MP Department of Education slated for R22 million annual school rent
The Mpumalanga education department has failed to build a facility for deaf learners for over a decade.
The Mpumalanga department of education has been lambasted for paying rent of R22 million a year to a private school that accommodates pupils with disabilities, instead of building a facility that was promised 14 years ago.
This has angered education experts and the association representing disabled people who want the matter to be investigated.
Mpumalanga education MEC Cathy Dlamini confirmed during a recent education portfolio committee meeting that her department was paying Bukhosibetfu Private Boarding School in Nkomazi local municipality R22 million a year to teach and accommodate 253 deaf pupils.
'It does not make sense'
Disabled People South Africa provincial chair Oupa Zitha accused the department of not taking the needs of pupils with disabilities seriously.
'The special school that they are delaying to build would have cost them only R15 million,' said Zitha. 'It does not make any sense for them to pay rent of R22 million, but failing to build the school.'
He said officials come with excuses when asked why the project is delayed. 'They told us they have not yet identified a site to build on,' said Zitha.
ALSO READ: Gauteng government splashes R2.9 million on near-empty office used mainly for photocopies, says DA
Lack of commitment?
Education expert Hendrick Makaneta said it was weird the government had been struggling to build a school for 14 years, yet it had been spending so much money on rent.
Makaneta said the department's failure indicates a lack of commitment to address the needs of pupils with disabilities.
'Spending such a significant amount on rent does not make sense because it could have been redirected towards building and maintaining public facilities that cater to pupils with special needs,' he said.
Call for action to be taken
National Association of School Governing Bodies secretary-general Matakanya Matakanya said action should be taken against the negligent officials. 'We condemn this behaviour.
This amount of money is supposed to help curriculum delivery. This failure needs to be investigated so that it can be established what has caused the delay,' said Matakanya.
Department justifies rent
Mpumalanga department of education spokesperson Jasper Zwane did not give specific answers on why the building of the school has been delayed.
ALSO READ: KZN Education slams student violence at Lakehaven Secondary School [VIDEO]
Instead, he justified his department's action of renting the facility. 'The department has ensured all 253 deaf pupils are accommodated in an environment conducive to quality education,' said Zwane.
'This initiative cannot be regarded as wasteful expenditure, as it directly supports the fulfilment of the pupils' constitutional right to basic education.
'Plans are being fast-tracked'
'Recognising the urgency and importance of a sustainable solution, the department has taken decisive action. One such measure involves the repurposing of Shongwe Boarding School to provide immediate support for these pupils.
'In addition, plans are being fast-tracked for the construction of a dedicated school for deaf and blind pupils in the Emalahleni local municipality. The planning and design phase for this new facility is at an advanced stage.'
South African Human Rights Commission provincial manager Eric Mokonyama said: 'After several engagements about the promised school, we have received a commitment from the Office of the Premier that the construction of the facility will start in the 2025-26 financial year.
'We are working on receiving their plans so we can monitor implementation.'
NOW READ: KZN education opens criminal case over teacher job scam
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?
The DA is now part of the government of national unity alongside the ANC. Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party. The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP). Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi. Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA. 'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base. 'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said. Transformation in the top structures Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group. 'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group. 'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said. Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon. 'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said. ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor? DA's balancing act Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded. 'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.' Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy. 'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said. Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party. 'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies. 'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.' DA for all DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests. 'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race. 'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.' Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings. 'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said. The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday. NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Here's how many Gauteng schools damaged by fire have been repaired
The GDE stated almost 30 schools had been damaged by fire in the last five years but only 16 had been repaired. The Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) has elaborated on the progress of repairing fire-damaged schools. Several schools have gone up in flames in recent years, most notably the 11 classrooms gutted at Riverlea High School in April. In a written response to questions posed in the provincial legislature, Education MEC Matome Chiloane signed off on details relating to repair efforts and precautions taken by schools. Only half of schools repaired The GDE confirmed recently that 29 schools had been damaged by fire since the 2021-22 financial year. Six of these 29 schools have been repaired by the GDE at a cost R9.3 million — roughly one per year at an average cost of R15 million per project. However, an additional 10 schools were fixed using funds made available by insurance companies, School Governing Body donations or private sponsors. Repairs at 13 schools are still outstanding, and the projects have since been handed over to another government department. 'It must be noted that damages were of such a nature that it required extensive work to be done in the affected schools,' stated Chiloane's response. 'In this regard, the work was referred to Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development for implementation,' it explained. Assessments and reports on the outstanding repairs are still pending, so the values of the remaining projects have not been determined. Lack of firefighting resources Democratic Alliance (DA) Gauteng Shadow MEC for Education Sergio dos Santos stressed that schools were not properly equipped to deal with fires. 'We demand a comprehensive review of the current safety measures to identify weaknesses and develop solutions to protect our schools and ensure the safety of our learners,' he stated. The majority of the fires have occurred after hours, and in the case of the Riverlea fire, police are investigating a suspected case of arson. 'The intentional sabotage of our schools by setting fires is unacceptable and must be condemned,' stated Dos Santos. The GDE explained that schools were left vulnerable to fire as only basic reaction tools existed due to a lack of resources. 'Due to financial constraints, the schools have limited fire safety measures, such as fire extinguishers and fire alarms,' stated the GDE. School safety measures These gaps are filled with training and awareness programmes, as well as the work of school safety committees. The GDE stated that the existing safety protocols were 'limited' but focused on basic firefighting and first aid training for pupils and teachers. Additionally, safety committee members are mandated to promote fire safety in schools, identify potential hazards, and contribute to the school management team. The GDE states that training is continuous and equips teachers to contain emergency situations while waiting for professional responders. 'Communique are sent to the schools to promote compliance for the safety equipment and schools are directed to ensure annual maintenance for the equipment to always be functional,' the department explained. NOW READ: Bela Act guidelines issued, minister accused of 'worthless' delays
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue can become act of self-healing
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied South Africa should have a national dialogue. It shouldn't cost R700 million. Its outcomes should influence the next three elections if we are serious about it. If we get it right, we should have one every ten years. The problem is that South African politicians and bureaucrats continually devise ways to spend money yet consistently fail to devise methods for determining whether the outcomes of those expenditures have been achieved. In his opposition to the proposed cost of the national dialogue, DA leader John Steenhuisen said the recent elections were South African conversations. The problem with that statement is that South Africa, with 63 million people and 28 million registered voters, only had 16 million people turn up to vote. That's just under 27% of our total population. If we include the demographic capacity for participation, then our elections are essentially a case of the middle and upper classes doing all the talking. The National Dialogue is a call to all South Africans to share their views on the kind of country they wish to live in. During elections, its politicians and party loyalists doing all the talking. Any opposing voices are usually shouted down. Our elections prove that many poor people are too discouraged to vote. But they do have a voice. But the DA leader is right: it still doesn't have to cost R700 million. South Africa has just over 49 million people aged 6 and older. This puts the unit cost at just over R14 per person if we include every citizen aged 6 and up. As someone who has done several conversations with communities across the country, the unit cost can be arrested at R2 per person. How? By allowing these conversations to be organically facilitated by local people over many days in their own geographic spaces. Eliminate catering other than water. Eliminate flying people in to host conversations. Eliminate the need to accommodate people in expensive locations. No one gets paid to serve as a local community facilitator for the national dialogue. Don't print any T-shirts. Allow conversations to take on diverse forms. Allow teachers to host conversations in their classrooms and feed this into the national dialogue feedback depository. Allow companies to hold national dialogue conversations. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Allow sports clubs, places of worship, pubs, and shebeens to host conversations. Appoint skilled, locally based, non-aligned community people to facilitate these local conversations. What skills are required? Not to interrogate inputs but to allow for the mature, free flow of conversations and to record it all in a non-judgmental way, and to protect the process. The Eminent Persons Group should prepare is a list of twenty core questions which can be used as conversation starters. Then allow people to talk. Don't judge their input. Just record it. Then thank them for coming. Within five days of every conversation, the community receives a verbatim transcript of all the inputs they have made to the national dialogue for their records. This ensures the integrity of the process. The worst thing that has already happened is that the Eminent Persons Group has been formed without thoroughly exploring the diverse concepts of a national dialogue. Because the default – a room filled with food and important people with t-shirts and security in over-priced facilities – will now dominate their minds. We have the opportunity to establish a dynamic process in which a country engages in conversation with itself as a regular and organic part of its democratic identity. In a country as filled as it is with generational trauma and constant violence, this process could become an act of immense self-healing. This is not an election. It's not a grandstand for public office. Nor is it the opportunity to launch personal attacks on others or to settle community or political scores. The most empowering and non-judgmental conversation starter for the national dialogue is, "If I had it my way, I would …." Cape Argus
