Almost 70% of top Australian universities tumble in global ranking amid Trump-era attacks and international student cuts
Dozens of Australia's top universities have tumbled down in a global ranking amid a 'turbulent year' for higher education, as attacks from Donald Trump's second administration exacerbated years of disruption for the embattled sector.
The University of Melbourne, Australia's highest performer, dropped seven places to 19th in the QS World University Rankings, run by the global higher education specialist Quacquarelli Symonds, while the University of Sydney dropped from 18th in the world to 25th.
The University of New South Wales, the nation's second best performer, dropped from 19th to 20th.
The rankings, released on Thursday, drew from millions of academic papers and insights from 127,041 academics across 1,501 universities in 106 countries.
Overall, 25 of Australia's 36 ranked universities (69%) declined in this year's results and just seven moved up, amid the rise of competitors in the Asia-Pacific region.
It was the third biggest percentage drop in the world behind Austria (88%) and Russia (85%), at the same time as the US continued to perform the best among the traditional big four study destinations, which include Australia, the UK and Canada.
Angel Calderon, the director of strategic insights at RMIT and a member of the rankings advisory board, said recent federal government discussions on limiting the number of international students coupled with financial constraints had not helped universities.
'Over the past five years, we have seen the reputation of Australian universities gradually decreasing,' he said.
'Organisational restructuring, staff movements, operational deficits, and any kind of disruption are likely to influence institutional perceptions elsewhere.'
The categories rank universities based upon their reputation, teaching and learning, research impact, internationalisation and, since 2022, sustainability.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Australia was particularly hard hit in its academic and employer reputation, with 20 and 30 universities declining in rank respectively in those categories. However, it continued to perform strongly in its citations per faculty and global engagement, including international faculty members.
Calderon said the poor performance came at the same time universities in Asian countries were 'rapidly improving' because of increased government or private sector investment in education and research.
Mainland China and India had particularly strong upward trends, with more than 40% of their universities rising in the rankings, while four of New Zealand's eight universities also improved compared with last year.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology retained the top position for the 14th consecutive year, followed by Imperial College London and Stanford University.
'The inconvenient truth is that reputation is an issue which continues to adversely impact Australian universities' performance in global rankings,' Calderon said.
'The relative decline in standing for both the academic and employer reputation measures has been in the making for several years. Here lies a key opportunity for the collective of Australian universities to ensure learners are better supported.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'The results are a wake-up call to Australia … our universities must adapt by providing quality education to the communities they serve if they want to remain competitive, relevant, and boost national productivity.'
Despite the dire overall picture, Australia still ranked fifth globally for the proportion of universities ranked in the world's top 100, with 25% making the list, behind Hong Kong and Singapore (56% and 50% respectively).
Nine Australian universities were ranked in the top 100. But of those, five of the high performing Group of Eight (Go8) sandstones moved down.
The CEO of QS, Jessica Turner, said there were 'areas of concern' for Australia's higher education system, pointing to the reputation dip coupled with a government crackdown on international students.
Since 2023, the commonwealth has introduced a range of migration reforms to 'restore integrity' to the international education sector, including higher visa fees and English language requirements and slowed visa processing for some 'high risk' countries.
'International students have been drawn into a wider national debate in Australia around migration and housing, where they are sometimes perceived as contributing to systemic pressures,' she said.
'In what has been a turbulent year for Australian higher education, universities are calling for sustainable research funding models and greater policy certainty around international education.
'These are critical to safeguarding and strengthening one of Australia's greatest national assets, particularly as the country faces growing competition from across the APAC region.'
At least seven Australian universities have had research programs temporarily suspended by the Trump administration this year, while a dozen universities were sent a questionnaire asking to confirm whether they aligned with US government interests.
The chief executive of the Go8, Vicki Thomson, said the results came against a backdrop of global uncertainty and 'mixed messaging' from Australia's largest research partner, the US.
'This … threatens our very capacity to deliver on our mission of education and research,' she said.
'And yet despite these headwinds, Australia continues to punch above its weight … that we have two Go8 members ranked in the top 20 and six in the world's top 50, is an outstanding result and must not be taken for granted but rather leveraged in these contested times.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
News live: nearly 4,000 Australians trying to evacuate Israel and Iran, Marles says; body found in search for missing man in NSW
Update: Date: 2025-06-21T22:49:34.000Z Title: Richard Marles Content: The defence minister, , is up on Sky News in the first of the Sunday morning political interviews. Marles has provided an update on the number of Australians attempting to leave Iran and Israel amid the latest conflict between the two nations. As of Sunday morning, he said there were 3800 Australian citizens - 2600 in Iran and 1200 in Israel - seeking government assistance to evacuate the countries. Marles said the government had a civilian charter plane on standby but it couldn't yet depart because the airspace over Iran and Israel remains closed. 'So we really are poised to provide whatever assistance we can in the event that airspace opens.' Update: Date: 2025-06-21T22:49:00.000Z Title: Good morning Content: Welcome to another Sunday morning Guardian live blog. The defence minister, Richard Marles, says nearly 4,000 Australians have applied for government assistance to leave Israel and Iran. Marles said the Australian government had a charter plan on standby to assist in an evacuation but it could not depart as the sky over Iran remains closed. New South Wales police have found the body of an 81-year-old man in the Moruya area after midnight on Saturday. Police found the body in a white ute after a search of the area but are not treating the death as suspicious at this stage. I'm Royce Kurmelovs and I'll be taking the blog through the day. With that, let's get started …
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
King or crook?: the enduring legacy of Queensland's political strongman Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen
'Sir Joh will be remembered, and he will long be remembered. But not for what he wanted to be remembered for.' This was my prediction when Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen died in 2005, heading up one of a number of obituaries. Propelling my pen was a sense of obligation to do justice to the stunted opportunities and deliberate and casual cruelties inflicted on the state and many, many, Queenslanders under Australia's most blinkered, authoritarian and corrupt postwar regime. The balance in the initial flood of obituaries was about two-thirds more adulation than condemnation. Cranes on the skyline and huge holes in the ground carried more weight than stamping on civil liberties and corruption. There is much better balance in newly minted television documentary Joh: Last King of Queensland, airing on Stan this weekend. Its signature touch is having Sir Joh present as actor Richard Roxburgh delivering characteristic monologues to answer or more typically homily his way around any questions or criticisms of his conduct. Vignettes from family, friends, political luminaries, journalists, historians and opponents and a wealth of available footage keep the narrative going. Back then, Joh's quite deliberate – even trained – incoherent rambling was all too frequently excessively tidied up by reporters and then judged by commentators as evidence of his political acumen. Of course, it also opened up opportunities for us reporters. Once, on a slow news day when he was still speaking to me, I asked Joh whether he was contemplating sending the then Liberal leader, Sir Llew Edwards, off to a coveted London posting. Nothing in his 'Well, you know Phil …' constituted a direct denial so yes, there was a story. It is easy to caricature much of Bjelke-Petersen's reign. Presumably Sir Joh had a hand in the wording of the citation for his 1984 knighthood, which noted he was 'a strong believer in the concept of parliamentary democracy' who had made 'many improvements in the parliamentary process'. This not long after the Liberals had abandoned the Coalition due to Joh's refusal to countenance parliamentary committees and while the legislative assembly continued to turn in new records for the brevity of its sitting sessions. In truth, Sir Joh (1968-1987) was the last and second-longest lasting of a string of strongmen Australian state premiers – Robert Askin (New South Wales: 1965-1975), Henry Bolte (Victoria: 1955-1972), Sir Charles Court (Western Australia: 1974-1982) and Thomas Playford (South Australia: 1938-1965). All were conservative and variously notorious for riding roughshod over Westminster traditions and disregard of civil liberties, abuse of the electoral system, and tolerance or participation in corruption. Even considering Askin's organised crime associations, Bjelke-Petersen was to surpass them all. Of many biographies, my vote for both best and best titled goes to Evan Whitton's The Hillbilly Dictator. That Queensland suffered for longer and graduated into such a relic of poor governance was, in Sir Joh's only valid defence, in part because a long string of Labor governments had demolished an inconvenient upper house and thoroughly gerrymandered the electorate. The Coalition government which fell, somewhat surprised, into government in 1956 ignored the pungent smell of corruption around Frank Bischof and appointed him police commissioner. In 1963, in the National Hotel royal commission, a future chief justice of the high court of Australia was successfully hoodwinked into a finding of negligible police corruption. Tony Fitzgerald, looking at many of the same names in much more senior positions 24 years later, found otherwise. Sir Joh, initially an impassioned critic of Labor's gerrymander, went on to embrace the innovation of making islands of Aboriginal communities within other electorates. Policing became political, increasingly aimed at opponents of the regime. A notable shortage of real communists (Queensland police had nearly beaten Australia's only ever Communist member of parliament to death in 1948) did not deter the anti-communist rhetoric Joh aimed at the Labor party, unions, university students and Aboriginal activists. Sir Joh long denied even the possibility of corruption in the police force, well beyond the optimum point to beat a hasty retreat to 'I knew nothing'. It is hard to reconcile this with the Fitzgerald inquiry's ability to acquire the records of any cabinet meeting of interest but one – the one that saw Terry Lewis appointed as commissioner of police. All of this is relatively well canvassed in Last King. My only quibble is that it leaves the question of whether Sir Joh was personally corrupt unnecessarily unresolved. When Sir Joh died, so did the defamation writ that he had issued years before for my publishing the details of the corruption charges that had been prepared against him in relation to brown paper bags of cash delivered to his office. True, he never faced these particular charges, but allegations of lying to Fitzgerald about the brown paper bags was the essence of the trial that brought him within a Young National juryperson of becoming the first Australian premier to be consigned to a term in prison. The special prosecutor judged Sir Joh too old to face a second trial before a fresh jury – unfortunate for the sake of history, and also in that it would have deterred Sir Joh from launching a ludicrous $338m claim against Queensland and Queenslanders for personal damages arising from the Fitzgerald inquiry. Other tribunals, however, were able to make definitive rulings. An outstanding A Current Affair program in 1989 detailed the largesse given to Bjelke-Petersen by construction magnate Sir Leslie Thiess. Thiess immediately sued for defamation and lost, the jury finding that Sir Leslie had bribed Sir Joh on an extravagant scale, defrauding his own shareholders in the process. Bjelke-Petersen's pioneering role in the bribe by way of defamation settlement racket was then highlighted by the Australian Broadcasting Tribunal. When Alan Bond let it slip that threats to his business were a feature of a 1986 $400,000 payment to Sir Joh in settlement of a 1983 defamation case, the tribunal delved deeper into whether Bond was a fit and proper enough person for a sizeable lump of the broadcast spectrum. Backing up the tribunal, the high court outlined Bond's proposal to pay Bjelke- Petersen the $50,000 Channel Nine's lawyers thought was a reasonable or at least defensible sum, with the $350,000 balance to meet his demands to come as 'a payment overseas related to assets, a loan without obligation to repay or an excessive payment for the sale of property'. But Bjelke-Petersen was too greedy and too needy – or too vengeful – for any of this, and the settlement made the television news and ultimately put Bond out of the television business. Karma also seems to have intervened after Bjelke-Petersen cajoled a large loan out of a foreign bank, with the internal documentation showing this as a balance of inducements and menaces decision somewhat at variance to the applicable credit rating. But appreciation of the Swiss franc then brought the Bjelke-Petersen family enterprises close to penury. Last King does note Bjelke-Petersen's deficient understanding of conflicts of interest, in his trying to put it over that it was perfectly OK for his wife, Florence, to hold the preferentially issued Comalco and Utah shares. In essence, enough evidence with enough in the way of judicial proceedings was lying for Last King not to leave the question of Bjelke-Petersen's personal corruption hanging. Last King deserves a notable place in the voluminous memorabilia around Sir Joh. The life and times (and crimes) of Sir Johannes Bjelke-Petersen are indeed pertinent to the current state of the world and Last King should be wheeled out at regular intervals and be a curricula staple to remind us. Phil Dickie is a Gold Walkley winner and author of bestselling book The Road To Fitzgerald: Revelations of Corruption Spanning Four Decades. His reporting on the Bjelke-Petersen government is credited, along with an ABC Four Corners program, with sparking the Fitzgerald corruption inquiry Joh: Last King of Queensland premieres on Stan on 22 June
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Queensland MP calls for return of vagrancy laws to allow police to prosecute homeless people
A Gold Coast Liberal National party MP has called for the return of vagrancy laws to allow police to prosecute homeless people amid an ongoing crackdown on tent cities in Queensland. Ray Stevens, the member for Mermaid Beach, made the call in a speech to parliament last week. He spoke about the rise of 'presumably homeless people' setting up in tents in 'some of the most sought after locations anyone could wish for – absolute beachfront' in his electorate. 'There are many local voices contacting my office to ask what I am doing to protect their residential amenity. My first call of course is to my local police station,' he said. 'The police reluctantly tell me they have no legislative power to move these people on, which I find incredibly disappointing. The vagrancy act is no longer applicable and unless there is demonstrable public disturbance the police, I am told, cannot move them on. This is unacceptable.' 'It is imperative a solution be found that includes giving law enforcement officers the legislative power to enforce the removal of these illegal camp sites,' he said. The 1931 Vagrants, Gaming, and Other Offences Act made 'having no visible lawful means of support or insufficient lawful means' an offence subject to six months' prison. It also banned begging, public drunkenness, fortune telling, using bad language and more. It was repealed in 2005. South-east Queensland is facing its worst housing crisis in generations, with hundreds living in tent cities or sleeping bags. Councils in the Gold Coast, Moreton Bay and Brisbane have carried out a campaign of clearing the camps in recent months. Council rangers don't have the same powers of detention as arrest, though they can levy a fine and can remove property such as tents from public land. Police typically accompany them during homeless camp clearances but only as a supporting element. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email A University of Queensland law professor, Tamara Walsh – who has long studied laws criminalising homelessness – said police can still charge people with public nuisance offences. But they tend not to because doing so is extremely expensive to the taxpayer, due to the cost of putting an offender through court and jail. 'If people are living in poverty and unhoused, then that is a housing issue. It's a social welfare issue, it's not a criminal law issue,' she said. Walsh said homelessness is typically not a choice, so punishing people for being homeless can't make them stop. 'I wonder how many people would swap their very comfortable, warm home for a beachfront squat at the moment, I certainly wouldn't. Yeah, the view is spectacular, but at night you can't see a thing and all you are is in the freezing cold,' she said. North West Community Group president, Paul Slater, said bringing back the act would be a step in the wrong direction. 'Making homelessness illegal would be a disgrace and would be shameful for our country,' he said. The attorney general, Deb Frecklington, was contacted for comment. The state government is also considering bringing back laws against public drunkenness, contrary to the recommendations of the 1991 royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody. Stevens said that he understood 'that there must be solutions to where the homeless people can be moved to' but that he had heard several reports of bad behaviour on the part of the homeless, including one father who saw two of them 'fornicating in the public toilets'. Council rangers moved on a tent city in Rebel Wilson park in the Gold Coast on Tuesday. A few kilometres away, the National Homelessness Conference was being held at the same time.
