Is This The Lowest Rates Rise In The Country? Whanganui Council Holds Firm On 2.2 Percent
Article – Moana Ellis – Local Democracy Reporter
The council is holding firm on an increase of 2.2 percent.Whanganui District Council is sticking to an average rates increase of 2.2 percent following deliberations on its draft Annual Plan.
Mayor Andrew Tripe believes it's the lowest rise in the country for the year ahead.
The plan for 2025/26 will go before the council in June to be adopted.
Tripe said the council has focused on doing the basics well, investing in core infrastructure, and involving the community in decision-making.
The big topics thrashed out by the council in this week's deliberations were creating a standalone housing entity to grow housing stock, adopting a new strategy for Whanganui, changes to fees and charges, and increasing loan repayments.
In each case, community feedback aligned with the council's preferred options.
On Thursday, the council confirmed it would:
Continue to consider a standalone housing entity
Consider all submissions and feedback to inform any minor changes ahead of adopting the draft Strategy for Whanganui
Proceed with proposed changes to fees and charges for the year ahead
Pay off an additional $590,000 of debt.
Operational budget changes have also been made since the council opened its draft Annual Plan 2025/26 for consultation.
This includes water levies set by water services authority Taumata Arowai to recover the cost of regulatory functions. These levies will take effect from 1 July, 2025 and are expected to cost around $16 per household.
Tripe said it was 'incredibly frustrating' to receive news of the levies just as the council was about to adopt its budgets for the year ahead.
'It is yet another example of central government shifting costs to local councils and communities – when it should be administered and funded at a national level.'
These levies, along with proposed Commerce Commission levies, would be incorporated into the Annual Plan budget for 2025/26 and would affect three waters rates for connected households.
To ensure full transparency, the levies would be identified on rates notices.
However, they would not increase overall rates due to additional income from other council revenue streams.
The Annual Plan will be adopted on 26 June, with the plan taking effect from 1 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Wording of campaign draws ire after lack of public consultation
"Together we decided" - that is the catchphrase of a Selwyn District Council campaign to tell people how their rates will be spent. But the word "together" has come under fire because the council bypassed public consultation, relying on the 1500 submissions it received as part of the Long Term Plan just over a year ago. The campaign, which the council spent $8000 advertising, focuses on two taglines: "Together we decided" and "together we're delivering". It was designed to provide an update on projects scheduled for the year ahead. On Wednesday councillors voted to approve the 14.2% average rates increase as part of adopting the 2025-26 Annual Plan. The vote was five to three with Ellesmere Ward councillor Elizabeth Mundt, Springs Ward councillor Grant Miller and Malvern Ward councillor and mayoral candidate Lydia Gliddon voting against the plan. Darfield Residents Association chair Harvey Polglase was not impressed with the campaign and said it was farcical the council did not recognise the need for consultation given the amount rates were increasing. 'We certainly did not decide, we were denied the opportunity to decide,' he said. In November, councillors voted 8-2 not to have a consultation on this year's rates rise. Instead they opted to 'engage and inform', which this campaign is part of. The decision to forgo consultation also meant councillors were unable to make any changes to the wording in the draft annual plan beyond small tweaks. Rolleston Residents Association chair Mark Alexander said he personally did not agree with the campaign. 'We haven't decided anything – except not to consult the community in 2025,' he said. Mayoral candidate and Malvern Ward councillor Lydia Gliddon said the campaign was 'tongue-in-cheek' given there was no consultation on this year's annual plan. 'The wording is not quite right when saying 'together' when we are 'engaging and informing'.' Gliddon, along with Springs Ward councillor Grant Miller, had voted in favour of holding a consultation. Mayor Sam Broughton defended the choice of wording. 'I think we have talked to our community, and it has been very transparent. We had 1500 submissions to the Long Term Plan, which includes what we are delivering this year,' he said. 'So together we did decide to do all of the things we are continuing to deliver for our community.' Broughton said it would be a waste of ratepayers' money to have another consultation just a year after deciding on the Long Term Plan. The last time the council skipped consultation in year two of a long-term plan was in 2019, when rates rose by 6%. Gliddon and Ellesmere Ward councillor Elizabeth Mundt were surprised at the timing of the campaign which started a week ago – before councillors had approved the draft annual plan. Broughton said he had expected the campaign to start tomorrow after the councillors had voted.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Nicola Willis Misleading On Job Numbers
Finance Minister Nicola Willis is misleading Kiwis by claiming she's created jobs when she hasn't. 'In today's Finance and Expenditure Committee hearing, Nicola Willis said that their policies will create 240,000 jobs, but those jobs are because of population growth, not because of her Budget,' Labour finance and economy spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. 'In fact, there are 30,000 fewer jobs now than when they took office, and Treasury says 20,000 more people will be unemployed at the end of the forecast period. 'She acts like there is a surge in opportunity, but really she's spinning her terrible economic mismanagement to suit her. 'Just like her story on the cost of living, which is falling to pieces before her eyes as she can't find a single family who has received her campaign promise of $250 a fortnight. 'Today will also come as a shock to those who were expecting a Working for Families top up of $7 a week, as promised in the recent Budget – because that won't come in for another year. 'It was the only cost of living relief Nicola Willis could name on Budget Day and it isn't actually going to help anyone until April 2026. 'This Government is misleading on jobs, outlandishly overstating their tax cuts, and have failed to deliver on key cost of living promises. At the same time, they're cutting women's pay in favour of big tax breaks for tobacco, fossil fuel, and big tech companies,' Barbara Edmonds said.
Scoop
12-06-2025
- Scoop
Influencer Not Disqualified From Vanuatu 'Golden Passport' Due To No Conviction
Caleb Fotheringham, RNZ Pacific Journalist A Pacific editor for the newsroom that found online influencer Andrew Tate has Vanuatu citizenship says Tate was not disqualified from getting the "golden passport" because he has not been convicted. Tate, a self-described misogynist, faces charges of rape and human trafficking in both the United Kingdom and Romania. The Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) found Tate was granted citizenship in December 2022. Dan McGarry, an editor with OCCRP, said the passport was issued about 15 days after Tate was detained in Romania. Tate bought into the "golden passport" scheme, formally known as citizenship by investment, where applicants can be granted Vanuatu citizenship for a minimum investment of $US130,000. McGarry said the citizenship commissioner - who has been newly appointed in the role - was surprised to find out who Tate was. "He expressed regret, but at the same time, he said that once a submission has been made, once the application is put to the commission, nothing short of a criminal conviction or false representation on the application itself is sufficient to stop the process," McGarry said. He said despite the charges, because Tate has not been convicted, "none of that is disqualifying". "I think if it comes out that there's a conviction that arises, it's possible that his citizenship may be revoked as a result." McGarry said there are several reasons why people want a Vanuatu passport, including not for nefarious reasons. "There is a fairly legitimate argument to be made for citizens of repressive regimes whose travel is restricted by their local authorities." But for Tate, Vanuatu citizenship could have seemed appealing because there's no extradition treaty between Vanuatu and Romania. "[Tate's] on the record saying that he has multiple passports and that he prefers to live in places where he can effectively buy his way out of any problem that he's facing. "However, he's now facing criminal charges in the UK as well. That was just confirmed last week and there is a very long-standing extradition agreement between the UK and Vanuatu, so I'm not sure the passport is going to do what he thought it would do originally." Citizenship by investment started in 1984 in the Caribbean, with Vanuatu launching its own scheme in 2017. "It structured it in such a way that it was very easy for people outside of Vanuatu to insert themselves into the process by acting as sub agents, effectively selling citizenship and that made it very lucrative," McGarry said. Until 2024, Vanuatu citizens had visa-free access to the Schengen area in the EU. "It made the Vanuatu passport very, very attractive, and the price was somewhat better than some of the earlier programs," McGarry said. He said citizenship by investment programmes at one point were the single largest source of government revenue in Vanuatu. "You can imagine how attractive that made it to politicians who had always been very financially limited in terms of delivering programmes for people domestically. "It's been very, very hard for the government to walk away from it, because there's just so much money to be made." The Vanuatu Citizenship Commission chairman, Charles Maniel, has told the Vanuatu Daily Post it can't carry out any revocation until allegations are proven by a court of law.
