
Side Hustles Can Mean Big Tax Trouble - Clear Start Tax Shares How to Avoid IRS Penalties
Clear Start Tax Breaks Down Common Filing Mistakes, Hidden Income Triggers, and What Freelancers Can Do to Avoid IRS Trouble
IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / June 23, 2025 / Millions of Americans now rely on gig work, freelance jobs, and side hustles to make ends meet, but many don't realize they're creating a hidden tax burden in the process. According to Clear Start Tax, side income can quickly trigger IRS scrutiny if it's not reported properly, especially in today's digital economy, where third-party platforms automatically report your earnings.
Whether it's driving for a rideshare service, selling on Etsy, or offering contract work through Upwork, the IRS considers that income taxable, and failure to report it accurately can lead to audits, penalties, and growing tax debt.
"Side hustle income is real income in the eyes of the IRS," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "And with the 1099 rules getting stricter, many taxpayers are being caught off guard by back taxes and enforcement actions they didn't see coming."
Where Side Hustlers Get Into Trouble
Clear Start Tax identifies the most common tax pitfalls freelancers run into, including:
Missing or Misunderstood 1099s - Payments over $600 from platforms like Venmo, Etsy, or Uber are often reported directly to the IRS, even if the taxpayer doesn't receive a paper form.No Estimated Payments - Many gig workers don't realize they're required to pay taxes quarterly. Skipping these payments can lead to underpayment penalties.Improper Deductions - Overstating business expenses - or not claiming legitimate ones - can trigger audit flags.Failure to Report Cash or App Income - Cash jobs and payments from Zelle, PayPal, or other apps are still taxable, even if no 1099 is issued.
"The IRS is getting more aggressive with digital income tracking," added the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "Without proactive reporting and planning, even a modest side job can create a major tax issue."
By answering a few simple questions, taxpayers can find out if they're eligible for the IRS Fresh Start Program and take the first step toward resolving their tax debt.
How IRS Algorithms Flag Side Income in 2025
With enhanced data-matching systems and tighter 1099-K thresholds, the IRS is cracking down on unreported income tied to third-party platforms. In 2025, many taxpayers will receive 1099-Ks for gross payments over $5,000 - and in some states, the threshold is even lower.
Clear Start Tax notes that many gig workers are unaware of these updates until they receive an unexpected IRS letter months after tax season.
How to Stay Compliant - and Out of Trouble
Clear Start Tax recommends that side income earners take the following steps to avoid IRS penalties:
Track Every Dollar: Use a bookkeeping app or spreadsheet to log all income and expenses in real time.Make Quarterly Payments: Use IRS Form 1040-ES to submit estimated taxes and avoid large year-end bills.Don't Ignore IRS Notices: Even small underpayment letters can snowball into enforcement actions if left unaddressed.Get Professional Help: If you've fallen behind or are unsure about how to file, it's better to get help before penalties increase.
How Clear Start Tax Helps Side Hustlers in Trouble
Clear Start Tax works with freelancers, gig workers, and small business owners to resolve tax debt, correct unfiled returns, and negotiate relief through programs like Offer in Compromise or Currently Not Collectible status. Their team begins with a full IRS transcript review to understand each client's exposure, then creates a customized plan to halt collections and get compliant again.
"When side income leads to IRS trouble, it's easy to feel overwhelmed," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "We work with clients to get ahead of enforcement, correct past mistakes, and build a plan that protects their future income."
With IRS enforcement rising in 2025, informed gig workers who act early have the best chance at avoiding penalties and resolving tax issues quickly.
About Clear Start Tax
Clear Start Tax is a full-service tax liability resolution firm that serves taxpayers throughout the United States. The company specializes in assisting individuals and businesses with a wide range of IRS and state tax issues, including back taxes, wage garnishment relief, IRS appeals, and offers in compromise. Clear Start Tax helps taxpayers apply for the IRS Fresh Start Program, providing expert guidance in tax resolution. Fully accredited and A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau, the firm's unique approach and commitment to long-term client success distinguish it as a leader in the tax resolution industry.
Need Help With Back Taxes?
Click the link below:https://clearstarttax.com/qualifytoday/(888) 710-3533
Contact Information
Clear Start TaxCorporate Communications Departmentseo@clearstarttax.com(949) 535-1627
SOURCE: Clear Start Tax
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement
President Donald Trump's signature legislation, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' includes plans for tax cuts, green energy cuts, Medicaid cuts and more. It also contains new retirement account provisions that could affect how Americans plan for their golden years. Be Aware: Read Next: As the landmark bill makes its way from the House to the Senate, here's a look at what you need to understand about how it can affect how you plan for retirement. Many Americans would receive a break on their taxes owed if the bill is passed. This means they would be able to channel more money into retirement savings accounts. 'Retirement planning fundamentally comes down to having sufficient resources to make work optional,' said Brett Horowitz, principal and wealth manager at Evensky & Katz / Foldes Financial Wealth Management. 'The proposed extensions of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act provisions, combined with new deductions for tip income, overtime pay and seniors over 65, could significantly improve retirement outcomes for Americans.' Those who benefited from the cuts in the original Tax Cuts & Jobs Act will continue to enjoy these cuts, allowing them to continue saving for retirement as they had been. 'With many TCJA provisions set to expire at the end of 2025, the House Republican proposal to make these extensions permanent may provide the certainty we need for effective long-term planning,' Horowitz said. 'Retirement modeling depends on clear inputs and stable variables,' he continued. 'The less uncertainty in tax policy, the more accurately we can project success rates. When these changes take effect — pending Senate approval — we'll be able to deliver much better news to clients about their retirement timeline.' Horowitz believes if Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' does not ultimately pass, it could negatively affect Americans' abilities to save for retirement. 'There's a profound psychological difference between telling someone they can retire earlier than expected versus having to extend their working years,' he said. 'The former energizes people about their financial future; the latter can feel overwhelming. These tax provisions create the conditions where more Americans can realistically achieve comfortable retirement.' Learn More: Savvy long-term investment strategies should take taxes into account, so changes to tax laws can shift these strategies. 'Smart investing isn't actually about chasing the highest gross returns — it's about maximizing what clients actually keep after taxes and expenses, and this tax bill addresses some issues there,' Horowitz said. 'While we can control costs through low-fee funds, tax efficiency requires a more nuanced approach that varies by everyone's personal circumstances. 'Higher tax rates push us toward tax-free municipal bonds and tax-efficient ETFs in taxable accounts, while we place tax-inefficient investments in retirement accounts,' he continued. 'This 'tax location' strategy can significantly impact net returns, even if it means accounts perform differently.' 'Two provisions in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act have created the most anxiety for our clients — the SALT deduction cap and estate tax exemptions,' Horowitz said. 'Both are getting significant relief under the current proposal.' The proposed increase in the SALT deduction cap means retirees will face less of a penalty if they choose to spend their golden years in a state with higher income taxes. 'The SALT deduction increase from $10,000 to $40,000 will reshape where people choose to live and retire,' Horowitz said. 'We've already seen migration patterns shift dramatically since 2017, with high-tax states losing residents to states like Florida and Texas. This change reduces the penalty for living in high-income-tax states, though it doesn't eliminate the advantage of no-tax states entirely.' Estate planning strategies would also change for many Americans if the bill were to pass. 'On the estate side, the current $13.99 million exemption was set to drop to $7.14 million in 2026 — a reduction that had wealthy clients scrambling to implement complex gifting strategies and trust structures,' Horowitz said. 'The proposed permanent increase to $15 million per person, or $30 million for couples, provides enormous relief for families in that middle tier.' This is particularly important because of state-level complications, Horowitz continued. 'Take New York, where you could face no federal estate tax, but still owe state estate taxes on estates between $7.16 million and $13.99 million,' he said. 'The interplay between federal and state rules makes domicile planning critical.' The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' should make estate planning less complex for many people. 'For clients who've already implemented sophisticated estate planning strategies, those structures remain valuable,' Horowitz said. 'But for families with estates under the new thresholds, this eliminates the pressure to make rushed gifting decisions or create complex trusts simply to avoid tax cliffs.' Overall, Horowitz believes the bill will make retirement planning easier. 'The permanent nature of these changes — assuming they pass — finally gives families the certainty to make long-term decisions about where to live, how to structure their wealth and when to implement estate planning strategies,' he said. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 4 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Change How You Plan for Retirement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald
41 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Forget Tesla, Ford is eyeing even bigger EV rivals
When most Americans think of electric vehicles, the first brand that comes to mind is Tesla. The brand revolutionized the EV market in the U.S. by making the first mass-market EV with broad commercial appeal. Until recently, Tesla has dominated the U.S. market, but in recent years, its market share has dropped from 70% to 43.4% in the first quarter of 2025. Related: Ford reports another blowout sales month, but trouble could be ahead Now, newcomers from legacy car brands like General Motors and Ford are gobbling up market share as they look to knock Tesla from the top spot. U.S. electric vehicle sales volume jumped 11.4% year over year in the first quarter to 294,250 vehicles sold. This jump was led by GM, which doubled its EV sales from a year ago, while Ford EV sales were up only modestly. Battery electric vehicles reached 7.5% of all new car sales in the first quarter, an improvement from a year ago, but short of the 8.7% peak reached in Q4 2024. GM went from selling 457 EVs in Q1 2022 to nearly 32,000 in Q1 2025. After a disastrous start to the year, Tesla is basically back where it started in 2022 when it sold 129,743. Ford went from selling 6,734 to 22,500 over the same period, but its path has been anything but straight. The company has struggled with inconsistent sales and elusive profitability. However, Ford remains unbowed, and the company has its sights set on a much bigger prize than the U.S. car market. Image source: Olson/Getty Images Ford's electric vehicle division, Ford Model e, lost $5.1 billion in 2024. That was an increase from the $4.7 billion it lost in 2023. The company says it expects to lose $5.5 billion this year. But despite the daunting landscape, the company thinks it has what it takes to turn its fortunes around. Part of that strategy is making an affordable EV that can compete with Chinese models currently dominating the market. Lisa Drake, who leads Ford's EV industrial plan, recently spoke wth investors during a "candid dinner discussion" hosted by Bernstein lead automotive analyst Daniel Roeska. Related: Ford loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs "Lisa Drake was explicit: Ford intends to match the cost structure of leading Chinese players. That means not just battery pricing, but full system cost from chassis and thermal systems to inverters and electronics," Roeska wrote, according to Axios. Ford will use its Advanced Electric Vehicle program to build an EV platform that will support eight different body styles, including trucks, crossovers, and possibly sedans. So Ford believes it can compete wth the BYDs of the world that dominate the Chinese EV market, which is much larger than the U.S. one. Ford has already announced that the first product will be a mid-sized pickup. But it will rely on an estimated $700 million federal tax credit this year that a Republican-led Congress could easily cancel. Ford released its May car sales report on Tuesday, June 3. The company reported a 16.3% increase in May sales to 220,959, mainly due to its biggest, most gas-guzzling models. Ford SUVs saw a 23% sales increase to 83,000, led by the Explorer, which had over 20,500 sold in the month. Meanwhile, Ford Trucks saw an 11.2% increase to 121,354 units sold. Overall, Ford has sold 930,925 vehicles to date, a 6.1% year-over-year increase, despite the specter of tariffs upsetting the whole apple cart. However, one area for the company that wasn't in the green was electric vehicle sales. More Ford news Popular Ford newcomer overtakes Jeep in a key areaFord CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffsFord loses its last cheap vehicle to tariffs Ford sold 25% fewer electric vehicles this month than last, accelerating a declining sales trend for a segment of the company's brand that had been experiencing growth. The Mustang Mach-E was the lone electric vehicle model to see sales growth, with an 11% increase to 4,274. In fact, the Mach E is inching toward overtaking its non-electric brother in sales. Mustang sales were down 3% in the month to just over 5,000 sold. Related: Ford CEO Jim Farley has a strong take on tariffs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Starving The Watchdog—Budget Cuts To IRS-CI Undercut Crime Fighting
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: A sign for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is seen outside its ... More building on February 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. Members of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) arrived at the Internal Revenue Service to begin examining the agency's operations. (Photo by) The Department of Government Efficiency's proposal to cut up to 25% of IRS staffing earlier this year is a textbook case of false economy. Among the casualties in the fiscal pruning is the IRS Criminal Investigation division—one of the few federal agency divisions that, rather than costing money, regularly recovers more money than it spends. In 2024 alone, CI helped claw back $9.1 billion in fraudulent proceeds—with a budget of less than $800 million. Raw numbers only tell part of the story, as IRS-CI plays a central role in dismantling financial networks behind everything from international drug trafficking and terrorism to pandemic fraud and offshore tax shelters. Workforce and budget cuts don't just shrink the IRS ranks, they weaken law enforcement, threaten ongoing tax compliance, and ultimately make it easier for the wealthiest criminals to operate with impunity. Efficiency, it turns out, isn't just about firing employees. High ROI Law Enforcement Taken as a whole, IRS-CI is one of the federal government's most cost-effective investments. According to a recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, CI's budget grew to $779 million by 2023, a modest increase by the standards of Washington. In return, taxpayers received a 90% conviction rate, over 2,600 investigations initiated, more than $1.2 billion in asset seizures, $1.7 billion in restitution, and $9 billion in uncovered fraud. The numbers speak for themselves: CI returns many multiples of its cost to the Treasury, even before accounting for intangible returns like any effects it may have on deterrence. The policy logic here should be self-evident—an agency that pulls in more than it costs should be the last place to target when looking for cost-saving cuts. All the same, CI now finds itself on the chopping block—not because it underperforms but, apparently, because its ongoing success isn't politically expedient. IRS-CI Reach IRS Criminal Investigation is deeply embedded in some of the current administration's highest priorities. CI agents don't merely pore over tax returns, looking for inappropriate business expense deductions, they infiltrate cartels, track terror financing, and expose shell companies laundering money through global financial networks for all manner of ills. In 2023, CI helped root out fentanyl trafficking networks linked to the Sinaloa cartel and Chinese money laundering firms. These aren't abstract wins that IRS-CI happened to play some bit part in—they're real-world enforcement actions with direct implications for both safety and national security. Despite playing a central role in bipartisan enforcement priorities, from counter-narcotics and sanctions evasion to terrorism, CI is now facing a hiring freeze and looming cuts. Unless the pursued efficiency is on behalf of criminal elements, the proposed reductions risk contravening the administration's policy priorities. IRS-CI As Signal The IRS doesn't audit every return and, even when artificial intelligence reaches its zenith, it likely never will. What holds the tax system together isn't the omnipotence of the auditor, but the shadow of the audit—the perception that cheating is risky and noncompliance has dire consequences. Ultimately however, paying taxes is more than a legal obligation, it's a form of social signaling. People comply not just to avoid known penalties, but to affirm their identity as law-abiding citizens in good standing. That behavior is heavily conditioned, if in an attenuated sense, on the visible strength of enforcement. Folks pay their taxes so long as they believe others are paying their fair share and that not doing so would be socially frowned upon. Remove any of those premises and the argument for being honest on your returns falls apart. With every staffing and funding cut, the signal begins to fade. This isn't just a shift in bureaucratic priorities—it's the start of a feedback loop that potentially ends in compliance collapse. As enforcement wanes, high- Outlook Slashing IRS-CI resources might make for a cleaner budget line in 2026, but it's the epitome of short-term thinking. The coming rollback risks coming just as enforcement was regaining traction after years of cuts. In recent years, CI began targeting high-income tax evaders more aggressively, including a campaign in 2024 that brought in $1 billion from 1,600 millionaires. These are complex cases that require skilled agents, time, and resources. Scaling back now sinks not only future collections, but past expenditures made to spool up investigative momentum. The same administration calling for tougher action on drug cartels and foreign adversaries is proposing cuts to the unit that leads financial investigations into those bad actors. This isn't just fiscal negligence—it's reckless incoherence.