Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes brings horror flooding back
Photo by Stefania Rosini/Disney+
Jeff Pope's meticulous drama Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes would be a harrowing watch wherever you were in July 2005. But if you happened then to be living or working in London, I must warn you that it brings it all flooding back: the shock, the horror, the fear; the sudden mistrust we all carried with us whenever we travelled by Tube or bus. Those dread-filled weeks. The bombings on 7 July, in which 52 people died and more than 700 were injured. The failed bombings on 21 July (this time, only the terrorists' detonators exploded). The shooting by the police of an innocent, young Brazilian electrician called Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell Underground station on 22 July.
In the past, I haven't always been kind about Pope's work: The Reckoning, the 2023 drama he produced about Jimmy Savile, was, for me, loathsome. But Suspect is brilliantly done, a piece that smoothly dispenses with certain myths even as it delivers what will be new information to some. How attentive it is to all those who were involved. Until now, I was unaware of the quiet bravery of Lana Vandenberghe (Laura Aikman), a Canadian secretary at the Independent Police Complaints Commission, who acted as a whistleblower when it became apparent that what the public was being told about De Menezes's death was contrary to the evidence the IPCC had gathered.
There are four parts, the first two of which are devoted to the bombings – a reminder of the highly febrile atmosphere in which the Metropolitan Police were working. So much is happening. In a tunnel, Cliff Todd (Daniel Mays), a forensic officer, is dealing with 40-degree heat and thousands of body parts. In Whitehall, politicians are holding Cobra meetings and panicking. At New Scotland Yard, Commissioner Ian Blair (Conleth Hill), Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick (Russell Tovey) and the head of the Anti-Terrorist Branch, Andy Hayman (Max Beesley), are running the biggest investigation of their lives. De Menezes is, at this point, a peripheral, happy-go-lucky figure; we see him working, we see him eating toast. He doesn't know – he will never know – that he lives in the same building in Tulse Hill as Osman Hussain, one of the perpetrators of the failed attacks of 21 July.
Pope must have read hundreds of documents before he went to his desk. His minute-by-minute depiction, in the third episode, of how De Menezes came to be mistaken for Hussain, and of the lies that were told about this afterwards, is unmuddied, dramatic enough in itself to need no writerly embellishment; ditto his reconstruction, in the fourth episode, of the 2008 inquest into De Menezes' death (though the sight of Alex Jennings as Michael Mansfield KC in a long grey wig does briefly threaten the solemnity).
But elsewhere, Pope can't resist getting into character, making much of the difficult relationship between Blair and Paddick (the latter is appalled by Blair's handling of events, the way he rushes to make statements before he's in possession of the facts) – and here I wonder slightly at Paul Andrew Williams's direction. Procedural obfuscation doesn't always announce itself loudly, as if it was arriving at a party. Hill makes Blair not only seem like a fool, but a ridiculously camp one at that, his pomposity threatening to bust the buttons of his uniform at moments.
I much prefer the portrait of Cressida Dick (Emily Mortimer), the commander of the surveillance operation that led to the killing of De Menezes: her implacability, her sophistry, her refusal to admit to mistakes. In the end, though, this is the definition of an ensemble piece: James Nelson-Joyce, the star of the BBC's This City Is Ours, plays a firearms officer, and has about three lines. I don't know if the cast were motivated by any cause, but the result, generous and committed, not only pays tribute to De Menezes, and the shameful circumstances of his death; this is also 'J'accuse', on a scale both subtle and grand. No officer ever faced charges for his killing. The Metropolitan Police was merely fined £175,000 for breaching health and safety rules. Dick rose to become its commissioner. Blair (like Paddick) sits in the House of Lords, where the lunches are subsidised, and the recent past is a land only dimly recalled.
Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes
Disney+
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
[See also: Louis Theroux: The Settlers is a deathly warning]
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment fare dodger tells rail inspectors ‘don't touch me' in tense clash after ‘falling £1.30 short for his ticket'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the tense moment a fare dodger told ticket inspectors to not touch him after falling short of being able to afford to travel. The passenger was confronted by revenue protection inspectors at Weybridge station in Surrey after using a discounted ticket for under 15-year-olds, despite being older. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 9 This is the moment two ticket inspectors stopped a young traveller after concerns were raised over his ticket Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law 9 The brazen fare dodger told officers that they 'can't touch' him as he tried to push through to the platforms Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law 9 He's eventually stopped at the top of one staircase by revenue protection officers Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law South Western Railway inspectors were alerted after the ticket - which provides half-price travel for children aged five to 15 compared to a full adult fare - pinged at the gateline. The incredible moment was captured by film crews for the latest episode of Channel 5's Fare Evaders: At War with the Law. Shocking footage shows how the young fare dodger refuses to present his ticket after being asked to do so by inspectors. When asked if his ticket was a child ticket by revenue protection officers Sharon and Carlos, the fare dodger brazenly admits to having a ticket but rejects multiple requests to show it. As the tense moment begins to boil over, the young fare dodger exclaims: "You can't actually physically touch me." Then, he begins to make his way along the walkway over the tracks at the station, heading towards one of the platforms. Despite other officers stepping in to try and help stop the cheat, he appears insistent to make it to his train without showing a valid ticket. Finally, officers manage to block him at the top of the staircase of one platform, confronting him continuously to present his ticket. At one point, an exasperated ticket checker asks: "Why don't you just show us your ticket?", to which the fare dodger replies: "Because I don't need to." Despite his continued protest, the young fare dodger eventually gives in, admitting he had bought a child's ticket, despite being over the age of 15. Top Tory Robert Jenrick becomes 'bobby on the beat' as he confronts fare-dodgers on the Tube Sharon explained that the traveller had been short of buying the adult fare by around £1.30 and had therefore opted to buy the cheaper child ticket instead. As a result, the fare dodger was issued with an "unpaid fare notice", which is the lowest penalty enforced in these situations. It means the young passenger was able to travel without a ticket on the day but he would need to pay the fine within 21 days. Sharon explained: "A colleague's been really fair with him. "He's issued an unpaid fare notice, which is the lowest penalty we can give and it's just the price of the ticket that he should have bought." However, if he failed to pay it within the time frame, he would have faced the risk of prosecution. 9 The crew trying to stop the fare dodger from making his way towards the trains at Weybridge station Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law 9 The young fare dodger eventually gave in to demands, admitting he had bought a child's ticket despite being over the age of 15 Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law 9 Inspector Sharon explained he had been around £1.30 short of buying the adult ticket and so had opted to buy the cheaper child fare Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law The show explained that there had been a "huge rise in passengers trying to get away with using half-price tickets they're not entitled to". Another inspector filmed for the show said how sometimes he and other staff are abused verbally by travellers. He said: "Sometimes we get bad language towards us, they will just push through and then we've got to stop them. "We do get that level of abuse from them. And these are kids that are between 14 and 16 and they're effing and jeffing at us. "And I'm like, well, hang on." He added: "You do get people who are unhappy about being spoken to. "No one wants trouble. You hope that everyone is going to be nice, but not everyone is the same, are they? "But then you get customers who do actually appreciate it as well." Just last month, South Western Railway revealed it had recovered a total of £3.4 million from revenue protection work last year. Unpaid fares cost the railway nearly £240 million each year - with South Western Railway estimating roughly 4.6 per cent of users of its network travel without a valid ticket. A recent poll by YouGov found 68 per cent disapproved of deliberate fare evasion, adding they believed it was a serious problem that should be penalised. 9 He was issued with a 'unpaid fare notice', equivalent to the cost of the ticket he should have bought Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law 9 The moment was captured at Weybridge station in Surrey as part of Channel 5's new show Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law Credit: Channel 5/Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Love Island star Shaughna Phillips stuns fans with incredible weight loss photos
Former Love Island contestant Shaughna Phillips has been getting herself summer ready with a strict fitness and diet plan - leaving fans gasping over her impressive transformation Love Island star Shaughna Phillips won praise from her fans as she detailed her incredible body transformation. The 31-year-old reality star found fame in 2020 when she appeared on season six of the ITV show. Shaughna lasted over four weeks in the villa before she was dumped form the island - and in the years since has won a following for her no nonsense approach to beauty and social media. While many reality stars turn to surgery or use heavy filters on images to give an illusion of their appearance, the mum-of-one has shunned touching up her images. Now the star has won further praise by showing off her figure with impressive before and after photographs, revealing that she changed the shape of her body through a strict exercise regime. The ITV star posed in just her underwear in both images which she shared on Instagram. The before photo showed Shaughna posing with her arms at her side and with a warm smile as she stood in place to be snapped. The follow up images showed how her body had become more toned, while her pose appeared more confident. Sharing the details of her transformation, she wrote: "Let the record reflect, although I've dropped a few dress sizes, I will ALWAYS love a high waisted full brief. "However if you want to swap your full briefs for a cheeky Brazilian (the knicker, not a man that is) - we have a NEW OFFER on my Shreditplan nutrition and workout programme. It's now HALF PRICE - so a whole 50% off the 4 month plan. That works out at less than the price of a latte a week!" Shaughna then listed exactly what fans could expect what training and support to receive if they signed up to the plan. She revealed fans could expect: "12 minute combat workouts you can fit round your day. A nutrition plan that doesn't feel like a diet (yes we have beige food and alcohol on it!)." She added that vegan and veggie options would also be available, and those taking part could be granted group support sessions. She rounded off her post, writing: "Your summer shred starts now." Fans took to the comments section to marvel at the reality star's transformation. One wrote: "You look amazing, you've done so well." Another wrote: "You really do look amazing. I'm so tempted to sign up." A fan commented: "U look amazing" alongside red heart emojis. And a further fan typed: "You look happy with your new body that's all that matters lovely." Earlier this year, fans commented on Shaughna's changing figure, with many speculating that she may have taken weight loss injections to lose weight. However, she hit back at the suggestion, telling The Mirror: "I love food way too much," to ever even consider suppress her appetite with a 'fad' like weight loss jabs. "There's a new fad every other year. It just so happens that this is the fad this time around, and after I have lost weight. The thing is, it just coincided with the time when I had my daughter Lucia, and I had this baby weight and everyone was commenting on it. Had it of been a few years prior, everyone would have been saying I had a BBL, or some magical liposuction that completely transformed how I looked," she shared. She went on: "We're in the Ozempic season at the moment, and I can't help how people perceive me. I believe that Ozempic is an appetite suppressant, and those are not new. It's just essentially a new name for something that gives the same results. "This has been something that has been around for 20 or 30 years - it's just another pharmaceutical company that have been able to market it in this new way and everyone is freaking out over it. In a couple of years time it will be something else, mark my words." It is noted, however, that Ozempic is not strictly a weight loss injection as it is a medication designed to treat type 2 diabetes with weight loss an unintended side effect.
Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Justin Bieber sparks concern with cryptic ‘manipulation' & ‘flirting' posts hours after Hailey ditches wedding ring
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) JUSTIN Bieber has sparked alarm among fans after sharing a cryptic post about "manipulation and flirting" after his wife Hailey ditched her wedding ring. The Canadian pop star, 31, posted a video on social media which sees an unknown man miming along to a very aggressive rant. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 7 Justin Bieber has sparked concern with a message about 'manipulation' and 'flirting' Credit: Getty 7 The cryptic post comes after his wife Hailey ditched her wedding ring Credit: BackGrid 7 The model has been spotted without her ring on more than on occasion Credit: BackGrid It is not clear who Justin is aiming the clip at but he has shared it to his Instagram Stories in the wake of Hailey taking off her wedding ring. In the footage, the man fumes, "How about you take your manipulation tactics and your b****-ass flirting and all you fake-ass time-wasting and shove it right up your mama's throat! "Now what?!" The video was among a slew of clips Justin has shared to his Instagram Stories. Another shows a different man saying, "I want to remind you that not everybody hates you. Just a lot of people do. "A lot of people despise you. A lot of people really hate you. "But not everybody hates you. People in Tasmania don't hate you. But that's just because they don't know you." Taking to his main IG grid, Justin posted a grainy close-up selfie of his face, with only his diamond nose stud and chunky earring on show. The singer captioned it, "Yall think the business is a joke. But your drunk 🤬." Fans have been quick to reply, with many asking Justin if he is okay. One follower said, "Old enough to be his mom. I see a young man struggling." Another added, "Don't you give up 🙏." A third wrote, "What are these posts Justin, are you okay bro?" And someone else penned, "I never thought this day would come, but unfortunately Hailey no longer wears her wedding ring. It's so sad to see a family falling apart." NO RING This week, Hailey was seen without her wedding ring on separate occasions while in New York City. As divorce rumors reach fever pitch following Justin's recent bizarre behavior, Hailey did very little to hide her bare finger. Stepping out for breakfast at The Commerce Inn in the West Village, Hailey put her left hand on display and the ring was missing. Later that evening, the Rhode Beauty founder's $500,000 ring was also noticeably absent when she headed to Chez Fifi on the Upper East Side with fellow models Camila Morrone and Suki Waterhouse. The beauty billionaire deliberately made sure her bare ring finger was visible to photographers for the entire duration of both of her outings. Meanwhile, sources have said mom-of-one Hailey has "grown tired of looking after two children". A source told RadarOnline that she has "reached her limit" and is now focusing on the couple's baby son Jack Blues, 10 months, and her career. The insider told the publication: "Hailey has reached her limit. She's been covering for Justin for years, but now she's focused on her own life — her career, her son, and her sanity." Discussions of Justin being placed in a conservatorship by Hailey have now been raised following his increasingly concerning behavior. A legal expert detailed to The U.S. Sun how Hailey would have to prove three points to carry out what has been called a "nuclear" option. 7 Justin has also posted a grainy selfie and told fans 'they're drunk' Credit: Instagram 7 The troubled star is at the centre of divorce rumors Credit: Getty 7 Hailey is said to have 'reached her limit' Credit: Getty
