Uni pumps $1.3b a year into city economy
The University of Otago injects $1.3 billion a year into Dunedin's economy, a new report says.
The university's 2024 Economic Impact Report, presented at this week's university council meeting, paints a surprisingly rosy picture.
It utilises a standard economic contribution methodology to estimate the economic impact for the university for last year.
"Due to assumptions and limitations underpinning such a model, these figures should be regarded as an indicative rather than a definitive picture of economic impact."
The report estimated Otago University comprised 15% of Dunedin's gross regional product and directly and indirectly accounted for 9% of the local workforce. It added $1.3b total value and a total employment impact of 6259 fulltime equivalent jobs.
The university had 18,690 FTE students enrolled last year and is one of New Zealand's largest employers.
Staff work in Dunedin, Christchurch, Wellington, Auckland and Invercargill, although the majority of staff (85%) and students (92%) are based in Dunedin.
Due to its presence in other parts of the country, the university also injected cash into Christchurch and Wellington, mainly through the university's health sciences-focused campuses in both cities.
In Christchurch, the total value added in 2024 was estimated at $88m and total employment impact of 368 FTE jobs; in Wellington the total value added was estimated at $83m and total employment impact of 349 FTE jobs.
It also pumped money into Invercargill ($5.8m) and Auckland ($17.6m).
Infometrics economist Dr Adolf Stroombergen said the numbers were "impressive", but "the thing is that these reports never produce the counterfactual of what would happen if the university did not exist".
"That said, the university is clearly a fulcrum of Dunedin's economy. Reports such as these are a great way to remind local and national politicians exactly how important universities are".
Otago University vice-chancellor Grant Robertson said it was the first time the university's contribution to the national economy had exceeded $2b.
'We know the university makes such a valuable educational contribution to the country. It is terrific to know it also makes a valuable financial contribution.
'This contribution has a direct impact on local economic development, but the wider flow-on effects are even greater.
"The institution, our staff and students spend widely with local businesses and contribute to the social and cultural vibrancy of communities.'
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
There's an upside to this painfully slow economic recovery
There's a lesson there, and it's one you might think a 50-something-year-old bloke should have learned already. There are no shortcuts in life. Or at least none that don't have consequences and complications of their own. So no prizes for guessing where this analogy is headed ... These days, we're talking a lot about the state of the economic recovery. We're frustrated because it is taking longer than we'd like. And yes, New Zealand took an almighty dose of over-the-counter stimulus to deal with the economic fallout from Covid-19. For a time, it felt like we'd avoided the worst of the symptoms, but then we overheated, and then we crashed. Now we're in recovery. And it's a hard-fought one. It's making us sweat. It's the kind of recovery we have to earn, and I think that, as painful as it feels now, it might be good for us in the long run. It's so hard precisely because it isn't pumped up by Government stimulus, it isn't pumped up by immigration, and it isn't pumped up by rising house prices making us richer than we are. We've relied on those three drivers to inflate our sense of economic progress for a long time. The disappearance of a 'wealth effect' based on house prices has been a shock to New Zealand's economic system I think it probably accounts for the slower pace of recovery as much as anything else in the myriad puzzle pieces. Gareth Kiernan, chief forecaster at Infometrics, said last week that his forecasts were for house price inflation to average 3.1% a year over the five years to June 2030. In nominal terms, prices would pass their 2021 peak in mid-2029, he said. But adjusted for inflation, prices in mid-2030 would still be a fifth below the peak. That would represent a bigger drop than we saw in the global financial crisis (GFC), when prices fell 14% in real terms. Long-term forecasts are notoriously unreliable and other economists aren't so downbeat. But if Kiernan is right and the days of the wild housing booms are over, then it would represent a huge cultural shift that could reshape our economy. We have dealt with many of the big supply constraints that were limiting the amount of house building a decade ago. There's also a demographic shift under way. A large bubble of boomers (is that the collective noun?) will be looking to sell down in the next few years. And, of course, migration has been subdued with a net population gain of just 21,000 in the year to May – down from a staggering peak of 138,000 in the year to October 2023. Perhaps this Government or the next will panic about house prices and start enacting policies to push them higher. But the politics of housing are shifting, and a growing number of non-home-owning voters is likely to keep the pressure on to keep supply open. Creating new demand isn't as simple as throwing open the borders either; we need an economy that is creating jobs to attract more migrants. I'm not convinced house price growth will stay as subdued for as long as Kiernan suggests. But I agree that there is no sign of another boom on the horizon to turbo-charge this economic cycle. So what's the good news? Where's the payoff for the economy? The early 20th-century Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter had a thing or two to say about the value of difficult economic cycles. He is famous for a concept called 'creative destruction'. He argued that downturns weeded out inefficient parts of the economy and ultimately made economies more innovative and efficient. His views can sound pretty hard-hearted when you consider the human cost of business failures and job losses. But he had a point about tough conditions driving new innovation and efficiencies in an economy. Faced with squeezed margins and slow revenue growth, businesses have to think creatively about what they do. They have to look at improving productivity, whether that is through cost-cutting or investing in new technology and exploring new products or new markets. Without property sitting there as an easy investment option, Kiwis will also have to get smarter about where they put their money. Capital is more likely to flow to the productive parts of the economy. It is a great relief that our agricultural export sector is humming this year. Without that, there may have been no recovery at all. Economies can and do get trapped in recessionary feedback cycles that are no good for anyone. But we have some momentum, and we have a central bank that has regained control of inflation. It may need to pause its interest rate cuts in July, to make sure it still has that control. But with plenty of spare capacity in the economy, the medium-term outlook for inflation remains subdued. The RBNZ still has scope to go lower if required. Yes, this recovery is a slow and painful process. We're being forced to sweat it out for every small gain in an uphill slog. I'm hopeful that it will see us emerge leaner and fitter. We'll be better placed for the period of sustained growth we'll need to start solving our fiscal woes and the social challenges we're facing in the coming decades. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
QS World University Rankings 2026: Academic Reputation & International Appeal Place NZ's University System 5th Globally
London, June 19th: Four of New Zealand's eight higher education institutions have improved their ranking in the QS World University Rankings 2026. All of New Zealand's universities feature in the top 30% of the 1,500+ institutions from the 106 countries and territories included in this latest ranking. New Zealand's performance in 2026 QS World University Rankings Rank in New Zealand 2026 Rank 2025 Rank Institution 1 65 65 The University of Auckland 2 =197 214 University of Otago 3 =230 =239 Massey University 4 =240 244 Victoria University of Wellington 5 261 =261 University of Canterbury 6 =281 235 University of Waikato 7 407 =371 Lincoln University 8 =410 412 Auckland University of Technology Professor Dawn Freshwater, Vice Chancellor University of Auckland, said: 'Retaining our 65th place QS World Universities Ranking is a tribute to the efforts of the Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland community and its pursuit of excellence in all it does. This ranking comes in a year of upheaval in higher education in some parts of the world, alongside rapidly improved performances from peers in other regions. The University of Auckland is particularly proud of its metrics in academic reputation, faculty citations, employment outcomes and sustainability. We are proud to be New Zealand's highest-ranked university and a popular destination for academics and students from around the world.' Stand-out achievements A reputation for academic excellence: Every institution improved its rank in the Academic Reputation indicator, while The University of Auckland, University of Otago, Massey University and University of Canterbury all improved their Citations Per Faculty ranking. While no NZ university features in the top 100 for Citations, The University of Auckland places 63rd worldwide for Academic Reputation. Home of diverse learning experiences: Reflecting a post-pandemic recovery in international student demand, all but one institution improved its International Students Ratio, with three in the top 100 globally and improving on their performance last year. Namely, Auckland University of Technology rose three places to 39th; Lincoln University improved 35 places to be ranked 53rd; and Massey University moved up 25 spots to 71st. That international attraction extends to academics, with all eight universities in the top 120 globally for the International Faculty metric, and six maintaining their place in the top 100. Among places with five or more universities in the ranking, only the UAE performs better in the International Faculty indicator with an average score of 100 (New Zealand's average score is 99.9). International Faculty Overall Rank Institution Score Rank Change =197 University of Otago 100 53 -3 407 Lincoln University 100 55 +6 261 University of Canterbury 100 73 +4 =410 Auckland University of Technology 100 76 -12 65 The University of Auckland 100 83 -7 =240 Victoria University of Wellington 100 96 -14 Sustained sustainability: New Zealand remains highly regarded for its research and programmes related to sustainability, with three institutions maintaining their top 100 position globally for this indicator that measures environmental, social and governance factors. Of the 17 universities across Oceania that featured in the top 100, the University of Canterbury was one of only two to improve its rank, climbing a further eight places to be 78th worldwide. This is an indicator that has seen some significant improvements by a number of countries and overall, only Sweden has a higher average score (84.5) in this indicator. New Zealand's average score of 82.5 reinforces this as a true strength of the sector. Ben Sowter, Vice President of QS, said: 'New Zealand is one of the few places on earth where all universities feature among the global top 500 in the 2026 QS World University Rankings. The breadth of excellence shown across the country's eight universities is testament to the work of students, outstanding staff and brilliant research carried out across New Zealand. With the University of Otago returning to the top 200 for the first time since 2022, the country once again has two institutions ranked among the very top tier of universities worldwide.' Challenges However, with a number of areas where global peers are improving at a rapid rate, there are some challenges evident for NZ's institutions. Employment challenge: While three universities (AUT, Lincoln and Massey) improved their reputation among global employers, five institutions fell again in the Employer Reputation indicator (contributing 15% to the overall ranking), while six fell in the Employment Outcomes indicator. Given the significance of employment outcomes in students' decision-making, this is an area that requires attention, however it should be noted this is a relative improvement on last year's results nationally, when all eight universities dropped on both metrics. Faculty student ratio challenge: While relatively small in overall size compared to some international peers, NZ universities perform poorly in terms of the number of faculty to students, with only Massey University (319th) ranked in the top 500 on this indicator. International Research: Despite attracting relatively large numbers of international academics to work on their campuses, NZ universities all declined in terms of their international network performance, with the exception of The University of Auckland which entered the top 200 at 194th. New Zealand's Universities improving in Employer Reputation 2026 Rank Institution Score Rank Change =410 Auckland University of Technology 22.5 587 +93 407 Lincoln University 10.7 1020 +34 =230 Massey University 24.1 558 +27 New Zealand's top five performance For a country with a relatively small population and higher education sector, New Zealand continues to outperform global peers in many areas. Among countries and territories with at least eight institutions featured in this year's rankings, New Zealand's overall average score of 51 puts the country fifth in the world for the overall quality of its higher education. Top 10 locations by average score per indicator and overall* Country/Territory No HEi ranked Academic Reputation Employer Reputation Faculty Student Ratio Citations Per Faculty Int'l Faculty Ratio Int'l Students Ratio Int'l Research Network Employment Outcomes Sustainability Overall Score Hong Kong SAR, China 9 57.8 40.3 62.6 71.6 98.8 94.7 50.1 50.8 65.7 61.8 Netherlands 13 55.8 49.8 39.7 73.1 89.7 77.5 87.9 53.9 72.0 61.7 Sweden 8 51.7 42.2 61.8 60.1 91.8 71.3 88.8 66.2 84.5 60 Switzerland 10 45.8 37.7 63.8 65.3 97.4 74.5 78.1 52.9 71.9 57.3 New Zealand 8 46.4 29.3 22.5 57.9 99.9 77.3 62.9 64.8 82.5 51 Australia 36 39.5 34.7 16.7 70.7 85.6 77.5 76.0 34.7 76.1 49.8 Belgium 10 38.1 26.5 33.1 51.6 78.5 58.2 82.5 50.6 74.6 45.6 Ireland 8 40.1 40.5 27.2 36.8 87.2 63.7 71.1 49.0 74.8 44.8 Canada 29 35.6 34.5 20.9 51.8 71.8 63.8 74.4 50.4 77.3 44.4 United Kingdom 90 34.0 34.8 26.7 39.2 82.0 83.5 72.9 31.8 67.7 42.1 *Note: only locations with at least eight universities feature in this chart Benchmarking against all countries and territories included in the rankings, New Zealand is placed for its Academic Reputation with an average score of 46.4, behind Hong Kong SAR (57.8), Singapore (56.9), Netherlands (55.8), Sweden (51.7) and Denmark (50.8). Only Singapore, Qatar, Brunei Darussalam, United Arab Emirates, Luxembourg and Macao SAR perform better in the International Faculty indicator, while New Zealand's average score of 82.5 is second only to Sweden's (84.5) in the Sustainability indicator. Among key English-speaking study destinations, New Zealand ranks lowest among global employers for its reputation but is highest in terms of Employment Outcomes. This suggests a need for New Zealand universities to build closer relationships with employers worldwide to ensure a match between the skills and knowledge their graduates are entering the workforce with and those that are sought, and that the providers of those graduates are recognised. With employment emerging this year as the key driver of student choice when choosing a destination and university, it is important that the strong outcomes are visible and New Zealand university qualifications recognised. English-speaking study destinations in 2026 Location No HEi ranked Employer Reputation Score Employment Outcomes Score New Zealand 8 29.3 64.8 Singapore 4 57.1 57.8 Canada 29 34.5 50.4 Ireland 8 40.5 49.0 United States 192 31.3 39.6 Australia 36 34.7 34.7 United Kingdom 90 34.8 31.8 Global context: a competitive landscape The QS World University Rankings 2026 evaluate 1,500+ institutions across 106 countries and territories. Global competition is intensifying, particularly across Europe, North America, and Asia: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology retains the top position for the fourteenth consecutive year, followed by Imperial College London in second place and Stanford University in third. The United States remains the most represented system, with 192 universities, and sees more institutions rise than fall in this edition. Germany sees more universities improve than decline, a reversal from recent years. Italy enters the global top 100 for the first time, with Politecnico di Milano ranked 98th. Mainland China continues its ascent. Peking University holds on to 14th place, Tsinghua University rises to 17th, and Fudan University climbs nine spots to 30th, signaling a strong research-led push and increased academic reputation. Hong Kong SAR is the world's second most improved higher education system in this edition, among those with five or more ranked universities. Only Ireland improves by more. These shifts underscore the growing importance of international visibility, talent attraction, and cross-border collaboration, all areas where New Zealand universities have traditionally been strong and must now focus on to remain competitive. QS World University Rankings 2026: Top 10 2026 Rank 2025 Rank Institution Location 1 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) United States 2 2 Imperial College London United Kingdom 3 6 Stanford University United States 4 3 University of Oxford United Kingdom 5 4 Harvard University United States 6 5 University of Cambridge United Kingdom 7 7 ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) Switzerland 8 8 National University of Singapore (NUS) Singapore 9 9 UCL (University College London) United Kingdom 10 10 California Institute of Technology (Caltech) United States The QS World University Rankings 2026 is based on a weighted index of indicators listed below. For further details, visit the QS methodology page. Lens Weighting Indicator Weighting Research and Discovery 50% Academic Reputation 30% Citations per Faculty 20% Employability and Outcomes 20% Employer Reputation 15% Employment Outcomes 5% Global Engagement 15% International Faculty Ratio 5% International Research Network 5% International Student Diversity 0% International Student Ratio 5% Learning Experience 10% Faculty Student Ratio 10% Sustainability 5% Sustainability 5% The full QS World University Rankings 2026 is available at
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
House prices to be '20% lower in 2030s than 2021'
House price inflation is expected to average 3.1 percent a year over the next five years, says Infometrics. Photo: RNZ House prices will be 20 percent lower in real terms in the mid-2030s than they were at the end of the house price peak in 2021, one forecaster says. Cotality - formerly Corelogic - has released its latest data, which shows the housing market is picking up in activity but values are still flat. Gareth Kiernan, chief forecaster at Infometrics, said that was likely to be the case for some time yet. He said his forecasts were for house price inflation to average 3.1 percent a year over the five years to June 2030. In nominal terms, prices would pass their 2021 peak in mid-2029. But when adjusted for inflation, prices in mid-2030 would still be a fifth below the peak. That is a bigger drop than recorded in the global financial crisis (GFC), when prices fell 14 percent in real terms, but not as big as the drop of the 70s, when prices were down 38 percent in real terms, although still rose 47 percent when not adjusted for the decade's significant inflation. Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said prices had only lifted about 0.5 percent in the year to date and it was possible that they could end the year 2 or 3 percent higher than they started. He said prices were still about 16 percent below their highest point, and agreed it could be a long time before they returned to that level, even in nominal terms. "At a 5 percent annual growth rate - you have to take compounding into it as well - but at a 5 percent growth rate it's going to take about three years from here. But once you get down to 2 percent or 3 percent [ a year], it's going to take quite a bit longer, five or six years." He said it was possible that growth in house prices could pick up but said it was not unexpected that the recovery would be slow. It had taken five years after the GFC for prices to get back to where they had been. "There's always been a chance this time that it would be slower and we're already three-and-a-half years into the cycle, if we get another three-and-a-half years to get back to the peak it's a seven-year cycle." It is a more prolonged and deeper downturn, he said, and there were other factors such as debt-to-income ratios and loan-to-value restrictions at play that were not in place after the GFC. "There's always been explanations for why this cycle could take a bit longer than it did back then." ANZ said it expected house prices to increase by about 0.5 percent a month over the rest of the year. "However, with high-frequency economic activity indicators soft of late, and housing market indicators still going sideways for the most part, the risks are tilted towards slower house price inflation than this." Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said his team still had a forecast for 6 percent growth this year. "Although the last month of data wasn't as strong as expected. We will review our forecasts when we do our August forecast review ahead of the Reserve Bank's MPS." Davidson said stock listing numbers were high, even with activity picking up, and concerns about the labour market could make people hesitant to commit to big purchases, even while interest rates fell. "There's a bit of balance out there at the moment. "There's two sides to it and some people might be disappointed [by market softness] but people who are looking to buy a house are probably fairly happy." He said it "might not be the worst thing" to have a period of readjustment for the market. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
