Australia urged to spend big while green iron is hot
Australia has a unique opportunity to trade its dirty coal and gas industry for cleaner green iron market and make four times the revenue from its export by 2060, a study suggests.
But there are hurdles to producing green iron in Australia, the report says, and government and businesses need to invest to beat rival nations racing to cash in on the opportunity.
The Superpower Institute released the findings in its Green Iron Plan for Australia report on Monday, analysing potential restrictions and opportunities to establishing a local industry.
The research comes three months after the government announced a $1 billion investment in green iron production, including $500 million to support existing and new developments.
Green iron is produced using renewable energy resources such as hydrogen and electricity generated by the sun and wind rather than coal or gas, and has the potential to cut 90 per cent of emissions from the steelmaking process.
Australia is considered a strong potential green iron producer as it is the world's biggest iron ore exporter, but the report identified three obstacles to its production.
Early investors were not being given enough financial support, infrastructure to support its production was lacking, and the absence of an international carbon price made it hard to compete with fossil fuel-based iron, the report found.
If these issues were addressed, Australia could have a clear pathway to producing green iron, cutting emissions and taking advantage of its natural resources, Superpower Institute chair Rod Sims said.
"If anyone is going to make green iron, it's going to be Australia," he told AAP.
"Every international study I've seen - and I've seen a few - says that if you want green iron, Australia is either one of the small number of top places or is the best place to do it."
Introducing a green iron production tax credit of $170 per tonne could temporarily address the lack of a carbon price, the report found, while grants of up to 30 per cent could help to establish early green iron projects.
Other recommendations include introducing a green hydrogen certification scheme and researching trade opportunities.
Australia could generate up to $386 billion a year from green iron by 2060, the report found.
Mr Sims said the nation should aim to have between two and four projects in operation by 2030.
"Australia is the world's largest producer of gas and coal combined but they will go down as the world moves to net zero, therefore you need a foot in the other camp," he said.
Small green iron plants are already planned in countries including Germany, Sweden and Namibia.
Superpower Institute chief executive Baethan Mullen said Australia should not delay investments.
"The global race to secure green iron production is already underway," he said.
Green iron projects in Australia include Fortescue's Christmas Creek project, expected to begin production before the end of 2025, and a $3.5 billion Gladstone project backed by Quinbrook Infrastructure Partners.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
32 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Indigenous art fair weaves legacy through every fibre
What started as a small market to support Aboriginal arts, crafts, tourism and bush food businesses now attracts vendors from the most remote corners of the nation. The Blak Markets began in Sydney's La Perouse in 2014, providing a space for Indigenous artists and small businesses to showcase their wares. It grew so popular they decided to open it up to arts centres from across Australia in 2017, said Peter Cooley, the chief executive of First Hand Solutions, which runs the market. "We got 11 arts centres from different parts of the country - Western Australia, the Northern Territory - making that journey over," the Bidjigal man told AAP. "It went crazy. People flocked knowing that there was going to be remote artists and art centres in town." The success of these markets made Mr Cooley think there was a need for an Indigenous art fair in Sydney. Now in it's sixth year, the National Indigenous Art Fair brings more than 30 remote art centres and almost 100 artists from across Australia together to showcase their works including textiles, fashion, ceramics, homewares and jewellery. Mr Cooley said there was something for everyone at the art fair, but admitted a soft spot for the weaved pieces. "You look at the master weavers and you see how they do their craft and their work and it's just like 'wow'," he said. One such master weaver is Regina Pilawuk Wilson, from the remote community of Peppimenarti, 300 kilometres southwest of Darwin. An internationally acclaimed Ngan'gikurrungurr artist and a cultural leader behind Durrmu Arts, Ms Wilson is known for her paintings based on weaving traditions. She began putting these works on canvas as a way to pass on her legacy, just as she passes her weaving knowledge on to younger members of her family and community. "When I was seven or eight, we used to help my mother get sandpalm and pandanus," she said. "She taught us how to weave and now I'm teaching lots of girls and young generations how to weave. "It is important to teach them so they can carry on what their ancestors used to do before the white people came to Australia." Wilson will host a weaving workshop during the art fair, using the same fibres her mother taught her to weave with, merrepen (sandpalm). The fair will be held in Sydney on July 5 and 6, marking the beginning of NAIDOC Week. Mr Cooley said with the 2025 NAIDOC theme The Next Generation: Strength, Vision and Legacy he hopes the art fair can leave a positive mark for all Australians. "We've just gone through a very difficult period since the referendum ... where we are still exposed to and feel a lot of racism, which seems to be very open these days," he said. "(The art fair) is a great way to put those perceived ideas of how people see us ... to put that to bed."
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Future focus as inflation blare dims but change needed
The man who writes the cheques for Australia's largest state budget can finally focus on the future. Inflation was "blaring" in NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey's ears when he was compiling his first two budgets after Labor returned to government in 2023 for the first time in 12 years. "But the challenge in front of the state and the nation is making sure that we are growing our economy fast enough to support a rise in living standards," he tells AAP as he prepares to hand down his third. Mr Mookhey says Tuesday's state budget is about the future of the state's essential services and economic growth. "There's a lot of opportunity and a lot of ambition in NSW and the changes we're making are designed to hold on to what we love ... but also ensure that our kids and our grandkids have the same level of opportunity that we had," he says. While receding inflation and distance from the COVID-19 pandemic's associated spending have allowed the treasurer to cast an eye to the future, issues from the past remain. Framed in Mr Mookhey's parliament office is a newspaper headline relating to the underpayments scandal in the state's workers' compensation scheme he played a role in exposing in opposition. The page is yellowing with age as Mr Mookhey pushes to reform a scheme he is now in charge of, and which he argues is becoming unsustainable due to the rising cost and prevalence of psychological injuries. "It's been a hard case to argue," he says. "This system is failing everybody. It's a system that is fundamentally broken." Changes are simmering on the back burner after a parliamentary inquiry prevented action before the budget. Mr Mookhey hopes reform can create a "prevention culture" that limits psychological injuries from occurring. Outside of the workplace, he has promised some reassurance to people dealing with mental health issues and their loved ones. "They will see more investment in mental health resources in our health system and they will see more investment when it comes to our social interventions," he says. However, public psychiatrists at the pointy end of mental health crises should not expect the budget to deliver a pay rise at the level they have been calling for amid resignations in protest and arbitration in the state's Industrial Relations Commission. The federal distribution of GST to the states also continues to frustrate Mr Mookhey after dashing his hopes of a surplus in 2024. NSW now receives its lowest share of GST since it was introduced - about 85 cents for every dollar raised. "What frustrates me is not so much that we support the other states, it's just the missed opportunities," he says. The distribution needs to change but the tax's bigger proportional hit on the spending power of lower-income Australians means Mr Mookhey does not support raising the rate. "We can do better," he says. "What we need to focus on is just making sure the system is simple, the distribution is fair, the distribution is predictable, but also the distribution is understandable." Another federal issue with implications for state budgets is the rise of the black market for illicit tobacco fuelled by rising excise on dinky-di durries. The market shift is robbing the Commonwealth of expected revenue and creating criminal complications for states. It has already led to increased funding for enforcement within the health budget, but Premier Chris Minns indicated earlier in June a decision would have to be made about the resources devoted to combating illicit tobacco sales. While smoke clouds what the budget might do to address the issue, Mr Mookhey notes it is a source of public anxiety. "It's right and fair that we respond to community concerns about it ... we're going to have to work through what is the right solution." The tax issues are part of what economic researchers at the e61 Institute call a "vertical fiscal imbalance" that characterises the nation. "The states carry many of the spending responsibilities but lack equivalent revenue-raising capacity," chief executive Michael Brennan says, warning state finances are drifting onto an unsustainable path. But NSW will at least bank a cash surplus in Tuesday's budget for the first time since 2021. "Which means we're no longer borrowing money to pay our day-to-day bills as a government," Mr Mookhey says. "That gives us a platform for further progress." Australian Public Policy Institute chief executive Libby Hackett expects the budget will be a step forward, building on previous years. "This will be a structural reform budget: supporting better service delivery, infrastructure alignment and long-term productivity, even in a tight fiscal environment," Professor Hackett tells AAP. "Moreover, this budget presents a real opportunity to advance whole-of-government objectives in cross-cutting areas." Opposition Leader Mark Speakman sees it differently, warning the state is heading for "yet another low-vision, low-value, low-energy budget". "We have had not one visionary pre-budget announcement."
West Australian
6 hours ago
- West Australian
No easy answers to gas network 'death spiral'
Australians are embracing electrification in the name of decarbonisation, healthier homes and cheaper bills but the shift has policymakers under pressure to insulate a shrinking pool of gas users from price shock. Ron Ben-David, a former regulator who holds a professorial fellowship with the Monash Business School, describes the flight from the gas network as a "death spiral". Like a runaway train, once some households start leaving the gas network, the cost of running and maintaining it increases for those who remain, prompting even more to make the switch. And so on, and so on. While a win for electrification and cutting emissions, the death spiral has consequences, not least for renters and others who might struggle to get off gas. Even middle-income households could be challenged to stump up the hefty sums needed to replace gas heaters, ovens and stoves as gas bills continue to rise. Left unchecked, Dr Ben-David said the problem could undermine community support for the net-zero transition. "If we lose consumer support, then we can kiss the transition away," he told AAP. The stranded gas asset issue has not gone unnoticed, with governments, regulators and industry all looking for solutions Consumer and welfare groups have also been active, with Energy Consumers Australia pushing for a rule change to force developers and new customers to pay the full cost of new connections up front to stop the problem becoming even bigger. Dr Ben-David believes there are no easy solutions to what is ultimately a political decision. The debate boils down to "who pays for what", with consumers, investors and taxpayers all in play. The matter is complicated by the unusual nature of gas distribution regulation. As natural monopolies, gas network companies are not allowed to set their prices. Prices must be approved by the Australian Energy Regulator under what is often described as a "regulatory compact" that ensures investor funds are returned to them during the life of the assets. Forcing investors to cop the risk asset of stranding, therefore, allegedly amounts to a broken compact, Dr Ben-David said, making network stranding more complicated than just writing off a dud investment. For gas network companies, "accelerated depreciation" is the answer. That effectively means asking the regulator to account for the shortened life spans of their assets so they can push up customer prices in the near term to hasten the recovery of their investments. Governments could also help absorb some of the shrinking customer base costs but state and federal budgets are already under strain and bailing out gas networks could be politically contentious. Dr Ben-David has put forward another option. Under his proposed model, electricity distribution networks would underwrite the shrinking gas network. There's more to his thinking, but using income generated by electricity distribution companies - and their customers - to underwrite declining gas networks is a key element. It's based on the rationale that electricity networks would continue to expand and have long life spans in a low-carbon economy. While he concedes it is controversial to be adding to electricity prices to pay off gas networks, he argues the other options are just as unappealing. He also put the call out for better ideas, and fast. "The best time to solve a problem is before the problem takes off," he said.
