Laapataa Ladies Fame Nitanshi Goel To Make Cannes Debut, Calls It 'Absolute Honour'
Last Updated:
Nitanshi Goel, star of Laapataa Ladies, will debut at Cannes 2025 for L'Oréal Paris.
Phool goes to Cannes! From the heartlands of India to the glamorous streets of Cannes, Laapataa Ladies star Nitanshi Goel is living the dream. After charming audiences as Phool in the critically acclaimed Laapataa Ladies, the 17-year-old powerhouse is ready to make her dazzling debut at the Cannes Film Festival 2025.
Nitanshi will be representing global beauty giant L'Oréal Paris, who've been the festival's official beauty partner for 28 years now.
Sharing her excitement about her Cannes debut, Nitanshi said, 'I came into this industry with aspirations of making things happen for me. From the incredible journey of 'Laapataa Ladies' to now standing on the global stage at Cannes, I am getting closer to realizing them. I am that girl who is representing every Indian girl out there who dreams big and is ready to go and achieve them, come what may."
The actress added, 'Being able to represent those girls at a global stage is a moment of sheer happiness. By me being on the carpet, I wish to empower each female out there who is taking charge of their life, dreams, and career. It's an absolute honour."
India's presence at the Cannes Film Festival 2025 is nothing short of spectacular, with a power-packed lineup of stars, storytellers, and cinematic gems making waves at the French Riviera. Alia Bhatt is all set to make her much-anticipated Cannes debut this year, walking the red carpet as a brand ambassador for global beauty giant L'Oréal Paris. She'll be joining Cannes veteran Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, who returns once again to represent the brand with her signature elegance.
Meanwhile, Payal Kapadia, who created history last year by winning the Grand Prix for All We Imagine As Light, is back at Cannes — but this time, as a jury member! The filmmaker will sit alongside global cinema greats on the main jury panel for the 78th edition, led by acclaimed French actress Juliette Binoche.
Cannes is also celebrating Indian cinema's legacy with Sharmila Tagore, who will attend a special screening of Satyajit Ray's Aranyer Din Ratri in its newly restored 4K glory. On the contemporary front, Neeraj Ghaywan's Homebound, starring Janhvi Kapoor and Ishaan Khatter, has been selected for the prestigious Un Certain Regard section.
And in a proud moment for Indian storytelling, Anupam Kher's directorial venture Tanvi The Great will have its world premiere at the Marché du Film.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gave Amitabh Bachchan a Hollywood film's CD instead of a script when I went to sign him, recalls producer: ‘He asked what do I do with it?'
In the early 2000s, Amitabh Bachchan was successfully mounting a comeback in Bollywood after enduring a tough period in the 1990s. During this time, filmmakers in India had no qualms about remaking Hollywood films, even without buying any rights as the laws regarding these matters weren't strictly in place at the time. Keeping up with the trend, Big B was also offered the remake of a Hollywood film, but interestingly, without a script. The actor, who is often regarded as the greatest actor in the Indian film industry, was directly handed the CD of a Hollywood film and was told that they will Indianise it if he came on board, which, obviously, left the actor shell shocked. While appearing on Friday Talkies' YouTube channel, producer Bunty Walia spoke about the making of Ek Ajnabee, which was directed by Apoorva Lakhia, and also starred Arjun Rampal, and said that Lakhia decided to make this film after watching Denzel Washington-starrer Man on Fire. The duo thought that if they wanted to remake it, Amitabh would be the best man for the job. Right before this, Lakhia had made his Bollywood debut with Abhishek Bachchan-starrer Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost. Bunty recalled, 'I talked to Amitabh sir's secretary, Sheetal ji, and we fixed up a meeting with him. When I met with him, he asked me for the script, and I told him that we didn't have any script, and I handed him the CD of Man on Fire. I told him we were going to 'Indianise' it and then make a film.' Walia added that Amitabh was confused with what they were trying to do and asked him, 'What do I do with it?' His secretary was definitely not impressed by their level of readiness. 'I remember Sheetal ji looking at me like I was a fool. We didn't have a script or schedule for the film, and we were trying to sign him for the film. He gave us dates for many months later and told us straight that now it was our job to convince Amitabh sir to do the film.' ALSO READ: Bollywood's biggest hairstylist died penniless, family was left with 'nothing to eat' despite counting Bachchans, Kapoors as friends After borrowing money from his father and talking to the actor, Walia was able to sign him for the film, but even though the veteran actor had said yes to the project, he still had his reservations about playing an action hero. Walia talked about shooting in Bangkok and shared how Amitabh was curious to know why they signed him. 'We had some time on our hands, and Amitabh sir asked me, 'Why did you guys sign me? I am an old man.' I smirked and said, 'If you think you are old, then so many people from the industry should just retire'.' Amitabh's time shooting Ek Ajnabee was certainly eventful, as previously shared by Apoorva Lakhia during his appearance on Friday Talkies. The director shared that while roaming around Bangkok after shooting one day, Big B ended up going to a strip club called Exotic p****. 'I told him, 'Sir, this is Patpong; there are live shows here. If I take you, there will be riots. He said, 'No, we will go.' So, I said, Let's go.' Big B would make new plans every day after filming was over, and according to Lakhia, he would reach the set right on time, even if he had been clubbing the night before. Apart from Amitabh, the cast of the film also included Arjun Rampal, Rucha Vaidya, Perizad Zorabian, and Akhilendra Mishra. The movie it took inspiration from, Man on Fire, was directed by Tony Scott.
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Memes are changing how we talk IRL
It started as a joke. Rishabh Malik, 21, a college student from Rajasthan, mimicked a trending meme at a party. 'Only one friend got it—we ended up laughing, but the rest looked lost," he says. 'That's when I realised not everyone lives online like we do. Sometimes," he adds, 'meme references completely derail a conversation, leaving it fragmented or flat." Visha Agrawal, 23, a graphic designer from Ahmedabad, has experienced similar moments. 'I quoted a reel and then had to explain the entire backstory. It killed the moment," she says. For her, the problem runs deeper. 'People escalate everything into a debate, even trivial stuff like AI memes. No one knows when to stop." Manan Sharma, 22, who works in advertising in Mumbai, has observed digital language infiltrating professional spaces. 'I've had coworkers say things like 'LMAO' or 'XD' out loud in meetings. It feels robotic. Like we're performing the internet version of ourselves." As our online lives bleed into the real world, social media's logic—fast, curated, and often performative—is subtly reshaping how we speak, share and show up offline. Real-world communication is beginning to mirror social media: fast-paced, reaction-driven and curated for attention. Mumbai-based Rutu Mody Kamdar, founder of Jigsaw Brand Consultants, specialising in consumer research, behavioural insights and cultural strategy, explains how digital validation has altered behaviour beyond screens. 'While validation has always been part of human nature, what's changed in the social media age is the pace, scale, and structure of how it plays out," she says. Earlier, validation was shaped by real-time cues in a room—today, it's shaped by the logic of virality. 'People now narrate stories not just to connect, but to resonate, to land, to be remembered—often unconsciously mirroring the rhythm of a post." Kamdar notes a 'performative edge" creeping into everyday offline moments. 'People talk at dinner like they're writing a caption. The ability to sit with nuance is diminishing." Conversations are either hyper-verbal or awkwardly thin—emotions skimmed, not felt. This shift is particularly visible in Gen Z and younger millennials, who have grown up with their online and offline selves deeply enmeshed. According to Instagram's 2024 Trend Talk report, Indian Gen Z users increasingly seek day-in-the-life content and advice from creators, blurring the boundary between what's authentic and what's aspirational. In turn, their real lives begin to echo the curated tones of their digital personas. Empathy eroded Mumbai-based clinical psychologist and trauma therapist Rupa Chaubal observes this closely in her practice. 'Gen Z's worldview is largely shaped by what they consume online. Many turn to Google or social media before speaking to their parents," she says. 'They believe they already know enough, which reduces trust in human experience." This trust deficit doesn't just affect families—it impacts peer groups, workplaces, and romantic relationships. 'Empathy is eroding. I see clients reacting impulsively or resorting to harsh criticism in conflicts," Chaubal explains. 'An increasing sense of entitlement becomes a barrier while handling real-life disagreements." Even in therapy, online habits seep in. 'Some clients bring memes to explain how they feel rather than using their own words," she says. Others cite social media counterpoints as if trying to 'dethrone" the therapist. 'It becomes a battle of sources." Preeti D'Mello, founder of The Fulfillment Institute, a leadership coaching and organisational development institute, and an organisational psychologist based in Princeton, New Jersey, links this to an overdependence on digital validation. 'When affirmation comes from likes and shares, people start needing constant feedback. They struggle with patience, active listening, and empathy." She sees the result in both personal and professional settings. 'People are more reactive and less able to sit with opposing views. Civil discourse is declining." Is debate mode the default? Malik says that at his engineering college, juniors often approach conversations like Twitter threads. 'You say something and they come back with 'Um, actually…'—as if every interaction is a thread to win, not a discussion." This debate-mode mindset, driven by online norms like quote-tweeting and clapbacks, often leaves real-life interactions tense or exhausting. 'People forget they're not on a comment section," Sharma says. 'You can't just mute or block someone in person." Chaubal adds, 'Younger clients seem more interested in the 'intent' of communication than the content itself. They're restless, they lose interest if a conversation isn't stimulating—and they often struggle with eye contact or pauses." This inability to read or respond to non-verbal cues—especially among those raised during the peak of screen use during covid—further frays connection. 'It can lead to relationships that feel hollow or unstable." The offline resistance Yet, even in a hyper-connected world, people are beginning to carve out intentional spaces for offline connection—often without making a big show of it. A recent trend, especially among young urban dwellers, involves turning apartments into temporary cafés. Friends are invited over for coffee shop-style hangouts—no phones, no agendas, just in-person time. Others are organising monthly themed dinners, cooking together, or doing small group activities like zine-making or handmade balm workshops. The goal is to shift attention from passive scrolling to active, tactile engagement. The trend is catching on because it offers something digital life can't: slowness, unpredictability, and the intimacy of shared silence. As Kamdar puts it, 'We're not going back to a pre-internet world. The answer isn't retreat—it's integration." She encourages a return to values that shaped real-world connection: deep listening, genuine curiosity, presence without performance. While the idea of a digital detox is often floated, experts agree that simply going offline isn't enough. 'What's needed is conscious choice-making," says Chaubal. 'A digital habit that overrides impulse control can have psychological side effects—social withdrawal, irritability, anxiety." Her advice: choose fewer platforms, set realistic time limits, and engage in real conversations—even if they're awkward or slow. 'It's about re-learning how to be human, without the filter of a screen," she says. D'Mello agrees: 'True social intelligence is built sitting around a dinner table, navigating pauses, and learning to read a room's unspoken needs." The internet has given us incredible tools—community, expression, visibility–but it's worth asking what we might be losing in the process. A long walk with a friend. A screen-free dinner. A quiet moment that isn't uploaded. Maybe the most radical thing we can do is simply show up, fully. Anoushka Madan is a Mumbai-based freelance lifestyle writer. She posts @noushontheinternet.
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Great loss for Indian languages: Murmurs of JCB Prize's departure causes concern among writers
New Delhi, The JCB Prize for Literature, India's priciest book award, seems to have made a quiet exit without any official confirmation, causing concern among the literary community, including writers and publishers. Great loss for Indian languages: Murmurs of JCB Prize's departure causes concern among writers A person close to the award told PTI on Saturday that 'it has shut down'. The literary prize was established in 2018 to 'celebrate Indian writing, and to help readers across the world discover the very best of contemporary Indian literature'. After giving the award to English writer Upamanyu Chatterjee on November 23 last year, the JCB Prize Foundation has kept quiet. Its last social media post was uploaded on Instagram on November 27, congratulating Chatterjee for winning the ₹ 25 lakh prize. The award did not call for entries this year, which generally happens around the first week of March. Malayalam writer Benyamin, who won the debut award in 2018 for his book 'Jasmine Days' translated into English by Shahnaz Habib, said that the news is 'deeply disappointing'. '...as the JCB Prize was a highly promising recognition for Indian literature not just Indian English writing, but also regional languages. It was a respected and influential award that played a significant role in helping Indian literature reach a global audience,' the author of 'Goat Days' told PTI. In its seven editions, the award has gone to translated works of fiction five times. In 2020, S Hareesh's 'Moustache', translated from the Malayalam by Jayashree Kalathil, won the award. M Mukundan's 'Delhi: A Soliloquy', translated from the Malayamal by Fathima E V and Nandakumar K, won the prize in 2021. The award in 2022 went to Urdu author Khalid Jawed's 'The Paradise of Food', translated by Baran Farooqui, followed by Tamil author Perumal Murugan's 'Fire Bird', translated by Janani Kannan, in 2023. 'This is a great loss for Indian languages. Malayalam translations have won the award three times, Tamil once, and Urdu has also been recognized. It's truly disheartening,' Murugan said. The award in 2019 was given to Madhuri Vijay for 'The Far Field'. Author Namita Gokhale said that it is possible that they might be 'reconsidering the format', while appreciating the work done by the JCB Prize. 'I don't know the truth of this. Perhaps they are reconsidering the format of the prize or are looking for some other form of literary activity . But I do appreciate the excellent work that the JCB Prize for Literature has done in forefronting translations in the past,' she said. Karthika VK, publisher of Westland Books, said that the prize added a 'great deal to the publishing ecosystem'. "I am sorry to hear that it's shutting down. We can only hope others will come along to fill the gap and sponsor prizes, grants, residencies, to support writers and translators,' she said. In its run of seven years, the award courted controversy ahead of the prize announcement last year when over a hundred writers, poets and publishers came out with an open letter condemning JCB, the British bulldozer manufacturer and the organiser of the literature prize, for allegedly 'uprooting' the lives of poor and marginalised in India as well as Palestine. Benyamin said that the criticism 'missed the point'. '...it's not the equipment that should be blamed, but those who choose to misuse it. The same machines are also used to build also. I can't align myself with that kind of reasoning, especially when the prize itself had such a positive impact. I hope they will reconsider and they will reinstate the prize for Indian literature,' he said. The award followed the process of call for entry, a longlist of 10 books, a shortlist of five books and finally, a winner. Each of the shortlisted authors was awarded ₹ one lakh, and if the shortlisted piece were a translation, the translator received ₹ 50,000. If a translated work won the prize, the author would take home ₹ 25 lakh while the translator received the prize money of ₹ 10 lakh. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
