MPL parent company serves legal notice to ASCI, demands INR 50 crore for alleged defamation
HighlightsGalactus Funware Technology, the parent company of Mobile Premier League, has issued a legal notice to the Advertising Standards Council of India demanding the withdrawal of a whitepaper on opinion trading and seeking INR 50 crore in damages for alleged defamation. The legal notice accuses the Advertising Standards Council of India of publishing a biased whitepaper that misrepresents Mobile Premier League's advertisements by allegedly tampering with screenshots and removing disclaimers. Galactus Funware Technology is challenging the authority of the Advertising Standards Council of India to comment on opinion trading, arguing that it does not have the mandate to categorize such activities as lacking skill, particularly as the legality of these games is currently under judicial review.
Galactus Funware Technology
, the parent company of online gaming platform
MPL
(
Mobile Premier League
), has issued a legal notice to the
Advertising Standards
Council of India (
ASCI
), demanding the immediate withdrawal of a whitepaper titled "Examining
Opinion Trading
in India" and seeking INR 50 crore in damages for alleged
defamation
and loss of goodwill.
The legal notice, dated May 23, 2025, sent through their legal counsel Trilegal, accuses ASCI of publishing a "biased and unsubstantiated" whitepaper that relies on "tampered" versions of MPL's advertisements and misrepresents their content to mislead consumers.
Allegations of tampering and misrepresentation
Galactus Funware
claims that the ASCI whitepaper, published in May 2025, deliberately edited screenshots of their advertisements to support a "baseless conclusion" that opinion trading involves an "element of risk" and "chances of financial losses".
The notice highlights specific instances of alleged tampering citing that ASCI allegedly removed disclaimers present in the original advertisement, thereby misrepresenting its compliance with
advertising
codes.
The company states that a screenshot from an educational YouTube video, emphasising "Skill, Interest, Knowledge," was taken out of context and selectively edited to imply risk, despite the video's focus on skill development.
Galactus Funware also claims ASCI reproduced only a partial section of their website, omitting detailed content on skill, knowledge, and responsible gameplay, and intentionally removing disclaimers.
"The Opinion Trading Whitepaper represents a gross misuse of ASCI's position and seemingly been issued with the sole intent of spreading misinformation and defaming our Client," the legal notice states, adding that its "sensationalist tone reeks of vested interests and a blatant disregard for objectivity".
The advertising self-regulatory body, ASCI told ET that they were in receipt of the notice, but a spokesperson denied any wrongdoing. "We are in receipt of the notice and there is absolutely no question of tampering," the regulator said, in response to a query from ET.
ASCI's Mandate Questioned
Beyond the allegations of tampering, Galactus Funware challenges ASCI's authority to publish such a whitepaper. They argue that ASCI's charter, the Code for Self-Regulation in Advertising, does not provide for commenting on the nature or legality of any industry's operations.
The notice further asserts that ASCI has "no technical acumen or mandate" to categorise opinion trading as a game devoid of skill, equating it to betting or wagering, especially when the legality and categorisation of such games are sub-judice before various high courts, with proceedings stayed by the Supreme Court.
Galactus Funware has given ASCI three days from the issuance of the notice to publicly withdraw the whitepaper. Failure to comply will result in the initiation of "appropriate legal actions (both civil and criminal)" for "deceptive and defamatory conduct", the notice said.
The company also warned that it would seek further compensation for each day the whitepaper remains in the public domain beyond the stipulated three days.
Copies of the legal notice have also been sent to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the All India Gaming Federation. When ET reached out to MPL for their response, a spokesperson declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Click, Learn, Repeat? Not yet. 2 of 3 Indians prefer degrees over online courses
With the rise of online platforms like Coursera, UpGrad, and others offering short-term courses for quick skill-building and better job prospects, a recent report by TeamLease EdTech shows that most Indian professionals still trust long-term degrees. The report, titled 'Impact of Upskilling on Performance Appraisals', finds that 66% of respondents firmly believe that traditional degrees and diplomas continue to hold strong value in career COURSES STILL SERVES THE PURPOSEWhile degrees remain important for career advancement, the report also shows that professionals actively use short-term courses to address immediate job 50% of respondents reported using platforms like YouTube and short online certifications that last 1 to 3 months. This trend is more common in sectors like Sales and Marketing, where over 80% of professionals said they used short courses to develop role-specific when it comes to gaining promotions or shifting roles, long-term academic programmes still AS A CAREER SIGNALFormal education, the report suggests, plays a bigger role than just providing knowledge. For many, it acts as a credential during performance reviews and appraisals. In an era where employees are steering their own career journeys, the weight of a recognised degree appears to offer both structure and report states that 84% of professionals took up some form of upskilling in the past year, with many choosing degree or diploma programmes to help secure their career who opted for longer formats often reported greater clarity in their career plans—even when promotions didn't follow TERM THINKING DRIVES LEARNING CHOICESOne of the major findings points to long-term career planning as the biggest reason behind upskilling. About 61% of those surveyed cited future planning as their key individuals were found to be three times more likely to feel confident about their career PAYS FOR UPSKILLING?Surprisingly, nearly half - about 46%-of professionals self-funded their most recent learning effort, while only 24% received full support from their employers. Tech and finance professionals led in self-funding, with about 78% in these sectors covering their PATH IN UPSKILLINGThe report highlights a clear pattern: professionals rely on short-term learning for daily tasks but lean on formal education for long-term 42% of respondents reported receiving a promotion, new role, or salary hike within 18 months of upskilling, and many of them had invested in long-term study, based on responses from over 14,000 professionals across sectors like Sales, Tech, HR, and Finance, sheds light on how upskilling choices affect career milestones such as appraisals and Watch
Indian Express
8 hours ago
- Indian Express
Google used YouTube's video library to train its most powerful AI tool yet: Report
Google used thousands of YouTube videos to train its latest Gemini and Veo 3 models, even as most creators remain unaware of their content being used for AI training purposes. Veo 3 is the tech giant's most advanced AI video generation model that was unveiled at this year's I/O developer conference. It is capable of generating realistic, cinematic-level videos with complete sound and even dialogue. And Google leveraged a subset of the 20-billion catalogue of YouTube videos to train these cutting-edge AI tools, according to a report by CNBC. While it is unclear which of the 20 billion videos on YouTube were used for AI training, Google said that it honours agreements with creators and media companies. 'We've always used YouTube content to make our products better, and this hasn't changed with the advent of AI. We also recognize the need for guardrails, which is why we've invested in robust protections that allow creators to protect their image and likeness in the AI era — something we're committed to continuing.' a company spokesperson was quoted as saying. Creators have the option to block companies like Amazon, Nvidia, and Apple from using their content for AI training. But they do not have the choice to opt out when it comes to Google. While YouTube has previously shared all of this information, many creators and media organisations are yet to fully understand that Google is allowed to train its AI models on YouTube's video library. YouTube's Terms of Service state that 'by providing Content to the Service, you grant to YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicensable and transferable license to use that Content.' YouTube content could be used to 'improve the product experience … including through machine learning and AI applications,' the company further said in a blog post published in September 2024. Independent creators have raised concerns that their content is being used to train AI models that could eventually compete with or replace them. AI-generated content also leads to the rise of other models that could compete with human creators who have said that they are neither credited nor compensated for their contributions. Last week, The Walt Disney Company and Comcast's Universal said that they have filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney, accusing the AI image generator of unlawfully copying and distributing their most iconic characters. Describing the tool as a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism,' the studios alleged that Midjourney recreated and monetised copyrighted figures without permission. Days later, the AI research lab rolled out its first-ever text-to-video generation model called V1. According to Midjourney, V1 can be used to convert images into five-second AI-generated video clips. Users can also upload images or use an AI-generated image by Midjourney to animate the image.
India.com
13 hours ago
- India.com
Why is so much money suddenly coming to India from THESE countries, and who is sending it?
Image for representational purposes New Delhi: Due to the depreciation of the Indian rupee, the Indians living in the Gulf countries like the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia have increased remittances back to India. It is important to note that the rupee has weakened against the AED (UAE's currency), with one AED now valued at approximately Rs 23.5 — the lowest since the beginning of April. The fall in the rupee's value has prompted Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) to quickly send money home. There has been an increase in AED-INR transactions since June 19. Officials at currency exchange houses say NRIs are no longer waiting for further depreciation. Those who have even a small amount of money are remitting it immediately. A senior official at a UAE exchange house told Gulf News, 'Last Thursday was the best day in recent weeks to send money through AED-INR.' He also mentioned that although the rupee briefly strengthened to 23.46, most NRIs continued to remit funds. Remittances Usually Dip in June Remittances generally decrease in June. This is because many Indians spend on travel and other expenses during the summer holidays. However, this year, the pattern has changed due to decrease in the value of rupee. Remittance volumes remained steady even over the weekend and are expected to stay strong through Monday. Officials from exchange houses say that if the rupee remains weak or falls further in July, it will benefit those sending money. One official said, 'If the rates stay at this level or drop again, it will be a double advantage.' Growth Seen Despite Geopolitical Uncertainty It is important to note that the growth has come despite geopolitical uncertainty, including the conflict between Israel and Iran. Typically, such events lead investors to turn to the US dollar as a safe haven. However, this time, gold has played that role. In simple terms, the decline in the value of the rupee has proven beneficial for NRIs. They are able to send more rupees to India while spending fewer AED. As a result, they are taking advantage of this opportunity and remitting more money home.
