Putin's War Taxes Are Crippling Russia's Oil Industry
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The tax burden on Russia's oil industry is severe and making production of the country's critical export unprofitable, a Russian energy minster has said.
Anton Rubtsov made the comments on Tuesday as Russia faces dwindling revenues from its oil exports, which are key to financing Vladimir Putin's war effort in Ukraine.
Newsweek has contacted the Russian energy ministry for comment.
This illustrative image from 2015 shows an oil terminal in Novorossiysk, Russia.
This illustrative image from 2015 shows an oil terminal in Novorossiysk, Russia.Why It Matters
The price of Russia's flagship Urals crude grade has plunged alongside all major oil benchmarks.
Reuters reported Russia's oil and gas revenue had fallen by a third in May from a year earlier to 0.52 trillion rubles ($6.48 billion), which is the lowest level since July 2023 amid weaker oil prices and a strengthening of the Russian currency.
The comment from a Russian energy minister about the taxation the oil industry faces signals further the complications Moscow has in extracting revenues from its key resources.
What To Know
In 2023, Russian oil producers faced big tax increases to replace lost revenues resulting from Western sanctions imposed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The sanctions included a G7 and EU-led measure to impose a $60 price cap on seaborne oil, although Moscow has created a "shadow fleet" that has circumvented this move.
The Kremlin's shift saw a move away from taxes on oil linked to the market rate of Urals blend toward an indicator pegged to Brent, the international crude benchmark.
But Rubtsov, director of the oil and gas department in Russia's Ministry of Energy, has sounded the alarm over the tax burden faced by his country's oil industry.
He told an industry conference in Moscow the taxation makes oil production unprofitable and that if prices continued to fall, low production efficiency will deter long-term investment and lead to a stagnation in production.
He said maintaining Russia's oil production at 540 million tons per year until 2050 will require doubling investment in the sector.
In the face of rising costs, "it is necessary to reduce the tax burden," said Rubtsov, according to state news agencies.
David Goldman, head of trading at Novion Global, told Newsweek on Tuesday that Moscow's energy revenues have been slashed because of sanctions and mixed signals from the government on tax highlight an unstable fiscal outlook.
He said that reducing the overall tax burden on Russia's oil producers might boost production in the long term but risks widening the budget gap in the short term.
The government is caught between the need to stimulate investment in a vital sector and fund a growing deficit without further depleting financial reserves, he added.
Goldman noted that although Rubtsov and other officials warn of an unsustainable tax burden threatening future investment and output, Russia's government has shown a selective willingness to ease pressure on some firms, such as gas giant Gazprom, which is set to receive over 30 percent in tax relief in 2025.
What People Are Saying
Anton Rubtsov, director of the oil and gas department in Russia's Ministry of Energy: "The tax burden is so substantial that today many options to maintain production are simply unprofitable."
David Goldman, head of trading at Novion Global: "The situation in Russia's oil industry is far from clear-cut. While Anton Rubtsov and other officials warn of an unsustainable tax burden threatening future investment and output, the government has shown a selective willingness to ease pressure on key firms."
What Happens Next
Russia's "shadow fleet" of oil tankers was one focus for the EU's 17th package of sanctions imposed last week and an 18th package of sanctions is being planned.
Meanwhile, anticipation is building over whether the Trump administration will include oil in the sanctions that the U.S. president has threatened if Putin does not agree to peace talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
B2s Dropped Six Bunker Busters on Iran's Fordow, Fox Host Says Citing Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump announced Saturday evening that the United States had conducted "very successful" airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities, marking the first direct U.S. military involvement in the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. According to Fox News host Sean Hannity, citing Trump administration sources, six bunker-busting bombs were dropped on the Fordow facility from U.S. Air Force B-2 bombers, while Isfahan and Natanz were targeted with Tomahawk cruise missiles from submarines. "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home." The GBU-57s, better known as "bunker busters" or Massive Ordnance Penetrators, can only be carried by B-2 bombers, with each aircraft capable of carrying two of these 30,000-pound weapons at a time. Multiple B-2 stealth bombers were detected heading west across the Pacific on Saturday, as speculation mounted that the U.S. would strike Fordow. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump takes heat from Dems and GOPers over decision to bomb Iran: ‘Another foreign war'
A handful of lawmakers on both sides of the aisle fumed at President Trump's decision to bomb top nuclear facilities in Iran and accused him of violating the Constitution. On Sunday, Trump announced that he had ordered strikes to target Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. Trump noted that all planes successfully departed Iranian airspace and were 'safely on their way home.' 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war,' firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a top Trump ally, lamented. Advertisement Several lawmakers of both parties met President Trump with fuming responses to his decision to bomb nuclear facilities in Iran. REUTERS 'There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear-armed nation. This is not our fight.' Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who hasn't been shy about splitting with Trump in the past, simply declared: 'This is not Constitutional.' Advertisement Top Intel Committee Democrat Jim Himes (D-Conn.) similarly accused Trump of exceeding his presidential authorities with the strikes. 'According to the Constitution, we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,' Himes fumed on X. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) simply declared: 'This is not Constitutional.' in response to the bombings. Getty Images Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) also called it an 'unambiguous impeachable offense.' Advertisement 'This is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress,' Casten said on X. 'I'm not saying we have the votes to impeach. I'm saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval and if Johnson doesn't grow a spine and learn to be a real boy tomorrow we have a BFing problem that puts our very Republic at risk.'
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Iran Says Nuclear Sites Evacuated Before US Strikes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Iranian nuclear sites that President Donald Trump says were struck by the United States were reportedly evacuated ahead of the strikes, Iran's semi-official Mehr News Agency reported. "IRIB's political deputy says that Iran had evacuated the three nuclear sites some while ago," Mehr reported. Trump said in a post on Truth Social Saturday that the U.S. had struck Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space," Trump said, adding, "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow." "All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter," Trump concluded. The attacks mark the first direct military involvement by the United States amid the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump said in a later post on Truth Social that he will address the nation at 10 p.m. Saturday night ET. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
