IRS Issues Tax Deadline Reminder To Millions
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a reminder to millions of U.S. taxpayers living and working abroad to file their 2024 federal income tax returns and pay any taxes due by June 16.
The extension applies to U.S. citizens and resident aliens outside the country, including dual citizens, offering them a two-month grace period after the regular April 15 deadline.
All U.S. taxpayers, regardless of where they live, must report worldwide income to the IRS. That includes wages, interest, dividends and income from foreign sources. Accurate and timely filing is required to avoid interest, penalties, and the risk of missing out on available tax credits such as the foreign earned income exclusion.
U.S. citizens or resident aliens whose residence and main place of business or post of duty is outside the U.S. and Puerto Rico, as well as members of the military on duty abroad, qualify for the automatic two-month extension-shifting their filing deadline from April 15 to June 16, 2025.
Taxpayers unable to file by June 16 can request an additional extension to October 15, 2025. This extension is limited to filing-not to payment. Interest will accrue on any unpaid taxes starting from April 15, 2025.
Electronic extension requests can be submitted through IRS systems, and Form 4868 is available for those unable to file online. Businesses should use Form 7004 for extensions, and can get a six-month extension.
The fastest payment options include IRS Online Account, IRS Direct Pay, and the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS).
U.S. taxpayers without a domestic bank account can transfer payments directly to the IRS. Debit and credit cards, as well as digital wallets, are also accepted and may include service fees.
Individuals affected by the ongoing conflict in Israel, or with residences or businesses in Israel, Gaza, or the West Bank, have their federal filing and payment deadline extended to September 30, 2025.
Military personnel on duty in combat zones may also qualify for automatic extensions.
Taxpayers with foreign financial accounts holding more than $10,000 at any point during 2024 must submit Form 114 (FBAR) electronically to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
The initial deadline was April 15, 2025, with an automatic extension to October 15, 2025, for those who missed the first date.
Jay A. Soled,professor and chair of the Department of Accounting and Information Systems at Rutgers Business School, New Jersey,previously told Newsweek: "Even with the tax-filing extension, interest will apply to any 2024 tax payments received after April 15. This means that unpaid tax-year 2024 tax balances will begin accruing interest, currently at the rate of seven percent per year, compounded daily, after April 15, 2025."
Commenting on why individuals working and living abroad have a two-month filing extension, Soled said it was "undoubtedly a relic of a bygone era when it was difficult for those living overseas to receive third-party information returns."
He added that "in light of current technological developments, Congress would be wise to eliminate this exception."
Richard D. Pomp, professor of law at the UConn Law School, Connecticut,previously told Newsweek, while discussing why individuals working and living abroad have a two-month filing extension: "The extension is a very old rule that predates the digital economy. Correspondence in those early days took place by mail and the time it took for mail to go back and forth across the ocean could lead to delays that taxpayers living in the country did not experience. In the digital economy, things are far more efficient and the rule is probably unduly generous."
He added: "We are currently living through a total state of chaos at the IRS. Whenever possible, taxpayers abroad should file electronically and verify with screen shots and saved files, and copies of all documentation.
U.S. taxpayers abroad have until June 16, 2025, to file their returns and pay taxes due for 2024, with eligible individuals able to seek additional extensions or payment arrangements if they are unable to meet this deadline.
Taxpayers affected by the Israel-Hamas conflict or stationed in combat zones should review specific guidance and utilize all available IRS resources for support.
Related Articles
Trump Admin Gets a Win as Judge Allows IRS to Share Tax Data With ICEHunter Biden Drops Lawsuit Against IRS Employees: 'Afraid to Fight'IRS Issues Advice As Natural Disaster Season ApproachesIRS Issues Guidance For Those Facing May 15 Tax Deadline
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Presidential Pardons Are a Dirty Business
In one of the most famous scenes of The Godfather, Don Corleone rejects a lucrative business opportunity because it involved narcotics. "Drugs," the Don explained, "are a dirty business." That quote came to mind when news broke about President Donald Trump's recent pardon of Paul Walczak. When I learned about Walczak—and the circumstances surrounding the president's exercise of his constitutional authority to liberate him—I instantly thought, "Pardons are a dirty business." According to the Justice Department, Walczak pled guilty in November 2024 to cheating on his taxes for years, amounting to nearly $11 million in stolen taxes. Beyond the large amount that he stole, the details of Walczak's fraud are even more sordid. President Donald Trump takes questions after signing a series of bills related to California's vehicle emissions standards during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12, 2025, in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump takes questions after signing a series of bills related to California's vehicle emissions standards during an event in the East Room of the White House on June 12, 2025, in Washington, has been an inveterate tax scofflaw since at least 2011. In short, he ran a web of health care companies, withheld $7.5 million of his employees' wages, and kept the money. He also pocketed $3.8 million of Social Security and Medicare taxes. He did all of this from 2016-2019, after he had already been penalized by the IRS for doing the exact same thing. To add insult to injury, Walczak also failed to pay his personal taxes for 2019 and 2020, even though he received a salary of $360,000 and transfers of nearly half a million dollars. To make matters worse, Walczak used those ill-gotten millions to spend lavishly on himself, including private flights and a yacht that cost over $2 million. "While Walczak was withholding taxes from the pay of his employees under the pretext of paying these funds to the IRS," the Justice Department stated in a press release, "he used over $1 million from his businesses' bank accounts to purchase a yacht, transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars to his personal bank accounts, and used the business accounts for personal purchases at retailers such as Bergdorf Goodman, Cartier, and Saks." Notably, the prosecutor reportedly told the court that Walczak did not act out of desperation—he was already rich. Rather, he took $10 million in taxes from the government "simply because he wasn't getting rich enough." Why would President Trump decide to use his special constitutional authority to liberate Walczak before he paid any penalty whatsoever? Now we know, thanks to reporting from The New York Times. Walczak's mother is reportedly a longtime Republican donor and Trump supporter, who just happened to attend a $1 million-per-person Trump fundraiser that "promised face-to-face access to Mr. Trump at his private Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla." Less than three weeks later, and shortly before Walczak was due to go to prison for his 18-month sentence, the president pardoned him. Despite his years-long abuse of the tax system, which he admitted, Walczak will get off scot-free. This should go down as another disgraceful star in the Constellation of Dirty Presidential Pardons, which features Barack Obama's pardon of Chelsea Manning, Bill Clinton's pardon of his half-brother Roger Clinton, and of course Joe Biden's unconscionable pardon of his son Hunter. The most analogous member of the Dirty Pardon Hall of Shame is Clinton's waiver of fugitive financier Marc Rich. Rich was indicted in 1983 for evading more than $48 million in taxes and charged with 51 counts of tax fraud, mail fraud, racketeering, as well as running illegal oil deals with Iran during a trade embargo. After his indictment, he fled the United States and remained a fugitive until Clinton pardoned him just hours before the president left the White House in 2001. The Rich pardon prompted a huge backlash because Rich's ex-wife had donated more than $1.3 million to Democratic party, including $70,000 to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign, along with $450,000 to Clinton's presidential library. Within days, Republicans on Capitol Hill opened an investigation. Even Democratic stalwarts like Pat Leahy, Paul Wellstone, and Barney Frank roundly criticized President Clinton for the Rich pardon. The Walczak pardon, with its financial quid-pro-quo overtones, is on par with the Rich debacle. This is the stuff of banana republics, not great ones. Alexander Hamilton defended the president's broad pardon authority in the Constitution, writing in Federalist No. 74: "Humanity and good policy conspire to dictate, that the benign prerogative of pardoning should be as little as possible fettered or embarrassed. The criminal code of every country partakes so much of necessary severity, that without an easy access to exceptions in favor of unfortunate guilt, justice would wear a countenance too sanguinary and cruel." The key words there are "unfortunate guilt," which implies some sort of miscarriage of justice. But neither the Rich nor Walczak cases feature "unfortunate guilt." To the contrary, they reflect the sleazy reality of modern-day politics, one befitting a mob boss, not U.S presidents. Pardons are a dirty business. Mark Lee Greenblatt is an expert on government ethics and compliance, an attorney, and author. Most recently, he served as inspector general for the U.S. Department of the Interior. From 2019 to 2025, Mr. Greenblatt led a team of nearly 300 investigators, auditors, and attorneys responsible for oversight of more than 70,000 agency employees. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Forbes
16 hours ago
- Forbes
IRS Can And Does Assess This 100% Tax Penalty—Over And Over Again
Employees, Payroll Binder data finance report business with graph analysis in office. getty For anyone with employees, paying employment taxes is inevitable. You withhold taxes from employee pay, then send the money to the IRS. The taxes are withheld from wages and are supposed to be promptly paid to the government. This is trust fund money that belongs to the government, and no matter how good a reason the employer has for using the money for something else, the IRS is strict. If you are in business, it can be tempting to figure that you have to keep the rent paid and the supplies ordered, and that the IRS won't miss the payroll tax money if you just divert it temporarily. You never want to become delinquent in paying taxes, especially employment taxes. The IRS is vigorous in going after these payroll taxes. It is one reason that in cases where the IRS catches the problem early, the IRS may encourage use of a payroll service. If the payroll service automatically takes out and remits all the payroll taxes, the business won't have the discretion to divert the money, even briefly. When a tax shortfall occurs, the IRS will usually make personal assessments against all responsible persons who have ownership in or signature authority over the company and its payables. The IRS can assess a Trust Fund Recovery Assessment, also known as a 100-percent penalty, against every 'responsible person" under Section 6672(a). You can be liable even if have no knowledge the IRS is not being paid. If you're a responsible person, the IRS can pursue you personally if the company fails to pay. The 100% penalty equals the taxes not collected. The penalty can be assessed against multiple responsible persons, allowing the IRS to pursue them all to see who coughs up the money first. "Responsible" means officers, directors, and anyone who makes decisions about who to pay or has check signing authority. When multiple owners and signatories all face tax bills, they generally do their best to direct the IRS to someone else. Factual nuances matter in this kind of mud-wrestling, but so do legal maneuvering and just plain savvy. One responsible person may get stuck, while another may pay nothing. Meanwhile, the government will still try to collect from the company that withheld on the wages. And those IRS collection efforts can be serious. The IRS can move to collect, too, including via a levy on your bank accounts. But before a levy can be issued the IRS must provide notice and an opportunity for an administrative Collection Due Process hearing. A Collection Due Process hearing is only available for certain serious IRS collection notices. Among other things, it allows you the opportunity to ask for an installment agreement, an offer in compromise or another collection alternative. The IRS also looks for situations where one company owing payroll taxes seems to morph into a 'new' company, and there are special rules in the case of a 'predecessor' employer. That is, some procedural safeguards won't apply if you are a predecessor employer. Here's what the IRS evaluates to determine if one business is a predecessor of another: Does it have substantially the same owners and officers? Are the same individuals actively involved in running the business, regardless of whether they are officially listed as the owners/shareholders/officers? If the taxpayer's owners or shareholders are different, is there evidence they acquired the business in an arm's-length transaction for fair market value? Does the business provide substantially the same products, services, or functions as the prior business? Does the business have substantially the same customers as the prior business? Does the business have substantially the same assets as the prior business? Does the business have the same location/telephone number/fax number, etc. as the prior business? See IRC Section 6330(h). A business won't be treated as a predecessor if there was a genuine change in control and ownership, as where the business was acquired in an arm's-length transaction for fair market value, where the previous owners have ceased all involvement. The IRS's guidance lists examples of predecessor status and explains how to determine if a business requesting a Collection Due Process hearing for employment taxes is a 'predecessor.' There's no right to a Collection Due Process hearing to resolve the employment tax liabilities if you already had your chance.
Forbes
17 hours ago
- Forbes
The Tax Consequences Of Debt Financing For Small Business Loans
Close-up of JP Morgan Chase and Co sign outside an office building in the SoMa neighborhood, San ... More Francisco, California, March 18, 2025. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) Small business loans Small businesses require financing, often using equity or debt. Financing decisions can significantly influence business outcomes. High-interest or unstructured loans have been linked to increased business insolvency rates over time. Interest deduction limitations on some larger businesses The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 placed new limitations on how much interest certain businesses can deduct. These changes are outlined in Internal Revenue Code section 163(j). Businesses with gross receipts averaging $31 million or less over the prior three tax years are not subject to these limitations. Loans from business owners Many owners lend money to the business, especially in the early stages of operation: At least the minimum applicable federal interest rate must be charged on these loans. The business will deduct the interest as an expense, and the owner will count the interest paid to them as interest income. Documenting these loans with promissory notes and repayment schedules is necessary to comply with IRS requirements. Related-party loans are subject to specific IRS rules. General thoughts on business loans If you take out a loan or get a cash advance, it is extremely important that you understand the terms: Please read all of the fine print. Are there penalties for early payment? Does the interest rate change? Are there other fees involved? Borrowers should evaluate the consequences of missed or late payments. Borrowers should review all loan terms thoroughly and negotiate changes as appropriate. Different states have different regulations regarding loans and cash advances. Traditional lenders and banks Traditional lenders and banks frequently provide loans to businesses with sufficient credit or collateral. These loans can be term loans or lines of credit. The interest rates might be specific or might be variable over time. These loans are very common and relatively straightforward. They are heavily regulated and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Traditional lenders and banks dominate business lending. Some Americans cannot qualify for these loans due to low credit scores, high debt-to-income ratios, insufficient income, or unemployment. Further, the traditional loan process often requires a fair amount of paperwork and time to complete. Private lenders Private lenders are rapidly expanding their market share and are not subject to the same level of regulation as traditional lenders. 75% of all private lending in the world occurs in the United States. Currently, private lending is growing three times as quickly as traditional lending. Private lenders typically impose higher interest rates and fees to offset higher risk. Merchant cash advances A Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) is business financing where a company receives a lump sum of cash in exchange for a portion of receivables or future sales. An MCA is not a loan and is not subject to as many regulations as private lenders. These loans are often riskier and typically result in higher fees. I analyzed 11 MCA advances from six lenders to four different businesses and this showed effective annual fees from 60% to 144%. Significant marketing by private lenders and MCAs Private lenders and MCAs market their offerings through the following strategies: Fast approvals, often promised within 24 to 72 hours. Streamlined approval process with minimal paperwork. Options for borrowers rejected by traditional lenders. What is tax deductible when your business has a loan or cash advance From an accounting and tax standpoint, money loaned or advanced to the business is recorded as a liability on the balance sheet. Repaying the principal reduces this liability on the balance sheet and does not affect the income statement. Anything paid to the lender that does not lower the principal is either a financing fee or interest. Both are tax deductible on the income statement for tax purposes as ordinary business expenses. Conclusions When and how businesses are financed and the fees associated with small business loans vary greatly and the available options are expanding. Verify eligibility for full interest deductibility under IRC 163(j). Understand all terms before borrowing. Nontraditional loans often come with significantly higher costs. Borrowers should assess the total repayment obligations before proceeding.
