Donald Trump throws curveball at Japan tea giant's United States expansion swing
Agencies
Top Japanese tea brand Ito En's latest push to win over health-conscious U.S. customers with its traditional unsweetened brew has hit a new road bump: President Donald Trump's trade tariffs.
The company, which splashed out on a tie-up with Major League Baseball star Shohei Ohtani and launched a less bitter tea to capture a bigger slice of the lucrative growth market, is now debating whether to hike prices or move some production across the Pacific, executives said in interviews with Reuters.
The dilemmas facing Ito En can be found across Japan, the biggest foreign investor in the United States, as Tokyo's trade negotiators returned to Washington this weekend to try and strike a deal to cushion the blow to its fragile economy.
Makoto Ogi, Ito En's general manager of international business development, told Reuters the company may raise prices of its products in the U.S. to compensate for Trump's 24% levy on Japanese goods set to come into force next month.
The problem is their retailers and distributors may resist for fear of losing sales.
'We may not be able to ask them to raise our prices despite what Trump is saying,' he said.
The last time Ito En raised prices in the U.S. - by approximately 10% in 2022 - sales dropped by around 5%. The company said the decline reflected the price hike as well as factors such as COVID-19 that affected market conditions.
The company is also considering making tea bags in the United States, and bottling drinks there rather than in Japan, Taiwan and Thailand as it does presently, Ogi and other executives explained during interviews in Tokyo.
These details of the firm's potential plans to counter tariffs have not been previously reported. The executives did not disclose the costs of such moves.
In its latest results released this month, Ito En reported its profit shrank by 8.2% in the year to April, but forecast an 11% jump this year.
It set a modest 3.7% profit growth target for its U.S. tea business, versus 20.7% growth achieved last year, an outlook partly related to tariffs, a company spokesperson said.
Its shares rose to nearly a four-month high in the wake of the results, with its president later telling investors the forecasts were 'conservative'.
Many Japanese firms have set up war rooms to chalk out plans to restructure supply chains or cut costs to offset tariffs and keep their U.S. growth plans on track, said Mizuho Bank analyst Asuka Tatebayashi.
A survey of 3,000 Japanese companies by export promotion organization JETRO late last year before Trump's tariffs found the level of interest in U.S. markets at the highest in nearly a decade, with food and beverage companies like Ito En the most enthusiastic.
'When you talk to companies in Japan, the U.S. comes first,' said Tatebayashi, adding that they face shrinking domestic demand and are generally cautious about expanding into riskier emerging markets.
For Ito En, the U.S. has long been a market it is eager to crack.Five years ago, Joshua Walker, the newly-appointed head of U.S. non-profit Japan Society, hosted Ito En's North America head Yosuke Honjo in his New York office.
Honjo gestured to the green-colored bottles of their flagship Oi Ocha brand lining the shelves and said he wanted them to spread around the world like Coca-Cola's red bottle.
'It was refreshing. Japanese companies would not normally have ambition of that type of grandeur,' said Walker, recounting the executive's previously unreported remarks. Honjo, via a company spokesperson, confirmed the remarks.
Founded in the 1960s by Honjo's father and uncle, Ito En has grown to dominate Japan's tea market, using around a quarter of the country's total crude tea production.
Since expanding into the U.S. in 2001, it has dabbled in selling sweet and flavored tea varieties familiar to Americans.
But more recently it has focused on the unsweetened tea popular in its home market, hoping to tap health-conscious customers and a boom in Japanese food and cultural exports.
Honjo said growth has also been aided by a sharp rise in Asian Americans, estimated at nearly 25 million in 2023, or around 7% of the U.S. population, according to the Pew Research Center.
Japan's exports of green tea surged 24.6% to 36.4 billion yen last year, with nearly half destined for the United States, official data showed.
Some equity analysts like Jiang Zhu of Tokyo-based rating agency R&I have highlighted the high marketing cost of Ito En's international push at a time it faces tough competition at home from tea brands such as Coca-Cola's Ayataka.
The company said it has around a 2% share of the U.S. market for tea beverages, ranking eighth largest, with Unilever's Pure Leaf leading the sector.
But it has a long way to catch up with the 3.9 billion gallons of Coca-Cola's trademark Coke drinks sold in the U.S. last year, at only 3.1 million gallons by comparison, according to research firm Beverage Marketing Corporation.
'Kikkoman's soy sauce is probably in every American household now, but it took about 50 years for it to become a part of the culture,' said Akihiro Murase, Ito En's public relations manager, referencing the Japanese food manufacturer as a template for success.
'We are not there yet but we would like to make unsweetened green tea a part of the food culture,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
32 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
US bombs Iran: What we know about US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities
US bombs Iran: What we know about US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities NewsFeed US President Donald Trump ordered the US military to bomb three nuclear sites in Iran, thereby joining Israel's war against the country. Iran has condemned the attack as a violation of international law. Here's what we know. Video Duration 01 minutes 05 seconds 01:05 Video Duration 01 minutes 31 seconds 01:31 Video Duration 00 minutes 55 seconds 00:55 Video Duration 01 minutes 19 seconds 01:19 Video Duration 00 minutes 25 seconds 00:25 Video Duration 01 minutes 22 seconds 01:22
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's shifting views on attacking Iran
Trump's shifting views on attacking Iran Compare & Contrast We compare and contrast Donald Trump's 2013 warning that President Obama would attack Iran out of weakness, with his own strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as president. Video Duration 01 minutes 12 seconds 01:12 Video Duration 01 minutes 39 seconds 01:39 Video Duration 01 minutes 20 seconds 01:20 Video Duration 00 minutes 50 seconds 00:50 Video Duration 01 minutes 20 seconds 01:20 Video Duration 00 minutes 50 seconds 00:50 Video Duration 00 minutes 55 seconds 00:55
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
By bombing Iran, the US continues to make the world safe for war
It seems like just yesterday that United States President Donald Trump was pushing a 'diplomatic resolution' to the Iranian nuclear issue. Now, the US has joined Israel's illegal assault on Iran, striking three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday in what Trump has boasted was a 'very successful attack'. As CNN dramatically put it, 'a midsummer night in June 2025 could come to be remembered as the moment the Middle East changed forever; when the fear of nuclear annihilation was lifted from Israel; when Iran's power was neutered and America's soared'. Of course, a 'fear of nuclear annihilation' has nothing to do with Israel's current strikes on Iran, which have been dutifully portrayed in the US media as targeting military and nuclear facilities but have somehow managed to slaughter hundreds of civilians. The victims include 23-year-old poet Parnia Abbasi, killed along with her family as they slept in their Tehran apartment building. As is clear as day to anyone not in the business of defending Israeli depredations, the attacks on Iran are simply a war of convenience for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is killing all sorts of birds with one stone in his campaign against Iranian nuclear facilities. In addition to distracting the world from Israel's ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip, where starving Palestinians continue to be massacred on a daily basis as they seek food and other aid, Netanyahu has also managed to divert attention from his own embroilment in numerous corruption charges at home. Plus, the war on Iran is wildly popular among Israelis, which translates into big points for a prime minister who has faced significant domestic opposition. Trump's initial insistence on diplomacy with Iran naturally got Netanyahu's panties into a giant bunch – but the situation has now been rectified by the midsummer night's bombing, which, according to the president, has 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites. To be sure, Iran has long occupied US crosshairs, with many an establishment figure salivating at the prospect of bombing the country to smithereens. Some have salivated more openly than others, as in the case of John Bolton – a former US ambassador to the United Nations and briefly the national security adviser in the first Trump administration – who in 2015 took to the opinion pages of The New York Times with the following advice: 'To Stop Iran's Bomb, Bomb Iran.' That the editors of the US newspaper of record did not bat an eye in publishing such a blatant call for the violation of international law is indicative of the extent to which Iran has been thoroughly demonised in US society and media. Recall that in 2002, then-US President George W Bush appointed the nation to his infamous 'axis of evil' along with Iraq and North Korea. And yet, aside from being a persistent thorn in the side of US imperialism, Iran's behaviour has been rather less apparently, um, 'evil' than certain other international actors – like the US itself. For instance, Iran is not the one currently funding a straight-up genocide to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. Nor is Iran the one that has spent the past several decades bombing and otherwise antagonising folks in every corner of the world – from backing right-wing state terror in Latin America to conducting mass slaughter in Vietnam. Furthermore, the sole clandestine nuclear weapons power in the Middle East is not Iran but Israel, which has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has never allowed UN safeguards on its facilities. Those who applaud the strikes on Iran citing the 'oppressive' nature of the Iranian government would, meanwhile, do well to revisit the US track record of fuelling oppression in the country. In 1953, the CIA orchestrated a coup d'etat against Iran's democratically elected leader, Mohammad Mossadegh, which paved the way for the extended reign of the torture-happy shah. Historian Ervand Abrahamian notes in his book A History of Modern Iran: 'Arms dealers joked that the shah devoured their manuals in much the same way as other men read Playboy.' Indeed, the shah's obsessive acquisition of US weaponry did much to enable his rule by terror, which was put to an end by the Iranian Revolution of 1979. And the Iranian nuclear programme that Trump has now bombed? It was started by that very same shah. Now, arms dealers are presumably not too upset over the midsummer night's events and the general escalation of the crisis in the Middle East. For his part, Netanyahu has gone out of his way to thank Trump for his 'bold decision' to go after Iran 'with the awesome and righteous might of the United States'. In Netanyahu's words, Trump's action will 'change history' – as though making the world safe for more war is anything new. And as the US media scramble to justify illegal attacks on a sovereign nation, the sinister hypocrisy of two heavily nuclear-armed nations undertaking to police nuclear 'threats' cannot be overstated. It is anyone's guess what Trump, who prides himself on spontaneous and manic behaviour, will do next. But rest assured that, whatever happens, the arms industry won't be going hungry any time soon. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
