MI5 neo-Nazi spy: Judge had 'no confidence' in Security Service's account of false evidence
MI5 is facing fresh scrutiny in the case of a violent neo-Nazi agent after a High Court judge said he had "no confidence" in the Security Service's account of how a senior officer gave false evidence.Ahead of a court hearing on Tuesday, the BBC can reveal Mr Justice Chamberlain ordered MI5 to hand over secret documents about the case.He also said there was a further issue about the "correctness" of new evidence provided by a very senior MI5 officer.Tuesday's hearing comes four months after the BBC revealed MI5 had lied to three courts about a misogynistic agent known as X. The agent used his MI5 role to coerce and terrorise his girlfriend, attacking her with a machete.
The most senior judge in England and Wales, Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, and the President of the King's Bench Division Dame Victoria Sharp, will now join Mr Justice Chamberlain to consider what, if any, action should be taken about MI5's false evidence.There are a range of potential options, from accepting the conclusions of MI5's investigations to initiating contempt of court proceedings against MI5 itself or individual officers - or both.Usually, contempt of court proceedings are referred to the Attorney General, currently Lord Hermer, but in this case, he is technically representing MI5.Details about MI5's internal investigation into how it came to give the false evidence, which were included in the secret documents given to the court, may also be made public on Tuesday.MI5 gave the evidence in 2022 after then-Attorney General Suella Braverman sought an injunction to stop a BBC investigation about X. She won him legal anonymity but failed to prevent the story being published.
During that case, a senior spy known only as Witness A said MI5 had stuck to its policy to "neither confirm nor deny" (NCND) that X was an MI5 agent during conversations with me in 2020, when I was investigating X's conduct.But, in February this year, the BBC was able to reveal Witness A's evidence was false.In fact, MI5 had disclosed X's status in phone calls to me, which I had made notes of and recorded, as the Security Service tried to persuade me to drop my investigation.MI5's false claim was repeated in two other courts considering a legal claim against the Security Service by X's former girlfriend, known publicly as "Beth".During hearings in recent weeks, Mr Justice Chamberlain raised the new concerns regarding MI5's account of how it came to give the false evidence.These concerns centred on accounts of the two investigations launched after the BBC exposed MI5's false claims in February this year - an internal one, and an external review by the government's former chief lawyer Sir Jonathan Jones KC, commissioned by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.In April, the court and the BBC were provided with a witness statement by the very senior MI5 officer - known as Witness B - purporting to summarise the investigations. They were also given an open, non-secret version of Sir Jonathan's external review.Although the court can receive sensitive information - and had security-cleared barristers, known as special advocates, acting on behalf of the BBC - it was not given a secret, closed version of the external review, nor a copy of the internal investigation report and its underlying documents.After a request by the special advocates, Mr Justice Chamberlain made clear he wanted disclosure of the closed version of the external review. During a later hearing he ordered that MI5 also hand over the internal investigation report described by Witness B, as well as policy documents and interview notes with MI5 officers.
He also raised concerns about whether the open, non-secret documents originally provided to the court and the BBC were an accurate reflection of the closed versions.He said Witness B had claimed the original open version of the report was a "fair and accurate" reflection of the closed version. But, having read the closed report, Mr Justice Chamberlain gave his provisional view that:
It contained "potentially significant material" not in the open version of the reportThis material "raises real questions about whether Witness B could properly rely on the open version as a fair and accurate report of the closed report"Because of "the piecemeal way this has come to light", he had "no confidence that the court has been given the full picture of how Witness A came to give false evidence"New material raised "a separate issue about the correctness of Witness B's recent evidence in these proceedings"
The court will also hear on Tuesday whether MI5 will be able to continue to apply its policy of NCND in relation to the agent status of X within the legal case itself, despite publicly accepting it had departed from the policy in phone calls to me.The NCND policy has allowed MI5 to withhold material from the BBC as well as the separate case brought by X's former girlfriend Beth.She had complained about MI5 to a specialist court, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), and then sought a judicial review in a third court of an IPT ruling that allowed MI5 to apply NCND.It meant that material confirming X's agent status has been confined to secret hearings, where she was represented by the tribunal's own barristers and her lawyers were excluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Prince William celebrates 43rd birthday with puppies in new picture
A photograph of the Prince of Wales with some new arrivals to the royal family has been issued to mark his 43rd birthday. William is shown holding one of four puppies born to Orla, the family's black cocker spaniel, in the picture taken by the Princess of Wales at Windsor earlier this month. The message was signed by Catherine, the couple's three children, George, Charlotte and Louis, and a pawprint emoji. 'Happy birthday! Love C, G, C, L, Orla and the puppies!', it read.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'You money grabbing little dog' - 'Jealous' drug dealer's messages to his ex-girlfriend are heard in court as he is accused of brutal murder of 'love rival' who was 'tortured to death' in his own home
A 'jealous' drug dealer accused of masterminding the brutal torture and killing of his alleged love rival branded his ex-girlfriend a 'money-grabbing little dog', a court heard today. John Belfield, 31, allegedly plotted the murder of Thomas Campbell out of 'hostility' because the victim had begun dating his ex-partner, as well as to steal from him. The 38-year-old's bloodied body was found bound in extra-strength duct tape and dressed in only a pair of socks in his own home in July 2022. In the run-up to the killing, Belfield was given crucial details about the intended victim's movements by Campbell's ex-wife Coleen, a jury has heard. She was later found guilty of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. Today Manchester Crown Court heard of threatening messages that Belfield sent to his ex-girlfriend Demi-Lee Driver, who had begun a relationship with Campbell. In one he wrote: 'You and that helmet will get domed. 'Shut your mouth you dog.' Another read: 'There's not a thing you or him will do so. I think you should get my draws out your house Monday.' Belfield added: 'And I'm going to shag his baby mum now for the point of it, you money grabbing little dog.' Ms Driver refused to give police access to her mobile phone but shared screenshots of the Instagram messages, jurors were told. Giving evidence in his defence today, Belfield admitted being a drug dealer but claimed he had been at his sister's home on the night of the killing. His barrister Richard Wright KC asked him: 'Do you understand that the prosecution allege that, together with his ex-wife Coleen Campbell, you had personal motivation to attack Thomas Campbell because he was in a relationship with your ex partner Demi-Lee Driver? 'You were annoyed or jealous of that relationship?' Belfield replied: 'I understand that.' Mr Wright asked: 'Did you conspire with Coleen Campbell and others to target Mr Campbell as a victim for robbery in his own home?' The 38-year-old, pictured with Coleen on holiday, was discovered by shocked neighbours 'No,' Belfield replied. Mr Wright asked: 'Were you motivated by jealousy or anger to attack Mr Campbell because he was in a relationship with Demi-Lee Driver?' Belfield anwered: 'No.' Belfield admitted that he had planned to to target Mr Campbell at some point in order to steal his drugs and admitted that he himself was a drug dealer. He denied being part of the team which placed a tracking device on Mr Campbell's VW van five days before the murder and said he did not know it had been put there. Belfield admitted he had taken part in alleged 'recces' of Mr Campbell's home in Mossley, Greater Manchester. But he denied that he had been one of the men who bought items used in the torture of Mr Campbell from a B&Q store in Oldham four days before the killing. Mr Wright asked him if he was with Reece Steven - who has been convicted of Mr Campbell's murder - when he was attacked and killed. He replied: 'No. I was at my sister's house with my niece and nephew.' Belfield admitted that he had taken part in efforts to disguise the van used in the attack but said he had done so 'to help my friends'. He also agreed that he had fled the country after the murder, travelling to the former Dutch colony of Suriname in South America. But he said: 'I was scared his friend were going to attack me and kill me because of the rumours they had heard.' The court has heard the 'horrific' killing was the result of 'very careful planning by a team of highly organised criminals' who used a tracking device placed on Mr Campbell's car and carried out reconnaissance on his home in the days before the assault. Jurors have been told that at a 2023 trial Reece Steven was convicted of murder and conspiracy to rob. Stephen Cleworth, from Heywood, who acted as a driver, was convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. He was responsible for planting the tracker on Mr Campbell's vehicle and assisting with surveillance although he was not present during the murder. Belfield - alleged to have been the 'driving force' behind the killing - is now standing trial for the murder after being extradited back from South America. The prosecution case is that Steven, Belfield and a third unknown man were all present when Mr Campbell was tortured to death. Belfield, of no fixed address, denies murder and conspiracy to rob. The trial continues.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Girl, three, has arm ripped open by cockapoo as her father is forced to 'hold her skin together' after attack outside primary school
A girl, three, has had her arm ripped open by a cockapoo, with her father forced to 'hold her skin together' after the attack outside a primary school. Bunnie was walking home with her father Rowen Skinley and two siblings in Rainham, Kent, on Tuesday when the designer dog attacked outside Miers Court Primary School. She had to be rushed to hospital in London for emergency plastic surgery after the Cocker Spaniel and Poodle crossbreed brutally mauled her unprovoked. The owner of the small, sandy-coloured pooch 'just disappeared', leaving no details, after pulling the dog off the toddler and tearing her skin in doing so, Mr Skinley said. The father explained: 'I was so shocked. All I had to stop the bleeding was my hands. I had to basically hold her skin together.' Thankfully, he continued: 'She's doing well now. She's just a bit shaken and keeps talking about how scared she is of the dog... 'It's really upsetting that the woman didn't stop because it makes you fear for the safety of other kids.' A Kent Police spokesperson confirmed an investigation is ongoing. Cockapoos have often been touted as family-friendly bundles of cuteness - playful, warm, curly-haired teddy bears, who are easy to manage and train. But Mr Skinley had a rather different experience with the popular breed: 'It happened parallel to the school on the main road. I was just walking home after the school run. 'The path is quite narrow and a woman was walking her dog on the actual road itself. 'Then, out of nowhere, the dog just lunged for my daughter and pulled her to the floor.' Bystanders rushed over to help: 'People who saw what happened came over and said that my daughter hadn't even put her hand out to the dog.' Bunnie was taken to Medway Maritime Hospital in nearby Gillingham before being transferred to St Thomas' Hospital in Westminster, London, the next morning. There, she had several X-rays to ensure the puncture had not hit her bone, before undergoing the reconstructive surgery. Mr Skinley explained: 'She also has a lung condition and really bad asthma so she had to be marked down as a high-risk category for sedation.' The girl will have to return to hospital within a week for a check-up, to assess if she needs even more surgery. Anyone with information that could assist officers' inquiries, including CCTV or doorbell footage, should contact police on 01634 792209, quoting 46/102876/25. It comes after MailOnline revealed at the end of last year that at least 16 dangerous dogs are seized every day in the UK. Just under 6,000 dangerous dogs were seized by 27 forces from November 2023 until the same month the following year, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request found - meaning 114 dogs are taken every week. Of the forces which responded to the FOI, Greater Manchester had the highest figures, with 19 dogs seized a week. It took 1,000 in a year and put 337 of the animals to sleep. Second highest is the West Midlands force with 17 dogs, followed by Northumbria with nine. West Yorkshire seized eight a week, while Leicestershire said it seized six. Experts have now warned that banning dangerous dogs in order to keep the public safe has 'critical flaws' and the focus should be on making owners more responsible instead. A spokesperson at which obtained the data, said: 'The Dangerous Dogs Act has been in effect for over three decades and yet, hospital admissions due to dog bites continue to rise.' They added that instead of focusing on breed, the emphasis should be on 'addressing the root causes of dog aggression' instead.
