Parents ‘abandoned' teenager in Ghana over fears he would become a gangster in Britain
Parents 'abandoned' a teenage boy in Ghana over fears he would become a gangster if he remained in Britain, a court has heard.
The boy, who cannot be identified, started a family court case after his parents enrolled him at a boarding school in the west African country before leaving him abroad in March 2024.
The parents were said to be concerned that the teenager was at risk of engaging in criminal activity or being killed due to knife crime.
At a previous hearing, he said he had been 'tricked' and his lawyers asked a judge to order that he be brought back to the UK, having lived in the country since birth.
In a decision in February, High Court judge Mr Justice Hayden did not make the order, finding the teenager 'is at real risk of suffering greater harm in returning to the UK than if he were to remain in Ghana'.
The teenager is now bringing a challenge over the decision at the Court of Appeal in London, which his parents oppose.
'Feels that he is a British boy'
At a hearing on Thursday, Deirdre Fottrell KC, the boy's barrister, said that it was his 'steadfast and firm wish' for the appeal judges to order his return to the UK.
She said: 'It is alienating for him and he feels that he is a British boy... he never envisaged the situation that he would be living away from his family in another country and away from all that is familiar to him.'
Ms Fottrell said the boy is 'highly distressed' about the situation and feels 'abandoned' by his family.
She continued: 'He really is quite desperate to return... to return to his family, to return to his social life and the structure in which he was living, but also to return to the UK.'
In written submissions, the barrister said the previous judge failed to give 'due weight' to the boy's feelings and autonomy and also 'erroneously limited' his role in reviewing whether the decision to move the boy to Ghana was within the scope of parental responsibility.
Ms Fottrell added: 'In the instant case Mr Justice Hayden discounted [the boy's] wishes and feelings, assuming that there was a clear and tangible threat to his welfare.
'He discounted evidence that any threat was not capable of being ameliorated by other safeguards or protective measures.'
Rebecca Foulkes, for the parents, said they 'found themselves in a wholly invidious position in March when they made the decision which they made'.
The barrister said in written submissions that the previous judge's decision was 'well reasoned' and 'fell well within the parameters of reasonable decisions open to him'.
Worrying conversations on Snapchat
The High Court previously heard that the parents' concerns about their son had been growing before the decision to take him out of the UK.
These concerns included poor school attendance, being aggressive, susceptibility to being groomed, an allegation of stealing phones and worrying conversations on Snapchat, a social media channel.
In his ruling, Mr Justice Hayden said he accepted that the teenager was involved in criminal activity and was at least 'on the periphery' of gang culture.
Ms Foulkes said in her written submissions on Thursday: 'The conclusion reached, on the facts of this case, cannot be said to be anything other than a sound welfare decision.'
The barrister later said that while the boy's wishes and feelings are a 'central aspect' of the decision over what is in his best interest, 'ultimately, the court determined that his best interests required that his views should not prevail'.
During the previous proceedings, the boy said he would rather be in foster care in the UK than remain in his current situation.
Ms Foulkes said the previous judge was entitled to conclude that the teenager 'had little understanding of what entering the care system truly involves' and that he was 'likely to continue to reject the authority of his parents, school and other adults, and his acting out and risk-taking behaviours were highly likely to increase' if he were placed in care.
The hearing before Sir Andrew McFarlane, Lord Justice Baker and Lord Justice Arnold is due to conclude on Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Keir Starmer must end the injustice of indefinite sentences today
It is scarcely believable that there are still 2,614 people in prison in Britain serving indefinite sentences under legislation that was repealed 13 years ago – at a time when other prisoners are being released early because the jails are full. The government is now being given the chance to end this monstrous injustice – and to ease prison overcrowding – by adopting a plan drawn up by Lord Thomas, the former lord chief justice. Indeterminate sentences were brought in under the last Labour government as an exceptional measure for prisoners considered too dangerous to release without special safeguards. But Labour peer David Blunkett, who introduced the legislation, said that many more such sentences were handed out than he had intended, and the policy was the ' biggest regret ' of his career. The sentence was abolished by the coalition government, but existing prisoners continued to be subject to the stringent rules, not knowing whether they would ever be released and, if they were, being recalled to prison for minor offences. Thus, there have been a succession of terrible cases reported by The Independent, including those of Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone, and Abdullahi Suleman, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for stealing a laptop. Plainly, there is more to their stories than this, and the Parole Board does need to be sure that those who are released are unlikely to be a danger to the public. But it cannot be right that, had they committed their crime a day after indeterminate sentences were abolished, they would have long been freed. What makes it worse is that other prisoners, some of whom pose a greater risk to the public than they do, are being let out early to free up prison places. As we report today, Lord Thomas has led a panel of experts in drawing up proposals to give every prisoner serving an imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentence a release date within two years, and to recall them only as a last resort. James Timpson, the prisons minister and Labour peer, should accept this workable and detailed plan and seek to close this shameful chapter in the history of British criminal justice. Presumably, the only reason that he has not acted to end this scandal already is that Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, is reluctant. Having been forced to order the early release of prisoners to avoid the police having to let criminals go because there is nowhere to put them, she does not want to hand further ammunition to ignorant critics who accuse her of being soft on crime. She has shown courage in taking the difficult measures forced on her by the irresponsibility of Conservative ministers, who allowed prisons to reach crisis point. She should show some more bravery in doing the right thing, which can even be sold, in part, as another emergency measure to free up prison places. If she will not do it, Sir Keir Starmer should instruct her to. He is the law and order prime minister, the former director of public prosecutions, who understands the criminal justice system better than any minister. He cannot allow this injustice to continue and must act on Lord Thomas's recommendations. We understand that the prime minister has taken to asking officials with increasing frequency, as he gets to grips with the frustrations of trying to deliver change: 'Why not today?' Why, we should ask him, not put an end to this scandal today?
BreakingNews.ie
38 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Woman aged in her 50s dies following Newry house fire
A woman aged in her 50s has died following a house fire in Newry. Police received a report of a fire in the Bearna Park area of Killeavy at around 8.40am on Saturday. Advertisement Emergency services attended the scene and the Northern Ireland Fire & Rescue Service extinguished the fire. The woman was pronounced dead at the scene. A young male was taken to hospital for treatment of his injuries. Officers are conducting enquiries into the cause of the fire. Advertisement They have appealed to anyone who may have footage that could assist with their investigation to contact detectives and refrain from sharing it online.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Frantic search for boy, 15, who vanished nearly a week ago from historic town
A POLICE search has been launched for a 15-year-old boy who was last seen six days ago. The teen, identified as Billy, was last seen leaving his home in Camberley, Surrey, on June 15 and has not been heard from since.
