logo
Death threats against Northern Ireland journalists increasing, says Amnesty

Death threats against Northern Ireland journalists increasing, says Amnesty

Irish Times02-06-2025

Journalists in
Northern Ireland
are facing a sustained campaign of violent threats from paramilitaries, making it the most dangerous place in the UK to be a reporter, according to
Amnesty International
.
Death threats – including under-car booby trap bombs – issued to crime journalists have increased in recent years, with repeated home visits by police warning they are at risk.
Others have been told they will be shot or stabbed and given 48-hour ultimatums to leave the country.
Interviews carried out by Amnesty with 22 journalists uncovered more than 70 incidents of intimidation or attacks in the North since the start of 2019.
READ MORE
Loyalist and dissident republican paramilitaries as well as organised crime groups are behind most of the incidents.
Journalists most at risk have their homes protected by bulletproof windows and doors with alarms linked to police stations.
One reporter was visited by
police
nine times in just under a year to inform her that her life was at risk. A pipe bomb was placed close to her home after a threat.
'Several journalists report that they are receiving more threats in recent years than ever before. It goes beyond threats: they are physically attacked,' according to the Amnesty report entitled Occupational Hazard? Threats and Violence against Journalists in Northern Ireland.
The report, published on Tuesday, says frustration with the police response means some journalists have stopped reporting the crimes to the authorities, citing 'time-consuming processes and lack of action or positive outcome'.
[
Lyra McKee: A bright star, fallen, sacrificed to bigotry and hatred
Opens in new window
]
To date, two journalists have been murdered in Northern Ireland. Investigative reporter
Martin O'Hagan of the Sunday World was killed
close to his Lurgan home by loyalist paramilitaries in 2001 and
Lyra McKee
died after being struck by a bullet fired at police during rioting in Derry in 2019. Dissident republican group, the New IRA, admitted responsibility.
A photographer was shot in the thigh covering a riot in Belfast in 2011.
Concerns are raised in the report about a lack of prosecutions. Amnesty is calling on the State to create a 'safe environment where journalists can work freely and report without fear of reprisals'.
'It is currently failing to do so,' said Amnesty International UK's Northern Ireland director, Patrick Corrigan.
'Journalists are being threatened, attacked and even killed for shining a light on paramilitary groups and others who seek to exert control through violence. This creates a climate of fear that many assumed was consigned to history when the Good Friday Agreement was signed,' he said.
Yet, he said, there has not been a single prosecution for threats against journalists from paramilitary groups.
[
Lyra McKee: Lost Girl of the Troubles
Opens in new window
]
'This sense of impunity only emboldens those behind the threats. When journalists are under attack, press freedom is under attack.'
Among the report's recommendations is the establishment of a new media safety group, with representatives from the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), Public Prosecution Service, media organisations and the National Union of Journalists to deliver a new journalist safety strategy.
The PSNI should also review its procedural response to threats and attacks against journalists and 'conduct investigations capable of leading to successful prosecutions', the report advises.
A Police Ombudsman's report examining the original police investigation into O'Hagan's murder is expected to be published this year. Amnesty recommends the UK government should order a public inquiry into the killing if 'serious failings or wrongdoing by the police' is found by the watchdog.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sinn Féin's Michelle O'Neill declines to rule out presidential run
Sinn Féin's Michelle O'Neill declines to rule out presidential run

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Sinn Féin's Michelle O'Neill declines to rule out presidential run

Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill has declined to rule out a bid for the presidency . Asked on Friday if she was considering putting her name forward, Ms O'Neill replied: 'I am working my way through our deliberations as we speak.' The Sinn Féin vice-president said the party had not finalised its deliberations on the subject. 'I think I've plenty to do, being First Minister,' Ms O'Neill said at a press conference in Co Armagh . 'But I would think the fact remains that I could stand for election, I could be elected as Uachtarán na hÉireann, but I can't vote in that election, so that's where there's a deficit and what we need to see is presidential voting rights extended to the North so the Irish citizens in the North can vote.' READ MORE Separately on Friday, former SDLP leader Colum Eastwood told the BBC that people had asked him to consider standing for the presidency. 'I'm going to take the time to think about it,' Mr Eastwood said. While SDLP leader, Mr Eastwood was involved in talks with Fianna Fáil about closer co-operation between the parties, although no agreement was progressed. It is expected that should he run in the presidential election, it would be as a Fianna Fáil candidate. Taoiseach Micheál Martin was asked if Mr Eastwood might stand on his party's behalf but he said there had been 'no contact with me' and 'no engagement that I'm aware of with Fianna Fáil'. 'It hasn't been on the agenda at all, I was surprised when I heard that this morning,' Mr Martin said. [ Nobody wants the presidency and its €250k salary. Why? Opens in new window ] On Friday, Mr Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, and Cabinet members joined Ms O'Neill, Northern Ireland's Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly , and members of the Stormont Executive for a plenary meeting of the North South Ministerial Council in Armagh. Topics the meeting focused on included US tariffs and trade, potential co-operation on gender-based violence, mother and baby institutions and Magdalene laundries . It also addressed infrastructure projects and an air route between Derry and Dublin. . Ministers also discussed the redevelopment of Casement Park GAA stadium in Belfast, a project currently facing a funding shortfall. Last week the UK government said it would allocate £50 million (€59 million) to support the rebuild, with the Irish Government also set to contribute £50 million. However, even with other money from the GAA and Northern Ireland's Executive, the project is about £90 million (€105 million) short of what is required to develop a 34,000-seater stadium. A smaller ground could be built with the approximate £120 million available. At a press conference following the meeting, the Taoiseach, Tánaiste and First Minister and Deputy First Minister were clear that now was the time to proceed. 'I think it is about not letting this moment pass,' Mr Harris said. 'Let's not look back in a number of years and see that this moment was squandered.' The Taoiseach said it was 'very important the moment is seized, when significant amounts of money are now on the table, that the stadium can be built here and can be developed'. Ms O'Neill said it was time for all partners involved to come together and find a way to start the work and complete the project. Meanwhile, Ms Little-Pengelly rejected comments by former taoiseach Leo Varadkar to the BBC on Thursday that Ireland was on a 'trajectory' towards unity . He said the most recent numbers show 'a very clear majority of younger people in Northern Ireland want there to be a new united Ireland'. Ms Little-Pengelly said he was 'entitled to reinvent himself in whatever way he so chooses, but he is wrong in terms of the trajectory … I don't accept that it is an inevitability'. Is Conor McGregor really the only person who wants to be President of Ireland? Listen | 19:19

‘Indications' Israel breached human rights obligations during Gaza war, EU review finds
‘Indications' Israel breached human rights obligations during Gaza war, EU review finds

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘Indications' Israel breached human rights obligations during Gaza war, EU review finds

A review by European Union officials has said there are 'indications' that Israel 's actions during the war in Gaza breached commitments to uphold human rights. The finding raises the prospect of the EU taking action against Israel for the first time since the start of the conflict. The review, a portion of which has been seen by The Irish Times, finds Israel's actions during its 20-month bombardment and invasion of Gaza constituted a failure to respect human rights. Focus will now likely turn to potential consequences for Israel, which EU states have to date been unable to find common ground on. READ MORE [ Israeli fire kills at least 44 Palestinians in Gaza Opens in new window ] The review examined whether Israel's actions in the Palestinian enclave had broken guarantees made about upholding human rights as part of the EU's 'association agreement' with Israel. The agreement governs relations between the two sides and includes a free trade deal, access to research funding and enhanced political dialogue. A majority of EU states last month supported a review taking place to determine whether Israel's military campaign in Gaza had broken human rights commitments signed up to as part of the agreement. The review was carried out by officials from the EU diplomatic corps, which is led by foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas. It was shared with diplomats from EU states on Friday evening. It concluded: 'On the basis of the assessments made by the independent international institutions ... There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel association agreement'. The findings will be debated at a meeting of EU foreign affairs ministers in Brussels on Monday. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris is expected to advocate for the EU to use what leverage it has, to put pressure on Israel to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza. It is expected ministers will ask Ms Kallas to come back to a further meeting next month, with a set of proposed actions the EU could take against Israel, such as possibly suspending parts of the EU-Israel association deal. A group of nine states, including Ireland, Spain, Belgium and Poland, have suggested the EU needs to do more to cut off trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and other occupied Palestinian territories. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel's military campaign in Gaza, which began after Hamas militants who control the enclave attacked southern Israel on October 7th, 2023. The governments of Ireland and Spain first called for a review of the EU-Israel deal in February of last year, but received little backing at the time. The worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza, exacerbated by Israel's recent blockade preventing food and aid getting into the territory for several weeks, saw growing support within the EU to exert political pressure on Israel to change course. It is understood the Israeli government has been lobbying EU states intensely behind the scenes through diplomatic and high-level political channels to push back on those efforts. Some of Israel's staunchest allies – Germany, Hungary and Czechia – had opposed the review taking place, as did the governments of Italy and Greece. 'We want to, through this process, up the pressure on Israel to change what they are doing,' a diplomat from one EU state said of the review. 'We want a broad agreement as possible on the outcome of the review.'

UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving the way for historic law change
UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving the way for historic law change

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving the way for historic law change

Assisted dying is a step closer to being made legal in England and Wales after the proposed legislation cleared the House of Commons in a historic vote. A majority of MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation took another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. READ MORE This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of the government's parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister James Cleverly speaks in the House of Commons. Photograph: PA Wire Conservative former minister James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Britain suggested 73 per cent of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75 per cent. – PA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store