Summer business travel is still on for many, but it might look different this year

Just because some Americans are scaling back on their summer travel, it doesn't mean their employers are.
Business travel demand has remained steady going into the summer season, several travel companies have said.
Navan, which works with companies like Lyft, Shopify, and Box, found that summer business travel in 2025 is up by double digits compared to 2024, a representative for the company told Business Insider in May.
Navan compared corporate travel bookings for the same group of companies over the same time period in 2024 and 2025 and found flight bookings were up 10% year-over-year, while hotel bookings were up 25%. The group included a mix of professional services, financial services, technology, and manufacturing firms, and ranged in size from small- and medium-sized businesses to public companies.
TravelPerk, another travel-management company, found work trip bookings this summer were up 3% compared to last year. The company compared bookings for June, July, and August made by the same group of long-term TravelPerk customers in 2024 and 2025.
"The month of June is the busiest month in the first half of the year, a key time for growth, industry events, and meaningful connections," Eugen Triebelhorn, a country manager at TravelPerk, said in an email. "Especially for sales teams, June is a strategic halftime for the year ahead of the quiet vacation period in July and August."
Ariel Katen, consumer advocate and director of product at Engine, another corporate travel management platform, to BI last month that the company has found work travelers expect some changes to their trips this year.
The company conducted a survey in April that found 71% of businesses expected to be affected in some way by shaky economic conditions, with 29% expecting increased scrutiny of travel expenses. That could mean cutting back on premium flight upgrades or booking more affordable hotels, she said.
Engine has also found that a new batch of more affordable cities is becoming popular for corporate travel, including Charlotte, North Carolina, and Nashville, Tennessee.
"If you had to get the entire team down somewhere, where are you going to find more affordable hotel rooms? Is that New York City or is that Tampa?" Katen said.
Business travel had shown some signs of slowing earlier this year. Airlines Reporting Corp., which tracks agency bookings, reported a 6% decline in April for agencies focused on corporate or government travel.
But several travel companies have recently reported an increase or a stabilization of corporate travel demand.
Alaska Air Group, which includes Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines, said in late April that business travel demand had "stabilized" after a slowdown in February and March.
"Total forward bookings are up low single digits, improved from where they seem to have bottomed out in March," Andrew Harrison, Alaska's chief commercial officer, said of corporate bookings during the first-quarter earnings call on April 24.
Southwest Airlines said on its quarterly earnings call, also on April 24, that corporate travel demand had been "softer, but stable."
American Express Global Business Travel, a travel management company, reported an increased demand for business travel on its quarterly earnings call in May, as did Choice Hotels, which includes brands like Radisson and Comfort Inn.
The trends in business travel come as leisure travel demand has softened, fueled by economic uncertainty. Several airlines withdrew their outlook for the year, with United, Delta, and Southwest cutting back on routes or capacity, citing weaker demand.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Newsweek

36 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Why More Boomers Are Deciding to Rent

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Baby boomers are redefining the rental market, a new study has found, with millions more older Americans now renting homes than was the case a decade ago. Over the past 10 years, the number of renters aged 65 and older has surged by nearly 30 percent, adding 2.4 million senior renters across the country—by far the largest growth of any age group, according to new research conducted by Point2Homes. While the number of renters declined in other age groups, particularly those aged 18 to 54, the number of seniors opting to rent has boomed. Past generations viewed homeownership as a hallmark of independence, but today's older adults are embracing the flexibility of renting. Downsizing, relocating to warmer climates, and avoiding the burdens of home maintenance are just a few of the more positive reasons behind the trend. But rising housing costs, inflation, and limited affordable inventory also play a critical role. As more seniors navigate retirement on fixed incomes, renting is becoming not only a practical alternative, but in many cases, a financially imperative one. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Why Are More Seniors Renting? The reasons behind the growing number of senior renters are varied, a mix of both lifestyle choices and financial necessity. "Seniors value the flexibility renting provides, which can allow them to downsize, move to better locations, or avoid the responsibility that comes with owning a home and its expenses," Alexei Morgado, a Florida realtor and CEO of Lexawise Real Estate Exam Preparation, told Newsweek. "Owning a home can take a lot of physical energy and money. When renting, you can simply enjoy life without worrying about major repairs, the uncertainty of property taxes, or if your home will lose value or be hard to sell." Shifting cultural attitudes toward aging and independence are also influencing this trend. "In the past, homeownership was viewed as a key indicator of independence in retirement," says Morgado. "The cultural shift in the thinking surrounding aging has moved rapidly, however, and seniors no longer feel as though homeownership is a mainstay of independence and a comfortable life in retirement." He notes that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this rethinking. "Seniors began to focus on flexibility and ease rather than stability and predictability, which is often associated with homeownership," Morgado said. "Many seniors have begun seeking smaller properties or apartments in more desirable areas away from their long-time homes and may prefer urban and suburban environments even if there is additional cost or a long-term rental lease. "In this way, renting allows for added freedom of movement if they feel they need to move or relocate." The study found that many senior renters are relocating to warmer climates, particularly in Florida, which is well-known for its large retirement community. Other southern states, such as Louisiana and Texas, are also experiencing an increase in the number of graying renters. In Baton Rouge, the percentage of properties rented by older Americans has boomed by 88.7 percent over the last ten years. Similar numbers are reported in Jacksonville, Florida, and Round Rock, near Austin, Texas. Financial Strains But for many, the switch to renting isn't just a matter of lifestyle—it's a financial necessity, Morgado explained. "The gap between owning and renting is widening, especially for seniors who rely on a fixed income. Home prices have skyrocketed in many parts of the country over the last 10 years with continued high mortgage interest rates," he said. "Rapid changes in housing demand mean that local areas with very limited affordable housing options have both renters and former homeowners looking for an affordable lifestyle. Seniors that once owned homes are now renting for value." Steve Sexton, CEO of Sexton Advisory Group, agrees. "This trend is fueled by both convenience and necessity; however recent economic uncertainty is the more likely driver of seniors renting in retirement," Sexton told Newsweek, noting that many retirees live on fixed incomes that have failed to keep pace with rising housing costs and inflation. "Utilities, insurance, property taxes, and maintenance costs associated with owning a home continue to increase, while Social Security and pensions struggle to keep up," he said. This is exacerbated by a lack of affordable homes on the market, even for those who may prefer to own, Sexton said, a problem that is getting worse over time. As a result, "for many seniors, renting offers a more predictable and/or simplified budget in which they don't have to account for repairs and certain housing expenses." Yet the underlying issue of housing affordability remains a serious concern. A 2024 report by the Joint Center for Housing Studies found that more than 40 percent of renters aged 65 and older spend more than 30 percent of their income on rent, the threshold at which the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development considers a household "cost burdened." "The availability of affordable housing, however, is a glaring reality for many seniors," Morgado said, noting that it's "a barrier obstacle to seniors maintaining their independence." What Happens Next Boomers having to rent out of financial necessity is likely to continue. For now, most adults aged 65 and older are homeowners, according to the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University. However, more than one in five older households, some 7 million, choose to rent, according to the 2023 Housing America's Older Adults study by JCHS. Jeff Lichtenstein, CEO and broker at Echo Fine Properties, said the trend "will get worse in the next decade," with "inflation being the main culprit." "With increased costs coming from tariffs and with cuts in the new bill and from DOGE, it puts seniors in a tough situation," he told Newsweek. "In the next decade, there will be an explosion of baby boomers in that age group. As one loses a spouse or looks at financing, there should be more of a need to rent."

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

Feeling oversubscribed? Why Americans are considering cutting their subscriptions

As cost-conscious Americans tighten their belts in an uncertain economy, they are starting to notice how quickly monthly subscription charges add up. Feeling oversubscribed? You are not alone. Most things these days – food delivery, ride hailing, TV and music streaming, fitness classes, digital storage apps – seem to come with a monthly payment. Few people have a system to manage the steady stream of autopilot charges on their credit cards or to track price hikes. What's more, they underestimate how much they spend each month on subscriptions. But as cost-conscious Americans tighten their belts in an uncertain economy, they are noticing how quickly these monthly charges can add up. Some 6 in 10 U.S. adults are considering breaking up with some of their paid subscriptions, according to a recent CNET survey. 'When people's budgets are tighter, they start asking themselves: Do I need to be paying over time for this?' asked Marco Bertini, a marketing professor at Esade, a university in Barcelona, who was not affiliated with the CNET survey. 'It just feels like a heavier burden.' What is the average amount of money spent on subscriptions? Cassandra Navarro of Scottsdale, Arizona, canceled her Hulu, Amazon and DoorDash subscriptions earlier this year. Streaming services have been too quick to drop titles and raise rates, she said, and she'd rather shop in person at Walmart or pick up a takeout order directly than deal with the extra costs associated with delivering goods directly to her doorstep. Navarro and her husband aim to cut out more music and movie streaming services after they move into their new home and have more space to collect CDs and DVDs. 'It just all adds up so much,' Navarro, 30, told USA TODAY. 'We don't mind having one or two subscriptions, but when you have so many subscriptions at once, you start to feel like you don't have control of your life anymore. … You can't keep track of your own finances.' The average American spends over $1,000 a year on subscriptions – $200 of it on unnecessary or unused subscriptions, according to the CNET survey. Why is the subscription model so popular? Nearly 75% of companies that sell directly to customers offer some sort of subscription, according to an industry and background note coauthored by Harvard Business School marketing professor Elie Ofek. The model makes sense in certain industries and can help consumers access big-ticket items, according to Bertini. But companies 'cannot and should not fit subscriptions to everything.' "There are some places where it makes sense, and some places where it doesn't," Bertini said, adding some bank on consumers simply forgetting the recurring charge. Those companies risk losing customers, especially as Americans tighten their purse strings. Retail sales were down 0.9% from the previous month in May, following a 0.1% dip in April, according to the Commerce Department. "Disposable income, during tough times, is a little more uncertain. It may be higher one month, lower another, then maybe I'm unemployed. Do I want to have a recurring expense when my disposable income is a bit fluctuating?' Bertini asked. McCarthy said the biggest risk to subscription companies is a lack of new subscribers, rather than a drop in the current subscription base. And that drop off will hit certain industries harder than others. "If you're a utility like a telecom provider, (the risk is) probably pretty low," he said. "If you start moving toward streaming services, I think the risk goes up. When you move toward a box subscription, the risk becomes pretty high.' Is the 'click to cancel' rule in effect? While subscription companies aren't immune to the effects of increasingly cost-conscious consumers, McCarthy says subscription-based companies are expected to weather economic turmoil better than purely transactional businesses. 'It takes effort to cancel, where it takes no effort to not purchase,' he said, adding that subscription companies fared well during the Great Recession. Netflix, for instance, closed the fourth quarter of 2008 with a 26% year-over-year leap in subscribers, and another 31% increase in the fourth quarter of 2009. Software company Salesforce also saw a jump in revenue and its customer base between 2008 and 2009. But a new rule from the Federal Trade Commission could make it much easier for consumers to click "unsubscribe." The agency's "click to cancel" rule, adopted last year under former Democratic Chair Lina Khan, requires businesses to make it as easy to cancel a service as it was to sign up. In other words, if a company allows you to sign up in two clicks, canceling should take no more than two clicks. Originally set to go into effect in May, the rule has faced legal and political challenges. Business associations have sued to block it, arguing it places too many burdens on businesses. Andrew Ferguson, the current Republican FTC chair, said he voted against 'click to cancel' because it came during the lame-duck period. The FTC has delayed enforcing the rule until July to give companies more time to comply. "I really hope that sticks, because this is hurting people," Khan said during an appearance on the 'Pablo Torre Finds Out' podcast in June. "Nobody should be stuck paying for a subscription that they either never signed up for or want to cancel." Will 'click to cancel' get canceled? New FTC rule faces legal, political challenges How to cancel an unwanted subscription Looking to trim monthly expenses? Here's how to break up with paid subscriptions.

Newsweek

2 hours ago

• Newsweek

Map Shows Cheapest and Most Expensive States to Retire Comfortably

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As large swaths of Americans are dipping into their savings to combat increased costs and economic tensions, living in some states as opposed to others could provide better long-term financial security. Why It Matters Financial instability has roiled countless Americans, some of whom are now more fearful of running out of money than dying. Simultaneously, people short on cash or worried about the stock market are dipping into their retirement accounts at higher levels than previously seen. What To Know Americans' economic anxieties come from different places, including fears of recessions, inflation, health issues, grocery and gas prices, tariffs, and fears of government cuts to Social Security and Medicaid. Kiplinger, a publisher of business forecasts and personal finance advice, devised a list of the states where money will go the longest in retirement without breaking the bank. The top 10 states where you need the least savings to retire are as follows: West Virginia – $712,913 – $712,913 Kansas – $741,455 – $741,455 Mississippi – $753,472 – $753,472 Pennsylvania – $864,633 – $864,633 South Carolina – $869,140 – $869,140 Minnesota – $870,642 – $870,642 Wyoming – $872,144 – $872,144 Illinois – $873,646 – $873,646 North Carolina – $905,192 – $905,192 Maryland – $924,720 The top 10 most expensive states where you need savings to retire are as follows: Hawaii – $2,212,084 – $2,212,084 Massachusetts – $1,645,764 – $1,645,764 California – $1,612,716 – $1,612,716 Alaska – $1,292,753 – $1,292,753 New York – $1,292,753 – $1,292,753 New Jersey – $1,163,566 – $1,163,566 Vermont – $1,153,051 – $1,153,051 Washington – $1,145,540 – $1,145,540 Maine – $1,144,038 – $1,144,038 Arizona – $1,133,522 A recent AARP survey found that about 20 percent of adults age 50 and older have no retirement savings, and roughly 61 percent are worried they will not have enough money to support themselves in retirement. While Americans are 15 times more likely to save for retirement when they have access to a plan through their employer, AARP reports that nearly 57 million people do not have access to a work-based retirement plan. John Tamny, founder and president of the Parkview Institute and senior fellow at the Market Institute, told Newsweek that the nation is in a "pivotal moment" following general inaction on behalf of multiple presidential administrations and countless lawmakers in Washington, D.C. He said the Trump administration is taking steps required to stabilize long-term fiscal sustainability by addressing structural deficits, rebalancing global trade relationships, and initiating housing reforms that prioritize supply-side incentives. "There are tensions," Tamny said. "Tariffs, housing affordability, concerns around entitlement spending—but these issues didn't begin today. What is new is the willingness to confront them head-on. That means Americans should reframe retirement planning not around fear, but around resilience. "In this environment, retirement preparation should be more dynamic, incorporating inflation-protected investments (like Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS), flexible retirement age expectations, and diversified income streams. Social Security may see adjustments, but by acting now, decades before any potential shortfall hits, this administration is likely protecting the program's future viability." A study by Vanguard that examined data from nearly 5 million people with retirement accounts found a record 4.8 percent of account holders took hardship withdrawals from their 401(k) accounts in 2024, up from 3.6 percent in 2023. He also said that geography certainly plays a role in how Americans of different ages and financial backgrounds are affected, and in turn their retirement prospects. For example, Americans in high-cost areas should plan more carefully as should those in coastal cities with high housing costs and climate-related infrastructure pressures, like California and Florida. "For Americans in high-cost states, that means thinking seriously and strategically about location," he said. "It's practical to think this way. Remote work, more portable benefits, and expanding infrastructure make relocation more feasible than ever. "Retirement security is no longer just about how much you save; it's also about where you spend those savings."