
MIT study warns how ChatGPT weakens critical thinking
A new study from MIT's Media Lab is raising red flags about the impact of generative AI tools like ChatGPT on human cognition—particularly among students. The study suggests that using ChatGPT for academic work may reduce brain activity, diminish creativity, and impair memory formation.
The experiment involved 54 participants aged 18 to 39, who were divided into three groups: one using ChatGPT, another using Google Search, and a control group using neither. Each group was asked to write multiple SAT-style essays while wearing EEG devices to measure brain activity across 32 regions.
Results showed ChatGPT users exhibited the lowest neural engagement, underperforming across behavioral, linguistic, and cognitive measures. Their essays were also deemed formulaic and lacking originality by English teachers. Alarmingly, as the study progressed over several months, many in the ChatGPT group abandoned active writing altogether, opting instead to copy-paste AI-generated responses with minimal editing.
Lead author Nataliya Kosmyna explained her urgency to publish the findings ahead of peer review, saying, 'I'm afraid in 6-8 months some policymaker will propose 'GPT for kindergarten.' That would be absolutely detrimental to developing brains.'
In contrast, the group that relied solely on their own brainpower showed stronger neural connectivity in alpha, theta, and delta bands—regions linked with creativity, memory, and semantic processing. These participants felt more ownership over their work and reported higher satisfaction. The Google Search group also demonstrated high engagement and satisfaction, suggesting traditional web research supports more active learning than LLM use.
In a follow-up test, participants had to rewrite a previous essay—this time without their original tool. ChatGPT users struggled, barely recalling their previous responses, and showed weaker brain wave activity. In contrast, the brain-only group, now using ChatGPT for the first time, exhibited increased cognitive activity, suggesting that AI can support learning—but only when foundational thinking is already in place.
Kosmyna warns that heavy AI use during critical learning phases could impair long-term brain development, particularly in children. Psychiatrist Dr. Zishan Khan echoed this concern: 'Overreliance on LLMs may erode essential neural pathways related to memory, resilience, and deep thinking.'
Ironically, the paper itself became a case study in AI misuse. Some users summarized it using ChatGPT, prompting hallucinated facts—like falsely stating the version of ChatGPT used was GPT-4o. Kosmyna had anticipated this and included 'AI traps' in the document to test such behavior.
MIT researchers are now expanding their work into programming and software engineering, and early results are even more troubling—suggesting broader implications for industries seeking to automate entry-level tasks.
While previous studies have highlighted AI's potential to boost productivity, this research underscores the urgent need for responsible AI use in education, backed by policies that balance efficiency with brain development.
OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment. Meanwhile, the debate on the role of AI in learning continues—with growing calls for regulation, transparency, and digital literacy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
New government arts and science college to offer five undergraduate courses
The new Government Arts and Science College in Thuraiyur will have a total intake of 270 students in five undergraduate courses. The college, which was inaugurated by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin through video conference from Chennai on Friday, will function temporarily from the Sengunthar Government Aided Higher Secondary School in Thuraiyur. The college offers undergraduate courses in B.A. in Political Science and Chemistry in Tamil medium and B.C.A., Computer Science and B. Com in English medium. The Naan Mudhalvan Scheme, which trains students to appear for competitive examinations, will be implemented in the college from this year itself. Twelve faculty posts and 14 non-faculty posts have been sanctioned for the college, an official press release said. Municipal Administration Minister and Collector M. Pradeep Kumar, elected representatives and officials were present during the inaugural ceremony on Friday.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tech firms, content industry debate AI, copyright at ministry of commerce event
Who owns the data that fuels artificial intelligence (AI)? That was the central — and contentious — question debated by representatives from big tech firms and the content industry during a two-day stakeholder consultation organised by ministry of commerce and industry's department for promotion of industry and internal trade (DPIIT). A nine-member DPIIT committee will soon publish a working paper outlining whether India's copyright law needs to be updated to address challenges posed by AI. (Getty Images/iStockphoto/ Representative photo) The meetings were chaired by DPIIT additional secretary Himani Pande on June 19 and 20. At the centre of the discussion was whether tech companies should be allowed to freely mine the internet, which includes copyrighted books, articles, music, images, and videos, to train their AI models. The content industry raised concerns over their copyrighted data being used to train AI models without permission, while tech companies argued that training their models requires massive amounts of data—much of which is copyrighted. The startups on the first day urged the DPIIT to ensure a level playing field, arguing that while they are still in the early stages of building their AI models, larger companies have already trained theirs, often without facing the same level of regulatory scrutiny or restrictions, said a participant from the tech meet on June 19. A representative from the Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA), who was present at the content industry meeting, said, 'DNPA firmly believes that utilising the content of digital news publishers, without consent, for AI training and subsequent generative AI applications, such as search assistance and information purposes, constitutes an infringement of copyright.' Also Read: HC experts differ in OpenAI copyright case 'The association advocates for a regime that ensures fair compensation for content producers, recognising their rights in the digital landscape,' he added. A stakeholder meeting for the content industry saw creators worried about being 'strip-mined for data,' a participant said. One of the key topics discussed at both meetings was whether India should permit text and data mining (TDM) under an opt-out framework. TDM is a technique used by AI systems to scan and learn from vast volumes of data, including text and images. Also Read: First meeting held on AI's impact on India's copyright framework An alternative mechanism that came up during the meeting on Friday was whether a statutory licensing mechanism for AI training purposes might work, which involves allowing the use of copyrighted works without direct permission, provided companies pay a government-set fee and follow certain rules. The DPIIT sought industry input on the copyright status of AI-generated works—an issue also at the heart of the ANI vs OpenAI case in the Delhi High Court, where the news agency filed a lawsuit against the ChatGPT creator for allegedly using its articles to train AI models. 'Who should be considered the actual owner of content generated by AI? If a user puts significant effort into crafting a prompt that leads to a specific output, does that make the user the rightful owner or does the ownership lie with the creators of the AI model?' a person representing an AI startup said. Also read: Data for training stored overseas, copyright law doesn't apply: OpenAI These stakeholder meetings build on the work of a nine-member DPIIT committee formed in April, which includes IP lawyers, industry representatives, IT ministry officials, academicians, and DPIIT officials. While the committee has been meeting regularly since May 16, HT had earlier reported that one member expressed discomfort with being on the committee, saying they lacked AI expertise. The committee, which heard different views from the tech and content industries during the two-day meeting, will soon publish a working paper outlining whether India's copyright law needs to be updated to address challenges posed by AI.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Are college degrees less relevant in AI era? LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman has an advice for students
In a world where ChatGPT writes code, Midjourney creates art, and AI resumes land interviews, it's no surprise that today's students are asking: Does my college degree still matter? The rise of AI has sparked a wave of uncertainty among young graduates, and Silicon Valley veteran Reid Hoffman—LinkedIn co-founder and venture capitalist—has stepped in with a timely reality check and some solid advice for the Class of 2025 and beyond. In a video shared on his YouTube channel this week, Hoffman addressed the growing concern around whether traditional degrees are becoming obsolete in an AI-powered job market. His answer was simple: Don't focus on the degree—focus on how you learn. 'Given that things are so disruptive, it's natural to feel anxious,' he said in response to a student's question. It's natural to question whether all the knowledge gained in college still holds value in a rapidly changing world. But the real benefit of a college education isn't tied to specific subjects or courses—it lies in developing the ability to learn, unlearn, and adapt as new tools and challenges emerge. According to Hoffman, the most powerful currency in the age of AI is not your diploma—it's your mindset. He urged students to stay curious, embrace lifelong learning , and keep experimenting with new tools and challenges. In a fast-changing world, adaptability is far more valuable than memorising a syllabus. He also emphasised that college is about more than just academics. It's a foundational period for building lasting relationships and a sense of community. The friends made and experiences shared during those years form a valuable network—one that can offer support, collaboration, and growth throughout both personal and professional journeys. In essence, Hoffman's advice is less about fearing obsolescence and more about future-proofing your mindset. In the AI era, your greatest asset isn't your degree—it's your ability to keep learning, stay connected, and adapt to whatever comes next.