A New Rulebook For Stablecoins ...The GENIUS Act Explained
Stablecoin backed by the U.S. dollar.
The era of unguided stablecoin issuance in the United States might be ending. U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty's GENIUS Act—short for Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins—clears the U.S. Senate. With it, Congress begins to draw a definitive line around one of the most consequential innovations in digital finance: a dollar-backed stablecoin.
Unlike previous legislative efforts that stumbled over partisan divides or technical incoherence, the GENIUS Act passed with bipartisan support. It is a serious, detailed, and targeted law that understands what stablecoins are and how they should function in a modern economy. At first glance, the law does not criminalize innovation. It clarifies the rules of engagement. And that is precisely what the crypto ecosystem needed.
At its core, the GENIUS Act establishes that only licensed and supervised entities can issue payment stablecoins in the United States. These are digital assets redeemable for U.S. dollars at par value, intended for payments and settlements. Under the law, only three types of issuers are permitted: (1) subsidiaries of insured banks and credit unions, (2) specially chartered nonbank firms approved at the federal level, and (3) entities regulated by states whose regimes are certified by the U.S. Treasury as substantially similar to federal standards. Presumably, if an issuer does not fall under these three types, that issuer cannot issue stablecoins to U.S. residents.
Each stablecoin must be backed one-to-one with safe, liquid assets. These seemingly include U.S. dollars, demand deposits, short-term Treasuries, and overnight repurchase agreements. Annual audits are required only for issuers with more than $50 billion in outstanding stablecoins. The law also bars stablecoin issuers from engaging in other business lines unless explicitly authorized. In short, the law creates a narrow but stable foundation for the industry to build on.
Importantly, the GENIUS Act does not force every stablecoin issuer into the federal pipeline immediately. Smaller firms, those with less than $50 billion in market capitalization, can still operate under state supervision, provided their state regime meets baseline federal standards. However, once they grow past that threshold, they must transition to federal oversight within 360 days. This federal trigger mechanism ostensibly allows for innovation and entry while scaling supervision proportionally to systemic risk.
The law also strengthens consumer protections. Stablecoins cannot be marketed as insured by the federal government. Custodians must segregate customer assets and are legally barred from treating them as proprietary. In the event of an issuer bankruptcy, stablecoin holders are granted first priority over reserve assets. This change to the bankruptcy code brings stablecoins closer to the treatment consumers already expect from cash equivalents.
What makes the GENIUS Act so notable is that it finally treats stablecoins as payment infrastructure, not speculative investment vehicles. The law strongly signals that properly structured stablecoins should not be treated as securities or commodities, though further clarification may still be needed from regulators. This may help resolve years of jurisdictional confusion and open the door for financial institutions, payment processors, and fintech firms to build with confidence.
Still, the law imposes serious limits. It effectively shuts out anonymous protocols, offshore entities, and experimental designs that cannot meet the legal and capital requirements. Decentralized finance platforms and unaudited startups will have to either partner with compliant issuers or leave the U.S. market. Some will view this as a loss for innovation. Others will recognize it as a necessary step toward maturity.
There is also unfinished business. The law calls for further study of algorithmic and self-collateralized stablecoins, leaving open the possibility that new models could be incorporated under future amendments. It also encourages regulators to develop interoperability standards, though it stops short of mandating any specific technical solution. This is the correct avenue because regulation should evolve alongside the technology, not try to freeze it in place.
Now that the GENIUS Act has passed the Senate and awaits House approval, the question becomes implementation. The Treasury Department, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and state regulators must coordinate to certify regimes, approve new charters, and monitor compliance. If done well, this could serve as a model for other areas of crypto regulation. If done poorly, it could entrench incumbents and stifle new entrants.
But the legislation itself attempts to address the fundamental risks posed by unregulated digital dollars while preserving room for innovation. It avoids the false choice between banning stablecoins and embracing chaos. It gives the industry a real path to legitimacy—one that depends on disclosures, audits, and public trust, not hype.
Ultimately, the stablecoin market will look different going forward. Issuers will need compliance teams. Consumers will get clearer information and stronger protections. Some projects will leave. Others will grow stronger. That is what happens when technology enters the domain of public infrastructure.
The GENIUS Act gives stablecoins some guidance to follow. Now, we wait for it to be signed into law, and meanwhile, the industry must catch up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI supremo Sam Altman says he 'doesn't know how' he would have taken care of his baby without the help of ChatGPT
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. For a chap atop one of the most high profile tech organisations on the planet, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's propensity, shall we say, to expatiate but not excogitate, is, well, remarkable. Sometimes, he really doesn't seem to think before he speaks. The latest example involves his status as a "new parent," something which he apparently doesn't consider viable without help from his very own chatbot (via Techcrunch). "Clearly, people have been able to take care of babies without ChatGPT for a long time,' Altman initially and astutely observes on the official OpenAI podcast, only to concede, "I don't know how I would've done that." "Those first few weeks it was constantly," he says of his tendency to consult ChatGPT on childcare. Apparently, books, consulting friends and family, even a good old fashioned Google search would not have occurred to this colossus astride the field of artificial, er, intelligence. If all that's a touch arch, forgive me. But the Altman is in absolute AI evangelism overdrive mode in this interview. "I spend a lot of time thinking about how my kid will use AI in the future," he says, "my kids will never be smarter than AI. But they will grow up vastly more capable than we grew up and able to do things that we cannot imagine, they'll be really good at using AI." There are countless immediate and obvious objections to that world view. For sure, people will be better at using AI. But will they themselves be more capable? Maybe most people won't be able to write coherent prose if AI does it for them from day one. Will having AI write everything make everyone more capable? Not that this is a major revelation, but this podcast makes it clear just how signed up Altman is to the AI revolution. "They will look back on this as a very prehistoric time period," he says of today's children. That's a slightly odd claim, given "prehistory" means before human activities and endeavours were recorded for posterity. And, of course, the very existence of the large language models that OpenAI creates entirely relies on the countless gigabytes of pre-AI data on which those LLMs were originally trained. Indeed, one of the greatest challenges currently facing AI is the notion of chatbot contamination. The idea is that, since the release of ChatGPT into the wild in 2022, the data on which LLMs are now being trained is increasing polluted with the synthetic output of prior chatbots. As more and more chatbots inject more and more synthetic data into the overall shared pool, subsequent generations of AI models will thus become ever more polluted and less reliable, eventually leading to a state known as AI model collapse. Indeed, some observers believe this is already happening, as evidenced by the increasing propensity to hallucinate by some of the latest models. Cleaning that problem up is going to be "prohibitively expensive, probably impossible" by some accounts. Anyway, if there's a issue with Altman's unfailingly optimistic utterances, it's probably a lack of nuance. Everything before AI is hopeless and clunky, to the point where it's hard to imagine how you'd look after a newborn baby without ChatGPT. Everything after AI is bright and clean and perfect. Of course, anyone who's used a current chatbot for more than a few moments will be very familiar with their immediately obvious limitations, let alone the broader problems they may pose even if issues like hallucination are overcome. At the very least, it would be a lot easier to empathise with the likes of Altman if there was some sense of those challenges to balance his one-sided narrative. Anywho, fire up the podcast and decide for yourself just what you make of Altman's everything-AI attitudes.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Tariffs Trigger Layoffs: Monopoly Maker Hasbro Slashes Jobs — These Companies Are Cutting Too
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Monopoly maker Hasbro Inc. (NASDAQ:HAS) announced that it has cut 3% of jobs amid higher tariffs on imports from China. Here's a list of five other publicly traded companies that have either reduced their workforce or intend to do so due to the impact of tariffs. What Happened: After announcing 900 job cuts in December 2023, the Hasbro management told Reuters that it laid off 150 employees or 3% of its workforce in its latest cost-cutting effort on June 18, 2025. According to its fiscal 2024 annual filing, the company had roughly 4,985 employees globally. The company CEO, Chris Cocks had hinted the same during the first quarter earnings call stating that 'Ultimately, tariffs translate into higher consumer prices, potential job losses as we adjust to absorb increased costs, and reduced profits for our shareholders.' Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — He had also said during the same call that the expanded rate on imports from China 'is creating volatility and introducing a range of scenarios for how the year could unfold.' Apart from Hasbro, other firms that have reduced their workforce due to tariffs include; Stellantis NV (NYSE:STLA): The automaker announced temporary layoffs of 900 workers across five U.S. facilities due to production pauses at its Canadian and Mexican plants, directly linked to tariffs announced in April 2025. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF): The steelmaker laid off 1,230 workers, with 600 job cuts at its Dearborn, Michigan, plant and 630 at two iron ore mines in Minnesota, citing falling automotive demand due to tariffs on steel and auto imports. United Parcel Service Inc. (NYSE:UPS): UPS announced expected layoffs of approximately 20,000 workers in 2025, citing "current macro-economic uncertainty" and reduced shipping volumes due to tariffs. Volvo ADR (OTC:VLVL): The company plans to lay off 550–800 workers at three U.S. facilities over three months, citing market uncertainty and reduced demand due to tariffs. Deere & Co. (NYSE:DE): The tractor manufacturer laid off 9 workers at its Ankeny, Iowa, facility, as per a Nation of Change report. The company expressed concerns about the impact of tariffs on production It Matters: President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs are on pause till July 9 while the administration is trying to strike deals with its trading partners. Trump declared a sweeping new trade agreement with China via Truth Social following two days of negotiations in London last week, suggesting major concessions from Beijing and lighter U.S. obligations. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump said, adding that the U.S. would reciprocate by allowing Chinese students access to U.S. colleges. The deal includes a significant tariff shift. The U.S. will continue applying tariffs totaling 55% on selected Chinese imports, while China will impose a 10% tariff rate on U.S. goods. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. Arrived Home's Private Credit Fund's has historically paid an annualized dividend yield of 8.1%*, which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Photo courtesy: Kobby Dagan / This article Trump's Tariffs Trigger Layoffs: Monopoly Maker Hasbro Slashes Jobs — These Companies Are Cutting Too originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 growth stocks I've bought for the ‘AI agent' revolution
As a long-term investor, I tend to focus on big, powerful investment themes. And one theme I'm really excited about today is the emergence of 'AI agents' – software that can perform business tasks autonomously. I believe the investment potential here is enormous. With that in mind, here are three growth stocks I've bought for the agentic AI revolution. My number one play on AI agents today is software company Salesforce (NYSE: CRM). It has a product called Agentforce and it's having a lot of success with it. Indeed, since its launch in October last year, the company has signed over 8,000 customers. Of these, around half are now paying for the service. The main reason I'm bullish here is that Agentforce integrates really well with Salesforce's apps and data services (Data Cloud and Tableau Next). This is important – without the right data, agents are likely to be useless. I'll point out that ServiceNow's agentic AI offering also integrates well with data and apps. So, competition from this firm is a risk. However, I like the risk-reward proposition here at today's share price and valuation. Salesforce trades on a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of just 23. I believe the stock offers value at present and is worth considering. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is well known for its generative AI capabilities (it's a part-owner of ChatGPT-owner OpenAI). What a lot of investors don't realise, however, is that this company is also a major player in the agentic AI space. Today, it offers a range of services designed to help developers/organisations build and deploy agents to increase business productivity. For example, Azure AI Foundry Agent Service allows professional developers to build specialised agents to handle complex business tasks. I was buying this growth stock a few months ago when it was near $350. It's now at $480, so doesn't look as attractive as it did back then. That said, I think it's still worth considering for the long term (especially on a 5%-10% pullback). While competition from other cloud computing giants such as Amazon and Alphabet is a risk, I believe this stock has bags of potential. Finally, I think CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) could be a major player in the agentic AI revolution. It's one of the world's leading cybersecurity companies. It offers a solution called Charlotte AI, which CEO George Kurtz refers to as the company's agentic security analyst. This is designed to transform threat detection and response by bringing automation and autonomous reasoning to cybersecurity operations. CrowdStrike should also benefit from other companies' rollout of AI agents. Given that they typically have access to massive amounts of data, they are going to significantly increase the surface area of IT that needs to be protected. Now, this stock is the riskiest of the three. That's because it's a much younger company (meaning it's a little more unproven) and doesn't have a lot of profits at this stage. It has also had a huge run this year, rising over 40%. I still believe it's worth considering, but I think investors are better off waiting for a pullback before buying. The post 3 growth stocks I've bought for the 'AI agent' revolution appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Edward Sheldon has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, and Salesforce. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
