." "We must return manufacturing to the United States." Thus their motto is, "Built for America by Americans. Do it cheaper. Do it better.'This intensified skepticism about Trump Mobile's ability to manufacture a smartphone in the US by August, despite the promise of delivery to preorderers.The fact that no significant smartphone is made in America was brought up recently when Trump threatened to impose high tariffs on tech firms like Apple that produce goods in Asia.The device was "designed and built in the United States," according to the Trump Organization's press release, and the company's website boasts that it operates on "All-American Performance.""Manufacturing for the new phone will be in Alabama, California, and Florida," the Trump Organization told The Wall Street Journal.Apple Insider reported that the T1 phone might be modified in the United States. "It was definitely not created or put together in the United States."When MAGA fans buy the T1, they might not be aware that they are purchasing an item that was produced overseas.According to other reports, Trump Media blew its rollout. The Journal was among those who doubted its ability to produce a smartphone manufactured in the United States in a timely manner.As only Chinese manufacturers, such as Xiaomi and Oppo, have comparable hardware at that price point, the paper stated that it is "possible even plausible that these phones would initially come from China."Since the current state of technology makes it impossible to produce the necessary components, Tinglong Dai, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, estimates that it will take five years to build the infrastructure for manufacturing a smartphone in America, as per a report by The Journal.For example, 404 Media reported that when they tried to preorder the device, their reporter's card was undercharged for the $100 deposit and they received an error message before they could provide an address for the product's eventual shipment.According to the Trump Media website, the T1 will have a 6.8-inch screen, which is marginally bigger than the biggest Apple iPhone to date. In addition, it has a bright AMOLED screen, a refresh rate of 120 Hz, and a larger battery than any iPhone.Despite claims, it is reportedly being manufactured in China rather than the United States, at least for the time being.Buyers reported website crashes, incorrect charges, and missing shipping information after paying deposits.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

37 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Why wouldn't there be a regime change?': Trump's 'hint' after US air strikes in Iran; contradicts his own administration's stand

President Donald Trump speaks from the East Room of the White House in Washington, as Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP) US President Donald Trump on Sunday (local time) appeared to support a potential regime change in Iran, seemingly contradicting his own administration's stand that Operation Midnight Hammer - US air strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran - was not aimed at bringing about a regime change in the Islamic Republic. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, slightly tweaking his "Make America Great Again" slogan. Earlier, Trump administration members such as vice president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio and defense secretary Pete Hegseth, all made public remarks about how Operation Midnight Hammer was only meant to target the nuclear sites, and not toppling the Iranian regime. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said at a news conference which detailed the aerial bombing of the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites. "Our view is very clear that we don't want a regime want to end their nuclear programme and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here," Vance told NBC News. Speaking to CBS News, Rubio noted that the precise mission had only three objectives - the three targeted nuclear sites. "It was not an attack on Iran, not an attack on the Iranian people, and this wasn't a regime-change move," he stated.

The Hindu

37 minutes ago

• The Hindu

India debunks claims of U.S. using Indian airspace for Iran strikes, PIB Fact Check confirms

India on Sunday (June 22, 2025) dismissed as 'fake' claims by certain social media handles that the U.S. fighter jets used Indian airspace to launch strikes against Iran. Also read: Israel-Iran conflict updates The U.S. bombed three nuclear sites in Iran on Sunday (June 22, 2025), with U.S. President Donald Trump warning of additional strikes if Iran retaliates. Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian Airspace was used by the United States to launch aircrafts against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer#PIBFactCheck ❌ This claim is FAKE ❌Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation… — PIB Fact Check (@PIBFactCheck) June 22, 2025 'Several social media accounts have claimed that Indian airspace was used by the United States to launch aircraft against Iran during Operation #MidnightHammer. This claim is fake,' PIB Fact Check said in a post on X. 'Indian Airspace was NOT used by the United States during Operation #MidnightHammer,' said the fact check unit of the Press Information Bureau that functions under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. It said that the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan Caine had explained the route used by U.S. aircraft during a press briefing.

Hindustan Times

38 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

US claims strikes on Iran's nuclear sites caused severe damage but full impact unclear

Jun 23, 2025 05:50 AM IST The US military's strike on three sites in Iran raised urgent questions Sunday about what remains of Tehran's nuclear program and how its weakened military might respond. A combination picture shows satellite images over Fordow underground complex, before and after the U.S. struck the underground nuclear facility, near Qom, Iran, June 20, 2025 (L) and June 22, 2025.(Reuters) The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. Follow LIVE updates. But U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and a 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground. Also Read | US warns Iran against closing Strait of Hormuz: 'It's economic suicide' 'At this time, no one, including the (International Atomic Energy Agency), is in a position to assess the underground damage at Fordo,' said U.N. nuclear chief Rafael Grossi. President Donald Trump announced the strikes. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported that attacks targeted the country's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. Iran's foreign minister said Iran reserves the right to retaliate.