Why won't Republicans call on Joe Hogsett to resign?

It is shocking that only one out of six Republicans on the Indianapolis City-County Council have called on Mayor Joe Hogsett to resign following sexual harassment allegations that have rocked his office in recent months.
Many constituents of Republican councilors are frustrated that their caucus has been more passive than council Democrats, three of whom are on record saying Hogsett should resign. It is hard to trust your leaders when they stay silent about a moral and ethical issue, especially involving one of their political enemies.
If anyone should have the courage to speak up, it should be Republicans. Unlike their Democratic colleagues, Republicans don't have to worry about Hogsett continuing to be a power broker in their party for several years due to their trouble building an independent political machine.
'[Calling on Hogsett to resign] could cause personal financial hardship to people,' Democratic Councilor Jesse Brown, the first to call on Hogsett to resign, told me. '[And he] is in good with all the biggest donors and he has a ton of money in the bank and so … he absolutely could you know levy those connections or that money to sink people's political careers.'
Briggs: Hogsett's texts to women show Indianapolis mayor embodied toxic culture
When I asked Republican Minority Leader Michael-Paul Hart why he hasn't called on Hogsett to resign, he said he didn't want to get political. He has focused his criticism on the investigation into Hogsett, rather than Hogsett himself.
After all, many are starting to think the investigation was just a PR stunt aimed at clearing him of legal liability.
'I try to be as apolitical as possible because I think local government is just non-political … we're always talking about roads, water, trash, public safety,' Hart said. 'At the end of the day, we've got to focus on what we can control and what is symbolic.'
Gov. Mike Braun expressed a similar sentiment when asked by WIBC-FM (93.1) host Nigel Laskowski about the scandal.
'What I'm more concerned about would be the potholes per linear mile,' Braun said June 18.
I don't think fixing potholes, criticizing a political process and taking a moral stance against political leaders engaging in ethical violations should be mutually exclusive.
However, Hogsett still controls the city budget and Council President Vop Osili appears to be positioning himself to succeed Hogsett. Either person could retaliate against Republicans who chose to make trouble and divert city funds away from their districts.
Opinion: I was dragged out by sheriff's deputies. Indiana Democrats stayed silent.
'I try to remind folks all the time there's … 240,000 people that the six of us (Republicans) represent and I would certainly not want them to be disenfranchised,' Hart told me when I asked if he thought Hogsett would retaliate against Republicans. 'But I would hope that the mayor wouldn't punish the people of our districts for something of that nature.'
Several councilors and their employers are also financially dependent on contracts with the city-county government, which Hogsett could push to terminate if councilors call on him to resign. Hart, for example, is employed as a director by SHI International, which has a six million dollar contract through 2027 with Indianapolis.
The risk of retaliation, however, did not stop both Democratic and Republican leaders from calling on former Attorney General Curtis Hill to resign after he faced allegations of groping, and did not stop both Democratic and Republican leaders from condemning former Indiana Senate Minority Leader Greg Taylor after he faced allegations of sexual harassment.
Taking the personal risk to call for greater ethical standards for political leaders may not fix the roads, but it will do something just as important. It will rebuild public trust in local leaders by providing some concrete evidence that they subscribe to a set of moral standards, and that they want our political system to be just and fair for both their constituents and employees.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Bloomberg

29 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

The Budget Bill Is Creating a Republican Existential Crisis

The Republican budget bill, a $3.7 trillion tax cut packaged with $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, is deeply problematic legislation from almost any perspective — including those of its authors. The Congressional Budget Office has the details about how it will be expensive and ineffectual. But for Republicans, President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is creating what amounts to an existential crisis. For half a century, Republicans have been committed to the policy of lower taxes to aid the economy — impervious to any evidence that tax cuts are inefficient and prohibitively expensive. At this point, to walk away from the bill is to abandon their economic raison d'etre.

Yahoo

35 minutes ago

• Yahoo

As Trump badgers Fed to lower rates, it's the bond market in need of convincing

The bond market showed little appetite Friday for granting President Donald Trump's wish for lower interest rates as two of his signature policy initiatives — tariffs and tax cuts — face looming deadlines. The president blasted Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell in the holiday-shortened week for holding rates steady, posting on social media Thursday that the Fed's wait-and-see approach was 'costing our country hundreds of billions of dollars.' My sister and her husband died within days of each other. Their banks won't let me access their safe-deposit boxes. What now? 'I'm at my wit's end': My niece paid off her husband's credit card but fell behind on her taxes. How can I help her? Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? Israel-Iran conflict poses three challenges for stocks that could slam market by up to 20%, warns RBC Trump also said Powell was 'one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in government, and the Fed Board is complicit.' But it's the bond market that also needs convincing if the White House is to get the lower rates it prefers. While the Fed exerts control over short-term rates, market forces dictate longer 10-year BX:TMUBMUSD10Y and 30-year BX:TMUBMUSD30Y yields, which serve as a peg for financing much of the economy. Instead of falling since September, when the Fed cut rates for the first time in four years, those yields have moved much higher since November's election produced a 'red wave' in Washington. Trump's latest Fed comments come as Republicans hope to quickly pass the president's signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act — sprawling tax and spending legislation aimed at extending tax cuts while slashing up to $1 trillion in Medicaid spending over a decade. Their goal has been to get the bill to the president's desk by July 4, only a few days before Trump's pause on 'liberation day' tariffs is set to expire — although the tariff deadline could be extended to give more time for negotiations. 'It's interesting to me that they are pushing for cuts,' said Mike Sanders, head of fixed income at Madison Investments, in an interview Friday. 'They could get them,' he noted, but that won't necessarily mean that mortgage rates or financing costs for businesses would move lower. One of the chief sources of concern for bond investors has been the large U.S. deficit. A new Congressional Budget Office estimate for the Republican tax-and-spending bill had it adding about $2.8 trillion to the deficit through 2034, more than an earlier estimate from May. 'The Fed controls the short end, but inflation expectations and term premium drive the long end,' Sanders said of yields. He expects inflation to climb as higher tariffs start showing up in economic data, but also should the Fed switch course and front-load more rate cuts this year, instead of sticking to projections for two cuts in 2025. Those concerns have Sanders and other bond investors on edge, making added exposure in the 10-year Treasury category and beyond a harder sell, even at current elevated yields. 'Over the next two to four months, we potentially will have a better idea of how inflationary the tariffs will be,' said Danny Zaid, a portfolio manager at TwentyFour Asset Management. But he also sees a 'cleaner, less uncertain' backdrop in European bonds and credit markets for now. Adding to the mix, Fed governor Christopher Waller made headlines on Friday by saying he favors rate cuts, beginning as early as July. 'I think we've got room to bring it down,' Waller said of the Fed's policy rate, which has been on hold at a range of 4.25% to 4.5% all year. 'If [inflation] got really bad and people got really nervous, you could just pause,' he told CNBC. When asked about Trump's comments on social media, Waller said Congress gave the Fed a mandate to worry about the labor market and price stability. 'It does not tell us to provide cheap financing to the U.S. government,' he said. Instead, it's the job of Congress and the Treasury Department to make sure there's a sustainable fiscal situation to bring deficits down and lower borrowing costs, he added. The 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields ended roughly flat on Friday at 4.374% and 4.889%, respectively. That was off the year's peak levels of nearly 5%, but well off their 12-month lows. Any pre-emptive Fed rate cuts could spook the bond market even more, causing yields to rise further. Cindy Beaulieu, chief investment officer at Conning North America, said she expects the 10-year yield to stay in a range of 4% to 5% this year, with any significant weakening in the labor market being a potential catalyst for a spike. 'We've had more confidence that the higher end of that range is more accurate than the lower end,' Beaulieu told MarketWatch. 'But we will test the lower end if we get weakening of the economy. 'But for now, there's just too many questions,' she added. How can I buy my niece a home in her name only — without alienating or upsetting her husband? My husband is in hospice care. Friends say his children are lining up for his money. What can I do? As Trump badgers Fed to lower rates, it's the bond market in need of convincing I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now?

Fox News

36 minutes ago

• Fox News

Senate GOP aims to approve major legislation next week as Trump touts party unity

Print Close By Chad Pergram Published June 23, 2025 If things go well, Senate Republicans hope to approve the "Big, Beautiful Bill" by this time next week. Senators, staff and budget referees worked through the weekend, deciding what should be in the bill and what complies with special budget rules. In? A decadelong freeze on local and state AI rules. But they axed plans to reduce food assistance and foist the cost onto the states. Ironically, that decision could help pass the bill - especially if it courts the votes of GOP moderates like Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska. TRUMP RECEIVES MIXED SUPPORT FROM CONGRESS FOR IRAN STRIKES AS WAR POWERS DEBATE However, there is still consternation about SALT, the deduction for state and local taxes, how the bill addresses rural hospitals, Medicaid and overall spending cuts. Conservatives still demand more deficit reduction. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said on Fox that the airstrikes against Iran only steeled his resolve to vote no unless senators included additional cuts. AFTER MINNESOTA KILLING, CAPITOL HILL REPRESENTATIVES FACE STARK REALITY ABOUT FAMILY SAFETY The overseas military activity did not distract President Donald Trump from focusing on the bill over the weekend. He posted on Truth Social Sunday that there was great "unity" in the Republican Party and that it was time to pass the "Great Big Beautiful Bill." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Senate Republicans hope to begin debate mid-week and perhaps wrap up over the weekend. But it's unclear how the House and Senate can align both versions of the legislation before July 4. Print Close URL