On Pak PM Shahbaz Sharif's call for peace talks, India says ‘only on process for Pakistan to vacate PoK'

Responding to Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif's recent overture for 'peace talks' with India, including on counterterrorism, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) firmly reiterated India's longstanding position.
During a weekly press conference, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal underscored that New Delhi's approach towards Islamabad remains 'clear and consistent' – that terrorism and talks 'cannot go hand in hand'.
Randhir Jaiswal said, 'I would like to begin by stating that our bilateral approach towards Pakistan has been clear and consistent. We want to reiterate that terrorism and talks cannot go hand in hand.'
He emphasized that any conversation on terrorism must begin with Pakistan handing over terrorists from the list India had shared years ago. He said any bilateral talks will happen only on the timeline and process for Pakistan to vacate Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
'As far as terrorism is concerned, the discussion will be solely about Pakistan handing over to India the terrorists from the list provided to them several years ago. As for Jammu and Kashmir, any bilateral talks will only take place regarding the timeline and process for Pakistan to vacate PoK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir),' he said.
Addressing a joint press conference in Tehran alongside Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Pakistan PM Shahbaz Sharif said, 'We want to resolve all disputes, including the Kashmir issue and the water issue, through negotiations and are also ready to talk to our neighbour on trade and counter-terrorism.'
The Pakistan prime minister also underlined that the country will show they 'really want peace, seriously and sincerely' if his 'offer of peace' is accepted.
India has, firmly, maintained that 'terror and talks' cannot go together.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

32 minutes ago

• Mint

US strike on Iran raises oil shock, capital flow risks for India's economy

New Delhi: The flare-up in West Asia following US missile strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities has heightened geopolitical tensions and intensified external risks to India's economy, even as many analysts say the escalation may prove short-lived. At stake for India is the potential fallout from surging oil prices, a widening current account deficit, higher energy and shipping costs fuelling domestic inflation, investor risk aversion, capital outflows, and broader risks to economic growth. 'The bigger impact will be on sentiment. However, oil intensity has been going down structurally. For India too, the share of oil imports in total imports has come down from 21% in 2018 to 16.5% in 2025," said Sachchidanand Shukla, group chief economist at Larsen & Toubro. Read this | Mint Primer: What if the US joins Israel's war with Iran? Shukla added that India can absorb oil prices up to $85 a barrel without triggering large macro imbalances. 'There is no need to panic and one needs to keep an eye on how the situation evolves," he said. In a televised address on Sunday (India time), US President Donald Trump confirmed the direct American assault on Iran's nuclear programme, ending days of speculation about Washington's entry into the Israel-Iran conflict. He warned that further strikes could follow. 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace doesn't come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill," Trump said. Oil price spike the immediate risk A sustained rise in oil prices remains the most visible risk for India, which relies on imports for nearly 85% of its crude oil needs. Higher global prices can widen India's current account deficit, fuel domestic inflation, trigger risk aversion among investors, and slow down growth. 'Every sustained 10% rise in oil price versus the baseline can lower India's GDP by 15 basis points (bps) and raise inflation measured by Consumer Price Index (CPI) by 30bps. On the other hand, it can reduce global GDP by 15 bps and raise CPI by 40 bps which can impede the rate cut trajectory," explained Shukla. While crude prices have already risen from $64–65 per barrel to $74–75 since the Israel-Iran conflict erupted on 13 June, some offsetting factors remain in play. Read this | US attack on Iranian nuclear sites roils oil market, India braces for possible price surge Experts noted that oil supply from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Plus (Opec+) is improving as members unwind voluntary production cuts. Crude output from Opec+ rose by 180,000 barrels per day in May compared to April, according to the cartel's latest monthly oil market report. This production rebound, experts said, could help cap sharp price spikes, provided the conflict does not escalate further. 'The current flare-up may be short-lived and could even mark a turning point in the West Asia crisis towards its early closure, given the substantial disparity in conventional military capabilities, though the complex regional dynamics suggest multiple pathways for conflict evolution," said Rishi Shah, Partner and Economic Advisory Services Leader, Grant Thornton Bharat. 'As things stand today, there may be regional disturbances but these appear unlikely to translate into a major negative shock for India's economy," said Shah. On the trade front, while treaty negotiations continue, commercial flows seem to be adapting and progressing despite the tensions, he added. "Therefore, based on current developments and assuming the conflict remains contained, we expect the net external impact on India's growth trajectory to be relatively muted in the near term — though this assessment remains contingent on the conflict not escalating significantly or disrupting critical energy supply routes," said Shah. Prolonged conflict could hit growth Economists warn that a prolonged conflict could have deeper consequences. 'For oil-importing countries like India, this means slightly higher inflation and increased fiscal costs. While we have some buffer, with inflation currently below 4%, expectations have suddenly firmed up," said NR Bhanumurthy, director of the Madras School of Economics. Bhanumurthy cautioned that the current account deficit could widen not just due to the oil import bill, but also from potential pressure on remittances and capital flows. 'CAD will be a key concern going forward," he said, adding that fiscal support may be needed to absorb part of the oil price shock. 'A sustained flare-up in the conflict poses upside risks for estimates of crude oil prices, and India's net oil imports and the current account deficit. A $10/bbl increase in the average price of crude oil for the fiscal will typically push up net oil imports by ~$13-14 billion during the year, enlarging the CAD (current account deficit) by 0.3% of GDP," rating agency Icra Ltd had noted in an earlier report. Oil marketing companies and the government can absorb some of the costs in the short term, Bhanumurthy said. 'There will be fiscal implications, but we do have some fiscal space as we have exceeded fiscal targets in the last two years," he added. A sharp oil price rise could also weigh on foreign inflows and hurt domestic investment sentiment, he warned. A similar note of caution was sounded by Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda, who said that if crude prices stay above $80 for long, the trade deficit will widen and the rupee will come under pressure. "Wholesale inflation will rise accordingly, but the impact on retail inflation will depend on how the government manages fuel prices," he said, adding that excise cuts, if implemented to shield consumers, would widen the fiscal deficit — 'one that can be absorbed." India's current account deficit edged up to $11.5 billion, or 1.1% of GDP, in Q3 FY25 compared to $10.4 billion a year earlier. Retail inflation eased to 2.82% in May, while wholesale price inflation fell to a 14-month low of 0.39%. Icra Ratings on Friday warned that oil is expected to average between $70 and $80 per barrel in FY26, and any sustained rise beyond current levels could weigh on India's growth outlook. Shipping watches Hormuz chokepoint The Strait of Hormuz remains a key chokepoint for global energy and container trade, with Indian shipping companies monitoring the situation closely. 'But operations and movement of ships as of now has remained unaffected in the region. We have not yet received any alerts from either UK Maritime Trade Operations that patrols the area or the Indian Directorate General of Shipping," said Anil Devli, CEO, Indian National Shipowners' Association. Even before the latest flare-up, some ships had begun avoiding the strait, pushing up freight rates and crew costs amid rising security risks. Read this | Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world? Any blockade could spike global energy prices, disrupt supply chains, and hit container trade across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, and East Africa. India is also watching its strategic asset in the region — Chabahar Port in Iran — closely. 'Operations at the port, located near Iran's southeastern border with Pakistan, remain unaffected and normal," an India Ports Global Ltd official said. Meanwhile, Adani Group's Haifa Port in Israel remains fully functional despite the ongoing conflict. 'Earlier strikes caused minor shrapnel damage nearby, but operations were unaffected," another official said. Haifa handles over 30% of Israel's imports and contributes about 5% to Adani Ports' revenue, though it accounts for less than 2% of cargo volumes. Rice exporters brace for fallouts Beyond oil, India's basmati rice exporters are facing uncertainty as Iran, a key buyer, may scale back purchases if tensions persist. Iran typically imports around 1 million tonnes of basmati rice annually from India, accounting for roughly a fifth of India's total basmati exports by volume. Several shipments are currently lying at Indian ports, with exporters hesitant to dispatch consignments amid growing uncertainty. "We are in a catch-22 situation. Amid escalation of tension, many of the exporters, whose shipments are lying at port have kept shipments on hold. If the current situation persists, exporters would be on the receiving end," said Satish Goel, President, All India Rice Exporters Association (AIREA). India's rice exports to Iran rose to $757.3 million in FY25 from $689.8 million a year earlier, accounting for three-fourths of India's total farm exports to the country. Also read | Javier Blas: An Israel-Iran war may not rattle the oil market The timing makes the situation especially sensitive — mid-June to mid-July is peak season for exports, just ahead of Iran's domestic harvest. 'This is a peak season, as in the middle of July Iran might temporarily ban shipments to protect their domestic farmers and ensure fair prices for their harvest," Goel added. 'This is a common practice, particularly during the harvest season, and is aimed at supporting local agriculture by reducing competition from foreign imports. The ban is usually lifted once the domestic harvest is sold." Vijay C Roy and Dhirendra Kumar contributed to this story

Business Standard

33 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Blocking of Strait of Hormuz may impact India's energy procurement: Experts

Any blocking or disruption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz -- a narrow passage connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea -- will have significant global and regional impact, including for India's energy security, strategic affairs experts said on Sunday. Following the US bombing of three major Iranian nuclear sites, Tehran has indicated that closing the Strait of Hormuz for shipping is one of the options on the table to pressure its adversaries. Nearly 30 percent of global oil and a third of the world's LNG (liquefied natural gas) passes through the strait daily and its closure would immediately reduce global supplies triggering a spike in prices, they said. The closure of the narrow passage would have significant global repercussions across energy markets and it will impact India's energy security as well, Dr Laxman Kumar Behera, Associate Professor at Special Centre for National Security Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, told PTI. Behera said any disruption in the critical shipping lane will majorly impact India's crude oil import from Iraq and to an extent from Saudi Arabia. Captain D K Sharma (retd), a former Indian Navy spokesperson who closely follows developments in the Gulf region, said Iran's threat to block the Strait of Hormuz could lead to significant disruptions in global oil trade. Any disruption in shipping traffic could impact insurance premiums, causing costlier rerouting of oil shipments, he argued. "Oil prices are expected to surge due to the increased tensions in the region, with some analysts predicting prices to reach USD 80-USD 90 per barrel or even USD 100 per barrel if Iran responds with retaliatory measures," he noted. Sharma also said that the currencies of the countries in the region may experience significant volatility, and investors may look for other stable markets. According to a recent analysis by the International Energy Agency, even a brief disruption of passage through the Strait of Hormuz will have a significant impact on oil markets. "With geopolitical and economic uncertainties affecting oil producers and consumers alike, oil supply security remains high on the international energy policy agenda," it said. The US on Sunday morning bombed three major nuclear sites -- Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan -- in Iran, bringing itself into the Israel-Iran conflict Later, President Donald Trump said the Iranian nuclear sites were "totally obliterated". Behera said Iran will also face economic consequences if it shuts down the Hormuz strait as such a move will severely cripple Tehran's exports. Since the start of Iran's hostilities with Israel, Iranian officials have spoken about the possibility of shutting the Strait of Hormuz. Mohammad Javad Hosseini, the deputy chief of mission at the Iranian embassy, on Friday said closing the Strait of Hormuz is an option. "We have many things on the table, but it doesn't mean that we are going to do it now. It depends on the situation and how the other players want to go. If they want to solve the problem, definitely some of these things will be put aside," he said.

Hindustan Times

37 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Donald Trump gave Iran two weeks, struck in two days. Here's why the US President didn't wait

US President Donald Trump warned Iran on Friday that it had up to two weeks to avoid possible military action. But just two days later, on Sunday, the US military hit key nuclear sites in Iran, dealing a major blow to the country's nuclear programme. U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation accompanied by U.S. Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Pool(REUTERS) However, a report by Axios said Trump was exploring the option of talks between US and Iranian officials before deciding to send ground troops. Follow Israel-Iran conflict live updates. The proposal was from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who gave a call to Trump earlier this week when the US President was meeting with G7 leaders in Canada. Trump also reportedly received 'signals' for back-channel talks from Iran. Not only was Trump willing to send Vice President JD Vance and White House envoy Steve Witkoff to Turkey for the talks, according to Axios, he even offered to attend the talks himself if need be. This proposal for talks was conveyed to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi by Erdogan. Both Iranian officials reportedly tried reaching Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with the proposal but couldn't. Khamenei went into hiding into a secure underground bunker, fearing an assassination attempt. After the Iranian officials failed to reach him, they informed Turkey, who then told the US that talks would not happen. Days after the meeting was called off, Erdogan reportedly met Araghchi in Istanbul and urged him to hold talks with the US, assuring that Turkey was willing to arrange it. The same day, B-2 stealth bombers departed from the US airbase in Missouri, and later struck three key nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, in Iran. Using the B-2 stealth bombers and bunker-buster bombs, the US joined its ally Israel in the fight against Iran's nuclear ambitions. Ever since the Iran-Israel conflict began on June 13, Trump had been warning Tehran to back down and 'come to their senses' about their nuclear plans. As he announced the US military operation in Iran, Trump said a full payload of bombs were dropped on Fordow, a nuclear site very important to Iran, and considered impenetrable by Israeli bombs. 'There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!" Trump said in a Truth Social post. Even as Trump asked "Middle East bully" Iran to come to peace following the strikes, Iran has said it reserves the right to defend itself against the "grave violation".