Windfarm campaign calls for planning inquiry on Skye
Just over a week ago major new grid infrastructure, the Skye overhead replacement line, was approved by the Scottish Government.
These developments, said Andrew Robinson, a spokesperson for Skye Windfarm Information Group, said could 'massively change Skye's landscape and cause untold damage both to the local environment, and to tourism, the island's key industry".
'The Scottish Government,' he said, 'have the power to initiate planning inquiry commissions. These are when you look at a big, strategic plan. Three times we've written to Gillian Martin, the energy minister, to say that we think on Skye because of its unique nature they should have a planning inquiry commission to look at what it's appropriate to build here. But they refused that. They just said that the existing planning process is enough.'
Skye, one of Scotland's top tourist destinations, currently has two windfarms, but there are a further eight at various stages of planning and scoping. These include Edinbane, Ben Aketil, Glen Ullinish, Glen Ullinish II, Ben Sca, Balmeanach and Breakish.
One of these applications, for an extension at Ben Aketil, in which nine turbine will be removed and substituted with 200m high replacements, is now at the desk of the Scottish Government reporter following an objection by the Highland Council, and will be the subject of a local public inquiry on the island this week.
Scottish Windfarm Information Group campaigners (Image: Vicky Allan)
In a previous letter to the Scottish Government, Robinson said: 'There is an urgent need to take a strategic look at all of the plans proposed for Skye. At present residents are overwhelmed by the individual planning applications they face, and may wish to object to.
'The paperwork for each application is huge. Communities are expected to comment and respond to each application yet we have no resources. The developers, usually funded by overseas private equity companies, have access to consultants, PR and marketing experts and endless legal and planning advice.
'The proposed plans will be overwhelming. They can not be justified on basis of need as Scotland stands to more than meet its renewable energy targets if the current consented wind farms across the country are built. The plans will cause untold destruction to Skye's fragile and beautiful habitat.'
Read more:
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Ministerial powers to refer certain planning questions to a Planning Inquiry Commission apply to cases where there are considerations of national or regional importance and a proper evaluation of them cannot be made unless there is a special inquiry for the purpose; and that the technical or scientific aspects of the proposed development are of so unfamiliar a character as to jeopardise a proper determination of that question unless there is a special inquiry for the purpose.
'There are however existing and well-established consenting procedures for renewable and grid infrastructure, including for the consideration of any cumulative impacts arising. Therefore, we have no plans to constitute a Planning Inquiry Commission.
'The Scottish Government has an ambition, as set out in our Onshore Wind Policy Statement, for 20GW of Onshore Wind by 2030 and we are working with the onshore wind industry to ensure that the delivery of this ambition supports our regional and national economies, communities and nature. The UK Government's Clean Power Action Plan respects the Scottish Government's onshore wind ambitions for 2030.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Highland-wide holiday lets control zone proposed by councillors
A Highland-wide control zone to limit Airbnb-style lets has been suggested as a way of tackling a shortage of homes across the proposing the move said 7,011 short-term let licences had been granted across the Highlands, but only four lets are not banned in control areas, but operators need planning permission as well as a short-term lets councillors said the powers could be used where there was local demand for them. Highland Council officials said control area status for the whole of the Highlands would require research and, if it was introduced, could mean additional costs and workload for its planning department. The idea of Highland-wide status has been suggested by Inverness councillors Michael Gregson and Duncan a paper going to next week's meeting of the full council, they said the region needed more than 24,000 homes over the next 10 added: "The private long-term rental market has shrunk disastrously: estate agents are withdrawing from letting out properties because of the shortage of properties available. "Even taking into account the efforts of Highland Council and the Housing Associations, there is a shortage of affordable housing."The councillors said the local authority should first ask the Scottish government to revisit its original plan to have an overprovision policy within short-term lets said if that was not possible, then to seek approval for Highland control area their response, officials said there would be financial implications for the local authority around both suggestions from the also said there could be potential challenges to Highland-wide of Edinburgh Council had to amend its licensing scheme following a court ruling. The whole of the City of Edinburgh Council area was designated Scotland's first short-term let control area in September 2022.A law requiring operators to have a licence came into force across Scotland in October the following Council's first control zone was approved in December 2023 and covers Badenoch and who supported its introduction said it was needed because workers and local young people had difficulties finding affordable the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers (ASSC) said at the time that targeting legitimate small businesses to address longstanding housing issues showed "a muddled sense of priorities".
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Tunnock's is not to blame for society's problems
We know why the government feels this is necessary: we have eyes and the official figures provide the proof. In 2003, according to the Scottish Government, one-quarter of adults in Scotland were obese. Now it's one-third. And with obesity comes increased risk of cancer, diabetes and death and, as the UK Government points out, a cost of billions of pounds to the NHS. We are deep in a serious crisis that's getting worse. The question is how we get out of it and Tunnock's feels it is being unfairly targeted. Its sales director Fergus Loudon said in Scottish Grocer magazine that the food industry was being blamed for societal problems that were not of its making. 'Banning chocolate biscuit ads on TV before nine o'clock to prevent obesity,' he said, 'is rather like banning foreign holidays to prevent skin damage from too much sun.' A couple of things are going on here. First, it would be stupid to deny that food ads have an effect and that restricting ads can have some effect on what we buy and eat. The science writer Ellen Ruppel Shell points out in her very good book on obesity, Fat Wars, that Burger King spends more than half-a-billion dollars on promotional efforts every year and does it because it works. Conversely, no or little advertising would have the opposite effect to some extent and reduce consumption. 'Free-market capitalism is wonderful for many things,' says Shell, 'but public health is not among them.' However, accepting that advertising has an effect is not the same as solving the health crisis because it goes deeper than that. There's been virtually no advertising of vapes and vaping, for instance, and yet vaping has exploded as a habit. It's also worth pointing out that Tunnock's (est. 1890) was around when there wasn't an obesity crisis and is around when there absolutely is an obesity crisis. Of course, a ban on ads will have an effect around the edges, but the crisis will go on until we tackle the deeper trends advertising cannot change – what Mr Loudon of Tunnock's calls societal problems. I raise this subject whenever I talk to people in the food industry and it pretty much always comes back to the same few things. I had lunch with the French chef Jean-Christophe Novelli in Edinburgh and asked him what he thought was to blame for obesity. He said without a moment's hesitation: mobiles. We're getting fatter, he said, because of what we've done to our brains with technology – the constant messages, the instant gratification – and it means we're more absorbed in technology than in cooking and eating well. 'This is the thing that inflates your stomach,' he said, pointing to his phone. I agree with chef Novelli – we know phones are changing the way we behave, I can feel it myself. We also know it starts young. Children are much less likely now to be active and outdoors because they prefer their phones but Shell also writes in Fat Wars that no-one is born with a taste for hot, bitter or sour or, for that matter, single malt or cigars: tastes develop with exposure and social pressure – and that's fine as long as the influences are good. However, as Shell points out, in the US and the UK, children increasingly dictate family food choices, which leaves households 'immersed in a miasma of one-dimensional sweet taste that reinforces and entrains juvenile preferences'. Read more Are you 'upset'? The dangers of flags in Scottish schools These are the latest plans at the Glasgow School of Art. Really? No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it all go wrong? Anyone who grew up in the 1970s or earlier will know how true this is. I try to avoid using the phrase 'in my day' if I can, but in my day it was your parents who dictated the food choices based on what was good for you and how much it cost. Sweet foods like a Tunnock's Caramel Log, or the greatest British biscuit of all, the custard cream, were allowed as a treat but only a treat. By contrast, children now appear to be able to wield control and a veto on certain foods that would have been unthinkable in the 1970s. Adverts were around then and adverts are around now – it's the parenting that's changed. How we fix the problem isn't easy – we're now into the second generation of parents who don't know how to cook and have handed food choices to their kids. But another chef I've spoken to is Gary Maclean, senior chef lecturer at City of Glasgow College and a winner of MasterChef: The Professionals. He knows what's he talking about because he lived it. He grew up in the 1970s when most food was cooked from scratch and something like Wimpy was a treat. Now, kids are outdoors much less than they were, and McDonald's and KFC are a ubiquitous part of many children's diets. Result: fat kids. Maclean is well aware that an important factor in all of this is poverty. Unhealthy rubbish is relatively cheap. There was also an interesting Glasgow University study which showed that fast-food outlets are six times more prevalent in the poorest parts of the city. And it's all borne out by what happens to children and adults. By primary one, five-year-olds in Scotland are more than twice as likely to be at risk of obesity if they're from the most deprived catchments compared to the least. Roughly the same with adults: the obesity rate in the most affluent areas is 26% compared to 36% in the poorest neighbourhoods. An ad for Tunnock's (Image: Newsquest) You may think the answer to the problem is to tax unhealthy food, but Gary Maclean's concern is that it just makes life for poorer people even harder. Much better, he says, to try to get in early and encourage good habits at an early stage. If he had his way, he would make cooking and food education compulsory in schools – and it's hard to resist his logic. 'Learning to cook is just as important as learning to write,' he said. 'PE is compulsory and what you eat is just as important as what you do.' His conclusion is that Scotland has the best food in the world but the worst diet, and only something fundamental such as compulsory food lessons at school will change it. You could introduce all the rules on ads you like – you could ban ads for Tunnock's Teacakes entirely – but not only would that be unfair on a firm like Tunnock's that's trying to promote its product, it would only make a marginal difference on a population affected, and made unhealthier, by deeper trends. As it happens, Mr Loudon of Tunnock's also believes it's education that will address the problem and he's right: don't change the ads, change how we see them, and react to them. There's nothing wrong with a biscuit or two as part of a healthy balanced diet; all we need to do is to re-learn the fact.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
New landscape charter gets Scottish Government backing
It set out steps to implement the ELC in Scotland, encouraging democratic involvement, valuing all landscapes as national assets, and encouraging stewardship and shared responsibility. A fresh charter by Scotland's Landscape Alliance, a coalition of 60 organisations, has been officially endorsed by the Scottish Government, and specifically addresses the climate and nature emergencies, with a new emphasis on sustainable land-use, biodiversity enhancement, and climate resilience. Read More: The new charter is designed to be regularly updated through an associated workshop series, and has also been formally endorsed by Nature Scot, Historic Environment Scotland, and the Scottish Land Commission. As a result it will be integrated into public planning decisions, aligning with policy goals such as net zero, land reform and public health. A case study included with the new charter focuses the Isle of Canna, where the community and the National Trust for Scotland worked together to make the island more sustainable and liveable. They built new homes, improved paths, restored old buildings, and made the land better for wildlife, showing how people can shape their own landscapes in a way that protects nature, supports the local economy, and respects history with the community at the heart of the decisions. The Scottish Government's Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, Mairi Gougeon said in a letter of support: "The Charter helpfully highlights the twin crises of biodiversity loss and climate change and points to landscape considerations being a key element in decision making if we are to achieve our ambition of a net zero and nature positive Scotland.' Rachel Tennant, co-chair of Scotland's Landscape Alliance said: 'Scotland's landscapes define who we are as a nation and sustain and support us as people. 'Landscapes have always been shaped by social, economic and technological developments. However, the pressing global crises of climate change and biodiversity loss are now recognised as key factors accelerating the pace of this change. 'Our landscapes are evolving as a consequence of competing demands and these significant threats, but they also need to be subject to positive and constructive change as a result of our response to them. 'This charter is about promoting awareness of the critical contribution of the landscape to all our lives and to promote the action required to maximise the many benefits they bring now and for the future.' Diarmid Hearns, interim director of conservation & policy at the National Trust for Scotland said: 'Everywhere we live in Scotland, be it urban, suburban, rural or beside our seas and rivers, faces the existential threats posed by climate change and biodiversity loss, as well as the economic impacts resulting from this and political and geopolitical events of recent times. 'If we are to thrive, then we need our landscapes to thrive too – they define us, our heritage and our diversity they affect our wellbeing, both mentally and physically, we rely on them for food, jobs and trade, and they are critical to positively protect and enhance biodiversity and the historic environment as well playing a key role in meeting the challenges of climate change 'The unavoidable truth is that we must take care of our landscapes and this means a collaborative, cross sectoral and a forward looking, thoughtful approach to how we design, plan and positively manage change in our landscapes. We need to work with communities of place and interest to deliver functional, resilient and dynamic landscapes and to make better choices for people and nature.' To ensure the charter is promoted and actively used, an initial action plan for implementation will be created in the coming months and updated on annual basis. This will include an event to be held on 30 October 2025 to advance its development and subsequent updating.
