Critic of Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega shot dead in Costa Rica

A retired Nicaraguan army officer in exile turned fierce critic of the country's authoritarian president Daniel Ortega has been shot dead in neighboring Costa Rica.
Maj Roberto Samcam, 66, was shot at his apartment building in San José on Thursday, reportedly by men pretending to deliver a package.
'It was something we did not expect, we could not have imagined it,' said Samantha Jirón, Samcam's adoptive daughter.
Nicaraguan rights groups and exiled dissidents immediately blamed the government of Ortega and his co-president wife, Rosario Murillo.
'Roberto was a powerful voice' who 'directly denounced the dictatorship' of Ortega, Samcam's wife, Claudia Vargas, told reporters in San José as she fought back tears.
His job, she said, was to 'expose human rights violations' in his homeland.
The head of Costa Rica's judicial police, Randall Zuñiga, said that the attackers took advantage of the fact that Samcam's apartment building was unguarded in the mornings.
The gunman called out to Samcam, and 'when he was within striking range, the individual began shooting at him and hit him at least eight times', Zuñiga told reporters.
The Nicaraguan news site Confidencial reported that the killers fled the scene by motorbike.
The US state department's bureau of western hemisphere affairs said on X that it was 'shocked' by Samcam's murder and offered Costa Rica help in 'holding the assassins and those behind them accountable'.
Nicaragua's former ambassador to the Organization of American States, Arturo McFields, who lives in exile in the United States, called the killing 'an act of cowardice and criminal political revenge by the dictatorship of Nicaragua'.
'The manner of the crime indicates political motives. This is very serious,' the exiled Nicaraguan writer Gioconda Belli wrote on social media.
Neither Ortega nor his government commented on the case.
Samcam, who was a political analyst, had spoken out frequently against the government in Managua, which he fled in 2018 to live with his wife in Costa Rica.
That year, protests against Ortega's government were violently repressed, resulting in more than 300 deaths, according to the UN.
In January last year, another Nicaraguan opposition activist living in Costa Rica, Joao Maldonado, was shot while driving with his girlfriend in San José. Both were seriously wounded.
Former Costa Rican president Luis Guillermo Solís called Samcam's murder 'for his frontal opposition to the Ortega and Murillo dictatorship' an 'outrageous and extremely serious act'.
'I feel that Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo are initiating a 'night of the long knives' … due to the regime's weakening,' Dora María Téllez, a former comrade of Ortega turned critic, said from Spain, where she too is in exile.
The Night of the Long Knives was a bloody purge of rivals ordered by Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in 1934.
'They resort to the execution of a retired ex-military officer, who they believe has a voice that resonates within the ranks of the army,' Téllez told the Nicaraguan news outlet 100% Noticias.
Ortega, now 79, first served as president from 1985 to 1990 as a former guerrilla hero who had helped oust a brutal US-backed regime.
Returning to power in 2007, he became ever more authoritarian, according to observers, jailing hundreds of opponents, real and perceived, in recent years.
Ortega's government has shut down more than 5,000 non-governmental organizations since the 2018 mass protests that he considered a US-backed coup attempt.
Thousands of Nicaraguans have fled into exile, and the regime is under US and EU sanctions.
Most independent and opposition media operate from abroad.
Pro-government media in Nicaragua did not report on Samcam's killing.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

34 minutes ago

• The Guardian

What next after EU finds ‘indications' that Israel is in breach of human rights obligations?

The EU has concluded 'there are indications' that Israel is in breach of human rights obligations over its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank. But that does not mean the bloc of 27 countries will impose sanctions on Israel any time soon. The EU's foreign policy service has reached the cautious conclusion that 'there are indications' that Israel is in breach of human rights obligations, in a review of its association agreement with the Middle Eastern country. The EU-Israel association agreement, which came into force in 2000, underpins the relationship between the EU's 27 member states and the Mediterranean nation, not only trade but social and environmental cooperation. Under pressure from EU member states appalled by the humanitarian blockade of the Gaza strip, the EU's high representative for foreign policy Kaja Kallas launched a review last month. The review was based on article 2 of the agreement, which states that respect for human rights and democratic principles is an 'essential element'. The report, which is a leaked unpublished draft, is expected to be presented to Israel's government by the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas. More immediately, Kallas will outline the findings to the EU's 27 foreign ministers meeting in Brussels on Monday. She wants to assess how far governments back the review and what to do next. While the humanitarian situation in Gaza remains catastrophic, with near daily fatal shootings of people queuing for food rations, warnings of famine and the collapse of water systems, EU processes move slowly. Kallas is expected to present a list of possible options to foreign ministers in July. In theory these could include full suspension of trade with Israel, or freezing its participation in EU programmes, but nobody knows. Such measures to put pressure on Israel would require further legal processes and their approval is highly uncertain. Even hedged in the low-key, caveat-laden language of the EU, the leaked document marks a significant moment in EU-Israel relations. But it is far from clear if it will change the calculus for the Israeli government.

Reuters

an hour ago

• Reuters

There are indications Israel breached EU agreement, bloc's foreign policy arm says

BRUSSELS, June 20 (Reuters) - The European Union's diplomatic service said on Friday there are indications that Israel has breached its human rights obligations under the terms of a pact governing its ties with the bloc, according to a document seen by Reuters. Citing assessments by independent international institutions, the European External Action Service said "there are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement". The report comes after months of deepening concern in European capitals about Israel's operations in Gaza and the humanitarian situation in the enclave. "Israel's continued restrictions to the provision of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies affect the entire population of Gaza present on the affected territory," the document said. The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, announced in May that the bloc would examine whether Israel is complying with the terms of its pact with the bloc, after over half of EU members backed conducting a review. Under the agreement, which came into force in 2000, the EU and Israel agreed that their relationship 'shall be based on respect for human rights and democratic principles". Israel has said that it respects international law and that operations in Gaza are necessary to destroy Hamas, the Palestinian group responsible for the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel. Israel's mission to the EU did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The new document includes a section dedicated to the situation in Gaza, covering issues related to denial of humanitarian aid, attacks with a significant number of casualties, attacks on hospitals and medical facilities, displacement, and lack of accountability. The report also looks at the situation in the West Bank, including settler violence. The document relies on "facts verified by and assessments made by independent international institutions, and with a focus on most recent events in Gaza and the West Bank," it said. The review was proposed in early May by Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp, who had raised concerns about Israeli policies 'exacerbating an already dire humanitarian situation'. EU foreign ministers are set to discuss the review during a gathering in Brussels on Monday. Member countries remain divided in their approach to Israel. While some ministers could advocate for moving toward taking action based on the review, no concrete decisions are expected at Monday's session. Diplomats expect EU officials will reach out to Israel with the outcome of the review in an effort to influence its behaviour, and that ministers will return to the subject during a meeting with July.

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

EU cites ‘indications' Israel is breaching human rights obligations over conduct in Gaza

The EU has said 'there are indications' that Israel is in breach of human rights obligations over its conduct in Gaza, but stopped short of calling for immediate sanctions. 'There are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under article 2 of the EU-Israel association agreement,' states a leaked document from the EU's foreign policy service, seen by the Guardian. Couched in the typically cautious language of Brussels, the document nevertheless represents a significant moment in Europe's relations towards a longstanding ally. The closely guarded paper, which will be presented by the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, to European foreign ministers on Monday, cites assessments by the international court of justice, the office of the high commissioner for human rights, and numerous other UN bodies, while saying that it does not represent 'a value judgment' by any EU official. The finding has been seen as a foregone conclusion since a review of the EU-Israel agreement was put on the agenda last month by 17 EU member states, led by the Netherlands, a traditional ally of Israel. EU officials were tasked to see whether Israel's internal and international relations were based on 'respect for human rights and democratic principles' against the backdrop of near-daily fatal shootings of Palestinian civilians seeking food. The review was triggered by Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip, amid widespread horror over the ongoing bombardment that has laid the territory waste and killed more than 55,600 people – mostly civilians – since 7 October 2023, according to the Gaza health ministry. The EU discussion is complicated by Israel's airstrikes on Iran, which may restrain some governments from putting pressure on Israel. Soon after Israel began waging war against Iran, the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, 'reiterated Israel's right to defend itself'. She has previously faced criticism for not speaking up over the humanitarian consequences for Palestinians of Israel's onslaught. The EU-Israel association agreement, signed in 1995, underpins a trade relationship worth €68bn (£58bn) between 27 European countries and the Middle Eastern country. The EU is Israel's largest market and accounts for about one-third of its trade. Israel is also a member of the EU's Horizon research funding programme, and has secured grants worth €831m since the current programme began in 2021. The document emerged after more than 100 campaign groups urged the commission this week to suspend the association agreement. 'A weak or inconclusive review of Israel's compliance with article 2, and/or failure by the commission and council to suspend at least part of the association agreement, would ultimately destroy what's left of the EU's credibility [and] further embolden Israel authorities to continue their atrocity crimes,' reads the statement, signed by 113 civil society groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Eve Geddie, the head of Amnesty International's EU office, said the decision to launch a review had come 'tragically, devastatingly late' and that while it was important, as time passed Israeli forces had become 'more and more emboldened'. Separately, eight EU member states have written to Kallas urging her to look into discontinuing trade of goods and services from the occupied Palestinian territory. The letter, organised by Belgium, states the EU is obliged to respond to an opinion from the international court of justice last July ordering Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories as soon as possible. In a landmark – albeit non-binding –ruling, the court said other states were under an obligation not to recognise the occupation as lawful. 'We have not seen a proposal on how to effectively discontinue trade of goods and services with the illegal settlements,' states the letter, calling for the EU to set out a timeline for reaching 'full compliance' with the advisory opinion around its first anniversary. EU policy on Israel has been hobbled by difficulties finding unanimity among 27 member states with starkly different views, from countries that have recognised Palestine, including Spain and Ireland, to staunch allies of the Israeli president, Benjamin Netanyahu, such as Hungary and the Czech Republic. The tide turned last month when the Netherlands, a strong ally of Israel, launched a call to review the EU-Israel association agreement, following the largest protests on Dutch streets over a foreign policy question in decades. The Dutch foreign minister, Casper Veldkamp, a former ambassador to Israel, argued that Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip was a breach of international law and therefore the association agreement. An unexpectedly large number of countries agreed, although the question was not put to a vote. The EU is far from united over what to do next. A full suspension of the agreement, which requires unanimity, is seen as impossible, given the certainty of a veto from Hungary, the Czech Republic or Germany. The EU only needs a weighted majority to suspend favourable trade terms or Israel's participation in Horizon, but even those outcomes are highly uncertain. Hildegard Bentele, a German centre-right MEP who chairs the European parliament's Israel delegation, criticised moves to question the agreement. 'This will not have any influence on the Israeli government. I am very sure about it. This will put us in a less influential position,' she said in an interview earlier this month. Kallas's predecessor Josep Borrell, however, has criticised Europe for shirking its moral responsibilities over Gaza. In a typically outspoken speech, he argued the EU should use the association agreement as a lever to demand that humanitarian law is respected. In a further illustration of the EU's foreign policy knots, Hungary is blocking EU sanctions against Hamas and violent Israeli settlers. Kallas earlier this week voiced frustration at critics that have accused the EU of silence and inaction, citing the need to find consensus. 'Sanctions need unanimity. And again I'm representing 27 [countries].' She argued that presenting sanctions that would inevitably fail was pointless: 'I feel better myself that I've done something, but actually I know that this will not go through … and then it will just show that we don't have a common position.'