India's legal bridge is one of reciprocity, not roadblocks
In May this year, the Bar Council of India (BCI) implemented the Bar Council of India Rules for Registration and Regulation of Foreign Lawyers and Foreign Law Firms in India (hereinafter 'rules'). While many within the legal profession lauded the rules, a few law firms based in the United States have voiced strong objections, calling the rules a 'non-trade barrier' and a 'deliberate move to exclude or freeze out' U.S. law firms from engaging with the Indian legal ecosystem.
However, such criticism reflects a limited appreciation of the statutory mandate of the BCI and an inadequate understanding of India's comprehensive regulatory framework governing its legal affairs. On the contrary, the rules strike a balance by facilitating the entry of foreign practitioners and firms while upholding professional standards and safeguarding the interests of stakeholders within the Indian legal profession.
The criticism
First, it is contended that the rules create a 'non-tariff trade barrier' by imposing procedural restrictions on U.S.-based law firms and legal professionals, thereby attempting to 'freeze out' their entry into the Indian legal landscape. Second, it is alleged that the interests of the U.S. were overlooked during global consultations preceding the framing of the rules, making it difficult for U.S. law firms and professionals to comply with the stipulated mandates. Third, the requirement to disclose details such as the 'nature of legal work' and 'client identity' is said to conflict with the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules on client confidentiality. Fourth, the regulations governing fly-in, fly-out provisions have been criticised for being inconsistent with the principle of reciprocity, as they impose duration-based, disclosure-based restrictions not similarly applied to Indian counterparts operating in the U.S. Fifth, the contention is that the rules have been introduced as a surprise move, providing no transition period for adjustment, thereby placing U.S. firms and professionals at a disadvantage. Finally, it is argued that the rules could adversely impact U.S.-India bilateral trade and legal engagement, as they may discourage Indian corporations from undertaking transactions involving U.S. laws, owing to a dearth of legal professionals who are skilled in U.S. laws.
A reality check
First, the BCI is not a trade body, but a statutory body to maintain standards of professional conduct and safeguard the interests of legal professionals across India. Second, constitutionally and technically, the practice of law cannot form part of a trade agreement, as it is governed under Entries 77 and 78 of the Union List, unlike entries dealing with trade and commerce under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Second, In Bar of Indian Lawyers Through Its President Jasbir Singh Malik vs D.K. Gandhi (2024), it was held that it was a contract of personal service, thereby segregating it from trade and business practices. Third, India recently chose not to include legal services in the United Kingdom-India Free Trade Agreement, despite facing significant international pressure. This reflects India's consistent position that legal services require a distinct regulatory framework.
Fourth, the impugned rules do not bar foreign law firms and practitioners but liberalise the Indian legal ecosystem, albeit in a structured and regulated manner. For instance, Rules 3 and 4 permit foreign law firms to operate in India, subject to registration and compliance with ethical and professional conditions. Further, the fly-in, fly-out model, under the proviso to rule 3(1), allows temporary visits, subject to an aggregate stay not exceeding 60 days within a 12-month period. Fifth, Indian legal professionals lack universal access to the U.S. legal system and are subjected to rigorous, state-specific, examination-based licensing regimes. The reciprocity requirement under the rules, subjecting the U.S. counterparts to similar regulatory compliances, merely establishes equivalence. Sixth, rule 4(h), which mandates a certificate of 'good standing at the bar', has been flagged by U.S. stakeholders as problematic, owing to its decentralised ecosystem. However, this limitation stems from the U.S. regulatory structure and cannot be attributed to the BCI or India.
Notably, rule 6 of chapter III allows for flexibility, empowering the BCI to verify such credentials holistically and on a case-by-case basis, thereby ensuring an accommodating approach, subject to an adherence to basic ethical and professional standards. Seventh, the requirement to disclose the nature and the extent of legal work does not dilute client confidentiality, as the objective is to obtain general information about the legal work or transaction. This ensures that the activities of foreign legal professionals remain within the permitted contours of legal practice in India.
There has been debate and discussion
Finally, the criticism regarding lack of consultations or a transition period before the operationalisation of the rules holds no ground. Debates and discussion have been ongoing for over two decades, encompassing expert committee reports, global consultations, and key judicial decisions such as Lawyers Collective vs Bar Council of India (2009) and Bar Council of India vs A.K. Balaji (2018) which have collectively laid the foundation for the present regulatory framework.
Far from being a barrier, the rules aim to create a cooperative bridge liberalising the Indian legal landscape in a measured manner, while safeguarding professional integrity, client confidentiality, and upholding the vital principles of reciprocity and ethical accountability.
Shivang Tripathi is a Senior Research Fellow at the Faculty of Law, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. Shaiwal Satyarthi is a Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
Sensex, Nifty outlook for June 23–27: Bullish breakout ahead?
The Indian stock market wrapped up a bullish week (June 16–20), with the Sensex closing at 82,408.17 and the Nifty 50 ending at 25,112.40 — both comfortably above key pivot levels. The rally was powered by strong FII inflows, easing RBI provisioning norms for infrastructure loans, declining bond yields, and a dip in volatility and gold prices. Market sentiment got a further boost as the Reserve Bank of India relaxed its earlier draft rule, now requiring just 1% provisioning for under-construction infra loans versus the proposed 5%. This move notably lifted banking and financial stocks. Additionally, easing tensions in the Middle East added to optimism. While geopolitical concerns remain, the US President's statement to delay military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict hinted at potential diplomatic engagement. Market Performance Recap: Sensex rose 1.5% this week. Nifty 50 added 1.3%. FIIs invested ₹8,709 crore; DIIs added ₹12,635 crore. Global indices, however, underperformed, with the Dow down 1% and the Nasdaq flat. Key Drivers for Next Week (June 23–27): US Economic Data: Focus on GDP and PCE inflation. Geopolitical Developments: Monitoring Middle East tensions and the US-China 90-day truce deadline. Monsoon Progress in India FII/DII Activity and Crude Oil Prices Monthly Derivatives Expiry Volatility Technical Outlook: Resistance: 25,250. A breakout may lead to 25,600–25,800. Support: 24,850–24,800 zone. Breakdown below 24,600 may trigger further correction. Indicators: Nifty is trading above both 21-day and 55-day EMAs, signaling strong momentum. Investor Strategy: Experts advise a stock-specific approach. Look for strength in banking, auto, realty, and IT sectors. Avoid heavy exposure to FMCG, energy, and mid/small caps until clearer signals emerge. Traders are also urged to be cautious of false breakouts near 25,200, especially ahead of monthly expiry. Monitor both global developments and technical resistance levels closely.
The Hindu
40 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cautious welcome to final notification on area around Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary
Samaj Parivartana Samudaya (SPS) and National Committee for Protection for Natural Resources (NCPNR) have extended a cautious welcome to the final notification declaring 423.7 sq km area as Eco Sensitive Zone (ESZ) around Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary. Now, they plan to hold in-depth discussion with all those concerned. Addressing presspersons in Hubballi on Saturday, founder-president of SPS and NCPNR S.R. Hiremath said that while they cautiously welcome the notification, they plan to hold in-depth discussion with all those concerned, including the seer of Gadag Tontdarya Mutt who successfully continues the movement initiated by his predecessor Sri Siddalinga Swami opposing mining and seeking protection to the unique eco system in Kappatagudda. The Kappatagudda Wildlife Sanctuary is spread out over 244.15 sq km comprising four taluks of Gadag district. And, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change issued the final notification on June 4, declaring 423.7 sq km area around the sanctuary as Eco Sensitive Zone. Mr. Hiremath said that they plan to call for a meeting about the notification and also discuss the need to pressurise the Karnataka government to drop the 18 mining proposals. Earlier, the State government put off (not dropped) the decision on these proposals. The meeting will also deliberate the sustained decade-long people's movement led by the Tontadarya Mutt and various organisations, including SPS and NCPNR, he said. He said that as the government is expected to prepare the zonal master plan in consultation with local communities, various departments and other stakeholders, the proposed meeting will also deliberate the related issues so that the mining proposals are cancelled permanently. Book release Mr. Hiremath, meanwhile, said that during the Emergency, the Indian diaspora in the United States resisted Indira Gandhi's authoritarian rule and many who believed in Gandhian values came together to save India's democracy. A book, The Conscience Network: A chronicle of resistance to a dictatorship, by Sugata Srinivasraju, which records these efforts, will be released in Bengaluru on July 4, he added.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Thackeray Back Soon, Instead Of Imposing Marathi…': MNS, Shiv Sena (UBT) Play The Poster Game
Last Updated: As the row over Hindi intensified, the MNS projected an aggressive stand on the language issue while the Shiv Sena (UBT) hinted at a big political change in Maharashtra Amid a possibility of the estranged Thackeray cousins – Uddhav and Raj – forming an alliance ahead of the civic polls, posters put up by both parties on Hindi 'imposition" and 'big change" have raised the political temperatures. As the row over Hindi intensified after the state government decided to adopt a three-language formula for classes 1 to 5, the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) projected an aggressive stand while the Shiv Sena (UBT) hinted at a big political change. According to a report by NDTV, MNS party workers are reaching out to school principals across the state and opposing Hindi while burning textbooks in the language as a symbolic protest. Uddhav Thackeray's Shiv Sena faction has also strongly opposed Hindi and said its imposition will not be tolerated. NDTV reported that both the parties have put up posters near Sena Bhavan in Mumbai, with the message of how Hindi is being imposed on Maharashtra and how the ruling alliance is a 'Maharashtra-hating" regime. Literary bodies to opposition parties, all have opposed the move even as Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said while Hindi was earlier made compulsory, an amended government resolution states that compulsion has been removed. '…Students can now opt for any Indian language as a third language," he said. 'What is the government doing? Instead of imposing Marathi on outsiders in the state, Hindi is being imposed on Marathi people in the state," read the MNS poster as reported by NDTV. 'Soon, political equations in Maharashtra will change. Maharashtra will experience a big political change. Thackeray government will be back soon," read the poster put up by Shiv Sena (UBT), as per NDTV. The parties further took to social media to express their opposition to the introduction of Hindi via the three-language policy under the National Education Policy (NEP). 'Today, the question of whether you will remain silent or get angry on questions about Marathi and Mumbai came to mind, and seeing the response, I was convinced that if Mumbaikars and Marathi people unite, we will together overcome every crisis, injustice, and oppression facing Mumbai!" said Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray in a social media post in a Marathi, while sharing a poster registering the party's protest on the Hindi move. मराठी आणि मुंबई बद्दलच्या प्रश्नांवर तुम्ही शांत बसता की पेटून उठता ह्याचाच अंदाज आज आला आणि प्रतिसाद पाहून खात्री पटली की मुंबईकर मराठी माणूस एकवटला तर मुंबईवरचं प्रत्येक संकट, अन्याय, दडपशाही आपण मिळून मोडून काढू! 'लढा आपल्या मुंबईचा' सुरु झालाय. मुंबईच्या प्रश्नांसाठी आम्ही… — Aaditya Thackeray (@AUThackeray) June 21, 2025 He added: 'The 'Fight for our Mumbai' has begun. We have been fighting for Mumbai's issues and will continue to fight, I am sure we will get your strong support in this! Together, let us free our Mumbai and Marathi from the clutches of this Maharashtra-hating regime!" In another post on their official X handle, the Shiv Sena (UBT) stated: 'The plot of Maharashtra haters should be identified in time…" WHAT IS THE MNS STAND ON HINDI? Earlier, Raj issued a stern warning to the educational institutions in the state not to support the Fadnavis government's plan to impose the language 'spoken in some northern provinces". He stressed that if the schools support the government's 'hidden agenda", then the MNS will consider it a 'betrayal" of Maharashtra. In a letter written to all the principals of schools in Maharashtra, Raj said, 'While we are raising this issue with you, we have also sent a similar letter to the government. We have firmly told the government that we need a written letter stating that the Hindi language or any third language in general will not be taught. They may or may not issue such a letter, but if your actions support the government's hidden agenda, we will surely consider it a betrayal of Maharashtra…" 'Do keep in mind that there is growing discontent in Maharashtra regarding this imposition of languages! Word to the wise! What more can I say?" it added. He referred to the recent developments in the education department and said the situation in Maharashtra has been 'chaotic" since April. He has accused the state government of planning to impose Hindi in the state 'discreetly" and urged the schools not to cooperate with this. These posters not only display the parties' opposition to Hindi but hint at a possible alliance between them. There has been much speculation recently about the two cousins coming together to contest the civic elections in Mumbai and elsewhere in the state. WHAT IS SHIV SENA (UBT) SAYING? Uddhav's Shiv Sena has left numerous hints of a possible political alliance with the MNS. In fact, the former chief minister has also accused the BJP of scuttling the possibility of his party's alliance with the MNS. Addressing a rally to mark the 59th foundation day of the undivided Shiv Sena formed by his father late Bal Thackeray on June 19, he warned the ruling party of dire consequences if it hurt the "Thackeray brand". He said in order to scuttle the possibility of alliance of 'Marathi parties", meetings are being held in hotels and elsewhere. He was apparently referring to Raj Thackeray's recent meeting with the Maharashtra CM at a five-star hotel in the city. 'What people want, will happen. We will see how it is to be done. The BJP and Shinde Sena do not want Marathi parties to unite. If you try to finish the Thackeray brand, we will finish off the BJP. I am prepared. I want to tell the BJP…..When you come to take me on….come with an ambulance…for yourself," Thackeray said. He, meanwhile, also said the imposition of Hindi in the state will not be allowed at any cost. 'The BJP wants to create a divide among Marathi and Hindi-speakers on the eve of civic polls," he said while exuding confidence that his party will retain the Mumbai civic body. (With PTI inputs) About the Author Oindrila Mukherjee Oindrila Mukherjee is a senior sub-editor who works for the rewrite and breaking news desks. Her nine years of experience in print and digital journalism range from editing and reporting to writing impactful More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) Raj Thackeray shiv sena uddhav thackeray Location : Mumbai, India, India First Published: June 22, 2025, 19:15 IST News politics 'Thackeray Back Soon, Instead Of Imposing Marathi…': MNS, Shiv Sena (UBT) Play The Poster Game
