AG's questions on Najib's addendum of public importance

The Federal Court ruled today that seven questions posed by the attorney-general (AG) in the case involving former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak's addendum are of public importance, which should be ventilated before the court.
Chief Judge of Malaya Hasnah Hashim, in granting the AG's leave to appeal over Najib's additional document, said the proposed questions met the threshold requirements under Section 96 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA) 1964.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Barnama

29 minutes ago

• Barnama

SIS Forum Appeal Not Concerned With Substantive Beliefs, Doctrine Of Islamic Faith, Says Federal Court

PUTRAJAYA, June 21 (Bernama) — The appeal by Sisters in Islam (SIS) Forum (Malaysia) does not concern the substantive beliefs in the religion of Islam, its mandates or doctrines relating to the Islamic faith but relates to the exercise of legal powers by certain state authorities, says the Federal Court in its judgment. Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the challenge only concerned the review of the Selangor State Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government's exercise of certain powers under the law, which is distinct from the substance and contents of their decisions. 'While it concerns a certain fatwa (religious edict), the case has neither to do with the substantive beliefs held in the religion of Islam nor does it have anything to do with the administration of the substantive aspects of the religion of Islam,' she said in the 40-page majority judgment. The top judge said in all civilised democracies with independent judiciaries, it is routine for the executive's decisions to be subjected to judicial review and in most cases, the subject matter of the exercise of discretion in the plaint is not the main issue rather the manner in which the decision was made. On Thursday, the Federal Court bench, in a 3-1 majority ruling, held that the 2014 fatwa issued by the Selangor State Fatwa Committee and gazetted by the Selangor state government is valid, but only insofar as it applies to individuals, not companies. The court ruled that a fatwa cannot be imposed on an organisation like SIS Forum as it is not capable of professing a religion. The ruling partially allowed the appeal by SIS Forum and its co-founder Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar to quash the 2014 fatwa, which had declared the group as deviating from Islamic teachings. In the written judgment released on the judiciary's website, Justice Tengku Maimun explained that the Selangor state government and the religious bodies are part of the executive branch and are empowered by the Federal Constitution and laws passed by the Selangor State Legislative Assembly (SLA). 'The fact that they deal with matters pertaining to Islamic faith, dogma and doctrine – are beside the point and these matters are, in any event, not within our purview (of the Civil Court),' she said.

Malaysiakini

3 hours ago

• Malaysiakini

Projek Sama urges swift action on Najib charges, warns of DNAA misuse

Project Stability and Accountability for Malaysia (Projek Sama) has called on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to take immediate steps to restore public confidence in the justice system following another court decision to grant Najib Abdul Razak a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA). The civil society group urged Anwar to direct the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) to promptly refile charges against the former prime minister over RM27 million allegedly linked to SRC International, warning that further delays could lead to full acquittals. 'Without swift and transparent action, DNAA may be used...

Malaysiakini

4 hours ago

• Malaysiakini

We had 'no other choice', AGC says over Najib's DNAA

The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) said it "did not have any other choice" but to await the conclusion of Najib Abdul Razak's 1MDB and the first SRC International trials, before it could use the overlapping documents required for the second SRC International case. The agency emphasised the necessity of securing the required documents as evidence, explaining that...