Scotland's First Minister John Swinney defends new guidance on tackling pupil behaviour

Scotland's first minister has defended guidance issued to schools on how to deal with violent and aggressive behaviour from pupils amid criticism a stricter approach is required to "restore discipline".
The Scottish government published new guidance earlier this week following calls from teachers for help to tackle the issue.
In her foreword, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said that exclusion should only be used as a "last resort".
The guidance aims to focus on improving outcomes by "reinforcing positive behaviour and working to reduce the likelihood of negative behaviour occurring in future".
It comes after a survey by the NASUWT union in March found 83% of members believed pupil violence and aggression had increased in the last year.
At First Minister's Questions on Thursday, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives said violent and disruptive behaviour in schools "is getting worse".
MSP Russell Findlay added: "A small minority of pupils prevent the majority from learning in peace and in safety.
"Some teachers feel unsafe. Many feel unsupported. The SNP's naive and weak approach fails absolutely everyone."
The Scottish government said the new guidance had been developed with input from headteachers, teaching unions, local government and educational psychologists.
Mr Findlay said it was "complicated and confusing", branding it "49 pages of tedious, hand-wringing nonsense".
He also criticised some of the suggested measures, including giving "violent pupils laminated bullet points, telling them to think about their behaviour", and tackling unsafe behaviour by having "a conversation to jointly problem solve with the child".
Mr Findlay added: "And it also says that disruptive pupils should be allowed to leave class two minutes early, which to me sounds like a reward rather than a punishment."
The MSP said his party had "long argued that a stricter approach is necessary to restore discipline in schools" as he called on the first minister to empower teachers to be able to do so.
He continued: "We believe in exclusions for violence because they protect staff and pupils, and because they work."
In response, John Swinney agreed that disruptive behaviour in schools was the product of a "minority of pupils".
But the first minister added: "I don't think for a moment that Mr Findlay's presentation of the guidance is in any way, shape or form representative of what is actually there."
Mr Swinney argued the guidance had been designed to de-escalate and resolve situations to ensure the youngsters are well supported to "fulfil their potential".
He explained: "Because if young people are unable to participate in their education, they are unlikely to go into good outcomes in our society, and we will simply repeat the difficulties that we've seen for many years of young people who do not go on to positive destinations."
Mr Swinney said there had been 11,676 exclusions in 2022/23.
Although lower than what was recorded in 2018/19, the first minister said "it is still a very high level of exclusion of young people from our schools".
Mr Swinney pointed to a summit he recently hosted in an attempt to curb school violence, where he said none of the attendees pushed for increased exclusions.
He said: "So, what we are getting from Russell Findlay today is a demonisation of young people and a failure to address the mechanisms and the interventions required to solve a difficult issue in our society."
Mr Findlay - a former crime journalist - has repeatedly criticised the SNP's "soft touch justice regime" and in recent months raised the issue of organised crime gangs "grooming" vulnerable youngsters as they face a "reduced risk" of being jailed due to the nation's sentencing guidelines for under-25s.
Mr Swinney said exclusions can have "negative consequences", explaining: "If a young person is excluded from school, they are not in the safe environment of school.
"They are therefore likely to be out on the streets and therefore potentially able to become involved in some of the criminal activity that Mr Findlay himself has put to me within the last fortnight at First Minister's Questions as being a risk to which young people are exposed."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

44 minutes ago

• BBC News

Hull asylum seeker: 'I have years of work in me'

As part of Refugee Week, people in Hull, the scene of rioting and anti-immigration protests 10 months ago, have been learning more about two asylum seekers who have fled Sierra a sunny car park, Francis waves hello to us on his phone screen. Having spent seven months in Hull waiting to hear if he would be granted refugee status, he is now in Scotland preparing an appeal with a lawyer after his claim was are on a group call so Francis can speak to Daniel Roche, a director at Roche Civil Engineering in Hull, who wants to understand his story and what refugees can offer businesses in this country."Every refugee was an asylum seeker once", Francis adds. "When you make an application for refugee status, you are an asylum seeker. If you get that granted, you become a refugee."And can you work when you're a refugee?" asks Daniel. "Yes, if I get refugee status, I can work," replies says to have people like Francis on his team would solve a big headache in the industry. According to industry website Civil Edge, 225,000 new workers will be needed by 2027."All we talk about is a shortage of skilled labour," Daniel explains. As the pair continue to chat, they discover they have plenty in common. They each have two children, but one difference is that Francis is thousands of miles from his girls after he fled West Africa in fear of his life."Back home, I was involved in politics and worked on the elections in 2018. There was some election malpractice and because of saying what I saw, my life was at risk."Daniel adds: "It's not fair, is it? Because of the hand you were dealt, where you were born, things out of [Francis's] control, he's ended up in the UK, with qualifications that are useable here and he can't work."After the call, I join trustee Shirley Hart at Welcome House - a community base and support centre for asylum seekers in part of Refugee Week, representatives from the Refugee Council are there to offer advice and people are getting help to fill in forms, one of which is for Hull college, where they can apply for an English course if they have been here for six aroma of spiced food comes from the kitchen, where volunteers cook a hot meal whenever the centre is is useful to those who live in shared accommodation, who, according to the government, get £49.17 per week each to cover food, travel and clothes. Those in full board hotels get £8.86 per Welcome House, we meet Sillah, who says he fled Sierra Leone in fear of his arriving in Europe he has been diagnosed with hepatitis C and cirrhosis of the liver. He was living at a hotel in the city until he collapsed in March and had to spend three months in the meantime, his application for refugee status was refused and his hotel place was withdrawn, along with his allowance. His condition is controlled now with medication but doctors are unable to release him until he has somewhere to go."I don't want to take up a hospital bed," he says. "But I have nowhere to go. I can't go back [to Sierra Leone]."My life is in danger and without this medicine, I will collapse again." Home Office applications He is talking to Helen, a former Hull primary teacher, who wanted to hear about Sillah's hopes for the future."I'm 30 this year. I have many years of work in me and I want to work in care," he to charity Skills for Care, there are about 131,000 vacant posts in the caring industry."When we're getting to know people, we always ask what they do," Shirley adds."In one day, we had a vet, a doctor, an ophthalmologist and a civil engineer. I see educated, young men who want to work but can't work because asylum seekers can't work."And because of the backlog at the home office... that's why they're in hotels for months and years."At the end of March 2025, there were 79,000 cases awaiting an initial decision, relating to 110,000 people, but the figures suggest the Home Office is making its way through the number is 9% fewer than the end of March 2024. The number of cases awaiting an initial decision is 41% lower than the peak at the end of June 2023 (134,000 cases).Helen sighs."How lucky are we?" she says."Sillah's is just one story. There's a hotel full of people with stories; there's a room full of people here with stories."It is our duty to treat other human beings as human beings, not just numbers, cases and problems." Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

The National

an hour ago

• The National

BBC issues correction after Debate Night 'bias' on eve of by-election

The programme, aired on June 4 – the night before the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election – was billed as a "Glasgow Special" episode. It featured the SNP's Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken, Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells, artist David Eustace as well as both Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney and Labour peer Willie Haughey. READ MORE: Scottish Labour drop below Alba and Greens as by-election results called The initial promotion material for the programme did not make it immediately clear that Haughey was a Labour peer, instead stating that he was an "entrepreneur". Tonight, join Debate Night for a Glasgow Special@StephenJardine will be joined by @SusaninLangside, @AnnieWellsMSP, @PaulJSweeney, Lord Willie Haughey, and David Eustace June 4th at 9pm on @BBCScotland, 10:40pm on @BBCOne Scotland Apply here: — BBC Debate Night (@bbcdebatenight) June 4, 2025 Further, there were no Green politicians represented on the programme, despite being the third largest party at Glasgow City Council with 11 councillors, leading the party to lodge a formal complaint accusing the BBC of "bias". The SNP also expressed anger at the decision, with a party source telling The National that Debate Night appeared to have 'thrown the BBC's proposed guidance on balance out of the window.' The by-election, which took place the following day, was won by Scottish Labour's Davy Russell with 8559 votes. The SNP's Katy Loudon came in second with 7959 votes, while Reform UK's Ross Lambie picked up 7088 votes. Now, the BBC has issued a correction on its decision to feature two Labour politicians. READ MORE: Actor Alan Cumming to receive honorary degree from University of St Andrews In a clarification published on Friday, the BBC admitted that it "could have been clearer" on Haughey's designation as a Labour peer. The full statement reads: "In featuring Lord Haughey, as part of the panel, we could have been clearer on his designation as a Labour peer. "While the programme did cite his status as a Labour donor and our social media team referenced prominently his party political affiliation in the House of Lords once the programme was live, we should have applied that approach consistently to both the pre-broadcast publicity on social media and referenced that point clearly on air. "We are happy to clarify that point."

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Dundee University had ‘overbearing leadership and lax financial controls'

An 'overbearing' principal, poor financial controls and a lack of transparency contributed to Dundee University's financial meltdown, a scathing report has concluded. The results of the independent investigation carried out by Professor Pamela Gillies were published on Thursday by the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) and suggest that much of the harm which resulted in a £35 million deficit was self-inflicted. Gillies was tasked with looking into the problems, which threatened to lead to hundreds of jobs losses. The Scottish government has already provided a £22 million bailout to ensure the immediate future of the institution. Gillies, who is a former principal of Glasgow Caledonian University, found that the University of Dundee had failed to adequately address issues around declining numbers of overseas students and did not take cost-saving action early enough, meaning it was 'set up to fail' in its 2024-25 financial year. Professor Shane O'Neill, who took over as interim principal in December, resigned immediately after the report was published. Tricia Bey, the acting chairwoman of the university court, and Carla Rossini, convener of the finance and policy committee, also departed with immediate effect. Jenny Gilruth, the education secretary, said: 'It is evident from the findings that there are serious questions which must be answered by the University of Dundee's management team. 'This is obviously a difficult time for the university but I welcome the decisive action which has been taken with the changes in leadership. It is vital that we now move to a period of stability to ensure the institution can move forward and thrive into the future.' O'Neill, previously the deputy vice-chancellor, and Professor Iain Gillespie, the former principal who left last December, along with other senior finance managers were described as not having 'a culture of openness' at all levels. Gillespie's 'overbearing leadership style' was also highlighted as well as his dislike of 'awkward' questioning, while 'dissent or challenge was routinely shut down'. Submissions made to the inquiry stated that Gillespie 'frequently demonstrated hubris, or excessive pride' in his role. Financial controls were lacking in many areas with the university actually breaching its banking covenants, although that information was not properly conveyed to oversight committees. Many investment decisions 'were not appropriately agreed against their effects on the University's sustainability'. The report also called into question the 'credibility and accuracy' of the documents which were put forward for scrutiny by the university court. It said: 'Information was generally presented in a manner which made it difficult to fully understand the true financial performance of the university.' The 64-page document notes that poor oversight meant 'operational and investment decisions were made without awareness of the university's cash position'. It also raised questions over how more than £40 million of cash was spent, having been raised from selling shares in the successful university spin-out company Exscientia, which uses artificial intelligence to aid drug discovery and development. It was supposed to have been ringfenced for 'strategic development' but instead appears to have been used in the university's day-to-day cash spending Alongside the poor financial governance, the cash problems were worsened by decisions to continue adding new members of staff instead of implementing a recruitment freeze. The total headcount peaked at more than 4,340 but had fallen slightly to about 4,100 by April this year. Francesca Osowska, chief executive of the SFC, said: 'Given the seriousness of the situation, it was important that the investigation was conducted with rigour and transparency. 'The report has identified a range of issues that contributed to the financial challenges facing the university; however, it is quite clear that there have been failures in financial monitoring and reporting, and failures in governance.' Michael Marra, a Labour MSP who used to work at the university, said: 'The report shows that the institution was failed catastrophically by a small group of executive leaders entirely out of their depth and cowed by a hubristic principal who brooked no dissent. 'Details of Iain Gillespie's leadership style are deeply troubling; sidelining, speaking over or publicly criticising women in the university who dared to speak up. 'There were also clear failures of governance, with inaccurate reports which masked the true financial picture, and public statements by the principal that were purposefully misleading.' Miles Briggs, the Scottish Conservative MSP, said: 'This is a devastating report into the gross mismanagement that has existed for far too long at the University of Dundee. 'Senior figures were told what they had to do to get Dundee University into a sustainable position but they repeatedly failed to act, and covered-up the true state of its financial position.'