Women don't need husband's signature to apply for passport: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court has held that it is not necessary for a woman to get the permission of her husband and take his signature before applying for a passport before the authority.Justice N Anand Venkatesh gave the ruling in a recent order while disposing of a petition filed by Revathy. She sought a direction to the authorities to issue a fresh passport without insisting signature from her husband in a time bound manner.advertisementThe case of the petitioner was that she got married in the year 2023 and that there was a matrimonial dispute between the parties which resulted in her husband filing a petition before a local court, seeking for the dissolution of the marriage. This petition was pending.
The petitioner, applied for a passport in April this year before the Regional Passport Office (RPO) in the city. It was not processed and when enquired, the petitioner was informed that she must obtain the signature of her husband in Form-J and only thereafter, the application will be processed by RPO.The RPO also took into consideration the pending dispute between the petitioner and her husband before the Court. It was under these circumstances, she filed the present petition.In his order, the judge said that in the considered view of this court, the application submitted by the petitioner seeking a passport has to be processed independently.advertisement"It is not necessary for a wife to get the permission of her husband and take his signature before applying for a passport before the authority", the judge added.He said this insistence made by the RPO shows the mindset of the society in treating women who were married as if they were chattel belonging to the husband. It was quite shocking that the passport office was insisting for the permission of the husband and his signature in a particular form in order to process the application submitted by the petitioner for the passport.Already the relationship between the petitioner and her husband was in doldrums and the RPO was expecting the petitioner to get the signature of the husband. Virtually, the RPO was insisting the petitioner to fulfill an impossibility, the judge added.The judge said the petitioner after marriage does not lose her individuality and a wife can always apply for a passport without the permission or signature of the husband in any form. "The practice of insisting for permission from the husband to apply for a passport, does not augur well for a society which is moving towards woman emancipation. This practice is nothing short of male supremacism", the judge added..advertisementThe judge directed the RPO to process the application submitted by the petitioner and issue a passport in her name on her satisfying the other requirements.This process shall be completed within four weeks, the judge added.
IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
HC: Husband's consent not needed for passport
A woman does not need her husband's consent and signature to apply for a passport and insisting on the same is an instance of 'male supremacism', the Madras high court has said disposing of a petition filed by a woman who sought directions to authorities to issue her a fresh passport. Chennai, Dec 25 (ANI): A view of Madras High Court, in Chennai on Friday. (ANI Photo) (ANI) Saying that the insistence by the Regional Passport Office (RPO) that the woman get her estranged husband's permission for issuance of a passport was 'shocking', the bench of justice N Anand Venkatesh said it shows the 'mindset of the society in treating woman who are married as if they are chattel belonging to the husband'. The woman, Revathy, moved the court saying that she applied for a passport in April, but her application was not processed and the petitioner was informed that she must obtain the signature of her husband in Form-J and only thereafter, the application will be processed by the Chennai RPO. The petitioner got married in 2023 and there was a matrimonial dispute between the parties which resulted in her husband filing a petition before a local court, seeking for the dissolution of the marriage. This petition was pending. The RPO also took the pending dispute into consideration, following which she filed the present petition. In his order, the judge said that in the considered view of this court, the application submitted by the petitioner seeking a passport has to be processed independently. 'It is not necessary for a wife to get the permission of her husband and take his signature before applying for a passport before the authority,' the judge said in the June 18 order. 'This insistence made by the 2nd respondent (the RPO) shows the mindset of the society in treating woman who are married as if they are chattel belonging to the husband. It is quite shocking that the passport office is insisting for the permission of the husband and his signature in a particular form in order to process the application submitted by the petitioner for passport,' the court said. The judge said the petitioner after marriage does not lose her individuality and a wife can always apply for a passport without the permission or signature of the husband in any form. 'It is quite shocking that the passport office is insisting for the permission of the husband and his signature in a particular form in order to process the application submitted by the petitioner for passport,' the court said. It noted that it was not possible for the petitioner woman to obtain her husband's signature on the application in view of the strained relationship between them, the judge said, the RPO was insisting the woman 'fulfill an impossibility'. 'The practice of insisting for permission from the husband to apply for passport, does not augur well for a society which is moving towards emancipation. This practice is nothing short of male supremacism,' the court said. The judge directed the RPO to process the application submitted by the petitioner and issue a passport in her name on her satisfying the other requirements. This process shall be completed within four weeks, the judge added.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Paw-sitive vibes: NDRF's yoga-doing dog steals the show at Udhampur event, video goes viral
A specially trained dog from the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) has become an internet sensation after performing yoga asanas during a pre-Yoga Day session in Udhampur. The heartwarming moment unfolded at the campus of the 13th Battalion NDRF in Sui, Udhampur, during a special yoga session held ahead of the 11th International Day of Yoga on June 21. The four-legged yogi, with his own mat, followed uniformed personnel performing yoga in unison. In a video shared by news agency ANI, the dog is seen patiently waiting for its trainer's command. On cue, it rises on its hind legs and stretches sideways, mimicking the asanas with impressive coordination. Trained over two years by NDRF staff, the dog has become a regular at the force's yoga drills, delighting personnel and audiences alike with its discipline and dedication. #WATCH | J&K | A dog trained by the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) emerges as the surprise star of a special Yoga session held, ahead of the 11th International Yoga Day, at the campus of the 13th Battalion at Sui, Udhampur today The dog was adopted and trained by NDRF… — ANI (@ANI) June 20, 2025 International Day of Yoga, celebrated annually on June 21, coincides with the summer solstice – the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. The date symbolises light, energy, and harmony with nature, resonating with the core philosophies of yoga. The concept of International Day of Yoga was proposed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his address to the United Nations General Assembly in 2014. The same year, the UN officially recognised June 21 as the International Day of Yoga, a resolution supported by 175 nations. Globally, the 11th International Day of Yoga was celebrated with enthusiasm. In Tokyo, the Indian Embassy in Japan organised a grand event that saw over 2,000 participants. The celebration was inaugurated by Yoshiko Ishiba, wife of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who also joined in performing yoga. Satoko Iwaya, wife of Japan's Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, was also in attendance, symbolising the strengthening cultural ties between the two countries
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court's 133-year-old heritage building gets a new lease of life
The Madras High Court is all set to complete 163 years since its establishment on June 26, 1862 and the heritage building in which it is housed in at present will be completing 133 years since its inauguration on July 12, 1892. What better time could there be to give a new lease of life to the timeless edifice still serving as a functional building visited by thousands of litigants and lawyers on a daily basis. The High Court's building committee comprising Justices R. Subramanian, R. Suresh Kumar, P.T. Asha and N. Mala have spent considerable amount of time and energy in turning the building's ground floor, that had been neglected for decades, into a pleasant haven that brings back nostalgic memories of the past. Now, the entire two-storey building looks magnificent. According to Public Works Department (PWD) Executive Engineer S. Kulanthaiyan, the biggest challenge in undertaking the renovation work was to shift the old case records that had been stored inside the rooms on the ground floor by stacking them on very tall iron racks. 'We had to spend considerable time on shifting those case bundles and then dismantling the racks using gas welding in order to free up the rooms,' he said. After completing the exercise, repairs were carried out on the damaged walls and ceiling joints, the stone arches were restored, both interior and exterior walls were white washed, doors varnished, all gates leading to the court buildings from multiple sides were opened up, the corridors were spruced up, vintage lighting arrangements were made and the walls were decorated with acclaimed illustrator Manohar Devadoss' pencil sketches of iconic locations in Chennai city. Not just this, the committee also insisted on opening up the spiral staircases that connect the ground floor with the top floors. These spiral staircases had remained under lock and key for several years and used as a place to dump the discarded furniture and other articles. They were also kept shut due to security concerns ever since the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) began guarding the court building. However, the committee insisted on opening up the spiral staircases too and made the CISF deploy additional personnel at those entry points. Even on the exterior front, multiple standalone overhead water tanks that had been blocking the view of the heritage building were razed down and alternative arrangements were made for water supply without disturbing the classic Indo Sarcenic structure. Advocate M.R. Jothimanian said, the lawyers would always be indebted to the committee for having taken the pains to restore the glory of the heritage building. 'For us, the lawyers, this High Court building is virtually our second home because we spend most of our time over here and we know that it is not an easy job to keep such a beautiful edifice functional without turning it into a museum.'
