Inside Trump's $4.5bn flagship supercarrier USS Nimitz rushing to flashpoint Middle East armed to the teeth with F-35s

Trump has threatened Iran would feel the 'full force' if they attacked the US
THE BIG GUNS Inside Trump's $4.5bn flagship supercarrier USS Nimitz rushing to flashpoint Middle East armed to the teeth with F-35s
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AMERICA is sending the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier to the Middle East as the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates.
The hulking $4.5billion nuclear-powered supercarrier, nicknamed Old Salt, is the flagship of the deadly Carrier Strike Group 11.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
12
Sun reporter Ryan Parry on board the USS Nimitz
Credit: John Chapple
12
The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz is heading for the Middle East
12
Sun reporter Ryan Parry below deck with a fighter jet
Credit: John Chapple
The strike group includes Carrier Air Wing Seventeen and Destroyer Squadron Nine - a potent combination of military hardware that will strike fear into Iran.
The Nimitz left the South China Sea Monday morning heading west towards the Middle East, where it will be stationed.
The move comes amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran and question marks over whether the West will become embroiled in the conflict.
Donald Trump has warned Iran it would experience the "full force" of the US military if it attacked US interests.
Read more on world news
GUN TRAGEDY Horror moment boy, 2, shoots his mum dead after picking up his dad's gun
And Sir Keir Starmer has sent more RAF jets to the Middle East, including Typhoons and air-to-air refuelers, as tensions mount.
The USS Nimitz will provide a major boost to US military presence in the region.
And The Sun knows first hand of the true might of this awesome 100,000 ton warship.
I spent two days on board the USS Nimitz during a training exercise.
The massive vessel is 1,092ft long and 252ft wide and consists of 117,000 sq ft.
The flight deck is four and a half acres and boasts four aircraft catapults to propel F/A-18 Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers and F-35C stealth strike fighters into the sky.
Iran launches 3rd night of strikes as Netanyahu warns war could lead to 'regime change' in Tehran
Four giant elevators bring the aircraft from the hangar in the guts of the carrier.
I stood just feet away as F-35 Lightning II fighter jets were catapulted from the deck with an ear-splitting blast, before disappearing off the bow of the ship in a haze of steam.
The violent rumble of the jet engines shook my bones to the core.
A Seahawk helicopter circled nearby in case of any accidents.
The F-35C is designed for long-range stealth strike missions and is built explicitly for US Navy carrier operations.
The flight deck of the Nimitz was awash with dedicated crewmen wearing different coloured 'jerseys' whose job is to tow the aircraft into position before the pilots ready the jets for take off.
Green jerseys operate the jet blast deflectors (JBD), aircraft handlers wear yellow jerseys, blue jerseys work in the hanger bay and purple jerseys refuel the aircraft, while red jerseys handle aviation ordinance and crash and salvage.
The whole manic scene - described by those on board as a choreographed ballet - is watched over by white jerseys.
12
A F/A-18E Super Hornet fighter jet lands on the deck of the USS Nimitz
Credit: Reuters
12
Fighter jets on board the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz's flight deck
Credit: AFP
12
I stood behind a yellow jacket, also known as a shooter, one of several catapult officers responsible for the safe and efficient launch of the ship's aircraft.
She threw a shooting sign to tell the jet to take off.
'Stay behind me,' she screamed as we ducked under the afterburners of a Super Hornet.
'The heat from those engines will take your skin off.'
Beneath deck is a massive floating city where 5,000 US Navy personnel carry out their duties like worker bees in a hive.
Inside the ten floor, 3,000 room hull, life is one slick operation.
There are several cafeterias, gyms, a Starbucks coffee shop and 'luxury' state rooms for 'Distinguished Visitors'.
Since it is nuclear-powered, the Nimitz – call sign NMTZ - can operate for up to 20 years without refuelling.
Capable of reaching 30 knots (35mph) the ship is one of ten nuclear-powered aircraft carriers in the US Fleet.
I joined the ship off the coast of Baja California, Mexico, for a routine five-day training mission which saw the F-35C put through its paces.
The ship raised its two 60,000lb anchors and set sail from Naval Air Station North Island, in Coronado, San Diego.
12
The USS Nimitz during a drill in the South China Sea in 2020
Credit: EPA
12
Sun man Parry said the carrier operates like a beehive
Credit: John Chapple
12
There is even a Starbucks on board
Credit: John Chapple
Walking around the vast warship you're struck by the sheer number of young faces walking the narrow corridors and stairways - the backbone of the US Navy.
The average age of sailors on board is 25 and often you'll find a teenager fresh out of high school steering the warship out of port.
During my time onboard I was also taken up to the bridge, the heart of the ship's operation, where the Captain sat on a raised chair surrounded by his team of navigators, officers and the rest of the watch team charged with keeping the ship away from hazards.
The mission of many of the Nimitz sailors will be to take off and land dozens of fighter jets, helicopters and planes, sometimes within less than 60 seconds of each other.
The crew often work 12-hour shifts, six days a week.
The busy ship goes through around 500 cans of energy drink Monster a day purchased from the ship's store.
The Nimitz entered service in 1975 but has undergone dozens of refurbishments and upgrades since.
It is the lead ship of her class, one of the largest warships in the world, second only to the USS Gerald R Ford.
The Nimitz's homeport is Naval Base Kitsap in Washington and the vessel is named for legendary fleet admiral Chester W. Nimitz (1885–1966), who helped the US defeat the Japanese Navy in World War II.
Its deployment to the Middle East will likely be its last mission as it marks 50 years of service.
The ageing warship is set to be replaced by the Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier USS John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) later this year.
12
The USS Nimitz is covered in US patriotism on board
Credit: John Chapple
12
On board sit special US Navy missiles
Credit: John Chapple

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

36 minutes ago

• The Independent

What's the point of the UK talking to Tehran? More than you might think…

Europe's frantic diplomatic mission in Geneva may go down as one of its most arduous ventures on the world stage – and also one of its most consequential. The foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany must persuade a battered Iranian regime to kow-tow to the US and Israel over its nuclear ambitions, or face likely annihilation. All three European powers would, of course, love to see the back of supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei's corrupt and brutal theocracy. But they rightly fear the regime's capacity to unleash death and destruction before it goes. If Trump joins Israel in the war on Iran with US bunker-busting bombs on nuclear sites, and it succeeds in killing Khamenei, there will still be plenty of Iranian hardliners left who will be willing to fight to the death. Previous inhibitions will not apply. That could mean use of a dirty bomb in the West, or chaos unleashed in the Strait of Hormuz, through which 90 per cent of the Gulf's oil passes. For the world at large, the stakes are that high. British foreign secretary David Lammy – after meeting his US counterpart, Marco Rubio, and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington on Thursday – said that the UK was 'determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon". He thinks a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution, as Trump dithers over whether to attack the regime, as US neo-cons and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are demanding – or whether to heed the no-more-wars mantra of his Maga base. And so, in search of a diplomatic solution, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi is meeting with his European counterparts in Switzerland. But what can be achieved? For all their good intentions – French president Emmanuel Macron said the diplomats would make a "comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation" to Iran – the Europeans are unlikely to persuade the Iranians to pull back from the brink. At least not on their own. While one Iranian diplomat said Tehran was willing to pursue 'a balanced and pragmatic policy in its dealings with Europe, and engage rationally with both East and West', Araghchi said there will be 'no talks' with the US over Iran's nuclear programme while the Israeli bombardment continues: 'The Americans want negotiations and have sent messages several times, but we have clearly said that there is no room for dialogue.' But there is a useful point to holding talks on neutral ground with Tehran – and it's not simply to ask them nicely and face-to-face if they wouldn't mind stopping with their nuclear enrichment programme. Rather than relaying Trump and Netanyahu's demands to Iran, Geneva is about feeding back to the White House – translating Tehran's position for the US president. The Europeans aren't there to stop the war, they're Trump-whispering for the Ayatollah. It's not clear that European diplomats have the connections they need to have a greater role to play than this, useful though it will prove. But when it comes to a practical breakthrough, some of the Gulf states might, however. Behind the scenes, figures in what some dub 'Iran's deep state' – many of them members of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – are talking to representatives of Oman and Qatar; it might be these Middle Eastern countries that can make the difference, in a second stage of dialogue. Qatar, for its part, will likely hold more sway over Washington than London or Paris. All the peacemakers, though, will be battling the plans of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Nothing less that the obliteration of the regime in Tehran will satisfy him. Worryingly, Israel's premier appears to have been joined by an increasingly pro-war Fox News, with Sean Hannity this week declaring that Iran 'is the biggest existential threat to the entire western world'. The West should have learnt by now – after the disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya – that enforced regime change in the Middle East is best avoided. Andreas Krieg, a leading Iran expert at King's College London thinks regime change in Iran would 'not be clean or peaceful'. If the current theocracy falls, there is no significant alternative political-social structure to lead this country of 92 million into the light. The IRGC, a ruthless military-industrial complex, would not easily cede control of the Iranian economy. Instead, with 190,000 personnel and a similar number of Basij paramilitaries to call on, it might well create a military dictatorship. The West and Israel would be back to square one. And the Iranian people would be no better off. Ironically, the last time the West brought about regime change in Iran – by booting out, in 1953, the democratically elected premier Mohammad Mosaddegh (for which we have British Petroleum and the CIA to thank) – it laid the groundwork for the emergence of the current Islamic Republic in the 1970s. In between rounds of golf, as he ponders his next steps in the Middle East, you can't help wishing Potus would be shown – by Lammy or anyone else – the relevant pages of a history book. It is within the president's power to unleash hell – or stop history repeating itself. After the Geneva talks, let's hope he listens to what the Trump-whisperers tell him.

Scottish Sun

38 minutes ago

• Scottish Sun

Council staff in major Scots city could soon be doing FOUR-DAY week

She said the proposed change to working arrangements could offer a new way to help staff morale WORK IN PROGRESS Council staff in major Scots city could soon be doing FOUR-DAY week Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WORKERS in one of Scotland's cities could soon be working just four days a week. The proposals could soon be trialled by a council meaning thousands of staff could be the first in the country to work the revamped hours. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 The City of Edinburgh Council is exploring a proposal to offer staff a four-day week Credit: The Times Councillors in the capital passed a motion lodged by the Scottish Greens' Claire Miller. She said the proposed change to working arrangements could offer a new way to help staff morale. Cllr Miller claimed that "productivity remains the same or in some cases can actually improve" with a four-day working week. She also told a City of Edinburgh Council meeting it would also assist in filling empty roles and aid poor health, as reported by BBC Scotland. Officers will now prepare a report for the local authority's finance and resources committee. The document will include information on the health of staff, productivity, recruitment and retention. Council officers will also inspect the evidence from four-day week pilots or reduced workday practices elsewhere. Ms Miller said: "The four-day week is a policy where our services remain as they are and there are no changes as far as the residents are concerned in terms of the opening hours provided to them. "Studies into a four-day week show productivity remains the same or in some cases can actually improve, and a great proportion of the working week is given back to people for their own responsibilities for rest and for leisure. "A four-day week is that rare unicorn policy, one where we can help our budgets but we would also be providing genuine benefits for our workers and through them to our residents." Scottish Conservative councillor Christopher Cowdy said that the report must be "balanced and grounded". New sinister threat issued in ongoing Scotland gang war He added that the council should be wary in interpreting limited trials and that locals should also be consulted. A number of local authorities in the UK have shown interest in trialling a four-day working week. South Cambridgeshire District Council was the first to trial it.

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Has Trump ‘chickened out' on Iran? Five reasons for his two-week delay

On Tuesday evening, Donald Trump appeared poised to join Israel's war against Iran. Having left the G7 summit in Canada early, he convened an emergency meeting of his national security advisers. JD Vance, his vice-president and a staunch opponent of foreign military entanglements, signalled that the president was contemplating action. Mr Trump issued a series of increasingly bellicose warnings, demanding Iran's 'unconditional surrender'. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' he wrote in a social media post. Yet within 48 hours, the president had pulled back. To some observers of US politics, this will seem like another instance of Mr Trump living up to his 'Taco' instincts – 'Trump Always Chickens Out', the acronym that so palpably infuriates him. There are, however, several plausible reasons for delay. Domestic disputes Mr Trump's flirtation with war has sharply divided his base. Maga loyalists, whose foreign policy instincts are overwhelmingly isolationist, are aghast at the prospect of their standard-bearer dragging them into a new conflict, especially after campaigning so forcefully against just such adventurism. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/Maga,' Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of Mr Trump's most ardent Congressional allies, posted on social media.