‘We have a National Treasury problem': Fuel levy hike defended amid criticism over tax strategy
At least R3.5 billion in revenue would be lost by not increasing the fuel levy, according to National Treasury.
Petrol pumps are pictured at a filling station in Melville on 20 January 2021. Picture: Tracy Lee Stark
The National Treasury has defended its decision to increase the general fuel levy in the budget 3.0 amid criticism over its broader tax policy.
On Friday, officials from the Treasury and the South African Revenue Service (Sars) appeared before Parliament in a joint meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Select Committee on Finance.
They were responding to public submissions on the fiscal framework and revenue proposals, which outline South Africa's economic policies, revenue projections, and government expenditure limits.
This follows the tabling of Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's third national budget for the 2025/2026 financial year, after months of political impasse.
The budget includes a fuel levy increase of 16 cents per litre for petrol and 15 cents for diesel, effective from 4 June.
However, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) are challenging the hike in court.
National Treasury's revenue projections
Treasury's head of tax and financial sector policy, Christopher Axelson, addressed the committee on the revised revenue outlook.
Axelson noted that revenue projections had decreased by R61.9 billion compared to the budget tabled in March.
This decline was driven in part by the withdrawal of proposed increases to value-added tax (VAT) and adjustments to zero-rated items.
'That increase was reduced slightly, but it still required a large amount of additional revenue to make sure we have a fiscally sustainable trajectory for our debt and debt-service costs, and because of that, this May 2025 budget does include R18 billion in additional revenue for 2025/2026 and has R1 billion in tax relief in 2026/2027,' the Treasury official said.
He also indicated that a further R20 billion in unspecified tax policy adjustments is anticipated for the 2026 budget.
To fund expenditure priorities, Treasury has opted for a range of tax measures, including no changes to personal income tax brackets or rebates, an inflationary increase in the fuel levy, and above-inflation hikes in excise duties on alcohol and tobacco.
Diesel refund relief for primary sectors was also announced.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: Fuel levy replaced VAT hike but is it the better option?
Axelson pointed out that past personal income tax increases had failed to raise the intended revenue, while corporate income tax remains 'highly volatile'.
'Corporate income tax increases are the most damaging to growth, and if you reduce growth, it reduces the tax bases as well, so it is not as effective.'
Axelson pointed out that a VAT increase was the most efficient revenue-raising option but had to be scrapped due to opposition.
As a result, a bulk of the revenue shortfall was addressed by not adjusting personal income tax and rebates for inflation.
He also explained that Treasury has aimed to avoid increasing taxes over the last five years in an effort to support economic recovery, adding that the country's tax system was 'progressive'.
National Treasury defends fuel levy hike
Moreover, Axelson responded to comparisons between the fuel levy hike and a VAT increase.
'The quantum is very different. The VAT increase over three years would have raised about R75 billion. Increasing the fuel levy by inflation is closer to around R12 billion.'
He defended the levy hike, arguing that it had not been raised in the previous three budgets.
'Part of that was due to the very high oil, petrol and diesel prices [but] those have been coming down lately. The recent non-adjustment in the March budget was to provide relief for VAT.'
READ MORE: VAT reversal overshadowed by fuel levy hike
Axelson emphasised that the fuel levy is a significant source of state revenue, contributing about 5% to total tax revenue.
'This is a specific tax, a cents per litre, so these kinds of specific taxes, which are the same as excise duties, they need to be adjusted by inflation; otherwise, the real value of that tax will go down over time.'
He warned that Treasury would lose about R3.5 billion in revenue by failing to increase the fuel levy.
'The vast majority of the tax revenue increase is all on the personal income tax side. Around R16.7 billion of the R18 billion in increases is all on personal income tax.'
Watch the meeting below:
Axelson told the committee that various alternative revenue proposals – such as eliminating the employment tax incentive (ETI), increasing corporate income tax, introducing a wealth tax, and partially adjusting tax brackets – will be considered in the 2026 budget.
'A lot of them are very good and interesting proposals which we are going to have to consider very carefully and hopefully have a more consultative process before the next budget.'
He added that although the finance minister has the authority under the Customs and Excise Act to implement an interim fuel levy adjustment via a notice in the government gazette, Parliament has the right to intervene.
'We do hope the notice will be published quite soon [but] Parliament may decide to intervene [as] there is legislative oversight.'
Tax policy criticised
Civil society and political parties reacted strongly to the Treasury's presentation.
The Budget Justice Coalition, one of the organisations that made submissions, rejected claims of a progressive tax system.
'Our tax system can look progressive on paper, but it doesn't actually work that way, and we know that all too well in a country that is marked by some of the highest levels of inequality,' the organisation's chairperson, Matshidiso Lencoasa, said.
She argued that South Africa's tax policy burdens the poor, while wealthy individuals and corporations continue to exploit loopholes to their advantage.
READ MORE: Fuel levy pain: Brace for possibility of petrol price hike in June
Lencoasa further criticised the proposed VAT and fuel levy increases, describing them as 'blunt instruments' that would place a heavier financial strain on the country's most vulnerable populations.
Pieter Faber, senior executive of taxation at the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (Saica), also expressed concern.
Faber said the institution cannot support further tax increases in an already high-tax environment, especially amid rising national debt and ongoing concerns about the lack of government accountability, as highlighted in the Auditor-General's report on local government this week.
Fuel levy increase under scrutiny
MK Party MP Des Van Rooyen criticised the delayed implementation of alternative proposals.
'My expectation was that most of the inputs would be accommodated in this budgeting cycle,' Van Rooyen said.
He asserted that the fuel levy increase was more regressive than the scrapped VAT hike.
'There should be a thunderous response against this proposal.'
Democratic Alliance (DA) MP Pieter Britz called for a fairer distribution of the tax burden.
READ MORE: EFF files urgent interdict to stop proposed fuel levy hike
EFF MP Omphile Maotwe strongly disagreed with Treasury's position on the fuel levy.
'National Treasury refuses to increase corporate income tax for ideological reasons and not practical ones. They oppose a wealth tax because their underlying assumption is that the state must serve those who already have wealth.'
She also challenged the narrative of a progressive tax system.
'The claim that our tax system is progressive cannot be taken seriously,' Maotwe said, accusing the department of ignoring alternative proposals.
'It is clear that we have a National Treasury problem,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
How the Correctional Services plans to allocate R1. 2 billion for prisoner food provision
The Department of Correctional Services has placed the provision of food for prisoners as one of the top four cost drivers of its budget after compensation of employees, property payments, and public-private partnership support. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers The Department of Correctional Services has allocated R1.2 billion for the provision of food for its more than 100,000 prisoners in the 2025/26 financial year, Minister Pieter Groenewald said. Responding to parliamentary questions from EFF MP Betty Diale, Groenewald said the department spent R1.4 billion on the provision of food on prisoners in 2023/24 financial year. The amount had increased to R1.5 billion in the last financial year that ended in March 2025. 'For the 2025/26 financial year, the department allocated R1,286,972,000 for the provision of nutrition to inmates,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In its 2025-2030 strategic plan, the department places the provision of food for prisoners as one of the top four cost drivers of its budget after compensation of employees, property payments, and public-private partnership support. The document puts the provision for food to the tune of R952,975. Groenewald also said the department planned to maximise the utilisation of the services of the prisoners to produce food for themselves, to enable the department to redirect funds to other essential programmes. He said the prisoners will participate in the production workshops in agriculture to maximise their skills utilisation for bread and agricultural production for their ration. 'The self-sufficiency and sustainability programme in the department is centred around offender development, through the provision of work opportunities to offenders in bakeries and agriculture. Expansion of bakeries and agricultural projects towards an increase in offender skills utilisation for food production,' he said. The department's strategic plan document states that the department wants to become self-sustainable through activities such as those in production workshops, bakeries, agriculture, skills development, formal education and training, as well as through arts and culture. 'The department will expand marketing of production workshops' products and services to other client departments to improve revenue generation.' Meanwhile, Groenewald revealed that the cost per capita per inmate incarcerated for the 2025/26 financial year is R462.13 per day. Asked how his department managed financial implications for imprisonment of foreign nationals, he said there were 13,181 sentenced foreign nationals in prisons as at May 4 this year. 'The total cost to accommodate 13,181 sentenced foreign nationals on 4 May 2025 was R6,091,335.53 per day.' He stated that foreign national prisoners were not a separate category of inmates. Groenewald added that there were currently no bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries to transfer sentenced foreign national prisoners to serve in their countries of origin. 'The DCS is in consultation with the South African Police Service, Department of Home Affairs, Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, and Department of International Relations and Cooperation to formalise a South African procedure to inter-state transfer of offenders.'
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Run on numbers: understanding the financial burden of raising a child in South Africa
A large portion of the expenses of personal income goes towards education, for those people lucky enough to have an income. 1. Momentum Investo did extensive research into what it costs to raise a child. 'At inflation-related sums, it can cost R550 000 for the first six years, between R640 000 and R880 000 for primary school, and up to R1 million for high school. A three-year degree at a South African university may cost R660,000. These numbers add up to R3 million.' Standard Bank's estimate is much the same. 'Conservative estimates indicate that it can cost around R10,000 per month in today's economy to raise a child, which means that over an 18-year period, factoring price increases, you can expect to spend over R2.5 million.' That is without considering sending the child to university. 2. In 2023, the average annual household income in South Africa was R204,359. This is based on data from Statistics South Africa's Income and Expenditure Survey (IES). It is obvious that the average household cannot afford a child. According to Statsa, 'South African households allocated the majority of their consumption expenditure to four main areas in 2023: housing and utilities, food and non-alcoholic beverages, transport, and insurance and financial services. These categories accounted for 75,6% of total household spending, meaning that three out of every four rand were directed toward these essentials.' These numbers indicate that there is very little left to spend on a child.
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Msunduzi ratepayers celebrate justice as former fleet supervisor receives 10-year sentence
Msunduzi Municipality ratepayer associations welcomed the sentencing of a former fleet supervisor to 10 years imprisonment for corruption in the Durban Specialised Commercial Crime Court on Thursday. Image: Independent Newspapers Archives Msunduzi Municipality ratepayer associations welcomed the sentencing of a municipal worker to 10 years imprisonment for corruption on Thursday. The Durban Specialised Commercial Crime Court sentenced Nhlakanipho Dlamini, 46, for two counts of corruption for an offence he committed in January 2020 while he was employed as a fleet supervisor in the Msunduzi Municipality. Lieutenant Colonel Simphiwe Mhlongo, spokesperson for the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (Hawks-DPCI), said that during the execution of his duties, Dlamini demanded a gratification of R100,000 from the service provider to process a payment of R1.5 million that was owed by the municipality. Dlamini only processed a payment of R1 million and continued to demand cash to process the remaining amount. 'An intensive investigation was conducted, and an undercover operation followed. Dlamini was caught red-handed after collecting cash from the complainant. He was placed under arrest and charged with corruption,' Mhlongo said. On August 27, 2024, Dlamini was found guilty on two counts of corruption. The Northern Areas Residents and Ratepayers Association (NARRA) acknowledged the prosecution team for their diligence and commitment to upholding the rule of law. Jimmy Naidoo, chairperson of the NARRA, said this successful outcome is a strong indication that consequence management is both possible and necessary in the public service. Naidoo believes this case must serve as a precedent for ongoing and future investigations, as it is clear that corruption remains entrenched in many municipalities. He added that the NARRA continues to advocate for transparency, accountability, and zero tolerance for corruption. 'We urge that more investigations be pursued vigorously so that those who abuse public resources are held to account. Only through consistent and decisive action can public trust in local governance be restored. We applaud the investigating and prosecution teams for getting to the root of the problem and encourage all oversight bodies to remain steadfast in the fight against corruption.'
