Australia's Anzac Day Welcome to Country controversy is why I'm glad I don't live there
Disruption during a traditional Welcome to Country at Melbourne's Anzac Day dawn service has revealed the grim state of race relations across the ditch, writes Ātea editor Liam Rātana.
It was 5.30am on Anzac Day. The sky was still dark, but 50,000 people had gathered at the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne to honour those who served – including the estimated 5,000 Aboriginal soldiers who fought in the first and second world wars.
Draped in a traditional possum fur cloak, Bunurong elder Mark Brown stood in front of the podium to welcome the crowd to the land of his ancestors. As he began speaking, a small group of hecklers attempted to interrupt Brown with boos and negative comments. 'What about the Anzacs?' one of them shouted. 'Don't welcome me to my own country.' Despite the attempted interference, a defiant Brown continued with his welcome, being met with applause from others in the crowd.
That evening, local NRL team Melbourne Storm was set to play in a highly anticipated match in front of 26,000 fans at a sold-out AAMI Park. To start proceedings, Wurundjeri elder Joy Murphy Wandin had been invited to provide a Welcome to Country to start the Anzac Day ceremony.
However, following the morning's events and subsequent controversy, Murphy Wandin was told she would no longer be required as the Welcome to Country was cancelled. 'The board doesn't feel comfortable having a Welcome to Country because of what happened in regards to the booing of Uncle Mark Brown at the Anzac Dawn Service,' is what the Djirri Djirri dancers, who were meant to perform following the Welcome to Country, allege they were told. Murphy Wandin said the Storm then reversed its decision before its chief executive Justin Rodski allegedly cancelled it again. This was despite Murphy Wandin already being at the stadium and having completed her final rehearsal.
Subsequent reporting has revealed that Storm director Brett Ralph is a significant donor to right-wing lobby group Advance, which is actively campaigning to end the practice of Welcomes to Country around Australia. The Storm have since released a statement claiming the cancellation was due to a 'miscommunication of expectations regarding the use of Welcome to Country at Melbourne Storm events' between the club's board and management. It is alleged the board were unaware that a Welcome to Country was to be performed at Friday's game.
The Welcome to Country is not a new practice. As Aboriginal Australian education leader Jessa Rogers recently wrote, 'Welcome to Country is a sovereign Aboriginal protocol, grounded in the laws, customs and practices of First Nations that have existed on this continent for tens of thousands of years'. A Welcome to Country is conducted by an elder, a formally recognised traditional owner, or a custodian, to greet visitors to their ancestral land. The ceremony can vary in form, often featuring a speech, traditional dance and a smoking ceremony.
The practice saw a modern renaissance in the late 1970s, following a Welcome to Country performed by Yamtji men Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley, for a group of Aotearoa Māori and Cook Islands Māori attending the Perth Fringe Festival. It is widely believed to be one of the first recorded welcomes for a group of people not indigenous to Australia.
In 2008, the official opening of Australia's federal parliament began with a Welcome to Country for the first time. It has since become a standard feature. The day after, then prime minister Kevin Rudd gave a formal apology to indigenous Australians for the atrocities committed against them.
However, following the Anzac Day controversy over the weekend, the use of Welcomes to Country was thrust into the spotlight, highlighting deeper issues around race relations in Australia. On Sunday evening, during the final leaders' debate prior to the Australian election, opposition leader Peter Dutton claimed Welcome to Country ceremonies were 'overdone' and said their regular use 'cheapens the significance'. It was a cheap way for Dutton to score brownie points with the (probably small) sector of Australians that agree with him, much like the politicians here in Aotearoa who pander to a similarly small, yet vocal crowd.
The kerfuffle with the Welcomes to Country in Melbourne on Anzac Day made me sad. Sad for our indigenous brothers and sisters in Te Whenua Momoeā. Sad that they are still being met with such overt racism while practicing their cultural traditions, literally welcoming people to the whenua where they have lived for at least 65,000 years. Sad for my cousins, nieces and nephews who call Australia home. Sad that they are growing up and living in a land where some people still have such visibly little tolerance and respect for indigenous cultures.
While I am fully aware that racism is alive and well here in Aotearoa, I like to (perhaps ignorantly) believe that our race-relations are better than that of the country across the ditch. We don't have people attempting to stop others from singing the national anthem in te reo Māori, or running on the field to stop the All Blacks doing a haka.
However, we do have several recent instances of intolerance for indigenous practices and beliefs here in Aotearoa. One such case is that of Kaipara District mayor Craig Jepson, praised by many of his constituents for banning karakia before council meetings. I also vividly recall a group of Pākehā verbally expressing their dismay at a karanga being performed for Lani Daniels' entrance to her world heavyweight boxing title fight in 2023. 'Just get on with the fight,' one of them said as she tsked and rolled her eyes.
Although I believe we are slightly more tolerant of, and educated on, the importance of Māori cultural customs in Aotearoa, I also think the select group of our population that is against the growing normalisation of these practices is becoming more galvanised in their beliefs. With that comes a growing inclination and comfort in publicly and explicitly expressing those views – not just on social media, but in real life too. My only hope is that we are quick to call out this harmful behaviour and continue to foster an acceptance of all cultures among our youth – especially of the indigenous culture of this land. One of the most important things to remember from this whole fiasco is children don't invent racism, they learn it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
NZ's pause on funding is 'patronising'
Pacific politics 18 minutes ago Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown says pausing nearly 20 million dollars in development assistance is "patronising" and "inconsistent with modern partnership".
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Former New Zealand PM Helen Clark blames Cook Islands for creating a crisis
Helen Clark, middle, says Cook Islands caused a crisis for itself by not consulting Wellington before signing a deal with China. Photo: RNZ Pacific Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark believes the Cook Islands, a realm of New Zealand, caused a crisis for itself by not consulting Wellington before signing a deal with China. The New Zealand government has paused more than $18 million in development assistance to the Cook Islands after the latter failed to provide satisfactory answers to Aotearoa's questions about its partnership agreement with Beijing. The Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand and governs its own affairs. But New Zealand provides assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief, and defence. The 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration signed between the two nations requires them to consult each other on defence and security, which Winston Peters said had not been honoured. Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown both have a difference of opinion on the level of consultation required between the two nations on such matters. "There is no way that the 2001 declaration envisaged that Cook Islands would enter into a strategic partnership with a great power behind New Zealand's back," Clark told RNZ Pacific on Thursday. Clark was a signatory of the 2001 agreement with the Cook Islands as New Zealand prime minister at the time. "It is the Cook Islands government's actions which have created this crisis," she said. "The urgent need now is for face-to-face dialogue at a high level to mend the NZ-CI relationship." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has downplayed the pause in funding to the Cook Islands during his second day of his trip to China. Brown told parliament on Thursday (Wednesday, Cook Islands time) that his government knew the funding cut was coming. He also suggested a double standard , pointing out that New Zealand has entered also deals with China that the Cook Islands was not "privy to or being consulted on". Prime Minister Mark Brown and China's Ambassador to the Pacific Qian Bo last year. Photo: RNZ Pacific/ Lydia Lewis A Pacific law expert says that, while New Zealand has every right to withhold its aid to the Cook Islands, the way it is going about it will not endear it to Pacific nations. Auckland University of Tchnology (AUT) senior law lecturer and a former Pacific Islands Forum advisor Sione Tekiteki told RNZ Pacific that for Aotearoa to keep highlighting that it is "a Pacific country and yet posture like the United States gives mixed messages". "Obviously, Pacific nations in true Pacific fashion will not say much, but they are indeed thinking it," Tekiteki said. Since day dot there has been a misunderstanding on what the 2001 agreement legally required New Zealand and Cook Islands to consult on, and the word consultation has become somewhat of a sticking point. The latest statement from the Cook Islands government confirms it is still a discrepancy both sides want to hash out. "There has been a breakdown and difference in the interpretation of the consultation requirements committed to by the two governments in the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration," the Ministry for Foreign Affiars and Immigration (MFAI) said. "An issue that the Cook Islands is determined to address as a matter of urgency". A Cook Island resident Jackie Tuara says she would rather be in agreements with countries that have democratic policies than with China Photo: Caleb Fotheringham Tekiteki said that, unlike a treaty, the 2001 declaration was not "legally binding" per se but serves more to express the intentions, principles and commitments of the parties to work together in "recognition of the close traditional, cultural and social ties that have existed between the two countries for many hundreds of years". He said the declaration made it explicitly clear that Cook Islands had full conduct of its foreign affairs, capacity to enter treaties and international agreements in its own right and full competence of its defence and security. However, he added that there was a commitment of the parties to "consult regularly". This, for Clark, the New Zealand leader who signed the all-important agreement more than two decades ago, this is where Brown misstepped. Clark previously labelled the Cook Islands-China deal as 'clandestine' which has "damaged" its relationship with New Zealand. RNZ Pacific contacted the Cook Islands Ministry of Foreign Affairs for comment but was advised by the MFAI secretary that they are not currently accommodating interviews.
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Mark Brown slams New Zealand for its 'patronising approach' over China deal
Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown Photo: Tiana Haxton Pausing nearly $20 million in development assistance is "patronising" and "inconsistent with modern partnership", Prime Minister Mark Brown has told the Cook Islands parliament. New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters has paused $18.2 million in development assistance to the Cook Islands due to a lack of consultation regarding a partnership agreement and other deals signed with Beijing earlier this year. The pause includes $10 million in core sector support, which represents four percent of the country's budget. Brown said on Thursday or Wednesday local time the money would have been used for health, education and tourism marketing. "The relationship between the Cook Islands and New Zealand is defined by partnership, not paternalism. Decisions to unilaterally pause core sector support reflect a patronising approach, inconsistent with modern partnership," Brown said in his parliament on Friday (Thursday, Cook Islands time). The 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration signed between the two nations requires them to consult each other on defence and security, which Peters said had not been lived up to. But Brown said the declaration is "explicitly clear" that the Cook Islands can enter into international agreements in its own right. "Where we are finding our divergence of views is in the provision relating to the consultation obligations and rights of both parties to the declaration. "We are committed to addressing this urgently. That is why we agreed to New Zealand's proposal to establish a formal dialogue mechanism to discuss the agreements and their implementation." Brown said there had been two meetings so far - one in April and May. "It is disappointing that political commentary from within New Zealand has come at a time when official dialogue continues. Such commentary undermines genuine and concerted efforts by our senior officials to mend the erosion of trust and confidence that, to be clear, has been experienced on both sides," he said. RNZ Pacific reached out to Peters' office for a response on Brown's comments. A spokesperson for Peters said they would make no further comment and stand by the statements issued Thursday. In parliament, on Thursday, Brown suggested a double standard from New Zealand and that he was "not privy to or consulted on" agreements New Zealand may enter into with China. Brown said he was surprised by the timing of the announcement. "Especially Mr Speaker in light of the fact our officials have been in discussions with New Zealand officials to address the areas of concern that they have over our engagements in the agreements that we signed with China." Peters previously said the Cook Islands government was informed of the funding pause on 4 June. He also said it had nothing to do with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon being in China. Brown said he was sure Luxon would ensure good outcomes for the people of the realm of New Zealand on the back of the Cook Islands state visit and "the goodwill that we've generated with the People's Republic of China". "I have full trust that Prime Minister Luxon has entered into agreements with China that will pose no security threats to the people of the Cook Islands. "Of course, not being privy to or not being consulted on any agreements that New Zealand may enter into with China." The Cook Islands is in free association with New Zealand and governs its own affairs. But New Zealand provides assistance with foreign affairs (upon request), disaster relief, and defence. Former Cook Islands deputy prime minister and prominent lawyer Norman George said Brown "should go on his knees and beg for forgiveness because you can't rely on China". "[The aid pause] is absolutely a fair thing to do because our Prime Minister betrayed New Zealand and let the government and people of New Zealand down." But not everyone agrees. Rarotongan artist Tim Buchanan said Peters is being a bully. "It's like he's taken a page out of Donald Trump's playbook using money to coerce his friends," Buchanan said. "What is it exactly do you want from us Winston? What do you expect us to be doing to appease you." Buchanan said it has been a long road for the Cook Islands to get where it is now, and it seemed New Zealand wanted to knock the country back down.
