The Platform Trap: Mallorca makes life miserable for the unsuspecting rail passenger

Other people's public transport is usually fun to unravel. So far this month I have variously been assured on some buses in Lithuania and Poland that I must get a ticket in advance; on others, I had to pay the driver. Some buses were cash only, others insisted on payment by card (or phone).
Flying on from Warsaw to Palma, the driver of the airport bus into town needed €5 in cash – but at least she could sell tickets, unlike increasingly many airport bus services (Lodz in Poland, for example). But last Wednesday evening, I fell foul of the Kafkaesque ticketing trap devised by Mallorca 's otherwise excellent public transport network.
The island's railway – a train line running north from Palma – has improved by leaps and bounds over the years. It is now a metro, with smart air-conditioned trains as frequently as every 10 minutes. But unlike any other such system I have seen, each platform is a stand-alone entity.
You can access the platform only by an automatic gate, and – as I discovered to my discomfort – you cannot cross from one platform to the other without exiting the automatic gate.
So what's wrong with that? Well, at a small station seven stops from central Palma, Pont d'Inca Nou, I bought a ticket at the entrance to platform 1 for a train that was departing from platform 2.
When I say 'ticket', it was just a paper receipt with a QR code, which I duly scanned. The gates allowed me onto platform 1. Where, I wondered, was the bridge, subway or street-level walkway that would allow me to cross to platform 2 to catch the Palma train that was due to arrive in two minutes?
Every railway I have ever used allows you to do that... except in Mallorca. But there is nothing to indicate the unusual arrangement. Indeed, I was able to buy a ticket to the island's capital from the wrong side of the station and go through the gates to a platform from which trains are travelling away from Palma.
Whoever programmed the whole thing presumably knew they were dispatching unknowing passengers into a transportational black hole where the normal laws of travel physics cease to exist.
No, you cannot retrace your steps because the machine has already checked you out of Pont d'Inca Nou. The only permitted journey is down to Palma, but you are trapped on a platform from which the only way is up. And yes, I did check out the fences: they are Iron Curtain grade.
All I could do was catch the next northbound train – immediately placing me at risk of a penalty, because I was going in the opposite direction – and hope a more normal arrangement prevailed at the next stop. It did not. I was unable to cross to the southbound track without exiting through the gate, which was never going to let me through because my ticket was not valid.
So I tailgated another passenger, and followed her over the pedestrian crossing that is unhelpfully located outside Stalag Platform 1, as I now knew it. As luck would have it, she had evidently overshot her station, and was heading for Platform 2. So I was able to tailgate her again (of which she was probably getting fed up). No ticket examiner appeared in the two minutes the train took to trundle to my original station, from where I was finally travelling legally.
Should you have the good fortune to find yourself in Mallorca, please do not follow in my tailgating, ticket-bending footsteps. And to TIB, the public transport provider, I say: put up signs saying 'Abandon hope, all ye who enter here'.
There is a serious point: an excellent way to cut traffic congestion in Mallorca is to encourage more rail use. But that will only happen if holidaymakers feel confident about using the trains.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Judge rejects Airbnb's appeal in move that could change Spanish tourism forever

A Spanish court has upheld an order for Airbnb to block nearly 66,000 rental listings across the country, rejecting an appeal from the online platform. The ruling reinforces the government's stance that these short-term rentals violate local regulations and contribute to Spain 's escalating housing crisis, particularly as the nation experiences record tourist numbers. The Consumer Rights Ministry had previously flagged the listings for violations, issuing an order last month for Airbnb to remove 65,935 properties. Of these, 5,800 were identified for immediate takedown. An Airbnb spokesperson could not be immediately reached for comment on the Madrid 's High Court 's decision. The ministry has said the listings it flagged did not include their license number or specify whether the owner was an individual or a company. It said others listed numbers that didn't match what authorities had. Last month, Consumer Rights Minister Pablo Bustinduy told The Associated Press that the tourism sector could not "jeopardise the constitutional rights of the Spanish people.' This included their right to housing and well-being. Carlos Cuerpo, the economy minister, said in a separate interview that the government had to tackle the unwanted side effects of mass tourism. It comes following protests across Spain and popular European hotspots. Earlier this month, protesters used water guns against unsuspecting tourists in Barcelona and on the Spanish island of Mallorca as demonstrators marched to demand a rethink of an economic model they believe is fuelling a housing crunch and erasing the character of their hometowns. The marches were part of the first coordinated effort by activists concerned with the ills of overtourism across southern Europe's top destinations. While several thousands rallied in Mallorca in the biggest gathering of the day, hundreds more gathered in other Spanish cities, as well as in Venice, Italy, and Portugal's capital, Lisbon. 'The squirt guns are to bother the tourists a bit,' Andreu Martínez said in Barcelona with a chuckle after spritzing a couple seated at an outdoor café. 'Barcelona has been handed to the tourists. This is a fight to give Barcelona back to its residents.' Martínez, a 42-year-old administrative assistant, is one of a growing number of residents who are convinced that tourism has gone too far in the city of 1.7 million people. Barcelona hosted 15.5 million visitors last year eager to see Antoni Gaudí's La Sagrada Familia basilica and the Las Ramblas promenade. Martínez says his rent has risen over 30 per cent as more apartments in his neighborhood are rented to tourists for short-term stays. He said there is a knock-on effect of traditional stores being replaced by businesses catering to tourists, like souvenir shops, burger joints and 'bubble tea' spots. 'Our lives, as lifelong residents of Barcelona, are coming to an end," he said. "We are being pushed out systematically.'

Daily Mail​

10 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Why buying a plane ticket means you're NOT guaranteed a seat on your flight: Experts reveal the hidden catches that could curtail your best laid holiday plans

Flight passengers are not guaranteed a seat even when they book one - and can be legally 'bumped' onto another service, a travel expert confirmed today. Airlines will sometimes book more people onto a flight than there are seats on a plane because travellers do not always turn up even if they have booked a flight. Carriers are also sometimes unable to board all passengers if they switch to a smaller aircraft for operational reasons, meaning too many people will try to board. Some passengers are therefore asked to give up their place on the flight – known as being 'bumped' - although airlines can also do so without your permission. There was after one such case last month involving a Ryanair passenger who did not pay to reserve himself a seat before a flight from Birmingham to Mallorca. Gym coach Scott McCormick and his girlfriend Helena Boshwick, both 33, were set to fly together on May 1 for a week-long break and gym mentorship event. The couple did not reserve seats - which typically cost from £4.50 to £33 each – before checking in because they did not mind sitting apart on the two-hour flight. Because of this, Mr McCormick and Miss Boshwick were each assigned a random seat free of charge upon checking in, which they did online before departure. But when they got to the airport gate, staff said that only one of them could board the plane - which they initially believed was because it had been overbooked. Ryanair has since confirmed that the flight was scheduled to operate on a Boeing 737-8200 with 197 seats, but had to be swapped to a 737-800 with only 189 seats. One passenger was left unable to board - and because the couple were the last two to check in, they were told one of them would be put onto the next flight. But because they did not wish to travel separately, only one of them could be moved onto the next flight - with the other having to pay a £100 missed departure fee, which was not refunded. Ryanair claimed Mr McCormick was entitled to claim back 'reasonable receipted expenses' under EU Regulation 261/2004, but he had yet to submit any receipts to the airline. Rory Boland, travel editor at consumer group Which?, told MailOnline: 'Unfortunately for travellers, it's not uncommon for flights to be overbooked. 'Sometimes a last minute change of aircraft might mean less seats available than planned for, in other cases some airlines actively overbook, betting on 'no shows' to balance things out, while maxing their profits by charging for more seats than the plane can actually accommodate. 'If an airline ends up with too many people at the gate, it can't just bump someone from the flight because they didn't pay extra to reserve a specific seat. 'So long as the flight is either departing the UK, or flying into the UK on a UK or EU based airline, the airline is legally obliged to ask for volunteers before resorting to forcibly denying boarding. 'If you volunteer then you surrender your right to statutory compensation, so you should make sure you're happy with the amount you negotiate - at a minimum be sure to get at least get the amount you would be owed if the flight was cancelled - which would be up to £520 each for a long-haul flight, or less for a short-haul journey. 'If there are no volunteers, only then an airline can choose to deny a passenger boarding. Anyone who is bumped from a plane should have their flight rebooked as quickly as possible, and be paid cancellation compensation.' Those who volunteer to be bumped on a flight must agree compensation with the airline, which will often make an announcement at the gate offering cash or vouchers. Passengers in such cases are also entitled to an alternative flight or a refund. But if a passenger is bumped without their agreement, they can get compensation as long as they checked-in on time – with the level depending on the length of flight and disruption. This is set out in the following table from the Civil Aviation Authority: Length of flight Length of disruptions Compensation Short-haul flight of under 1,500km (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam) Arrive 2 hours or more later at final destination £220 Short-haul flight of under 1,500km (e.g. Glasgow to Amsterdam) Arrive less than 2 hours later at final destination £110 Medium-haul flight of 1,500km - 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakesh) Arrive 3 hours or more later at final destination £350 Medium-haul flight of 1,500km - 3,500km (e.g. East Midlands to Marrakesh) Arrive less than 3 hours later at final destination £175 Long-haul flight of over 3,500km (e.g. London to New York) Arrive 4 hours or more later at final destination £520 Long-haul flight of over 3,500km (e.g. London to New York) Arrive less than 4 hours later at final destination £260 Regardless of whether a passenger volunteered or was forced to be bumped, the airline must also let them choose an alternative flight and provide 'care and assistance' while they wait. This means they must provide a reasonable amount of food and drink, which is often provided as vouchers; a means for them to communicate, often by refunding the cost of calls; and accommodation in a hotel, if they are move onto a flight the next day. Transport to and from the accommodation, or the passenger's home, if they are able to return there, must also be provided. For those who do not wish to fly, they can get a refund for all parts of the ticket which have not been used – which would include the full cost of the return ticket if they are bumped from the outbound leg. If a passenger is midway through a journey, the airline should also provide a flight back to the starting point. This all comes under UK law, which provides rights for passengers departing from an airport in the UK on any airline; arriving at an airport in the UK on an EU or UK airline; or arriving at an airport in the EU on a UK airline. Ryanair has a policy that it does not overbook flights, but it is understood that the airline does try to seek volunteers to be bumped if a seat is not available for a passenger with a confirmed reservation. If no one volunteers, the airline then chooses the passengers itself to bump, and is supposed to offer them compensation, reimbursement and 'care and assistance'. Mr McCormick, from Birmingham, explained what happened in his case in a TikTok video, saying: 'We checked in the night before and we didn't reserve a seat but you normally just get a random one. 'Me and my partner thought it's not that much of a problem if we're not sitting together for a two-hour flight, we're adults here. 'We were the first ones at the gate ready for boarding. The lady scanned our boarding passes and told us to step to the side for a second. That moment was a red flag, I thought: 'There's something happening here'. 'When everyone boarded, she said: 'the plane is full, there's only one seat remaining and we will have to reimburse you for the other seat or you'll have to get on the next flight'.' He claimed that the couple then had a 'meltdown' because they had wanted to catch the same flight and arrive to their destination together. Mr McCormick continued: 'There was no compassion or care whatsoever. After going back and forth we said we're not going to take separate flights and be in separate countries for hours.' He claimed that they protested and were eventually told that they could both get on the next flight and receive a refund for both tickets. Mr McCormick added: 'I asked if we can have that in writing or an email for them to confirm it in some way. They said it's on the system, and when we go to ticket sales, they will reimburse us and we can get on the next flight.' But when the couple got back to the check-in desk, they claim to have been told that they still had to pay for one of the tickets. According to the holidaymaker, one of the seats had been marked in the system as a cancelled booking, while the other was put down as a missed flight. They then spent a further £100 on the new ticket and claimed they were assured that a refund would be processed for this fee, but they have not received it. Ryanair has since claimed that the passenger was not entitled to a refund for the flight because they were reaccommodated onto the next available service. But Mr McCormick said the experience felt like 'discrimination,' and that the couple were singled out because they are 'young' and did not have children. He added that he would avoid flying with Ryanair in future due to the staff's 'lack of compassion'. Mr McCormick said: 'Ryanair should have asked all passengers if anyone would like to volunteer their seats. 'It felt like discrimination, how do they pick out these people, is it because we're young and we have no kids so there's just two of us, is it to do with something we don't see or understand? 'There was so much of it that was really frustrating, and it's the lack of care, no empathy. You can be bawling your eyes out and they just don't care, they're deadpan. We just had to get over what happened, it was a terrible way to start a holiday. 'They said at ticket sales they would be doing this themselves and get everything over and start the process, so I haven't formally complained. 'I don't think they did, I definitely haven't got the money back. We just got caught in a big company's terms and conditions. I would avoid it [Ryanair] if I could now. Why am I being singled out?' But a Ryanair spokesman told MailOnline: 'This flight from Birmingham to Palma de Mallorca (May 1) was not 'overbooked' - it was scheduled to operate on a 737-8200 (197 seats) but for operational reasons had to be swapped to a 737-800 aircraft (189 seats). 'As a result, 1 passenger was unable to travel on this flight, and was reaccommodated onto the next available flight to Palma de Mallorca. 'Mr McCormick's travel companion was not refused boarding but chose not to board and travel on this flight from Birmingham to Palma de Mallorca and was required to pay a Missed Departure fee (£100) to be booked onto the next available flight.

BBC News

16 hours ago

• BBC News

Free Leicester city centre bus service extended after new funding

A free electric bus service that carries passengers around Leicester city centre will continue to run into 2026 after securing more government funding. Leicester City Council said more than a million trips had been taken on Hop! buses since they were launched in Thursday, the authority said it had been awarded £9.3m from the Department for Transport (DfT) to invest in bus said part of the funding would allow the £426,000-a-year service to run until at least March. Hop! buses run every ten minutes in a loop, largely around the city's inner ring road, with stops at Haymarket Bus Station, Highcross shopping centre, Jubilee Square, Leicester Royal Infirmary, the railway station and the market. The DfT cash will also be used to buy 48 new electric buses to serve other routes in the council said it hoped all buses in Leicester would be electric-run by 2030 in a move intended to cut added it had also received £12.6m to spend on other transport projects in the next 12 include major planned resurfacing and maintenance schemes on Melton Road and Aylestone council said a new maintenance programme, to replace street lighting columns and illuminated street signs, would also get under addition, it plans a neighbourhood improvement fund to support local projects to improve public spaces around the council has been further informed it will get £59m to spend on transport projects between 2026 and 2030 though it has yet to allocate the money to specific schemes.