Bahrain Elected as Non-Permanent Member of UN Security Council for 2026–2027 Term
Bahrain has secured a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council for the 2026–2027 term, following a vote at the UN General Assembly in New York today. The Kingdom garnered an overwhelming 186 votes out of 187, achieving a remarkable 99.5% support rate.
In a statement marking this historic achievement, His Excellency Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, Minister of Foreign Affairs, extended heartfelt congratulations to His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, His Royal Highness Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the Crown Prince and Prime Minister, and to the people of Bahrain.
Dr. Al Zayani emphasized that this resounding vote reflects the global community's confidence in Bahrain's foreign policy, which is rooted in mutual respect, constructive cooperation, and positive engagement. He added that under the wise leadership of His Majesty the King and His Royal Highness the Crown Prince and Prime Minister, Bahrain has consistently demonstrated its commitment to the principles of peace, stability, and international collaboration.
'This prestigious recognition is a testament to Bahrain's unwavering dedication to the values of peace, security, and international cooperation. It also highlights the Kingdom's readiness to play an active role in preserving global peace and security,' Dr. Al Zayani said.
He reaffirmed Bahrain's resolve to work collectively with all Security Council members and the wider UN community to promote peace and stability across the region and the world, while supporting multilateralism and upholding the principles enshrined in the UN Charter.
Dr. Al Zayani concluded by stating that Bahrain's approach during its tenure on the Security Council will be guided by its core values of dialogue, coexistence, mutual respect, and consensus-building. The Kingdom, he said, aims to serve as a voice for diplomacy, a bridge for understanding, and a defender of solutions that embody the aspirations of people worldwide for a peaceful, stable, and prosperous future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
12 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
IAEA Chief Warns of Nuclear Fallout Risk After Israeli Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Sites
Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has issued a grave warning over the risk of nuclear contamination following Israeli airstrikes on several nuclear sites in Iran, calling the situation "extremely dangerous" and urging restraint to avoid triggering a regional nuclear crisis. Speaking at an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council, Grossi confirmed that while no off-site radiological release has yet been detected, the safety of Iran's nuclear facilities has been severely compromised. He warned that continued attacks could lead to major radioactive fallout with wide-ranging consequences. 'The radiation, primarily consisting of alpha particles, poses a significant danger if inhaled or ingested,' said Grossi. 'Chemical toxicity inside the affected facilities is also a major concern.' Damage at Multiple Sites The IAEA chief reported that the Natanz nuclear facility, targeted in the Israeli strikes, suffered internal chemical and radiological contamination, although external radiation levels remain within normal limits. Four buildings at the Esfahan site were also damaged in the June 13 attacks. At Fordow—one of Iran's key uranium enrichment sites—no damage has yet been reported. Grossi particularly emphasized the potential danger to the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, an operational reactor housing thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. 'A direct hit on Bushehr could lead to a very high release of radioactivity into the environment,' he cautioned, noting that even disabling the plant's two power supply lines could trigger a reactor core meltdown. 'Protective actions such as evacuations, sheltering, or iodine distribution could be necessary across distances of several hundred kilometres.' He added that an attack on the Tehran Nuclear Research Reactor could have catastrophic consequences for the capital and its population. A Call for Restraint Grossi reiterated the IAEA's position that armed attacks on nuclear facilities must never occur, calling on all parties to exercise maximum restraint. He warned that escalating military actions threaten not only civilian safety but also ongoing diplomatic efforts to curb nuclear proliferation. 'Military escalation delays indispensable work toward a diplomatic solution for the long-term assurance that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon,' he said. He added that the IAEA remains prepared to enforce a 'watertight inspections regime' that could support a long-term agreement and prevent nuclear weapons development. Grossi stressed that a diplomatic resolution remains within reach—if political will is present. 'This opportunity should not be missed,' he urged. 'The alternative is a protracted conflict and a looming nuclear threat that would erode the Non-Proliferation Treaty and destabilize the entire region.' The warning comes amid heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, with concerns mounting that further strikes could push the Middle East closer to an unprecedented nuclear emergency.
Gulf Insider
17 hours ago
- Gulf Insider
IAEA Chief Warns UN Security Council That Strike On Iran's Bushehr Plant Would Create Nuclear Disaster
The head of the UN nuclear watchdog IAEA,Rafael Mariano Grossi, has issued fresh remarks before the Security Council on Friday, warning that Israeli strikes on Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant is where the consequences of an attack could be most serious. The active and operating nuclear power plant currently hosts thousands of kilograms of nuclear material. He warns of potential nuclear disaster: 'Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear — in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity,' Grossi tells the UN Security Council. More highlights from Grossi's UN address via Al Jazeera: Countries of the region have reached out directly to me over the past few hours to express their concerns, and I want to make it absolutely and completely clear that, in case of an attack on the Bushehr nuclear power plant, a direct hit would result in a very high release of radioactivity to the environment. Similarly, a hit that disables the only two lines supplying electrical power to the plant could cause its reactor core to melt, which could result in a high release of radioactivity to the environment. In their worst case, both scenarios would necessitate protective actions, such as evacuations and sheltering of the population, or the need to take stable iodine with a reach extending to distances from a few to several hundred kilometres. Radiation monitoring would need to cover distances of several hundred kilometres, and food restrictions may need to be implemented. Any action against the Tehran nuclear research reactor could also have severe consequences, potentially for large areas of the city of Tehran and its inhabitants. Armed attack on nuclear facilities should never take place and could result in radioactive releases with great consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the state which has been attacked. I, therefore, again call for maximum restraint. Oil facilities are still getting hit by Israeli warplanes into Friday: A series of headlines, some contradictory, on where things stand with Iran nuclear negotiations with the US, sent oil sliding, then pumping, then extending losses again. One senior Iranian official told Reuters that Iran is 'ready' to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment, while a quick follow-up headline said 'zero enrichment will undoubtedly be rejected' by Iran 'especially now, under Israel's strikes.' The official said 'the role of European powers is now more prominent, as Tehran is unwilling to engage with US amid Israeli attacks. After that glimmer of hope offered for negotiations, the clarification that nothing has in fact change, sent oil dropping further Friday morning. Oil prices declined on Friday but stayed on track for a third straight weekly increase, following the White House's postponement of a decision regarding US participation in the Israel-Iran conflict: Brent crude futures were down $2.57, or around 3.3%, to $76.28 a barrel by 1204 GMT but still set to gain nearly 3% on the week. According to the latest from Bloomberg: Israel will complete the task of preventing Iran from gaining nuclear weapons whether or not the US joins the operation, its energy minister said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the only way to end the war is to 'unconditionally' stop Israel. And Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has clarified just before meeting European officials in Geneva related to EU efforts at mediate that 'Iran is not prepared for negotiations with anyone while Israel continues its attacks.' Click here to read more…
Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Israel Among First at Risk as EU Tightens Visa-Free Entry Rules
European Union introduces tougher criteria for suspending Schengen visa waivers, placing Israel and Serbia under potential scrutiny In a major shift to its travel policy, the European Union is poised to reform the mechanism that governs short-stay visa-free access into the EU and Schengen countries — with Israel reportedly among the first nations at risk under the new rules. The European Parliament and Council reached a political agreement on Tuesday to expand the grounds for suspending visa-free travel. For the first time, violations of international human rights, humanitarian law, and breaches of United Nations resolutions could justify the imposition of mandatory visas for countries currently benefiting from the waiver. According to EU Parliament sources cited by Euronews, Israel's treatment of Palestinians and its ongoing military campaign in Gaza have raised significant concern, with allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity being referenced in UN reports. Serbia has also been named as another country under watch due to repeated concerns about human rights violations. Currently, nationals from 61 countries — including Israel, Australia, the UK, Japan, Ukraine, and the Western Balkans — enjoy visa-free access to the Schengen area for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. However, this exemption can be suspended under certain conditions, though such action has only been taken once in the past — against the Republic of Vanuatu. Under the new agreement, the suspension mechanism will become easier to trigger. Thresholds for invoking the mechanism have been lowered, and additional criteria have been introduced. Notably, the reformed rules empower the EU to suspend visa-free access if a country is found to be violating UN Charter principles, ignoring international court rulings, or involved in systemic human rights abuses. 'This tool helps us deliver the values that have built our community and allows us to enforce human rights and respect for international law,' said Slovenian MEP Matjaž Nemec, the lead rapporteur for the legislation. 'No specific country is being targeted,' he added, although sources suggest that discussions around Israel played a significant role in shaping the final draft. Under the procedure, the European Commission would issue an implementing act to suspend visa-free access for an initial period of one year. This decision must be approved by EU member states and can only be blocked by a qualified majority. Extensions would require further acts, which could be vetoed by either the Council or the European Parliament. In addition to human rights criteria, the reformed regulation introduces stricter controls over irregular migration. The threshold to flag a "significant increase" in irregular stays will now drop from 50% to 30% of the previous period's numbers. Furthermore, the benchmark for low asylum approval rates — another trigger for suspension — will rise from 4% to 20%. These changes are seen as part of the EU's broader push to manage migration and assert values-based diplomacy. 'The Polish presidency pushed hard for this reform due to strong ambitions among member states,' Nemec added, highlighting the political momentum behind the deal. While the legislation has been agreed upon in principle, it must still be formally adopted by both the European Parliament and the Council before becoming law. Once enacted, it could have significant implications for countries currently enjoying visa-free travel — especially those under scrutiny for human rights practices.
