Former mayor from Haiti gets prison time for lying to get into the US
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A former mayor from Haiti convicted of lying about his violent past on his visa application was sentenced Friday to nine years in prison and three years of supervision, after which he will be subject to deportation proceedings.
Jean Morose Viliena, of Malden, Massachusetts, was the mayor of Les Irois, Haiti, from December 2006 until February 2010. He was convicted of three counts of visa fraud in March and sentenced Friday in federal court in Boston.
'For more than a decade, he lived freely and comfortable in this country while the victims of his brutality lived in fear, exile and pain,' U.S. Attorney Leah Foley said in statement. 'Today's sentence brings a measure of justice for the lives he shattered and sends a clear message: the United States will not be a safe have for human rights abusers.'
According to prosecutors, Viliena committed 'violent atrocities' against his political foes in an isolated, rural community of about 22,000 residents on Haiti's western tip. In 2007, he was accused of leading a group of his allies to the home of a political opponent, where he and his associates shot and killed the opponent's younger brother, then smashed his skull with a rock.
In 2008, Viliena and his allies went armed with guns, machetes, picks and sledgehammers to shut down a community radio station that he opposed, prosecutors said. Authorities said he pistol-whipped and punched a man and ordered an associate to shoot and kill the man and another person.
Both survived, but one of the men lost a leg and the other was blinded in one eye.
When he applied for a visa to enter the U.S., however, Viliena denied having 'ordered, carried out or materially assisted in extrajudicial and political killings and other acts of violence against the Haitian people.' He later received a permanent resident card and has raised a child who is a U.S. citizen by birth, prosecutors said.
Defense attorneys argued in court that it was members of a rival political party — including some who they say are government witnesses — who committed the violence. They described the former mayor as the son of a farmer who became a teacher and eventually ran for mayor to improve conditions in town.
In 2023, Viliena was found liable by an American jury in a civil trial in connection with the killing and the two attempted killings and assessed $15.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Special prosecutor in Karen Read's retrial, Hank Brennan issues statement following verdict
Hank Brennan, the special prosecutor in Karen Read's retrial has issued a statement following the verdict. On Wednesday, a jury found Karen Read not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter charges in the 2022 death of her Boston police officer boyfriend, a case that attracted people all over the country. 'I am disappointed in the verdict and the fact that we could not achieve justice for John O'Keefe and his family,' Special prosecutor Hank Brennan said in a statement. Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally spearheaded the prosecution's efforts in Read's first trial, which ended in a mistrial. 'District Attorney Michael Morrissey appointed me, giving me full discretion to independently assess the case and follow the evidence no matter where it led,' Brennan added. 'After an independent and thorough review of all the evidence, I concluded that the evidence led to one person, and only one person. Neither the closed federal investigation nor my independent review led me to identify any other possible suspect or person responsible for the death of John O'Keefe.' The same jury found her guilty of a lesser chargeof drunken driving. The jury handed down its decision after deliberating for at least 22 hours since June 13. 'The campaign of intimidation and abuse that has been waged, funded, and promoted in public and on social media is the antithesis of justice,' Brennan added. 'If this type of conduct becomes commonplace, it will threaten the integrity of our judicial system, affecting both victims and the criminally accused.' Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey issued a response on Thursday regarding the outcome of Karen Read's retrial. After reaching out multiple times to the Norfolk County DA's Office, Morrissey released a short four-word statement to Boston 25 News on Thursday, saying, 'The jury has spoken.' Prosecutors argued that Read hit O'Keefe with her SUV, leaving him to die in a blizzard, and charged her with second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a deadly collision. 'We cannot condone witness abuse, causing participants to worry for their own safety or that of their families,' Brennan said. 'It is my hope that with the verdict, the witnesses and their families will be left alone. The harassment of these innocent victims and family members is deplorable and should never happen again in a case in this Commonwealth.' 'My heartfelt condolences to the O'Keefe family and faith that over the coming years they will find peace and closure,' Brennan ended with. This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Murder-accused's father took knife 'for safety'
A man accused of hiding a knife after a fatal crash and a stabbing has told a jury he put it in the boot of his car for "safety reasons". Mohammed Jhangur, 57, said he arrived at the scene in Burngreave, Sheffield, on 27 December 2023, shortly after Chris Marriott, 46, had been fatally struck by a car while trying to help a stranger. Mr Jhangur's son, Hassan, is also on trial at Sheffield Crown Court, charged with murdering Mr Marriott and causing grievous bodily harm to four people when he drove his car into a crowd. Mohammed Jhangur, of Whiteways Road, Sheffield, denies perverting the course of justice, telling jurors on Wednesday had he not taken the knife "somebody would've used it again". Prosecutors previously told the court how the Jhangurs and the Khan family had been feuding over a wedding between their children Amaani Jhangur and Hasan Khan, which had taken place earlier that morning. Later that day, the bride was at the Khan family home in College Court when her mother and sister arrived, the court heard, with violence breaking out in the street between the two families. Mr Marriott, who had been out on a post-Christmas walk with his family, had stopped to help Nafeesa Jhangur when he saw her collapsed in the road. Not long after, Hassan Jhangur drove his Seat Ibiza first into Riasat Khan and then into a group of people, including off-duty midwife Alison Norris and his own mother Ambreen and sister Nafeesa. Mr Marriott died at the scene. Jurors heard the defendant then got out of his car and stabbed his new brother-in-law, Hasan Khan, several times. Jhangur admitted causing serious injury to Alison Norris, Ambreen Jhangur, Nafeesa Jhangur and Riasat Khan by dangerous driving but denies four charges of causing grievous bodily harm with intent. He denies murdering Mr Marriott and attempting to murder Hasan Khan and wounding him with intent. Jhangur's father said he had driven to the scene after receiving a phone call telling him his daughter Nafeesa was not well. "When I arrived it was just complete carnage, like a horror movie," he told jurors. "I saw my daughter Nafeesa under the car." Mr Jhangur said he initially thought his wife and daughter had died and then found his son Hassan Jhangur lying on the floor and bleeding from his head. "I went to pick him up but then Hasan Khan swung his baseball bat at me," he said. "I just managed to duck in time." Mr Jhangur said he spotted a knife on the floor but denied saying "give me that knife, open your hand before anybody notices". "The reason I picked it up was the safety of people around me," he said. "If I didn't pick the knife up, somebody else would have picked it up and used the knife again." Footage played on Monday, recorded Mr Jhangur telling police: "I don't know who put the knife in there, mate, I don't know, I don't know anything about the knife". Asked if he accepted that was a lie, he said: "Maybe at that time it was not the truth. "I was never in this situation before, I was not thinking right, I was not thinking straight, I had a lot of things on my mind." The trial continues. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North Driver laughed after running over dad - court 'Good Samaritan' killed in wedding brawl - court HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fat Joe accused of sex acts with minors in $20 million lawsuit filed by former hype man, rapper denies allegations
Fat Joe is denying all allegations of exploitation and abuse made by his former hype man in a newly filed $20 million lawsuit. Terrance "T.A." Dixon filed the suit against the 54-year-old rapper in federal court on Thursday, alleging that his former boss — whose real name is Joseph Antonio Cartagena — engaged in "coercive labor exploitation, financial fraud, sexual manipulation, violent intimidation, and psychological coercion." The complaint, obtained by Entertainment Weekly, includes Fat Joe's codefendants, Peter "Pistol Pete" Torres and Richard "Rich Player" Jospitre, referring to them as key associates in the musician's "criminal enterprise," as well as Erica Juliana Moreira, a lawyer for Fat Joe. In it, Dixon claims that his work went beyond that of a hype man, with him serving as a writer and background vocalist on tracks like "Congratulations," "Ice Cream," and "Money Over Bitches." He also alleges that despite being a foundational element in the rapper's career for 16 years, Fat Joe and his associates systematically suppressed, silenced, and erased his contributions. He also claims that he has never been properly compensated for his work, and is seeking $20 million in damages. "Fat Joe is Sean Combs minus the Tusi," Dixon's attorney, Tyrone Blackburn, said in a statement to EW on Friday. Blackburn is also currently the lead counsel in a high-profile case against hip-hop artist Sean "Diddy" Combs on behalf of accuser Lil Rodney. "As with most criminals, Fat Joe is pretty dumb, as displayed in the pleading," Blackburn added. "We have three additional pages of predicated acts, which would make the 24 in the complaint look like child's play. Fat Joe has a lot of explaining to do." Fat Joe's team has vehemently denied Dixon's allegations. The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claims that Dixon was forced "into humiliating situations, including sex acts performed under duress and surveillance, accompanied by threats of abandonment in foreign countries if [he] refused compliance." According to his estimation in the complaint, he "was coerced into more than 4,000 sexual acts to maintain his standing within the Enterprise." The suit alleges that the "wide spectrum of sexual coercion, psychological control, forced exhibitionism, and surveillance-based humiliation" were "tactics designed to control Plaintiff's body, erode his autonomy, and ensure silence." "These sex-based abuses were not private, incidental, or isolated," the complaint continues. "They were integral to the enterprise's culture of dominance and humiliation, enforced by Defendant's associates such as Pistol Pete, [UPNYC store manager] JB, and others, and sustained across numerous tour locations including Miami, North Carolina, Germany, Spain, and Wisconsin." The most damning and disturbing accusations in the complaint include several centered on Fat Joe's alleged sexual relations with minors. It claims that Dixon "personally witnessed [Fat Joe] engage in sexual relations with children who were 15 and 16 years old" and lists three alleged examples of underage girls identified as "Minor Does." Minor Doe 1 is described as a 16-year-old Dominican girl from New York, who, according to the lawsuit, "would [perform] oral sex and other sexual acts" for the rapper in exchange for "cash, clothing, and payment of her cell phone bill." Minor Doe 2 is described as a Caucasian female who is not an American citizen and allegedly met Fat Joe when she was 15 years old after a concert overseas. "Defendant flew Minor Doe 2 to New York City and Miami, Florida, on multiple occasions," the complaint reads. "Due to Minor Doe 2's body being adolescent and not fully formed, Defendant paid for her to get a Brazilian Butt Lift. Minor Doe 2 eventually left Defendant and is now married to a professional athlete." Minor Doe 3 is described as a Latina female who allegedly met the rapper when "she was 15 years old, turning 16." According to the suit, the rapper was "in love with Minor Doe 3" and even contemplated leaving his wife for her. "The Defendant paid all Minor Doe 3's bills and even took her overseas to his tour stops," the lawsuit claims. "He brought her to Florida and would put her up in a condo he rented a few blocks from his house with his wife. In a recorded conversation, Minor Doe 3 and her 15-year-old cousin describe in detail to Plaintiff how 'inappropriate' it was for Defendant, who was in his late 30s at the time, to be fawning over children." The complaint also alleges that Fat Joe engaged in money laundering and tax evasion schemes, including artificially inflating Dixon's tax liabilities "in an effort to conceal their extensive wage theft," exposing him to unwarranted tax audits and penalties, and systematically obscuring the exploited labor. The suit additionally names Jay-Z's Roc Nation as a defendant, claiming that the company, which represents Fat Joe, knowingly participated in "concealing, transferring, and manipulating" Dixon's authorship rights and royalty interests and sought to intimidate, harass, and obstruct the hype man's legitimate claims against Fat Joe, Torres, and Jospitre. Jordan Siev, an attorney at Reed Smith LLP who works with Roc Nation, called the complaint "bogus" in a statement to EW on Friday. "Dixon worked for Joe for many years until 2019. During the time since he left in 2019, there were no complaints about what he was paid or any supposed mistreatment," Siev said. "He made up a whole bunch of claims in a money grab. Joe took the affirmative step of filing a lawsuit for defamation against Dixon in April, and also against Dixon's lawyer, Tyrone Blackburn, for intentional infliction of emotional distress. So nothing happens for two months, and then out of nowhere, this lawsuit comes up yesterday, which is clearly in retaliation for the filing made — and clearly ignores the facts." Siev also cited a recent ruling by a New York federal judge that criticized Blackburn's litigation strategy in the Combs case and noted that Fat Joe's April filing called Blackburn's behavior "shakedown tactics masquerading as lawyering." "This is simply a shakedown effort," Siev said. "Joe would not agree to it, and now [Dixon] has not only sued Joe, but he's dragged in everybody under the sun who has had any affiliation with Joe at any time, including Joe's management for the last several years. [The complaint] has no legal basis or no legal theory to support it." The attorney said the case will be "fought hard and actively," concluding, "We certainly expect to prevail on Joe's claims and to dismiss the claims that were brought yesterday."Fat Joe filed a lawsuit against Dixon for allegedly slandering him on social media with claims that the rapper flew a 16-year-old girl across state lines for sex. That suit, filed in April, claimed that Dixon and Blackburn sought to extort Fat Joe for money for being a "ghostwriter and uncredited vocalist" on some of his songs. "The lawsuit filed by Tyrone Blackburn and Terrance Dixon is a blatant act of retaliation, a desperate attempt to deflect attention from the civil suit we filed first, which exposed their coordinated scheme to extort Mr. Cartagena through lies, threats, and manufactured allegations," Fat Joe's attorney, Joe Tacopina, said in a statement to EW on Friday. "We didn't just sue a disgruntled former employee trying to revive a false claim from 15 years ago — we sued the lawyer behind it all," he added. "Law enforcement is aware of the extortionate demand at the heart of this scheme. The allegations against Mr. Cartagena are complete fabrications — lies intended to damage his reputation and force a settlement through public pressure. Mr. Cartagena will not be intimidated. We have taken legal action to expose this fraudulent campaign and hold everyone involved accountable." Dixon seems prepared for a lengthy legal battle. "This is the right way to fight Joe — through the system," he told Variety. "You can't fight him no other way. Joe thinks he's a god. Joe thinks he's untouchable." Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
