Reporter's Notebook: Why the Senate is unlikely to debate the 'big, beautiful bill' until next week
Fox has learned it is doubtful that Senate Republicans will put the "big, beautiful bill" on the floor for debate and a vote this week.
That will likely wait until the week of June 22. This potentially jeopardizes final passage of the measure through the Senate and House by July 4.
The Senate Finance Committee is expected to release its text of the bill as early as Monday. That section of the legislation is the most expansive and probably the most controversial. Key tax provisions like SALT (state and local tax reductions), potential spending cuts and changes to Medicare and Medicaid all appear in this section of the legislation.
Senators and Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough will then begin the process of weeding out provisions that do not comport with strict Senate Budget provisions. That's why the plan probably isn't ready for debate and a "vote-a-rama" until the week after next.
If the Senate advances the bill, the House will have a tight window to either accept the Senate changes and green-light the bill before July 4 – or bounce it back to the Senate with yet another set of changes.
Such a scenario would most certainly stretch out the process beyond the July 4 deadline. It would also compel the Senate to take a fourth vote-a-rama in just a matter of months. That's where the Senate votes for hours on end with one roll call after another.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPKeep in mind that July 4 is merely an aspirational deadline, not a hard one. The true deadline is early August. That's when the Treasury Department says the U.S. will collide with the debt ceiling. A debt ceiling increase is part of the big, beautiful bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
6 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Toyota's Prices Are Going Up
In the market for a new Toyota? Better get to the dealership soon. Toyota will begin hiking prices for its vehicles by an average of $270 beginning in July. According to Automotive News , these latest price increases aren't in response to President Trump's 25-percent tariff on imported vehicles and auto parts. A company spokesperson said it's simply "part of our regular review of the prices." Lexus buyers won't be off the hook for additional costs, either. Prices for Toyota's luxury brand are expected to increase by an average of $208 beginning in July. Toyota & Tariffs Even though the company denies that these latest price hikes are in response to tariffs, in May, Toyota Motor North America Chief Operating Officer Mark Templin said that President Trump's plan would result in higher prices and more expensive repair bills. Templin stated: 'When it comes to tariffs on auto parts, it's important to understand the supply chains are global, they're complex, and they're very fragile. And many of the suppliers are not capitalized for an abrupt tariff. So levies on parts will negatively impact the automobile supply chain and lead to higher prices, lower vehicle sales, and will make servicing and repairing vehicles more expensive for customers.' That said, a report from Reuters suggests that Toyota is considering moving production of the newest RAV4 to the US, rather than importing from Canada and Japan. Toyota produced the outgoing RAV4 in Kentucky, Canada, and Japan, but could keep production of the next-generation model in Kentucky. The Toyota RAV4 was the best-selling SUV in the US last year and the fourth best-selling vehicle overall, with more than 475,000 units sold. Car Prices Are Going Up Toyota isn't the only automaker expected to raise prices this year. BMW has announced that it will start hiking prices in July in response to Trump's tariffs, with some models increasing by as much as $2,500. BMW did offer a temporary "price protect" program for the 2 Series and 3 Series models through April. Volkswagen also plans to increase prices in July after announcing pre-tariff pricing through June. The Jetta sedan and Taos SUV, which are both produced in Mexico, are expected to be hit hardest by price increases next month. Other brands like Ford, Subaru, and Volvo have already raised prices on their vehicles—some models by as much as $2,000. More on Tariffs Car Shipments to the US Have Fallen. Guess Why Volvo CEO: Customers Must Pay Tariff Costs, Not Us Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Automotive News Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ex-Clinton official applauds Trump's 'courageous' Iran call, doubts Harris would've had the nerve
A former Clinton-era National Security Council staffer broke with his party and heaped praise on President Donald Trump's successful strikes on Iran over the weekend, while remarking former Vice President Kamala Harris would have likely lacked the "courage" to execute such a mission if she were commander-in-chief. "I am not a fan of many of Donald Trump's actions, but I will speak openly and honestly when he takes bold steps defending America's interests, as he did tonight," Jamie Metzl, founder of the international social group One Shared World, posted to X on Saturday evening. Metzl served on former President Bill Clinton's National Security Counci and was former President Joe Biden's deputy staff director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and he heaped praise on Trump repeatedly on X over the weekend, while also taking a shot at Harris' lack of "courage and fortitude." "But I'm not a blind tribalist and am perfectly comfortable praising President Trump for bold and courageous actions in support of America's core national interests, as he took last night," Metzl posted to X on Sunday morning. "Although I believe electing Kamala Harris would have been better for our democracy, society, and economy, as well as for helping the most vulnerable people in the United States and around the world, I also believe VP Harris would not have had the courage or fortitude to take such an essential step as the president took last night," he added. Metzl continued in his X messages that "Iran has been at war with the United States for 46 years," and was aiming to build a nuclear weapon with the intention of wielding it over the U.S and its allies. "Iran has been at war with the United States for 46 years. Its regime has murdered thousands of American citizens. Its slogan 'death to America' was not window dressing but core ideology. It was racing toward a nuclear weapon with every intention of using it to threaten America, our allies, and the Middle East region as a whole. No actions like this come without risks, and I imagine the story will get more complicated over time, but that's why these types of decisions are complicated," he wrote. Fox News Digital reached out to Harris' office regarding Metzl's post, but did not immediately receive a reply. Metzl's comments are among a cacophony of Democratic elected officials and traditional anti-MAGA voices who have come out to praise Trump since the successful attack on Iran, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer." "The destruction of Iran's nuclear program is essential to ultimate peace in the Middle East. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue — dealing with the Iranian threat is central to America's national security. The world is safer because of the actions of our brave service members. I'm praying for the safety of our service members in the region," New Jersey Democratic Rep. Josh Gottheimer said in a statement over the weekend, for example. "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS," Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman wrote on X on Saturday. "Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." While New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, a frequent Trump critic, wrote in an opinion piece that Trump made a "courageous and correct decision that deserves respect, no matter how one feels about this president," while fellow Times columnist David French also said it was the "right decision" on social media. Other Democrats and frequent Trump critics, such as New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, have slammed Trump over the strikes, arguing they bypassed Congress. Trump announced the Saturday evening strikes on Iran in a Truth Social post that was not preceded by media leaks or speculation that strikes were imminent. The unexpected social media post was followed just hours later by a brief Trump address to the nation while flanked by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance. "A short time ago, the U.S. military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan," Trump said from the White House late on Saturday in an address to the nation regarding the strikes. "Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success." The strikes "obliterated" Iranian nuclear facilities and backed the nation into a corner to make a peace deal, Trump said. This mission was also celebrated by Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine as one that was cloaked in secrecy and intentionally deceptive to confuse the enemy. "It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security. Our B-2s went in and out of… these nuclear sites, in and out and back, without the world knowing at all," Hegseth said. "In that way, it was historic." The operation included the longest B-2 spirit bomber mission since 2001, the second-longest B-2 mission ever flown and the largest B-2 operational strike in U.S. history, Hegseth and Caine said during the Sunday press conference. Operation Midnight Hammer followed Israel launching preemptive strikes on Iran on June 12 after months of attempted and stalled nuclear negotiations and subsequent heightened concern that Iran was advancing its nuclear program. Netanyahu declared soon afterward that the strikes were necessary to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival."
Skift
11 minutes ago
- Skift
AI Is Changing the Game for Travel Startups — Here's What Excites Amex Ventures Most
The managing director of Amex Ventures explains investments in Mindtrip, Boom Supersonic, and how he thinks about investing in the travel space. Editor-in-Chief Sarah Kopit and Head of Research Seth Borko talk travel every week. Editor-in-Chief Sarah Kopit and Head of Research Seth Borko talk travel every week. Learn More AI isn't just reshaping the travel industry — it's also unlocking new opportunities for startup founders to innovate and scale faster, said Kevin Tsang, managing director of Amex Ventures, the investment arm of American Express. Tsang said on the Skift Travel Podcast that he believes startup founders "are able to do a lot more with less now." "You can imagine manual tasks that can be done much more efficiently. So if you had an idea before that was difficult to scale because there was this semi-manual component, this kind of opens up the aperture," he said, adding he sees a lot of "excitement" surrounding the tools that can turn ideas into working prototypes. Tsang joined American Express in 2011 and Amex Ventures has invested in more than 100 companies, including travel brands Mindtrip, Superlogic, and Boom Supersonic. Listen Now Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | RSS Tsang provided Mindtrip as one example of the "with a blank slate approach." "(Mindtrip executives)" said, 'If you were going to build a travel planning platform today and you knew you had these tools, what would you do?' And I think for us, that was a really compelling vision," Tsang said. "They're continuing to find new ways to experiment with AI and the tools that might be needed for it." Tsang cited Mindtrip's "Start Anywhere," a feature that can build an itinerary from any point of inspiration — such as a screenshot, a URL, or even a post on social media — noting that AI is increasingly intersecting with social commerce and creator-driven inspiration. He also addressed Amex Ventures' investment in Boom Supersonic, a company back in the spotlight after the U.S. government recently cleared supersonic flights over the U.S. "You can kind of see why we were drawn to the future of travel that they were kind of exhibiting," Tsang said. Understanding Why People Are Traveling Tsang explained it's important to understand why travel people are traveling. "We often talk about recommendations to people, but if you don't know why someone is going on a trip, it's actually a big limiting factor in how you do that. And so, you might know someone's travel profile and how they like things," he said. "But if you're going to recommend someone on a business trip versus their honeymoon versus a wellness (trip) ... it's actually a really interesting and compelling data point ..." Dealing With 'the Big Boys' When asked about the role companies like Marriott, and Google would play in startups — as partners, acquirers, or even competitors, Tsang highlighted the benefits of partnerships. "There's a lot of things in the travel sector that work and don't need to be recreated. So I wouldn't want a startup to go out and do that," Tsang said. "So that's where partnerships or different types of collaboration will become. The startups are going to be able to focus on the net new things with extreme focus that hopefully will be complimentary to some of these big players."
