Public has ‘every right to be angry' about small boats crossings, PM says

The Prime Minister suggested he was 'angry too', after Home Office data showed 1,194 migrants arrived in 18 boats on Saturday.
But Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described Sir Keir's words as 'rubbish', claiming that even Defence Secretary John Healey had acknowledged ministers had 'lost control' of the borders.
Saturday's figures were the first time daily crossings topped a thousand in 2025, and prompted Mr Healey to claim Britain had 'lost control' over the last five years, implicating the former Tory government.
Writing on social media site X on Monday, the Prime Minister said: 'You have every right to be angry about small boat crossings.
'I'm angry too.
'We are ramping up our efforts to smash the people smuggling gangs at source.'
Rubbish! Even the Defence Secretary admits the govt has "lost control" of our borders.
The facts:– Small boat arrivals up 95% from this point in 2023– Most returns are voluntary– Scrapped the only viable deterrent– Voted against our Deportation Bill that would fix things https://t.co/TuaJTV9zxq
— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 2, 2025
He claimed hundreds of boats and engines had been 'seized', raids on illegal working were up, and 'almost 30,000 people' had been returned.
But Mrs Badenoch hit back, responding: 'Rubbish! Even the Defence Secretary admits the govt has 'lost control' of our borders.'
Small boat arrivals are 'up 95% from this point in 2023', she said, and claimed ministers had 'scrapped the only viable deterrent': the previous Conservative government's Rwanda plan.
Sir Keir had earlier insisted the Rwanda plan 'didn't deter anybody', after his decision to scrap it was highlighted while he visited Glasgow for a major defence announcement.
He added: 'I'm not up for gimmicks. I'm up for the hard work of working with partners, enhancing the powers that law enforcement have, in my determination to take down the gangs that are running this vile trade.'
The Prime Minister also signalled to journalists he had a duty to stop Channel crossings.
(PA Graphics)
He said: 'In relation to border security, I want to be really clear: nobody should be making that journey across the Channel and it's our duty to make sure that we ensure that they don't.
'We are working very closely with our counterparts in France and elsewhere to take further action in northern France, and of course, we are giving enhanced powers to our own law enforcement through the Borders Bill, which is currently going through Parliament.'
Saturday's crossings brought the provisional annual total so far of migrants who have made the journey to 14,811.
This is 42% higher than the same point last year (10,448) and 95% up from the same point in 2023 (7,610), according to PA news agency analysis of the data.
It is still lower than the highest daily total of 1,305 arrivals since data began in 2018, which was recorded on September 3 2022.
On Sunday, Mr Healey said the scenes of migrants being picked up by smugglers 'like a taxi' to be brought to the UK were 'shocking'.
Britain has 'lost control of its borders over the last five years', he added.
The Defence Secretary said it is a 'really big problem' that French police are unable to intervene to intercept boats in shallow waters.
A group of people thought to be migrants onboard a small boat leaving the beach at Gravelines, France, attempting to reach the UK by crossing the English Channel (Gareth Fuller/PA)
French police officers were seen watching as migrants, including children, boarded at a beach in Gravelines, between Calais and Dunkirk, and authorities were then pictured escorting the boats.
Some 184 people were rescued, the French authorities said.
The UK agreed a £480 million deal with France to beef up its efforts to stop migrants in 2023 under former prime minister Rishi Sunak.
It was the latest in a series of agreements with France since 2014 aimed at cracking down on crossings.
This year is on course to set a record for Channel crossings, with the 14,811 total arrivals so far the highest recorded for the first five months of a year.
It has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year.
In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058).
Sir Keir's Government has pledged to 'smash the gangs' behind people-smuggling operations to bring down crossings.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

36 minutes ago

• Sky News

Why won't Starmer call out Trump?

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 Days after Sir Keir Starmer told Beth that a US strike on Iran wasn't imminent, Donald Trump gave the go-ahead for US bunker buster bombs to hit Iran's nuclear facilities. The UK's position on the attacks is unclear. The focus is not on what the prime minister is saying - but what he isn't saying. After a brief interview, it's clear Sir Keir isn't willing to either endorse the strikes or criticise President Trump. For this extra episode, Beth, Ruth and Harriet discuss the delicate situation the prime minister finds himself in after a full-blown escalation of the Middle East conflict. They ask what will be going through the minds of Sir Keir and those around him - and if there are any answers the government can, and will, give in the coming days.

Sky News

36 minutes ago

• Sky News

Palestine Action to be proscribed - but what does that mean?

Palestine Action faces being proscribed as a terror group after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged two military aircraft. It was the latest law broken by the activist group. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said they are also alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage and assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer. He said he was "shocked and frustrated" to learn that a protest in support of the group was being planned on Monday, but that the force had "no power in law" to prevent it. The group's proscription, however, would change that. But what is proscription, what effect does it have, and how many proscribed organisations are there? What is proscription? Proscription is the banning of an organisation based on an assessment that it commits or participates in, prepares for, promotes or encourages, or is otherwise concerned in terrorism, the Home Office says. 1:49 The home secretary can choose to proscribe an organisation if it is found to do any of the following: • Commits or participates in acts of terrorism • Prepares for terrorism • Promotes or encourages terrorism (including the unlawful glorification of terrorism); or, • Is otherwise concerned in terrorism. Any move to proscribe the group must be debated and approved by MPs and peers. When deciding to proscribe an organisation, the government takes into account: • The nature and scale of an organisation's activities • The specific threat that it poses to the UK • The specific threat that it poses to British nationals overseas • The extent of the organisation's presence in the UK • The need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism. What does proscribing a group do? It makes it illegal to show support for the proscribed group, with any offences punishable by a maximum of 14 years in prison. 2:45 Specifically, it is a criminal offence to: • Belong to a proscribed organisation • Invite support for a proscribed organisation • Recklessly express support for a proscribed organisation • Arrange a meeting in support of a proscribed organisation • Wear clothing or carry articles in public which arouse reasonable suspicion that an individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation • Publish an image of an article such as a flag or logo in the same circumstances. The last two offences are less severe and punishable by up to six months in prison and/or a fine not exceeding £5,000. How many proscribed organisations are there? There are 81 organisations proscribed by the UK government under the Terrorism Act 2000, not including 14 organisations in Northern Ireland such as the Irish Republican Army (IRA) that were proscribed under previous legislation. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is on the proscribed list and the most recent addition is The Terrorgram collective - an online transnational network of extreme right-wing terrorists which the government says wants to bring about the collapse of Western democracy and a "race war". You can see the full list by clicking here. Can a proscribed group be taken off the list? The group or someone deemed to be "affected" by a proscription can submit a written application to the home secretary requesting that they consider taking them off the list. If the application is refused, the applicant can appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, which allows an appeal if it considers that the home secretary's decision to refuse de-proscription was "flawed".

Daily Mirror

40 minutes ago

• Daily Mirror

Have your say on whether Brexit has been a success nine years after referendum

As the UK marks nine years since the Brexit referendum, we want to know whether you think leaving the EU has been a success June 23rd 2025, signalling the country's intention to leave the European Union. The vote ultimately ended a 47-year relationship with the political and economic bloc - but with nearly a decade now past since we went to the polls, do you think Brexit has been a success for the UK? The referendum - in which Brits narrowly voted to leave by 51.9% to 48.1% - lead to years of uncertainty across the country. Shortly after the result was released, David Cameron stepped down as Tory leader leading to a flurry of four different Conservative prime ministers in the space of five years - including Liz Truss, whose premiership lasted just 49 days. ‌ Rachel Reeves has previously blasted the Tories' Brexit deal, saying it 'reduced trade flows' between Britain and Europe. Similarly, Starmer has also criticised Boris Johnson's botched deal to leave the EU, stating it hampered the UK's ability to tackle the small boats crisis. ‌ The current Labour government has now committed to repairing the 'fractured' relationship with their nearest neighbours. In May, the PM announced his 'common sense' deal with the EU, which he declared was a 'win-win' deal that would put the UK 'back on the world stage'. Starmer announced key changes, including allowing tourists to use e-gates at airports in Europe. He said businesses will be able to sell burgers and sausages into the bloc again and shoppers will see cheaper prices in the supermarket. The deal marked a stark difference from the tensions during Theresa May's time as PM, when the UK and EU were locked in fraught negotiations to get a Brexit deal over the line. The PM said: "It's time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.' If you can't see the poll below, click here. At the beginning on 2025, a YouGov poll revealed that just 30% of Brits believe it was right to leave the EU, with 55% believing Brexit was wrong and just 11% seeing it as more of a success than a failure. The survey also revealed that one in six leave voters now say it was the wrong choice, marking the lowest public belief in Brexit since YouGov began asking after the 2020 referendum. ‌ In a previous poll, Mirror readers shared their comments slamming Brexit as an 'unmitigated disaster' without 'one single benefit'. Orient Geoff wrote: "Unmitigated disaster! Nothing we were promised has happened, especially with regards to immigration, and it has cost the country billions in lost trade. "That's before we deal with the mountain of red tape people have to go through when importing or exporting goods, little of which existed when we were members of the EU. It certainly wasn't perfect but we should have dealt with that from within. not isolate ourselves on the back of false promises.' ‌ Agreeing with the overwhelming anti-Brexit response to the questions, Taeidy said: 'Another EU referendum is necessary and this time the result would be different. UK economy from around the fourth strongest sliding down to a break-down economy with no chance of recovery." Iron57 also wrote: 'I voted for Brexit and realise I got it badly wrong. I cannot name one single benefit of Brexit, but I can name plenty of negatives. Given the information we now have, I'd relish the chance to reverse my mistake, and so would many others in my experience.' Ralan said: 'I think we were betrayed by those who advocated for Brexit. Political sovereignty was a perfectly legitimate objective and we expected a cost to do that. However it now appears that the economic cost was played down quite considerably and the immigration problems were overstated."