A Belgrade landmark bombed by Nato could get Trump makeover
One of the first sights that greets arrivals to the centre of Serbia's capital Belgrade are government buildings in an advance state of collapse. Nato planes bombed them back in 1999 – and they remain in much the same condition.The message they deliver to visitors could be "welcome to Serbia, our recent history has been tumultuous and complicated – and we still haven't quite finished processing it".Like a smile with a row of broken teeth, the Defence Ministry buildings are still standing. But they clearly took a serious hit when Nato intervened to stop Serbia's then military campaign in Kosovo.As a member of the Western military alliance, the US was implicated in the bombing.
Given that history, last year it came as something of a jolt for Serbians when the government struck a deal with a company called Affinity Global to redevelop the site into a $500m (£370m) luxury hotel and apartment tower complex.Not just because the business concerned is American, but due to the fact its founder is Jared Kushner, best-known as Donald Trump's son-in-law. And because the planned development is due to be called Trump Tower Belgrade.While these has now been a major twist in the tale that puts the scheme in some doubt, the Serbian government's decision to strike the deal wasn't too surprising.Before he became US president in 2016, Donald Trump himself expressed interest in building a hotel on the site.The move also fits a government pattern - as alleged by the Serbian opposition - of allowing foreign investors to profit from public property.They cite, as a prime example, the Belgrade Waterfront residential and retail project, constructed by Emirati developers on land owned by Serbia's railways.Where there used to be rusting rolling stock and derelict sidings, there is now a swish shopping centre, smart restaurants and the oddly bulbous, 42-storey Belgrade Tower. It is not to everyone's taste.
That, however, was a brownfield site, rather than a city centre landmark. The Defence Ministry complex is an entirely different proposition – not least because it acts as a memorial to the casualties of the 1999 bombing campaign.It is also a highly visual reminder of why the vast majority of Serbians remain opposed to Nato, and feel sympathetic towards Russia.In that context, granting a US developer a 99-year lease on the site, reportedly for no upfront cost, is a bold move.But Serbia's president, Aleksandar Vucic, is unapologetic. "It's important to overcome the burden from 1999," he tells the BBC."We are ready to build better relations with the US – I think that is terribly important for this country."
That view garners a degree of sympathy from Belgrade's international business community.Foreign direct investment inflows have more than tripled over the past decade. But GDP per capita remains low compared to EU member states. It stands at just one third of the bloc's average.To keep those figures moving in the right direction, attracting new investors is vital. And while the financial details of the Ministry of Defence development have not been revealed, the New York Times has reported that the Serbian government will get 22% of future profits. "For a small and specific market – ex-Yugoslavia, outside the EU – all publicity is good publicity," says James Thornley, a former senior partner at KPMG Serbia, who is now a partner at financial consultants KP Advisory in Belgrade."If you have major international players coming in, it's a pull, it's a draw. You're getting the name and opportunity out there."Mr Thornley has lived in Serbia for 25 years and is fully aware of the sensitivities surrounding the Defence Ministry complex. But he believes that views would change once people saw the benefits of the development."That site is an eyesore and should be resolved," he says. "Nothing's happened for 26 years, let's get it sorted out."
But not everyone involved with international investment in Serbia is so enthusiastic.Andrew Peirson was the managing director of global real estate giant CBRE in Southeast Europe, and now holds the same role at iO Partners, which focuses entirely on the region.He admits that the shattered state of the Defence Ministry complex is "not good for the city's image", and that the deal to develop the site is "probably good news, because it shows the country can attract big investments".But he has serious qualms about how the government struck the deal with Affinity Global. Mr Peirson says that there was no open tendering process that would have allowed other firms to bid for the site."With state-owned land, you should be able to prove you're getting market value for the site. The way you usually do that is to run a proper tender process," says Mr Peirson."If it had been in UK, Germany, Hungary or even Romania or Bulgaria, there would have been a process; it would have gone through the open market. Developers that were looking to enter Serbia, or already active, would have been given the chance to buy it themselves."Back in 2023 Vucic said he met with Kushner and had an "excellent conversation" with Jared Kushner regarding the "potential for large and long-term investments."And Donald Trump Jr has since made follow up visits to Belgrade after Affinity Global announced that a Trump International Hotel would form part of the development. The role of Trump Jr and the family business is thought to be limited to the hotel.Questions have been raised about the Trumps making commercial deals while Donald Trump is in the White House but his press secretary has rejected any suggestion he is profiting from the presidency.Mr Peirson is concerned that the nature of the Ministry of Defence building deal may irk businesses which have already committed to Serbia."If I'm an investor already putting tens or hundreds of millions into the country, I would feel sad that I hadn't been given the chance," he says.Both Affinity Global and the Serbian government did not respond to requests for comments about how the deal over the site was agreed, and whether or not there was an open tendering process.
Then there is the question of whether a commercial development should be taking place at all. The site, even in its current state, remains architecturally and historically significant.The buildings were originally constructed to welcome visitors to the capital of Tito's Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Architect Nikola Dobrovic created two structures on either side of Nemanjina Street which, viewed together, took the form of a gate.The design also echoes the contours of Sutjeska Gorge, the site of the Yugoslav Partisans' pivotal victory over Nazi forces in 1943. And in 2005, it was granted protected status under Serbia's cultural heritage laws."No serious city builds a modern future by demolishing its historical centres and cultural monuments," says Estela Radonjic Zivkov, the former deputy director of Serbia's Republic Institute for the Protection of Monuments."For Serbia to progress, it must first respect its own laws and cultural heritage," she insists. "According to Serbian law, it is not possible to revoke the protection of this site."
But just when it seemed the site's fate was sealed, Serbian organised crime prosecutors delivered a twist worthy of a Hollywood thriller.On 14 May, police arrested the official who had given the green light for the lifting of the Defence Ministry complex's protected status.Prosecutors said Goran Vasic, the acting director of the Republic Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, had admitted to fabricating an expert opinion which had been used to justify the change of status. He faces charges of abuse of office and forgery of official documents.This admission has been seized on by those opposed to the project as evidence Kushner got preferential treatment. The Serbian government denies this.Where this leaves the Affinity Global project – Trump International Hotel and all – is not entirely clear.Repeated efforts to arrange an interview with the company have been unsuccessful, though it did issue a statement insisting that Mr Vasic had "no connection to our firm", adding that it would "review this matter and determine next steps".Vucic, meanwhile, denies there is any problem with the development. During a meeting of European leaders in Tirana, he said "there was not any kind of forgery".Still, it seems the Defence Ministry's shattered visage will remain unchanged for a while at least. And thanks to the Trump connection, it will offer even more of a talking point for first-time visitors to Belgrade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
US and Iran: What's happening?
The United States has launched military strikes in Iran, attacking three nuclear bases in the in a televised speech from the White House, US President Donald Trump called the operation a "spectacular military success" and warned that Iran should make peace or face "far greater" response to the strikes, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said: "The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences." What's the background to this? The US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites comes just over a week after Israel launched strikes on then Israel and Iran have continued to fire missiles at each and the US have long been allies. Now President Trump has decided to support Israel by joining the attack on said American warplanes attacked three nuclear sites in Iran - including an underground nuclear site called has always said its nuclear research is for peaceful purposes like the strikes President Trump said: "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." What has been the reaction? UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described Iran's nuclear programme as "a grave threat to international security"."Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat," Starmer Foreign Minister David Lammy says "the UK did not participate in these strikes" and urged Iran to "show restraint and reach a diplomatic solution to end the crisis", which means through peaceful UN Secretary-General António Guterres said:"There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace."Since the US bombing, missile attacks between Israel and Iran have continued.
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
US warplanes strike three nuclear sites as Iran warns of 'everlasting' consequences
The US has carried out a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites on Iran, President Donald Trump has said, while Tehran has warned of "everlasting" consequences. Bunker buster bombs were dropped on the heavily protected Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep under a mountain near the city of Qom, as well as sites at Natanz and Isfahan. Satellite imagery has revealed some of the surface damage at Fordow after the US strikes. The dramatic escalation brings the US into direct involvement in the war between Israel and Iran. Tehran's threat of reprisals raises fears of a wider regional conflict. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned that the US strikes "will have everlasting consequences", adding that his country "reserves all options" to retaliate. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said America's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' had "devastated the Iranian nuclear programme" but confirmed the strikes were "not about regime change". "The United States does not seek war, but let me be clear - we will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partners, or our interests are threatened," he said. Iran has repeatedly denied that it is seeking a nuclear weapon, and the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said in June that it has no proof of a "systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon". The Iranian foreign minister told journalists on Sunday morning that he was flying to Moscow to have "serious consultations" with Vladimir Putin. He described Moscow as a "friend of Iran", adding: "We always consult with each other." Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRCG) said that "invaders must now await responses that will bring regret" after US strikes. 2:48 Iran has requested an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council to "maintain international peace and condemn the US strikes", according to state media. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the "bold decision" by Mr Trump, saying it would "change history". Iran's Revolutionary Guard said it launched 40 missiles at Israel on Sunday morning, including its biggest ballistic missile, the Khorramshahr-4. Iranian missiles hit sites in northern and central Israel, including in Haifa, Ness Ziona, Rishon LeZion and Tel Aviv. The UK is preparing to fly British nationals out of Israel, and Israeli airspace will temporarily open today for repatriation flights to land. Countries trying to evacuate their citizens are waiting for the airspace to reopen fully to charter flights out. Gulf states like Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, all home to US military bases, are on high alert after the strikes, with Bahrain urging drivers to avoid main roads and Kuwait setting up shelters. The UK has also further increased "force protection" measures for its military bases and personnel in the Middle East to their highest level. The and reach "a diplomatic solution to end this crisis". "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat," said Sir Keir Starmer. 3:34 However, Mr Araghchi said the US and Israel had "blown up" negotiations and asked: "How can Iran return to something it never left, let alone blew up?" 2:28 US Senator Chris Murphy posted on X after the strikes, saying that he and other senators received a classified briefing last week indicating that Iran did not pose an immediate threat through its nuclear program. "Iran was not close to building a deliverable nuclear weapon," Senator Murphy said. "The negotiations Israel scuttled with their strikes held the potential for success." Addressing the nation in the hours after the strikes, Mr Trump said that Iran must now make peace or "we will go after" other targets in Iran. "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," he said. 1:20 In a post on Truth Social, Mr Trump said: "All planes are safely on their way home", and he congratulated "our great American Warriors". He also threatened further strikes on Iran unless it doesn't "stop immediately", adding: "Now is the time for peace." Sky News understands there was no UK involvement in the strikes. 'Fordow is gone' Among the sites hit was Fordow, a secretive nuclear facility buried around 80 metres below a mountain and one of two key uranium enrichment plants in Iran. "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow," Mr Trump said. "Fordow is gone." There had been a lot of discussion in recent days about possible American involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict, and much of it centred around the US possibly being best placed to destroy Fordow. Meanwhile, Natanz and Isfahan were the other two sites hit in the US attack. Natanz is the other major uranium enrichment plant in Iran and was believed to have possibly already suffered extensive damage in Israel's strikes earlier this week. 1:44 Isfahan features a large nuclear technology centre and enriched uranium is also stored there, diplomats say. 'No increase in radiation levels' US media reported that six 'bunker buster' bombs were used to strike Fordow. However, most of the highly enriched uranium at the Fordow nuclear facility was moved to an undisclosed location ahead of the attack, a senior Iranian source told the Reuters news agency. Personnel numbers were also reduced at the site, according to the report. The International Atomic Energy Agency said that there has been "no increase in off-site radiation levels" after the US airstrikes. Mr Trump said no further strikes were planned and that he hoped diplomacy would now take over. In a briefing with journalists, Iran's foreign minister said Mr Trump had deceived his own voters over his promises not to get involved in any more "forever wars". "While President Trump was elected on a platform of putting an end to America's costly involvement in forever wars in our part of the world, he has betrayed not only Iran by abusing our commitment to diplomacy, but also deceived his own voters."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump's ‘Midnight Hammer' attack on Iranian nuclear sites used more than 125 US aircrafts
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth spoke to reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday, June 22, where he revealed, along with General Dan Caine, the extent of the US military strikes on Iran, titled the 'Midnight Hammer.' General Dan Caine gave a breakdown of the attacks claiming over 125 US aircrafts were involved in the strikes against three of Iran's nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Hegseth claimed they devastated the Iranian nuclear programme, giving credit to US President Donald Trump saying, 'What the president gave us was a focussed, powerful and clear mission on the destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities." Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has called the attack an "act of aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities," calling it a flagrant breech of the UN charter.
