Renowned Mars expert says Trump-Musk axis risks dooming mission
WASHINGTON - Robert Zubrin quite literally wrote the book on why humanity should go to Mars -- so why has the renowned aerospace engineer soured on Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur leading the charge?
In an interview, the 73-year-old founder of the Mars Society delivered a blistering critique, accusing the world's richest person of undermining the mission through divisive politics and a bleak vision of the Red Planet as an escape from Earth rather than a journey of hope.
"On one level, he's absolutely instrumental in opening up this opportunity to get humans to Mars, both through the development of Starship and also the inspiration that has been caused," Zubrin told AFP, referring to Musk's prototype rocket.
"But for it to succeed, it has to go beyond these -- this initiative cannot be seen as a Musk hobbyhorse or a Trump hobbyhorse -- it must be seen, at a minimum, as America's program, or preferably the Free World's program."
Zubrin's 1996 book "The Case for Mars," since updated numerous times, laid out a practical blueprint for reaching and settling the Red Planet using existing technologies and local resources -- with the ultimate goal of transforming the atmosphere for long-term human habitation.
- Supporter turned critic -
The book won praise from Musk himself, who once posed with Zubrin at SpaceX's Starship facility in Texas and called it "worth reading."
But today, Zubrin -- who co-authored the Mars Direct plan in 1990, has published hundreds of papers, and invented several advanced propulsion concepts -- sees troubling signs.
While he described Musk as a "tremendously talented and forceful person," he said his success has bred "hubris and arrogance," comparing him to Napoleon as he thumped his fist for emphasis.
He was especially critical of Musk's embrace of Donald Trump during the 2024 election and his role as the administration's chainsaw-wielding cost slasher.
"This combination of Trump and Musk is not going to persist forever," Zubrin warned, in an interview conducted before the pair's relationship imploded Thursday in a spectacular public row.
"And if this program is identified as their deal, it will be crushed as soon as opposing forces have sufficient power."
During their fight on Thursday, Trump called Musk "crazy" and threatened to terminate his government contracts worth billions of dollars.
Zubrin also condemned Trump's efforts to gut NASA's space science budget -- a move he sees as fundamentally at odds with the exploratory spirit of the Mars endeavour.
The Mars Sample Return mission -- aimed at retrieving specimens collected by the Perseverance rover -- is among the biggest science projects on the chopping block.
Although the mission, developed with the European Space Agency, has suffered delays and budget overruns, Zubrin said eliminating it entirely rather than reforming it would be a mistake.
"This threatens to brand this program with the mark of Cain of original sin -- that this program is born with the blood of the murder of Space Science on it."
- Creative outpost -
Where Zubrin still sees promise is in Starship -- Musk's massive prototype rocket aimed at making life multiplanetary, though the vessel's repeated test explosions show there's a long way to go.
He diverges with Musk over how it should be used. Starship is far too large to serve as a Mars ascent vehicle, Zubrin said.
The Mars expert has proposed a vessel he calls Starboat -- a compact lander that could shuttle between planetary surfaces and orbit, using a fraction of the propellant and surface power.
But his sharpest critiques are philosophical.
He rejects Musk's portrayal of Mars as a refuge from a dying Earth -- a vision that echoes the works of science fiction writer Isaac Asimov.
"We're not going to Mars out of despair," Zubrin said. "We're going to Mars out of hope... to establish new branches of human civilisation which will add their creative capacity to that of humanity as a whole."
He sees Mars not as a refuge but renewal, where a campaign beginning with robotic missions in the late 2020s and culminating in human landings by 2033 could inspire bipartisan support, showcase American ingenuity and restore national purpose.
"If we do the kind of program that I advocated... we will once again, as we did in Apollo, astonish the world with what free people can do," he said. "We'll make it clear that freedom, not authoritarianism, is the future of the human race."
by Issam Ahmed
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's last card: the Gulf of Tonkin false flag justification
US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. Image: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. He is not alone. He finds himself in the same position as many US presidents before him, who had to authorise the military to go to war, rehearsing how the justification could be elegantly and persuasively announced. The pacing up and down the lawn of the White House and in Trump's case, the silliness of the diversionary tactics, including the hosting of two 'big beautiful' poles on each side of the White House, is not a sign of preoccupation with whether or not to go to war. That decision has already been taken. The White House resident is mulling over the speech that justifies the war he has already authorised, especially on how its impact would be felt by different constituencies that make up his political and financial support base. President Trump has had a similar decision to make in his first stint as POTUS 45. He was required to authorise decapitation strikes against General Suleimani of Iran, who was on an official visit to Iraq. As provocative and illegal as the decapitation strikes are, there were no retaliatory measures or follow-up exchanges. The lesson was learnt. Pinpoint strikes against Iran will not have any consequence against the US nor its allies, for that matter. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In his second term, having authorised the military strikes against Iranian nuclear and oil facilities, including the killing of nuclear scientists and that country's top military brass, it is difficult to imagine what, if anything… is Trump still waiting to decide in two weeks. Along came deception. The second term of DJT, Elon Musk's endearment for the Donald, is characterised by deception as the primary instrument of statecraft. Briefing journalists both in the Oval Office and inside Air Force One, President Trump struck a note of confidence, convinced that he was the ultimate America First deal maker who would get the best nuclear deal for Israel first and America second. And so at the end of the fifth round of negotiations with Iran, his decapitation drones had already left Tel Aviv to decapitate the Iranian negotiators he was negotiating with. There could be no sixth. Sometimes the deception starts with the US President calling the President of another country 'my friend'. When such endearments gain currency, he is certainly planning something unsavoury against them. While President Xi Jinping is a dear friend of Trump, with whom he got along very well, and in his words, with great respect, he was buttering him up for something nasty. On the 25th of April 2025, Trump's administration produced a fact sheet that imposed a combined tariff rate of a whopping 245%. And this was just for a dear friend, he got along with them very well and with respect. President Vladimir Putin has come to learn of this strategy of deception at great cost. Whilst Trump supported and encouraged a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian negotiators planned for Istanbul, the US president sat with Zelensky in the hall of the Vatican and discussed something pressing. In full view of the world, they sat for 15 minutes discussing a sensitive subject which was mutually strategic for both countries, and exhilarating for the accompanying European leaders. So soon thereafter, the nuclear bombers of the Russian Federation went up in billows of smoke from drone explosions launched from smuggled trucks into various parts of the Russian Federation. The United Kingdom was quick to confirm that the success of this attack is owed to Operation Spiderweb, which had been in the making for 18 months, as far back as the time of Joe Biden. Only, Trump had to see it through as a negotiating pressure tactic against Russia. And it had plausible deniability of direct US involvement. Of plausible deniability and false flags, the US always deploy them as two successive pages of the same war book. When one is used, the other will inexorably follow. Perhaps it is that script which has popularised the adage that in politics, there are no coincidences and in war, all coincidences are suspect. The preeminent requirement for the US to refer to the war book in the first place is when a decision to go to war has already been taken. Thereafter, the usual blood-curdling rituals follow, with the demonisation of the target by the mainstream media leading the charge. Horrible things start happening to the said adversary without the US being perceived to be directly involved. That is enough plausible deniability. Suddenly, without warning, the war mongers start yearning for more blood. Considering that the administration had long acquiesced to war, all they needed was an excuse to escalate. But the war hawks know what the world knows already. They must provide their own justification in order to fully inhabit the theatre of conflict. That justification is on the very next page of the book. In the Vietnam War, it was officially called the USS Maddox incident, an infamous deception known to historians as the Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation. This Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation marked a historic milestone. It eulogises every false flag justification with a name of its own. With the resolve to topple Saddam Hussein in a full invasion, the justification had a heavy title. 'Weapons of mass destruction!' For such a loquacious group, their vocabulary is disturbingly sparse. The titling of these justifications has limits, apparently, occasioned no doubt by the need to retain shock and horror and manufactured consent. In Libya, the justification that toppled Gaddafi is shockingly called 'the weapons of mass destruction'. President Trump may not need to worry about his MAGA constituency, nor his utterances of many years that the senseless forever wars must come to an end. So much proselytising was fair game in electioneering season and accordingly was meant for votes. No normal US president can ever imagine that they would finish a term without obliging some military adventurism or spilling of blood, however infinitesimally, in some small country or exotic island. But this is deception's open season. There are no two weeks within which to decide. The strike will be within days of the announcement by the White House spokesperson. If Trump were facing re-election concerns and possible dethroning by his Democrat rivals, he would have shut this war down a long time ago. But he has been liberated from such psychological constrictions. The trillion dollars of investments from Saudi Arabia are almost ready for purchase. So is the Palace in the Sky 747 aircraft gift from the Emir of Qatar. It is humming on the tarmacs of Doha. No matter. No business is more urgent than, nor competes in importance with, Netanyahu's fabled wars with ubiquitous foes. After all, the letter from his ambassador in Jerusalem, Mike Huckabee, has confirmed that Trump is the second coming of the Messiah, to do what the Messiah is wont to do. The messianic to-do list may be a stretch for the Donald, with at least 8 billion people yearning for their reward for a lifetime of religious loyalty. All he has to do is save only that sliver of humanity who are his allies and destroy everyone else. He has an amazing name for this messianic operation, composed of many false flags. Helped by the charismatic evangelists, its haloed name is shocking for its biblical end-of-time-ish fatalism. The Gog of Magog. * Ambassador Bheki Gila is a Barrister-at-Law. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Warning signs on climate flashing bright red: top scientists
The planet's energy imbalance has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, and scientists do not know how long oceans will continue to massively soak up this excess heat. Image: Alan Kearney / Connect Images via AFP From carbon pollution to sea-level rise to global heating, the pace and level of key climate change indicators are all in uncharted territory, more than 60 top scientists warned Thursday. Greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels and deforestation hit a new high in 2024 and averaged, over the last decade, a record 53.6 billion tonnes per year -- that is 100,000 tonnes per minute -- of CO2 or its equivalent in other gases, they reported in a peer-reviewed update. Earth's surface temperature last year breached 1.5 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels for the first time, and the additional CO2 humanity can emit with a two-thirds chance of staying under that threshold long-term -- our 1.5C "carbon budget" -- will be exhausted in two years, they calculated. Investment in clean energy outpaced investment in oil, gas and coal last year two-to-one, but fossil fuels account for more than 80 percent of global energy consumption, and growth in renewables still lags behind new demand. Included in the 2015 Paris climate treaty as an aspirational goal, the 1.5C limit has since been validated by science as necessary for avoiding a catastrophically climate-addled world. The hard cap on warming to which nearly 200 nations agreed was "well below" two degrees, commonly interpreted to mean 1.7C to 1.8C. With the 1.5C level now expected to be breached in the coming years, "we are already in crunch time for these higher levels of warming," co-author Joeri Rogelj, a professor of climate science and policy at Imperial College London, told journalists in a briefing. "The next three or four decades is pretty much the timeline over which we expect a peak in warming to happen." 'The wrong direction' No less alarming than record heat and carbon emissions is the gathering pace at which these and other climate indicators are shifting, according to the study, published in Earth System Science Data. Human-induced warming increased over the last decade at a rate "unprecedented in the instrumental record", and well above the 2010-2019 average registered in the UN's most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, in 2021. The new findings -- led by the same scientists using essentially the same methods -- are intended as an authoritative albeit unofficial update of the benchmark IPCC reports underpinning global climate diplomacy. They should be taken as a reality check by policymakers, the authors suggested. "If you look at this year's update, things are all moving in the wrong direction," said lead author Piers Forster, head of the University of Leed's Priestley Centre for Climate Futures. The rate at which sea levels have shot up in recent years is also alarming, the scientists said. After creeping up, on average, well under two millimetres per year from 1901 to 2018, global oceans have risen 4.3 mm annually since 2019. What happens next? An increase in the ocean watermark of 23 centimetres (nine inches) over the last 125 years has been enough to imperil many small island states and hugely amplify the destructive power of storm surges worldwide. An additional 20 centimetres of sea level rise by 2050 would cause $1 trillion in flood damage annually in the world's 136 largest coastal cities, earlier research has shown. Another indicator underlying all the changes in the climate system is Earth's so-called energy imbalance, the difference between the amount of solar energy entering the atmosphere and the smaller amount leaving it. So far, 91 percent of human-caused warming has been absorbed by oceans, sparing life on land. But the planet's energy imbalance has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, and scientists do not know how long oceans will continue to massively soak up this excess heat. Dire future climate impacts worse than what the world has already experienced are already baked in over the next decade or two. But beyond that, the future is in our hands, the scientists made clear. "We will rapidly reach a level of global warming of 1.5C, but what happens next depends on the choices which will be made," said co-author and former IPCC co-chair Valerie Masson-Delmotte. The Paris Agreement's 1.5C target allows for the possibility of ratcheting down global temperatures below that threshold before century's end. Ahead of a critical year-end climate summit in Brazil, international cooperation has been weakened by the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. "Governments, financiers, and businesses must put this (report) in focus in the run-up to COP30 in Brazil," said David King, former UK Chief Scientific Advisor and Chair of the Climate Crisis Advisory Group. "If today's data tells us anything, it's that we do not have time to delay any further."
The Herald
a day ago
- The Herald
SpaceX Starship rocket explodes in setback for Musk's Mars mission
SpaceX's massive Starship spacecraft exploded into a dramatic fireball during testing in Texas late on Wednesday, the latest in a series of setbacks for billionaire Elon Musk's Mars rocket programme. The explosion occurred around 11pm local time while Starship was on a test stand at its Brownsville, Texas Starbase while preparing for the 10th test flight, SpaceX said in a post on Musk's social-media platform X. The company attributed it to a 'major anomaly' and said all personnel were safe. Its engineering teams were investigating the incident, and it was coordinating with local, state and federal agencies regarding environmental and safety impacts, the company said. 'Preliminary data suggests a nitrogen COPV in the payload bay failed below its proof pressure,' Musk said in a post on X, in a reference to a nitrogen gas storage unit known as a composite overwrapped pressure vessel. 'If further investigation confirms this is what happened, it is the first time for this design,' he said. The Starship rocket appeared to experience at least two explosions in quick succession, lighting up the night sky and sending debris flying, according to video capturing the moment it exploded.
