Pasifika leaders, influencers weigh in on proposed social media ban for under 16s
Photo:
RNZ
As the New Zealand government
considers restricting social media access for under-16s
, Pacific leaders in Parliament and online influencers are weighing in with a mix of views, ranging from cautious support to concern, and even strong opposition.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced on Sunday that Cabinet will consider a social media ban for under-16s, despite opposition from coalition partner ACT.
He expressed concern about the harm social media can cause young New Zealanders, suggesting that restricting access for under-16s would help protect them from bullying, harmful content, and addiction.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
"I talked to parents, I talked to teachers, I talked to principals and they are all struggling with actually the harm that social media is causing our kids," Luxon said.
Labour's Pacific peoples spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni said they are pleased the government listened when they told them it should be a government bill not a private member's bill.
Sepuloni said as a mother she shares concerns about online safety for her children in the new digital age.
She said that many Pacific people have created safe spaces online for their communities.
However, increased time spent on these platforms raises the risk of unsolicited harm, which understandably fuels many parents' fears.
Among Pacific social media influencers, the response is more critical.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
RNZ Pacific spoke to three prominent influencers all of whom said the government's focus might be misplaced.
Social media content creator and broadcaster Regan Foai, who hosts
Niu FM's
breakfast show, is a parent himself and he said the government should invest in more significant issues.
"I'll double down on the fact that I do feel that the money that is being put into this should be put into other places in this country," Foai told RNZ Pacific.
"There's a lot of things going on at the moment, and I feel for the people that are struggling on the ground here.
"I do feel like it's a parent's responsibility to help their children navigate the social media world, and I do worry in that space where, if the government tell you, 'Hey, we're putting a ban, your kids can't go on social media'.
"What's next after that? They're going to tell us how to feed our kids. Once you put that ban in place, it kind of opens up a gate to a whole bunch of other things," he said.
Content creator and NiuFM host Regan Foai
Photo:
Supplied
Hana Matauaina Vaai Schmidt, a mother and presenter of Bluwave's Breaking Waves Podcast, said it was a good idea, but she pointed out similar initiatives were failing in other countries.
"When I heard this, the first thing I thought was 'the intention is good, but will it work?'
"We've seen other countries try to apply the same law but children and youth have just found a way around to accessing social media tools," Schmidt said.
"It is a good thing we're identifying that this is a problem in New Zealand, and we're working towards a solution.
"But I think more consultation needs to be done on whether putting the investment or money into this solution will actually work and if it will provide a better outcome for our communities."
Hana Matauaina Vaai Schmidt
Photo:
Supplied
Comic artist Michael Mulipola, better known as 'Bloody Samoan' on his online platforms, echoed similar sentiments.
However, he said for him it is an educational thing.
"It's almost kind of plugging a leak with a piece of sellotape," Mulipola said.
"It's a temporary kind of measure and a short-sighted one too because our youth, the last two generations of youth, their existence is in the online space. That's where they find friendship, that's where they find connection."
He said the drawback is it is also where you can find harassment and online trolls, which he has had first-hand experiences with himself.
"I feel like it should be more about education around how to deal with those kind of things," he said.
"But that's the lives of our youth now - it's online [and] they are digital."
Comic artist Michel Mulipola aka Bloody Samoan
Photo:
Supplied
Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono said its important to acknowledge the harms that can come with social media platforms and the issue should be looked at from a harm-reduction perspective.
At the same time, he said the onus should not just be put on people under the age of 16.
"We know that misinformation and disinformation target people right across [all] age groups, and many of our seniors are particularly vulnerable as well," Tuiono said.
He said it is also important to hold the social media platforms accountable.
"It's all very well to pass out the responsibility to the individual and...young people under the age of 16 or older people.
"But where's the responsibility from social media platforms? They are responsible for this harm where is there responsibility for this?"
Green Party MP Teanau Tuiono
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
He believes a broader approach is needed.
"They need to be responsible for the harm they they are creating, that their algorithm creates for young people, and also on democracy itself.
"That's an important ingredient in this conversation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
36 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
NZ Government's progress overshadowed by global economic, political risks
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon meets with China's President Xi Jinping at the Apec Summit in Peru. Photo / Pool Opinion by Bruce Cotterill Bruce Cotterill is a professional director and adviser to business leaders. He is the author of the book, The Best Leaders Don't Shout, and host of the podcast, Leaders Getting Coffee. Learn more THE FACTS It's 18 months since the new Government was sworn in. The mess they inherited has been well documented, so too has their less-than-rapid impact on solving the problems we have. We're an impatient bunch, and it feels like they're taking their time. When we look at many of
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Christopher Luxon raises Cook Islands impasse with Chinese Premier, disagrees with Nato boss that China in league with Russia to undermine West
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon brought up New Zealand's frustrations over China's engagement with the Cook Islands in his meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing yesterday. Relations between New Zealand and the Cook Islands are strained after Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown signed a Comprehensive Strategic
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tai Rāwhiti protest: A burning question on Ngāti Oneone's redress
Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson stoking the fire at the protest movement taking place at Te Pā Eketū Shed, on Hirini St, calling for the return of Ngāti Oneone's ancestral lands. Photo: Zita Campbell / LDR A fire signalling Tai Rāwhiti hapū Ngāti Oneone's call for the return of their ancestral lands has been burning for over six weeks. The hapū said it will stoke the fire until the grievance is resolved, but after three generations of attempting to remedy it, does not want the redress to fall on them. "It always falls on us to 'make the case'," Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told Local Democracy Reporting (LDR) when the movement started on 5 May. The Crown said any potential redress in this case is the responsibility of the landowner and the hapū. As part of its protest, members of Ngāti Oneone have inhabited Te Pā Eketū Shed, a warehouse-sized property on Gisborne's Hirini St. Rather than an "occupation", the hāpu calls the action "a reclamation of whenua". The location is where Ngāti Oneone's marae and pā were originally established in 1852 before being removed for harbour development under the Private Works Act. Eastland Port, of which Trust Tai Rāwhiti is the sole shareholder, owns the shed and others on the hapū's ancestral land on Hirini St and the Esplanade. At the beginning of the protest movement, the hapū called on the trust, Eastland Port and Gisborne District Council to return land not used for "core business". Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann told LDR the council had started exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024. This includes investigating the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners. However, Trust Tai Rāwhiti, which has a funding partnership with the council and serves as the region's economic development and tourism organisation, earlier said addressing historical Treaty breaches was not its responsibility, but rather a matter for the Crown, after it sought independent legal advice. "We support Ngāti Oneone in pursuing this with the Crown," chairman David Battin told LDR when the protest started. Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka had a different view. The 2010 Ngāti Porou settlement of historical Treaty of Waitangi claims includes Ngāti Oneone, Potaka told LDR. "The matter being raised ... is outside of the process for the settlement of historical Treaty claims. "Any exploration of options to return and/or purchase the land is a matter for the landowner agency to undertake in discussion with Ngāti Oneone," he said. Regarding Potaka's statement, a Trust Tai Rāwhiti spokesperson this week said trustees continued to "engage directly with Ngāti Oneone and remained focused on constructive resolutions". Gibson confirmed the hapū had met with the landowner groups involved under Trust Tai Rāwhiti and would have a meeting with the council next week. She was unsure whether the groups would respond individually or together. The hapū has committed to maintaining the protest for two months and then will reassess depending on outcomes, she said. "We'll keep the fire burning until we've had an acceptable response." In addition to the return of land, the hapū has made other requests to the landowners through an online petition signed by over 1950 as of Friday. The petition urges the Tai Rāwhiti leaders to take three actions: "Whakahokia Whenua Mai", which requests the return of land not used for core business, "Whakamana Tangata" and "Te Tiriti". Whakamana Tangata requests that Trust Tai Rāwhiti financially compensate Ngāti Oneone for "the alienation" of their lands without conditions. "Te Tiriti" requests that the leaders seek a pathway that treats Ngāti Oneone in the same vein as a "Treaty" partner, rather than "a community group". Gibson said that after Eastland Port sold a shed on their ancestral land to the Gisborne Tatapouri Sports Fishing Club three years ago, they worried about what could happen to the rest of their ancestral land, so they started negotiations for the Te Pa Eketū Shed. If the land were sold, it would be harder to reclaim, she said. However, they then realised the port had other sheds in the area, not used for "core business". "In my view, it's not an occupation, it's a reclamation of whenua," Gibson said, explaining that the shed had been leased while negotiating the sales and purchase agreement. The port would send the hapū the bill, which they would send to Trust Tai Rāwhiti, who would pay Eastland Port (owned by the trust), she said. Trust Tai Rāwhiti was going to give them $1.4 million to purchase the shed, but the hapū wanted to use the money to buy the lot. When their request was denied, they understood and looked into other ways of obtaining the sheds, Gibson said. However, when the hapū got the sales and purchase agreement, things shifted. "There were four clauses within the sales and purchase agreement, which undermined Mana motuhake [self-determination], which made it untenable," said Gibson. On 5 May the beginning of the hapū's "Reclamation of whenua", they were supposed to sign the sales and purchase agreement but decided to "reclaim" the land instead. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
